Show that $P(x,y)=0$ is a parabola if $b^2-4ac=0$.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I tried the following:
I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.
But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?
proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I tried the following:
I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.
But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?
proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I tried the following:
I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.
But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?
proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
I tried the following:
I write the polynomial $P(x, y) = ax^2+bxy+cy^2+dx+ey+h$ in the form $P(x, y) = Ax2 + Bx + C$ where $A$, $B$, and $C$ are polynomial functions of $y$. This $P(x, y) = Q(x)$ has the discriminant $Delta_x(y) = (b^2 − 4ac)y^2 + (2bd − 4ae)y + (d^2 − 4ah)$. Letting $b^2-4ac=0$ makes $Delta_x(y)$ a linear function of $y$ and if $y ge frac{4ah -d^2}{2bd − 4ae}$ then for any of those $y$'s there is only one corresponding $x$. So IF for the $P(x, y)$ there are only four possible shapes: circle, ellipse, parabola and hyperbola then the only choice is parabola.
But the proof is not only complete but also doesn't look so rigorous. Are there any better proofs?
proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves
proof-verification algebraic-geometry conic-sections plane-curves
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
edited Nov 22 at 13:38
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
asked Nov 22 at 12:26
72D
53116
53116
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50
add a comment |
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009068%2fshow-that-px-y-0-is-a-parabola-if-b2-4ac-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Strictly speaking, $P(x,y)=0$ is not necessarily a parabola when $b^2-4ac=0$. Take $a=b=c=d=0,e=h=1$. But as I've written in the answer to your another question, we can say that by a suitable rotation, $P(x,y)=0$ becomes an equation of the from $AX^2+CY^2+DX+EY+F=0$ with $AC=0$.
– mathlove
Nov 27 at 5:26
@mathlove, evaluation of P(x,y)=0 by rotation method is much easier, but the book didn't introduced it (yet?). But after learning about it in your answer I could evaluated different cases too.
– 72D
Nov 27 at 5:50