Are the two definitions of that a map $F:Ato N$ is smooth on $A$ equivalent?
$begingroup$
In the above pictures, we can see two definitions of that a map $F:Ato N$ is smooth on $A$, are they equivalent?
manifolds smooth-manifolds manifolds-with-boundary
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the above pictures, we can see two definitions of that a map $F:Ato N$ is smooth on $A$, are they equivalent?
manifolds smooth-manifolds manifolds-with-boundary
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the above pictures, we can see two definitions of that a map $F:Ato N$ is smooth on $A$, are they equivalent?
manifolds smooth-manifolds manifolds-with-boundary
$endgroup$
In the above pictures, we can see two definitions of that a map $F:Ato N$ is smooth on $A$, are they equivalent?
manifolds smooth-manifolds manifolds-with-boundary
manifolds smooth-manifolds manifolds-with-boundary
asked Dec 11 '18 at 11:56
Born to be proudBorn to be proud
848510
848510
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035216%2fare-the-two-definitions-of-that-a-map-fa-to-n-is-smooth-on-a-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035216%2fare-the-two-definitions-of-that-a-map-fa-to-n-is-smooth-on-a-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@JackLee Please take a look at my question.
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 13:35
$begingroup$
They're not always equivalent in case $N$ has nonempty boundary. Here's a counterexample: Let $M=mathbb R$, $N = [0,infty)$, $A = [0,infty)subseteq M$, and let $Fcolon Ato N$ be the identity map. Then $F$ is not smooth by the definition in the text, because there is no neighborhood of $0$ in $mathbb R$ on which $F$ has a smooth extension as a map into $N$. But the coordinate representation of $F$ using standard coordinates in domain and codomain (which is essentially the same map) has an extension to an open subset of $mathbb R$ as a map into $mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:15
$begingroup$
See also this question.
$endgroup$
– Jack Lee
Dec 11 '18 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@JackLee Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Born to be proud
Dec 11 '18 at 23:54