Euclidean division exercise












6












$begingroup$


I faced the following problem in a previous abstract algebra session in my university:
Let $omega$ be a non-zero real number and n be a non-zero natural integer both supposed to be fixed. Calculate the remainder of the Euclidean division of the polynomial $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ by $X^2 +1$.



I tried to expand $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ but it didn't look helpful for me. Can anyone help?






abstract-algebra polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    I faced the following problem in a previous abstract algebra session in my university:
    Let $omega$ be a non-zero real number and n be a non-zero natural integer both supposed to be fixed. Calculate the remainder of the Euclidean division of the polynomial $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ by $X^2 +1$.



    I tried to expand $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ but it didn't look helpful for me. Can anyone help?






    abstract-algebra polynomials







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I faced the following problem in a previous abstract algebra session in my university:
      Let $omega$ be a non-zero real number and n be a non-zero natural integer both supposed to be fixed. Calculate the remainder of the Euclidean division of the polynomial $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ by $X^2 +1$.



      I tried to expand $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ but it didn't look helpful for me. Can anyone help?






      abstract-algebra polynomials







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I faced the following problem in a previous abstract algebra session in my university:
      Let $omega$ be a non-zero real number and n be a non-zero natural integer both supposed to be fixed. Calculate the remainder of the Euclidean division of the polynomial $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ by $X^2 +1$.



      I tried to expand $(cos{omega}+Xsin{omega}) ^n$ but it didn't look helpful for me. Can anyone help?






      abstract-algebra polynomials




      abstract-algebra polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 21:53









      José Carlos Santos

      177k24138251




      177k24138251










      asked Dec 30 '18 at 21:23









      user7857462user7857462

      987




      987






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Write the reminder $aX+b$. You have



          $$P(X) = (cos omega + sinomega X)^n =Q(X)(X^2+1) +aX+b.$$



          Substitute in this equation $X$ by $i$. You get
          $$e^{in omega} = ai+b.$$ Substitute now $X$ by $-i$. You get



          $$e^{-in omega} = -ai+b$$



          Solving in $a,b$ you finally get $b =cos nomega$ and $a = sin nomega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            This is essentially the same answer as mathcounterexamples.net's answer, but it's a slightly different explanation and thought process, which seems to me to be slightly more natural (though I did upvote mce.net's answer). Hence I'll give my thought process on seeing this question.



            We can calculate the remainder on division by a polynomial $fin k[x]$ by working in the ring $k[x]/(f)$, since the remainder of a polynomial $a$ on division by $f$ is the unique representative of $a$ in $k[x]/(f)$ of degree less than the degree of $f$.



            Then recognize that $Bbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)cong Bbb{C}$ via $Xmapsto i$.
            Thus $(cos omega +Xsin omega)^nmapsto (e^{iomega})^n=e^{iomega n} = cos(nomega) + i sin(nomega)$. Thus the remainder on division by $X^2+1$ must be $cos(nomega)+Xsin(nomega)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Towers
              Dec 31 '18 at 3:38










            • $begingroup$
              @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Dec 31 '18 at 3:57










            • $begingroup$
              Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Towers
              Dec 31 '18 at 4:05










            • $begingroup$
              @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
              $endgroup$
              – jgon
              Dec 31 '18 at 4:08












            • $begingroup$
              ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
              $endgroup$
              – Eric Towers
              Dec 31 '18 at 4:14














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057214%2feuclidean-division-exercise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9












            $begingroup$

            Write the reminder $aX+b$. You have



            $$P(X) = (cos omega + sinomega X)^n =Q(X)(X^2+1) +aX+b.$$



            Substitute in this equation $X$ by $i$. You get
            $$e^{in omega} = ai+b.$$ Substitute now $X$ by $-i$. You get



            $$e^{-in omega} = -ai+b$$



            Solving in $a,b$ you finally get $b =cos nomega$ and $a = sin nomega$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              9












              $begingroup$

              Write the reminder $aX+b$. You have



              $$P(X) = (cos omega + sinomega X)^n =Q(X)(X^2+1) +aX+b.$$



              Substitute in this equation $X$ by $i$. You get
              $$e^{in omega} = ai+b.$$ Substitute now $X$ by $-i$. You get



              $$e^{-in omega} = -ai+b$$



              Solving in $a,b$ you finally get $b =cos nomega$ and $a = sin nomega$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                9












                9








                9





                $begingroup$

                Write the reminder $aX+b$. You have



                $$P(X) = (cos omega + sinomega X)^n =Q(X)(X^2+1) +aX+b.$$



                Substitute in this equation $X$ by $i$. You get
                $$e^{in omega} = ai+b.$$ Substitute now $X$ by $-i$. You get



                $$e^{-in omega} = -ai+b$$



                Solving in $a,b$ you finally get $b =cos nomega$ and $a = sin nomega$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Write the reminder $aX+b$. You have



                $$P(X) = (cos omega + sinomega X)^n =Q(X)(X^2+1) +aX+b.$$



                Substitute in this equation $X$ by $i$. You get
                $$e^{in omega} = ai+b.$$ Substitute now $X$ by $-i$. You get



                $$e^{-in omega} = -ai+b$$



                Solving in $a,b$ you finally get $b =cos nomega$ and $a = sin nomega$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 30 '18 at 21:53









                mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net

                27k22158




                27k22158























                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    This is essentially the same answer as mathcounterexamples.net's answer, but it's a slightly different explanation and thought process, which seems to me to be slightly more natural (though I did upvote mce.net's answer). Hence I'll give my thought process on seeing this question.



                    We can calculate the remainder on division by a polynomial $fin k[x]$ by working in the ring $k[x]/(f)$, since the remainder of a polynomial $a$ on division by $f$ is the unique representative of $a$ in $k[x]/(f)$ of degree less than the degree of $f$.



                    Then recognize that $Bbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)cong Bbb{C}$ via $Xmapsto i$.
                    Thus $(cos omega +Xsin omega)^nmapsto (e^{iomega})^n=e^{iomega n} = cos(nomega) + i sin(nomega)$. Thus the remainder on division by $X^2+1$ must be $cos(nomega)+Xsin(nomega)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:38










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:57










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:08












                    • $begingroup$
                      ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:14


















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    This is essentially the same answer as mathcounterexamples.net's answer, but it's a slightly different explanation and thought process, which seems to me to be slightly more natural (though I did upvote mce.net's answer). Hence I'll give my thought process on seeing this question.



                    We can calculate the remainder on division by a polynomial $fin k[x]$ by working in the ring $k[x]/(f)$, since the remainder of a polynomial $a$ on division by $f$ is the unique representative of $a$ in $k[x]/(f)$ of degree less than the degree of $f$.



                    Then recognize that $Bbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)cong Bbb{C}$ via $Xmapsto i$.
                    Thus $(cos omega +Xsin omega)^nmapsto (e^{iomega})^n=e^{iomega n} = cos(nomega) + i sin(nomega)$. Thus the remainder on division by $X^2+1$ must be $cos(nomega)+Xsin(nomega)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:38










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:57










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:08












                    • $begingroup$
                      ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:14
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    This is essentially the same answer as mathcounterexamples.net's answer, but it's a slightly different explanation and thought process, which seems to me to be slightly more natural (though I did upvote mce.net's answer). Hence I'll give my thought process on seeing this question.



                    We can calculate the remainder on division by a polynomial $fin k[x]$ by working in the ring $k[x]/(f)$, since the remainder of a polynomial $a$ on division by $f$ is the unique representative of $a$ in $k[x]/(f)$ of degree less than the degree of $f$.



                    Then recognize that $Bbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)cong Bbb{C}$ via $Xmapsto i$.
                    Thus $(cos omega +Xsin omega)^nmapsto (e^{iomega})^n=e^{iomega n} = cos(nomega) + i sin(nomega)$. Thus the remainder on division by $X^2+1$ must be $cos(nomega)+Xsin(nomega)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    This is essentially the same answer as mathcounterexamples.net's answer, but it's a slightly different explanation and thought process, which seems to me to be slightly more natural (though I did upvote mce.net's answer). Hence I'll give my thought process on seeing this question.



                    We can calculate the remainder on division by a polynomial $fin k[x]$ by working in the ring $k[x]/(f)$, since the remainder of a polynomial $a$ on division by $f$ is the unique representative of $a$ in $k[x]/(f)$ of degree less than the degree of $f$.



                    Then recognize that $Bbb{R}[X]/(X^2+1)cong Bbb{C}$ via $Xmapsto i$.
                    Thus $(cos omega +Xsin omega)^nmapsto (e^{iomega})^n=e^{iomega n} = cos(nomega) + i sin(nomega)$. Thus the remainder on division by $X^2+1$ must be $cos(nomega)+Xsin(nomega)$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 31 '18 at 4:28

























                    answered Dec 30 '18 at 22:33









                    jgonjgon

                    16.7k32244




                    16.7k32244












                    • $begingroup$
                      Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:38










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:57










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:08












                    • $begingroup$
                      ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:14




















                    • $begingroup$
                      Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:38










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 3:57










                    • $begingroup$
                      Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:08












                    • $begingroup$
                      ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Eric Towers
                      Dec 31 '18 at 4:14


















                    $begingroup$
                    Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 3:38




                    $begingroup$
                    Note that algebraic concerns alone cannot tell you whether you should use $X mapsto mathrm{i}$ or $X mapsto -mathrm{i}$ (since algebra doesn't distinguish Galois conjugates). mathcounterexamples.net does both.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 3:38












                    $begingroup$
                    @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jgon
                    Dec 31 '18 at 3:57




                    $begingroup$
                    @EricTowers That's what confuses me so much about mathcounterexamples.net's answer. There's absolutely no reason to do both, since it doesn't matter which isomorphism with $Bbb{C}$ you choose. You'll get the same answer either way.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jgon
                    Dec 31 '18 at 3:57












                    $begingroup$
                    Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:05




                    $begingroup$
                    Since algebra can't tell the difference, both specializations give (simultaneously) valid equations. We get an equation for $b+ mathrm{i} a$ and its conjugate $b - mathrm{i} a$, exactly as we should since the action taking $mathrm{i}$ to $-mathrm{i}$ is conjugation. (If the LHS had been real, the two equations would be redundant, again as expected, since $mathbb{R}$ is fixed by this action.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:05












                    $begingroup$
                    @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jgon
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:08






                    $begingroup$
                    @EricTowers, but you don't need both, since we've already fixed an isomorphism to $Bbb{C}$. The fact that $b+ia=e^{inomega}$ is already enough to figure out what $a$ and $b$ are, since we know how to expand $e^{inomega}$ in the $1,i$ basis for $Bbb{C}$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – jgon
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:08














                    $begingroup$
                    ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:14






                    $begingroup$
                    ... or you've had $sin theta = frac{mathrm{e}^{mathrm{i}theta} - mathrm{e}^{-mathrm{i}theta}}{2mathrm{i}}$ beaten into you so hard that when you try both substitutions in your head you realize you can immediately solve for $a$ and $b$ in sines and cosines entirely algebraically, that is, without having to know an additional obscure analysis fact: Euler's identity. Notice: I'm not claiming mathcounterexample.net's answer is better or worse than yours. I'm only responding to your line "since frankly I don't follow several aspects ..." with how my head justified his manipulations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Eric Towers
                    Dec 31 '18 at 4:14




















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057214%2feuclidean-division-exercise%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Image
                    Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                    Read more

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Image
                    Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                    Read more

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Image
                    Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                    Read more