Borel measurable function (Hausdorff dimension)
Let $sgeq0$ be a real number and $f:mathbb{R^n} to [0,infty)$ a Borel measurable function.
How to show:
$0<int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}<infty Rightarrow$ dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$.
To show this implication I tried:
Since $int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}$ is finite there is a $A>0$ and for every countable cover $mathcal{B}$ of $mathbb{R}^n$ it's $text{diam}(A)>deltaforall Ainmathcal{B}$.
So: $sumlimits_{Ainmathcal{B}}text{diam}(A)^s=infty Rightarrow dim_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R}^n)=0$
I'm not sure if this is correct so far and how to conclude that the Hausdorff Dimension is
dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$ from here.
measure-theory
add a comment |
Let $sgeq0$ be a real number and $f:mathbb{R^n} to [0,infty)$ a Borel measurable function.
How to show:
$0<int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}<infty Rightarrow$ dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$.
To show this implication I tried:
Since $int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}$ is finite there is a $A>0$ and for every countable cover $mathcal{B}$ of $mathbb{R}^n$ it's $text{diam}(A)>deltaforall Ainmathcal{B}$.
So: $sumlimits_{Ainmathcal{B}}text{diam}(A)^s=infty Rightarrow dim_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R}^n)=0$
I'm not sure if this is correct so far and how to conclude that the Hausdorff Dimension is
dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$ from here.
measure-theory
add a comment |
Let $sgeq0$ be a real number and $f:mathbb{R^n} to [0,infty)$ a Borel measurable function.
How to show:
$0<int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}<infty Rightarrow$ dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$.
To show this implication I tried:
Since $int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}$ is finite there is a $A>0$ and for every countable cover $mathcal{B}$ of $mathbb{R}^n$ it's $text{diam}(A)>deltaforall Ainmathcal{B}$.
So: $sumlimits_{Ainmathcal{B}}text{diam}(A)^s=infty Rightarrow dim_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R}^n)=0$
I'm not sure if this is correct so far and how to conclude that the Hausdorff Dimension is
dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$ from here.
measure-theory
Let $sgeq0$ be a real number and $f:mathbb{R^n} to [0,infty)$ a Borel measurable function.
How to show:
$0<int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}<infty Rightarrow$ dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$.
To show this implication I tried:
Since $int_{mathbb{R^n}}f dmathcal{H^s}$ is finite there is a $A>0$ and for every countable cover $mathcal{B}$ of $mathbb{R}^n$ it's $text{diam}(A)>deltaforall Ainmathcal{B}$.
So: $sumlimits_{Ainmathcal{B}}text{diam}(A)^s=infty Rightarrow dim_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R}^n)=0$
I'm not sure if this is correct so far and how to conclude that the Hausdorff Dimension is
dim$_mathcal{H}(mathbb{R^n}$ $f^{-1}(0))=s$ from here.
measure-theory
measure-theory
asked Nov 28 '18 at 16:42
Olsgur
444
444
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You'll find it's easier to proceed if you work using general measure theory techniques for this problem, rather than trying to work from first principles. This is especially because we are given some information about $f$ in terms of the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure, so you want to exploit that.
Recall that for any $A subset mathbb R^n,$
$$ dim_{mathcal{H}} A = inf{s>0 : mathcal{H}^s(A) = 0 }. $$
It is known that if $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s,$ then $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = 0$ and $mathcal{H}^{s-varepsilon}(A) = +infty.$ So if it happens that $mathcal{H}^s(A) in (0,infty),$ then we can conclude that $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s.$ This is the key property of the Hausdorff dimension that we will use here.
The lower bound is quite easy, using the fact that the given integral is positve. If we set $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ then since $f$ vanishes outside $A$ by definition we get,
$$ int_A f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s = int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s > 0. $$
Then we get that $f$ is not $mathcal{H}^s$-almost everywhere zero, so we get $mathcal{H}^s(A) > 0.$ Note that we did not use any special property of the Hausdorff measure; this argument goes through for a general measure $mu.$ We conclude that $dim_{mathcal H} A geq s.$
The upper bound requires a bit more work. We can first try to estimate the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure of $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ but this might not be finite in general. We can however consider
$$ A_k = { x in mathbb R^n : f(x) > 1/k },$$
so then $A = bigcup_{k geq 1} A_k.$ By Markov's inequality, for each $k$ we have,
$$ frac1k mathcal{H}^s(A_k) leq int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s < infty. $$
So $dim_{mathcal{H}} A_k leq s$ for each $k.$ Then for each $varepsilon > 0,$ we have $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A_k) = infty$ so we conclude that each $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = infty$ by countable subadditivity. Hence $dim_{mathcal{H}} A leq s$ so the result follows.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017360%2fborel-measurable-function-hausdorff-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You'll find it's easier to proceed if you work using general measure theory techniques for this problem, rather than trying to work from first principles. This is especially because we are given some information about $f$ in terms of the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure, so you want to exploit that.
Recall that for any $A subset mathbb R^n,$
$$ dim_{mathcal{H}} A = inf{s>0 : mathcal{H}^s(A) = 0 }. $$
It is known that if $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s,$ then $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = 0$ and $mathcal{H}^{s-varepsilon}(A) = +infty.$ So if it happens that $mathcal{H}^s(A) in (0,infty),$ then we can conclude that $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s.$ This is the key property of the Hausdorff dimension that we will use here.
The lower bound is quite easy, using the fact that the given integral is positve. If we set $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ then since $f$ vanishes outside $A$ by definition we get,
$$ int_A f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s = int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s > 0. $$
Then we get that $f$ is not $mathcal{H}^s$-almost everywhere zero, so we get $mathcal{H}^s(A) > 0.$ Note that we did not use any special property of the Hausdorff measure; this argument goes through for a general measure $mu.$ We conclude that $dim_{mathcal H} A geq s.$
The upper bound requires a bit more work. We can first try to estimate the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure of $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ but this might not be finite in general. We can however consider
$$ A_k = { x in mathbb R^n : f(x) > 1/k },$$
so then $A = bigcup_{k geq 1} A_k.$ By Markov's inequality, for each $k$ we have,
$$ frac1k mathcal{H}^s(A_k) leq int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s < infty. $$
So $dim_{mathcal{H}} A_k leq s$ for each $k.$ Then for each $varepsilon > 0,$ we have $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A_k) = infty$ so we conclude that each $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = infty$ by countable subadditivity. Hence $dim_{mathcal{H}} A leq s$ so the result follows.
add a comment |
You'll find it's easier to proceed if you work using general measure theory techniques for this problem, rather than trying to work from first principles. This is especially because we are given some information about $f$ in terms of the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure, so you want to exploit that.
Recall that for any $A subset mathbb R^n,$
$$ dim_{mathcal{H}} A = inf{s>0 : mathcal{H}^s(A) = 0 }. $$
It is known that if $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s,$ then $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = 0$ and $mathcal{H}^{s-varepsilon}(A) = +infty.$ So if it happens that $mathcal{H}^s(A) in (0,infty),$ then we can conclude that $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s.$ This is the key property of the Hausdorff dimension that we will use here.
The lower bound is quite easy, using the fact that the given integral is positve. If we set $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ then since $f$ vanishes outside $A$ by definition we get,
$$ int_A f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s = int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s > 0. $$
Then we get that $f$ is not $mathcal{H}^s$-almost everywhere zero, so we get $mathcal{H}^s(A) > 0.$ Note that we did not use any special property of the Hausdorff measure; this argument goes through for a general measure $mu.$ We conclude that $dim_{mathcal H} A geq s.$
The upper bound requires a bit more work. We can first try to estimate the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure of $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ but this might not be finite in general. We can however consider
$$ A_k = { x in mathbb R^n : f(x) > 1/k },$$
so then $A = bigcup_{k geq 1} A_k.$ By Markov's inequality, for each $k$ we have,
$$ frac1k mathcal{H}^s(A_k) leq int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s < infty. $$
So $dim_{mathcal{H}} A_k leq s$ for each $k.$ Then for each $varepsilon > 0,$ we have $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A_k) = infty$ so we conclude that each $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = infty$ by countable subadditivity. Hence $dim_{mathcal{H}} A leq s$ so the result follows.
add a comment |
You'll find it's easier to proceed if you work using general measure theory techniques for this problem, rather than trying to work from first principles. This is especially because we are given some information about $f$ in terms of the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure, so you want to exploit that.
Recall that for any $A subset mathbb R^n,$
$$ dim_{mathcal{H}} A = inf{s>0 : mathcal{H}^s(A) = 0 }. $$
It is known that if $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s,$ then $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = 0$ and $mathcal{H}^{s-varepsilon}(A) = +infty.$ So if it happens that $mathcal{H}^s(A) in (0,infty),$ then we can conclude that $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s.$ This is the key property of the Hausdorff dimension that we will use here.
The lower bound is quite easy, using the fact that the given integral is positve. If we set $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ then since $f$ vanishes outside $A$ by definition we get,
$$ int_A f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s = int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s > 0. $$
Then we get that $f$ is not $mathcal{H}^s$-almost everywhere zero, so we get $mathcal{H}^s(A) > 0.$ Note that we did not use any special property of the Hausdorff measure; this argument goes through for a general measure $mu.$ We conclude that $dim_{mathcal H} A geq s.$
The upper bound requires a bit more work. We can first try to estimate the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure of $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ but this might not be finite in general. We can however consider
$$ A_k = { x in mathbb R^n : f(x) > 1/k },$$
so then $A = bigcup_{k geq 1} A_k.$ By Markov's inequality, for each $k$ we have,
$$ frac1k mathcal{H}^s(A_k) leq int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s < infty. $$
So $dim_{mathcal{H}} A_k leq s$ for each $k.$ Then for each $varepsilon > 0,$ we have $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A_k) = infty$ so we conclude that each $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = infty$ by countable subadditivity. Hence $dim_{mathcal{H}} A leq s$ so the result follows.
You'll find it's easier to proceed if you work using general measure theory techniques for this problem, rather than trying to work from first principles. This is especially because we are given some information about $f$ in terms of the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure, so you want to exploit that.
Recall that for any $A subset mathbb R^n,$
$$ dim_{mathcal{H}} A = inf{s>0 : mathcal{H}^s(A) = 0 }. $$
It is known that if $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s,$ then $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = 0$ and $mathcal{H}^{s-varepsilon}(A) = +infty.$ So if it happens that $mathcal{H}^s(A) in (0,infty),$ then we can conclude that $dim_{mathcal{H}} A = s.$ This is the key property of the Hausdorff dimension that we will use here.
The lower bound is quite easy, using the fact that the given integral is positve. If we set $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ then since $f$ vanishes outside $A$ by definition we get,
$$ int_A f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s = int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s > 0. $$
Then we get that $f$ is not $mathcal{H}^s$-almost everywhere zero, so we get $mathcal{H}^s(A) > 0.$ Note that we did not use any special property of the Hausdorff measure; this argument goes through for a general measure $mu.$ We conclude that $dim_{mathcal H} A geq s.$
The upper bound requires a bit more work. We can first try to estimate the $mathcal{H}^s$ measure of $A = mathbb R^n setminus f^{-1}(0),$ but this might not be finite in general. We can however consider
$$ A_k = { x in mathbb R^n : f(x) > 1/k },$$
so then $A = bigcup_{k geq 1} A_k.$ By Markov's inequality, for each $k$ we have,
$$ frac1k mathcal{H}^s(A_k) leq int_{mathbb R^n} f,mathrm{d}mathcal{H}^s < infty. $$
So $dim_{mathcal{H}} A_k leq s$ for each $k.$ Then for each $varepsilon > 0,$ we have $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A_k) = infty$ so we conclude that each $mathcal{H}^{s+varepsilon}(A) = infty$ by countable subadditivity. Hence $dim_{mathcal{H}} A leq s$ so the result follows.
answered Nov 28 '18 at 21:14
ktoi
2,2931616
2,2931616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017360%2fborel-measurable-function-hausdorff-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown