How to transform integral after coordinate transformation
$begingroup$
Consider the Cartesian coordinate system with a vector $$f=(a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}cos(Ntheta),a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}sin(Ntheta),bz)$$where $a,binmathbb{R}$ fixed and $N$ is an integer.
For $f'=f/|f|$, I want to determine the integral
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty}f'cdotleft(frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}right) dxdy.$$
To do that, we transform to "almost spherical" coordinates
$r=sqrt{a^2(x^2+y^2)^N+b^2z^2}$
$tantheta=frac{y}{x}$
$tanphi=frac{a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}}{bz}$
with $thetain[0,2pi]$, $phiin[0,pi]$.
How do I rewrite the integral to these new coordinates?
I find that $f=(rsinphicos(Ntheta),rsinphisin(Ntheta),rcosphi)$ and $f'=(sinphicos(Ntheta),sinphisin(Ntheta),cosphi)$, but how do I rewrite $frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}$?
real-analysis integration definite-integrals coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the Cartesian coordinate system with a vector $$f=(a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}cos(Ntheta),a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}sin(Ntheta),bz)$$where $a,binmathbb{R}$ fixed and $N$ is an integer.
For $f'=f/|f|$, I want to determine the integral
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty}f'cdotleft(frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}right) dxdy.$$
To do that, we transform to "almost spherical" coordinates
$r=sqrt{a^2(x^2+y^2)^N+b^2z^2}$
$tantheta=frac{y}{x}$
$tanphi=frac{a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}}{bz}$
with $thetain[0,2pi]$, $phiin[0,pi]$.
How do I rewrite the integral to these new coordinates?
I find that $f=(rsinphicos(Ntheta),rsinphisin(Ntheta),rcosphi)$ and $f'=(sinphicos(Ntheta),sinphisin(Ntheta),cosphi)$, but how do I rewrite $frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}$?
real-analysis integration definite-integrals coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the Cartesian coordinate system with a vector $$f=(a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}cos(Ntheta),a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}sin(Ntheta),bz)$$where $a,binmathbb{R}$ fixed and $N$ is an integer.
For $f'=f/|f|$, I want to determine the integral
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty}f'cdotleft(frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}right) dxdy.$$
To do that, we transform to "almost spherical" coordinates
$r=sqrt{a^2(x^2+y^2)^N+b^2z^2}$
$tantheta=frac{y}{x}$
$tanphi=frac{a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}}{bz}$
with $thetain[0,2pi]$, $phiin[0,pi]$.
How do I rewrite the integral to these new coordinates?
I find that $f=(rsinphicos(Ntheta),rsinphisin(Ntheta),rcosphi)$ and $f'=(sinphicos(Ntheta),sinphisin(Ntheta),cosphi)$, but how do I rewrite $frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}$?
real-analysis integration definite-integrals coordinate-systems
$endgroup$
Consider the Cartesian coordinate system with a vector $$f=(a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}cos(Ntheta),a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}sin(Ntheta),bz)$$where $a,binmathbb{R}$ fixed and $N$ is an integer.
For $f'=f/|f|$, I want to determine the integral
$$int_{-infty}^{infty}int_{-infty}^{infty}f'cdotleft(frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}right) dxdy.$$
To do that, we transform to "almost spherical" coordinates
$r=sqrt{a^2(x^2+y^2)^N+b^2z^2}$
$tantheta=frac{y}{x}$
$tanphi=frac{a(x^2+y^2)^{N/2}}{bz}$
with $thetain[0,2pi]$, $phiin[0,pi]$.
How do I rewrite the integral to these new coordinates?
I find that $f=(rsinphicos(Ntheta),rsinphisin(Ntheta),rcosphi)$ and $f'=(sinphicos(Ntheta),sinphisin(Ntheta),cosphi)$, but how do I rewrite $frac{partial f'}{partial x}timesfrac{partial f'}{partial y}$?
real-analysis integration definite-integrals coordinate-systems
real-analysis integration definite-integrals coordinate-systems
asked Dec 27 '18 at 16:42
Pierre LeFèvrePierre LeFèvre
11
11
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, to answer your question, you need to find the Jacobian Matrix $mathcal{J}$ between the 2 set of coodinates. And then $dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta$, where $|mathcal{J}|$ is the determinant of the Jacobian Matrix.
There are a couple more problems in your thinking
- Your original integral is 2-D, I feel it is better to just think $z$
as a constant and ignore the third coordinate $z$ (or $phi$) in the transformation
$f$ is a vector already, then $f'$ is a very confusing notation.
It can be a matrix (gradient)
$$
f' = [partial_x f, partial_y f, partial_z f]
$$
It can be a vector (curl)
$$
f' = nabla times f
$$
It can also be a scalar (divergence)
$$
f' = nabla cdot f
$$
not sure which one you are referring to , but I guess it is the third one
- I noticed that $theta$ is not a new variable you defined, it is already in the definition of your $f$ function. Is your transformation definition of $theta$ consistent with the meaning of $theta$ in $f$ function?
So if you define the transformation between $x,y$ and $r,theta$ as
$$
r = a(x^2 + y^2) ^{N/2} quad tantheta = frac{y}{x}
$$
Your Jacobian matrix is
$$
mathcal{J} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{partial x}{partial r} & frac{partial x}{partial theta} \
frac{partial y}{partial r} & frac{partial y}{partial theta} \
end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta & -(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta \
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta & (frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta \
end{bmatrix}
$$
so
$$
dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta = frac{2}{Nr}left(frac{r}{a}right)^{4/N}drdtheta
$$
Just a sanity check, when $N=2, a=1$, we can observer that it falls back to the form of polar cooridnate
$$
dxdy = rdrdtheta
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054138%2fhow-to-transform-integral-after-coordinate-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First, to answer your question, you need to find the Jacobian Matrix $mathcal{J}$ between the 2 set of coodinates. And then $dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta$, where $|mathcal{J}|$ is the determinant of the Jacobian Matrix.
There are a couple more problems in your thinking
- Your original integral is 2-D, I feel it is better to just think $z$
as a constant and ignore the third coordinate $z$ (or $phi$) in the transformation
$f$ is a vector already, then $f'$ is a very confusing notation.
It can be a matrix (gradient)
$$
f' = [partial_x f, partial_y f, partial_z f]
$$
It can be a vector (curl)
$$
f' = nabla times f
$$
It can also be a scalar (divergence)
$$
f' = nabla cdot f
$$
not sure which one you are referring to , but I guess it is the third one
- I noticed that $theta$ is not a new variable you defined, it is already in the definition of your $f$ function. Is your transformation definition of $theta$ consistent with the meaning of $theta$ in $f$ function?
So if you define the transformation between $x,y$ and $r,theta$ as
$$
r = a(x^2 + y^2) ^{N/2} quad tantheta = frac{y}{x}
$$
Your Jacobian matrix is
$$
mathcal{J} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{partial x}{partial r} & frac{partial x}{partial theta} \
frac{partial y}{partial r} & frac{partial y}{partial theta} \
end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta & -(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta \
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta & (frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta \
end{bmatrix}
$$
so
$$
dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta = frac{2}{Nr}left(frac{r}{a}right)^{4/N}drdtheta
$$
Just a sanity check, when $N=2, a=1$, we can observer that it falls back to the form of polar cooridnate
$$
dxdy = rdrdtheta
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, to answer your question, you need to find the Jacobian Matrix $mathcal{J}$ between the 2 set of coodinates. And then $dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta$, where $|mathcal{J}|$ is the determinant of the Jacobian Matrix.
There are a couple more problems in your thinking
- Your original integral is 2-D, I feel it is better to just think $z$
as a constant and ignore the third coordinate $z$ (or $phi$) in the transformation
$f$ is a vector already, then $f'$ is a very confusing notation.
It can be a matrix (gradient)
$$
f' = [partial_x f, partial_y f, partial_z f]
$$
It can be a vector (curl)
$$
f' = nabla times f
$$
It can also be a scalar (divergence)
$$
f' = nabla cdot f
$$
not sure which one you are referring to , but I guess it is the third one
- I noticed that $theta$ is not a new variable you defined, it is already in the definition of your $f$ function. Is your transformation definition of $theta$ consistent with the meaning of $theta$ in $f$ function?
So if you define the transformation between $x,y$ and $r,theta$ as
$$
r = a(x^2 + y^2) ^{N/2} quad tantheta = frac{y}{x}
$$
Your Jacobian matrix is
$$
mathcal{J} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{partial x}{partial r} & frac{partial x}{partial theta} \
frac{partial y}{partial r} & frac{partial y}{partial theta} \
end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta & -(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta \
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta & (frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta \
end{bmatrix}
$$
so
$$
dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta = frac{2}{Nr}left(frac{r}{a}right)^{4/N}drdtheta
$$
Just a sanity check, when $N=2, a=1$, we can observer that it falls back to the form of polar cooridnate
$$
dxdy = rdrdtheta
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, to answer your question, you need to find the Jacobian Matrix $mathcal{J}$ between the 2 set of coodinates. And then $dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta$, where $|mathcal{J}|$ is the determinant of the Jacobian Matrix.
There are a couple more problems in your thinking
- Your original integral is 2-D, I feel it is better to just think $z$
as a constant and ignore the third coordinate $z$ (or $phi$) in the transformation
$f$ is a vector already, then $f'$ is a very confusing notation.
It can be a matrix (gradient)
$$
f' = [partial_x f, partial_y f, partial_z f]
$$
It can be a vector (curl)
$$
f' = nabla times f
$$
It can also be a scalar (divergence)
$$
f' = nabla cdot f
$$
not sure which one you are referring to , but I guess it is the third one
- I noticed that $theta$ is not a new variable you defined, it is already in the definition of your $f$ function. Is your transformation definition of $theta$ consistent with the meaning of $theta$ in $f$ function?
So if you define the transformation between $x,y$ and $r,theta$ as
$$
r = a(x^2 + y^2) ^{N/2} quad tantheta = frac{y}{x}
$$
Your Jacobian matrix is
$$
mathcal{J} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{partial x}{partial r} & frac{partial x}{partial theta} \
frac{partial y}{partial r} & frac{partial y}{partial theta} \
end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta & -(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta \
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta & (frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta \
end{bmatrix}
$$
so
$$
dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta = frac{2}{Nr}left(frac{r}{a}right)^{4/N}drdtheta
$$
Just a sanity check, when $N=2, a=1$, we can observer that it falls back to the form of polar cooridnate
$$
dxdy = rdrdtheta
$$
$endgroup$
First, to answer your question, you need to find the Jacobian Matrix $mathcal{J}$ between the 2 set of coodinates. And then $dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta$, where $|mathcal{J}|$ is the determinant of the Jacobian Matrix.
There are a couple more problems in your thinking
- Your original integral is 2-D, I feel it is better to just think $z$
as a constant and ignore the third coordinate $z$ (or $phi$) in the transformation
$f$ is a vector already, then $f'$ is a very confusing notation.
It can be a matrix (gradient)
$$
f' = [partial_x f, partial_y f, partial_z f]
$$
It can be a vector (curl)
$$
f' = nabla times f
$$
It can also be a scalar (divergence)
$$
f' = nabla cdot f
$$
not sure which one you are referring to , but I guess it is the third one
- I noticed that $theta$ is not a new variable you defined, it is already in the definition of your $f$ function. Is your transformation definition of $theta$ consistent with the meaning of $theta$ in $f$ function?
So if you define the transformation between $x,y$ and $r,theta$ as
$$
r = a(x^2 + y^2) ^{N/2} quad tantheta = frac{y}{x}
$$
Your Jacobian matrix is
$$
mathcal{J} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{partial x}{partial r} & frac{partial x}{partial theta} \
frac{partial y}{partial r} & frac{partial y}{partial theta} \
end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix}
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta & -(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta \
frac{2}{Nr}(frac{r}{a})^{2/N}sintheta & (frac{r}{a})^{2/N}costheta \
end{bmatrix}
$$
so
$$
dxdy = |mathcal{J}|drdtheta = frac{2}{Nr}left(frac{r}{a}right)^{4/N}drdtheta
$$
Just a sanity check, when $N=2, a=1$, we can observer that it falls back to the form of polar cooridnate
$$
dxdy = rdrdtheta
$$
answered Dec 27 '18 at 21:01
MoonKnightMoonKnight
1,673611
1,673611
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Just to clarify on the points you made: $f'$ is my (indeed poor) notation for the unit vector in the direction of $f$, i.e. $f':=f/|f|$. Further $theta$ is indeed consistent with the $theta$ in $f$. Nice username btw :)
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 21:47
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
So to find $dx$, $dy$ in the integral we basically take $theta=pi/2$. Must we also fill that in in our expression for $f’cdot (partial_x f’times partial_y f’)$?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
$begingroup$
Oh sorry I missed your definition of $f'$, now it makes sense. I will update the solution later (probably tonight). btw. I don't understand your comment about $theta=pi/2$. There is no dependence of $theta$ in the conversion of $dxdy$ because all $theta$ cancels out in the $cos^2theta + sin^2theta=1$ calculation. Maybe you misunderstand how to calculate the determinant of a matrix.
$endgroup$
– MoonKnight
Dec 28 '18 at 18:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054138%2fhow-to-transform-integral-after-coordinate-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Recall the chain rule: $frac{partial f'}{partial x} = frac{partial f'}{partial r}frac{partial r}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial theta}frac{partial theta}{partial x}+frac{partial f'}{partial phi}frac{partial phi}{partial x}$, and similarly for $frac{partial f'}{partial y}$.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Dec 27 '18 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@user3482749 And how do the integral variables change? We integrate over $x$ and $y$ from $-infty$ to $infty$, what does that become in the new coordinates?
$endgroup$
– Pierre LeFèvre
Dec 27 '18 at 17:33