How to squeeze a long equation?
I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?
math-mode equations
add a comment |
I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?
math-mode equations
3
Can't you write0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?
math-mode equations
I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?
math-mode equations
math-mode equations
edited Dec 30 '18 at 23:21
Circumscribe
7,34121542
7,34121542
asked Dec 30 '18 at 19:38
nanjunnanjun
15517
15517
3
Can't you write0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
3
Can't you write0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
3
3
Can't you write
0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
Can't you write
0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366
begin{document}
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
end{document}
I've done the following:
I've used the
split
environment fromamsmath
to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second\&
.To place the anchor (
&
) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it withkern 4em & kern-4em
.
The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters:
thickmuskip
(;
and space around e.g.=
),medmuskip
(:
and space around e.g.+
),thinmuskip
(,
and space around e.g.sum
andsin
),nulldelimiterspace
(space around e.g. fractions) andscriptspace
(space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths usingsqueezespaces{0.5}
(which is defined in the preamble).
Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside
split
, so I've put the square root inside anmbox{$<…>$}
and usedsqueezespaces{0.5}
in the inner math environment. You can replace0.5
by another number between0
and1
if you want.
A side-effect of putting the
sqrt
in a box is that it is set intextstyle
, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by usingtfrac
instead offrac
or by insertingtextstyle
right beforesqrt
(or at the beginning of its first argument).
If you don't want text style fractions you should use
mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}
.
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair[
and]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1. The&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the&
directly in front of thembox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by4em
, then inserting a&
and then moving the cursor left by4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the&
is placed4em
to the right of the start of the √. Insertingkern4em
after the&
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.[
is equivalent tobegin{equation*}
and]
is equivalent toend{equation*}
.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble fromthickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
tothickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new commandscalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?
– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version ofsqueezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in asqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces withinsplit
or any of the otheramsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.
– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
add a comment |
For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the =
symbol fit in a column; then, use an align*
environment to split the full expression across two lines.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.
begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
hrule
begin{align*}
&begin{aligned}[t]
Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222×1.111163 \
&+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
end{aligned}\
&= sqrt{0.111222} \
&= 0.111222
end{align*}
hrule
end{document}
Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
&quad = 0.1112
end{align*}
A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z
to these values:
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
&quad = 0.340074
end{align*}
%
with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
Try using split
or multiline
in the amsmath
package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".
Try:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
end{split}
end{equation}
begin{multline}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
end{multline}
end{document}
and adjust the 5mm in rule
to get the overline
spacing to look right.
Some other options to adjust the overline
spacing
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed theIEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
add a comment |
Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac
command from mathtools
combined with mfrac
(medium-sized fractions) from nccmath
:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum[11]
begin{equation*}
sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
{+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467942%2fhow-to-squeeze-a-long-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366
begin{document}
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
end{document}
I've done the following:
I've used the
split
environment fromamsmath
to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second\&
.To place the anchor (
&
) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it withkern 4em & kern-4em
.
The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters:
thickmuskip
(;
and space around e.g.=
),medmuskip
(:
and space around e.g.+
),thinmuskip
(,
and space around e.g.sum
andsin
),nulldelimiterspace
(space around e.g. fractions) andscriptspace
(space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths usingsqueezespaces{0.5}
(which is defined in the preamble).
Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside
split
, so I've put the square root inside anmbox{$<…>$}
and usedsqueezespaces{0.5}
in the inner math environment. You can replace0.5
by another number between0
and1
if you want.
A side-effect of putting the
sqrt
in a box is that it is set intextstyle
, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by usingtfrac
instead offrac
or by insertingtextstyle
right beforesqrt
(or at the beginning of its first argument).
If you don't want text style fractions you should use
mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}
.
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair[
and]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1. The&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the&
directly in front of thembox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by4em
, then inserting a&
and then moving the cursor left by4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the&
is placed4em
to the right of the start of the √. Insertingkern4em
after the&
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.[
is equivalent tobegin{equation*}
and]
is equivalent toend{equation*}
.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble fromthickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
tothickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new commandscalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?
– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version ofsqueezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in asqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces withinsplit
or any of the otheramsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.
– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
add a comment |
The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366
begin{document}
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
end{document}
I've done the following:
I've used the
split
environment fromamsmath
to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second\&
.To place the anchor (
&
) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it withkern 4em & kern-4em
.
The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters:
thickmuskip
(;
and space around e.g.=
),medmuskip
(:
and space around e.g.+
),thinmuskip
(,
and space around e.g.sum
andsin
),nulldelimiterspace
(space around e.g. fractions) andscriptspace
(space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths usingsqueezespaces{0.5}
(which is defined in the preamble).
Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside
split
, so I've put the square root inside anmbox{$<…>$}
and usedsqueezespaces{0.5}
in the inner math environment. You can replace0.5
by another number between0
and1
if you want.
A side-effect of putting the
sqrt
in a box is that it is set intextstyle
, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by usingtfrac
instead offrac
or by insertingtextstyle
right beforesqrt
(or at the beginning of its first argument).
If you don't want text style fractions you should use
mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}
.
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair[
and]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1. The&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the&
directly in front of thembox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by4em
, then inserting a&
and then moving the cursor left by4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the&
is placed4em
to the right of the start of the √. Insertingkern4em
after the&
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.[
is equivalent tobegin{equation*}
and]
is equivalent toend{equation*}
.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble fromthickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
tothickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new commandscalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?
– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version ofsqueezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in asqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces withinsplit
or any of the otheramsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.
– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
add a comment |
The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366
begin{document}
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
end{document}
I've done the following:
I've used the
split
environment fromamsmath
to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second\&
.To place the anchor (
&
) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it withkern 4em & kern-4em
.
The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters:
thickmuskip
(;
and space around e.g.=
),medmuskip
(:
and space around e.g.+
),thinmuskip
(,
and space around e.g.sum
andsin
),nulldelimiterspace
(space around e.g. fractions) andscriptspace
(space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths usingsqueezespaces{0.5}
(which is defined in the preamble).
Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside
split
, so I've put the square root inside anmbox{$<…>$}
and usedsqueezespaces{0.5}
in the inner math environment. You can replace0.5
by another number between0
and1
if you want.
A side-effect of putting the
sqrt
in a box is that it is set intextstyle
, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by usingtfrac
instead offrac
or by insertingtextstyle
right beforesqrt
(or at the beginning of its first argument).
If you don't want text style fractions you should use
mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}
.
The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366
begin{document}
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
end{document}
I've done the following:
I've used the
split
environment fromamsmath
to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second\&
.To place the anchor (
&
) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it withkern 4em & kern-4em
.
The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters:
thickmuskip
(;
and space around e.g.=
),medmuskip
(:
and space around e.g.+
),thinmuskip
(,
and space around e.g.sum
andsin
),nulldelimiterspace
(space around e.g. fractions) andscriptspace
(space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths usingsqueezespaces{0.5}
(which is defined in the preamble).
Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside
split
, so I've put the square root inside anmbox{$<…>$}
and usedsqueezespaces{0.5}
in the inner math environment. You can replace0.5
by another number between0
and1
if you want.
A side-effect of putting the
sqrt
in a box is that it is set intextstyle
, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by usingtfrac
instead offrac
or by insertingtextstyle
right beforesqrt
(or at the beginning of its first argument).
If you don't want text style fractions you should use
mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}
.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 22:51
answered Dec 30 '18 at 21:10
CircumscribeCircumscribe
7,34121542
7,34121542
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair[
and]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1. The&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the&
directly in front of thembox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by4em
, then inserting a&
and then moving the cursor left by4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the&
is placed4em
to the right of the start of the √. Insertingkern4em
after the&
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.[
is equivalent tobegin{equation*}
and]
is equivalent toend{equation*}
.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble fromthickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
tothickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new commandscalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?
– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version ofsqueezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in asqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces withinsplit
or any of the otheramsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.
– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
add a comment |
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair[
and]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1. The&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the&
directly in front of thembox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by4em
, then inserting a&
and then moving the cursor left by4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the&
is placed4em
to the right of the start of the √. Insertingkern4em
after the&
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.[
is equivalent tobegin{equation*}
and]
is equivalent toend{equation*}
.
– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble fromthickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
tothickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new commandscalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?
– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version ofsqueezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in asqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces withinsplit
or any of the otheramsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.
– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair
[
and ]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair
[
and ]
do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 22:24
1
1
1. The
&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the &
directly in front of the mbox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em
, then inserting a &
and then moving the cursor left by 4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the &
is placed 4em
to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em
after the &
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
1. The
&
in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the &
directly in front of the mbox
the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em
, then inserting a &
and then moving the cursor left by 4em
, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the &
is placed 4em
to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em
after the &
on both the second and third line would have the same effect.– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:35
2.
[
is equivalent to begin{equation*}
and ]
is equivalent to end{equation*}
.– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
2.
[
is equivalent to begin{equation*}
and ]
is equivalent to end{equation*}
.– Circumscribe
Dec 30 '18 at 22:36
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble from
thickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
to thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new command scalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
Just noticed that you changed in the preamble from
thickmuskip=#1thickmuskip
to thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}
, and defined a new command scalemuskip
. Can I know what is the additional benefit of this?– nanjun
Jan 3 at 17:57
1
1
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version of
squeezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in a sqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces within split
or any of the other amsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
@nanjun: These skips have a base value and some maximum amount by which they can be stretched and shrunk if necessary (to improve the layout of a paragraph or equation). The old version of
squeezespaces
effectively removed this stretch/shrink, but the updated one scales it along with the base value. In this case it made no difference because the spaces in a sqrt
can't be shrunk (nor can spaces within split
or any of the other amsmath
environments), but I felt I should do it right.– Circumscribe
Jan 3 at 18:26
add a comment |
For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the =
symbol fit in a column; then, use an align*
environment to split the full expression across two lines.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.
begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the =
symbol fit in a column; then, use an align*
environment to split the full expression across two lines.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.
begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the =
symbol fit in a column; then, use an align*
environment to split the full expression across two lines.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.
begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}
For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the =
symbol fit in a column; then, use an align*
environment to split the full expression across two lines.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.
begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}
answered Dec 30 '18 at 20:55
MicoMico
288k32394782
288k32394782
add a comment |
add a comment |
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
hrule
begin{align*}
&begin{aligned}[t]
Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222×1.111163 \
&+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
end{aligned}\
&= sqrt{0.111222} \
&= 0.111222
end{align*}
hrule
end{document}
Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
&quad = 0.1112
end{align*}
A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z
to these values:
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
&quad = 0.340074
end{align*}
%
with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
hrule
begin{align*}
&begin{aligned}[t]
Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222×1.111163 \
&+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
end{aligned}\
&= sqrt{0.111222} \
&= 0.111222
end{align*}
hrule
end{document}
Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
&quad = 0.1112
end{align*}
A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z
to these values:
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
&quad = 0.340074
end{align*}
%
with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
hrule
begin{align*}
&begin{aligned}[t]
Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222×1.111163 \
&+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
end{aligned}\
&= sqrt{0.111222} \
&= 0.111222
end{align*}
hrule
end{document}
Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
&quad = 0.1112
end{align*}
A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z
to these values:
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
&quad = 0.340074
end{align*}
%
with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
hrule
begin{align*}
&begin{aligned}[t]
Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222×1.111163 \
&+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
end{aligned}\
&= sqrt{0.111222} \
&= 0.111222
end{align*}
hrule
end{document}
Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
&quad = 0.1112
end{align*}
A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z
to these values:
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
&quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
&quad = 0.340074
end{align*}
%
with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 22:19
answered Dec 30 '18 at 21:42
AboAmmarAboAmmar
34.7k32985
34.7k32985
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
1
1
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:46
1
1
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
– AboAmmar
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48
add a comment |
Try using split
or multiline
in the amsmath
package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".
Try:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
end{split}
end{equation}
begin{multline}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
end{multline}
end{document}
and adjust the 5mm in rule
to get the overline
spacing to look right.
Some other options to adjust the overline
spacing
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed theIEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
add a comment |
Try using split
or multiline
in the amsmath
package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".
Try:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
end{split}
end{equation}
begin{multline}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
end{multline}
end{document}
and adjust the 5mm in rule
to get the overline
spacing to look right.
Some other options to adjust the overline
spacing
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed theIEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
add a comment |
Try using split
or multiline
in the amsmath
package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".
Try:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
end{split}
end{equation}
begin{multline}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
end{multline}
end{document}
and adjust the 5mm in rule
to get the overline
spacing to look right.
Some other options to adjust the overline
spacing
Try using split
or multiline
in the amsmath
package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".
Try:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
end{split}
end{equation}
begin{multline}
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
end{multline}
end{document}
and adjust the 5mm in rule
to get the overline
spacing to look right.
Some other options to adjust the overline
spacing
edited Dec 30 '18 at 21:23
answered Dec 30 '18 at 20:18
xerxes25xerxes25
4318
4318
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed theIEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
add a comment |
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed theIEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
1
1
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
It would be better if your code employed the
IEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
It would be better if your code employed the
IEEEtran
document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.– Mico
Dec 30 '18 at 20:58
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:04
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
@Circumscribe, fixed! Good to know about case sensitivity across platforms.
– xerxes25
Dec 30 '18 at 21:27
add a comment |
Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac
command from mathtools
combined with mfrac
(medium-sized fractions) from nccmath
:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum[11]
begin{equation*}
sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
{+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac
command from mathtools
combined with mfrac
(medium-sized fractions) from nccmath
:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum[11]
begin{equation*}
sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
{+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{equation*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac
command from mathtools
combined with mfrac
(medium-sized fractions) from nccmath
:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum[11]
begin{equation*}
sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
{+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{equation*}
end{document}
Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac
command from mathtools
combined with mfrac
(medium-sized fractions) from nccmath
:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}
usepackage{lipsum}
begin{document}
lipsum[11]
begin{equation*}
sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
{+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{equation*}
end{document}
answered Dec 30 '18 at 22:38
BernardBernard
177k779211
177k779211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467942%2fhow-to-squeeze-a-long-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Can't you write
0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2)
?– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 30 '18 at 19:42
I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
Dec 30 '18 at 21:24
@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
Dec 30 '18 at 21:48