Black Depth in Red-black Tree?












0














Wikipedia's Red-black tree states the last property of a Red-black tree:




Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes contains the same number of black nodes. Some definitions: the number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth; the uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree




I'm not understanding this property. So, looking at this tree from the above Wikipedia article:





What is this field's value for the 8 tree, i.e. Root (13) -> 8?



How about for 15, i.e. Root (13) -> 7 -> 15?



When providing an answer, please also explain the why of that number.










share|cite|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
    – hardmath
    Mar 6 '16 at 16:51


















0














Wikipedia's Red-black tree states the last property of a Red-black tree:




Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes contains the same number of black nodes. Some definitions: the number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth; the uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree




I'm not understanding this property. So, looking at this tree from the above Wikipedia article:





What is this field's value for the 8 tree, i.e. Root (13) -> 8?



How about for 15, i.e. Root (13) -> 7 -> 15?



When providing an answer, please also explain the why of that number.










share|cite|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
    – hardmath
    Mar 6 '16 at 16:51
















0












0








0







Wikipedia's Red-black tree states the last property of a Red-black tree:




Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes contains the same number of black nodes. Some definitions: the number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth; the uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree




I'm not understanding this property. So, looking at this tree from the above Wikipedia article:





What is this field's value for the 8 tree, i.e. Root (13) -> 8?



How about for 15, i.e. Root (13) -> 7 -> 15?



When providing an answer, please also explain the why of that number.










share|cite|improve this question















Wikipedia's Red-black tree states the last property of a Red-black tree:




Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes contains the same number of black nodes. Some definitions: the number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth; the uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree




I'm not understanding this property. So, looking at this tree from the above Wikipedia article:





What is this field's value for the 8 tree, i.e. Root (13) -> 8?



How about for 15, i.e. Root (13) -> 7 -> 15?



When providing an answer, please also explain the why of that number.







trees data-structure






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 16 '17 at 14:10









Smylic

4,53921225




4,53921225










asked Mar 6 '16 at 16:36









Kevin Meredith

281522




281522





bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1




    The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
    – hardmath
    Mar 6 '16 at 16:51
















  • 1




    The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
    – hardmath
    Mar 6 '16 at 16:51










1




1




The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
– hardmath
Mar 6 '16 at 16:51






The definition you quote concerns "Every path from a given node to any of its descendant NIL nodes", but you ask about "this field's value" for paths 13 -> 8 and 13 -> 7 -> 15 that are not of such a form. I'm not sure what you are asking. Probably you meant 17 in place of 7.
– hardmath
Mar 6 '16 at 16:51












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














In red-black tree you know: that black-depth is permanent for every two child in the tree.
For example:



8:



We have two children's $1$ and $11$ and for them we know that black-depth($1$) = black-depth($11$)=$2$.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    From the definitions:




    The number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth.




    Let's use $d(n)$ for the black depth of a node $n$. So $d(8) = 1$, for example, because one node is black along the path $13 to 8$ (namely node $13$). Similarly $d(15)=2$ because along the path $13 to 17 to 15$, two nodes ($13$ and $15$) are black.




    The uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree.




    The black-height of the tree here is $3$ because $d(n)=3$ whenever $n$ is NIL.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1685705%2fblack-depth-in-red-black-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      In red-black tree you know: that black-depth is permanent for every two child in the tree.
      For example:



      8:



      We have two children's $1$ and $11$ and for them we know that black-depth($1$) = black-depth($11$)=$2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0














        In red-black tree you know: that black-depth is permanent for every two child in the tree.
        For example:



        8:



        We have two children's $1$ and $11$ and for them we know that black-depth($1$) = black-depth($11$)=$2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          In red-black tree you know: that black-depth is permanent for every two child in the tree.
          For example:



          8:



          We have two children's $1$ and $11$ and for them we know that black-depth($1$) = black-depth($11$)=$2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          In red-black tree you know: that black-depth is permanent for every two child in the tree.
          For example:



          8:



          We have two children's $1$ and $11$ and for them we know that black-depth($1$) = black-depth($11$)=$2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 '16 at 16:48









          openspace

          3,4452822




          3,4452822























              0














              From the definitions:




              The number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth.




              Let's use $d(n)$ for the black depth of a node $n$. So $d(8) = 1$, for example, because one node is black along the path $13 to 8$ (namely node $13$). Similarly $d(15)=2$ because along the path $13 to 17 to 15$, two nodes ($13$ and $15$) are black.




              The uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree.




              The black-height of the tree here is $3$ because $d(n)=3$ whenever $n$ is NIL.






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0














                From the definitions:




                The number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth.




                Let's use $d(n)$ for the black depth of a node $n$. So $d(8) = 1$, for example, because one node is black along the path $13 to 8$ (namely node $13$). Similarly $d(15)=2$ because along the path $13 to 17 to 15$, two nodes ($13$ and $15$) are black.




                The uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree.




                The black-height of the tree here is $3$ because $d(n)=3$ whenever $n$ is NIL.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  From the definitions:




                  The number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth.




                  Let's use $d(n)$ for the black depth of a node $n$. So $d(8) = 1$, for example, because one node is black along the path $13 to 8$ (namely node $13$). Similarly $d(15)=2$ because along the path $13 to 17 to 15$, two nodes ($13$ and $15$) are black.




                  The uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree.




                  The black-height of the tree here is $3$ because $d(n)=3$ whenever $n$ is NIL.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  From the definitions:




                  The number of black nodes from the root to a node is the node's black depth.




                  Let's use $d(n)$ for the black depth of a node $n$. So $d(8) = 1$, for example, because one node is black along the path $13 to 8$ (namely node $13$). Similarly $d(15)=2$ because along the path $13 to 17 to 15$, two nodes ($13$ and $15$) are black.




                  The uniform number of black nodes in all paths from root to the leaves is called the black-height of the red–black tree.




                  The black-height of the tree here is $3$ because $d(n)=3$ whenever $n$ is NIL.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 6 '16 at 17:30

























                  answered Mar 6 '16 at 17:19









                  Théophile

                  19.5k12946




                  19.5k12946






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1685705%2fblack-depth-in-red-black-tree%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten