Review on my method for $Number$ $of$ $diagonals$ in a regular $n$-gon is $frac12n(n-3)$












1












$begingroup$


I have an assignment on permutations and combinations topics. In that there is a question-
The number of interior angles of a regular polygon is $150^circ$ each. The number of diagonals of the polygon is _____.



Attempt



I don't know about any thing about the P&C method for diagonals. So I found the side as per the formula $$(n-2)(360^circ)=(theta)n$$ where $n$ is the number of side and $theta$ as interior angle.



But the main problem came to be the diagonal part because I was not able to understand the logic given on platforms like MSE itself. (Maybe it is due to language problem because I am still learning English language.)



But I tried to count the polygon diagonal one by one to generate some pattern which may be useful. So I observed this-



In quads, if we start making diagonals then for first it will be $1$, then again $1$ and $0$ and $0$.



In pents, the similar process gave $2$ then again $2$ then $1$ and then $0$, and $0$.



In hexes, $3$ then $3$ then $2$ then $1$ then $0$ and again $0$.



Also, I observed that for the last two vertices it came to be $0$ always.



So observing this I first did in same way for hepts and after doing this I checked the answers for above cases in that formula $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$. (Though I didn't understand how it was formed. And to my surprise, it came to be same. I even checked for $12, 13, 50, 40 ldots$ It all gave the same value as that formula.




Now my doubt is What I observed is right but how? Also I wrote it in terms of $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+...+1$$ to give $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have an assignment on permutations and combinations topics. In that there is a question-
    The number of interior angles of a regular polygon is $150^circ$ each. The number of diagonals of the polygon is _____.



    Attempt



    I don't know about any thing about the P&C method for diagonals. So I found the side as per the formula $$(n-2)(360^circ)=(theta)n$$ where $n$ is the number of side and $theta$ as interior angle.



    But the main problem came to be the diagonal part because I was not able to understand the logic given on platforms like MSE itself. (Maybe it is due to language problem because I am still learning English language.)



    But I tried to count the polygon diagonal one by one to generate some pattern which may be useful. So I observed this-



    In quads, if we start making diagonals then for first it will be $1$, then again $1$ and $0$ and $0$.



    In pents, the similar process gave $2$ then again $2$ then $1$ and then $0$, and $0$.



    In hexes, $3$ then $3$ then $2$ then $1$ then $0$ and again $0$.



    Also, I observed that for the last two vertices it came to be $0$ always.



    So observing this I first did in same way for hepts and after doing this I checked the answers for above cases in that formula $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$. (Though I didn't understand how it was formed. And to my surprise, it came to be same. I even checked for $12, 13, 50, 40 ldots$ It all gave the same value as that formula.




    Now my doubt is What I observed is right but how? Also I wrote it in terms of $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+...+1$$ to give $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$.











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have an assignment on permutations and combinations topics. In that there is a question-
      The number of interior angles of a regular polygon is $150^circ$ each. The number of diagonals of the polygon is _____.



      Attempt



      I don't know about any thing about the P&C method for diagonals. So I found the side as per the formula $$(n-2)(360^circ)=(theta)n$$ where $n$ is the number of side and $theta$ as interior angle.



      But the main problem came to be the diagonal part because I was not able to understand the logic given on platforms like MSE itself. (Maybe it is due to language problem because I am still learning English language.)



      But I tried to count the polygon diagonal one by one to generate some pattern which may be useful. So I observed this-



      In quads, if we start making diagonals then for first it will be $1$, then again $1$ and $0$ and $0$.



      In pents, the similar process gave $2$ then again $2$ then $1$ and then $0$, and $0$.



      In hexes, $3$ then $3$ then $2$ then $1$ then $0$ and again $0$.



      Also, I observed that for the last two vertices it came to be $0$ always.



      So observing this I first did in same way for hepts and after doing this I checked the answers for above cases in that formula $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$. (Though I didn't understand how it was formed. And to my surprise, it came to be same. I even checked for $12, 13, 50, 40 ldots$ It all gave the same value as that formula.




      Now my doubt is What I observed is right but how? Also I wrote it in terms of $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+...+1$$ to give $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$.











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have an assignment on permutations and combinations topics. In that there is a question-
      The number of interior angles of a regular polygon is $150^circ$ each. The number of diagonals of the polygon is _____.



      Attempt



      I don't know about any thing about the P&C method for diagonals. So I found the side as per the formula $$(n-2)(360^circ)=(theta)n$$ where $n$ is the number of side and $theta$ as interior angle.



      But the main problem came to be the diagonal part because I was not able to understand the logic given on platforms like MSE itself. (Maybe it is due to language problem because I am still learning English language.)



      But I tried to count the polygon diagonal one by one to generate some pattern which may be useful. So I observed this-



      In quads, if we start making diagonals then for first it will be $1$, then again $1$ and $0$ and $0$.



      In pents, the similar process gave $2$ then again $2$ then $1$ and then $0$, and $0$.



      In hexes, $3$ then $3$ then $2$ then $1$ then $0$ and again $0$.



      Also, I observed that for the last two vertices it came to be $0$ always.



      So observing this I first did in same way for hepts and after doing this I checked the answers for above cases in that formula $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$. (Though I didn't understand how it was formed. And to my surprise, it came to be same. I even checked for $12, 13, 50, 40 ldots$ It all gave the same value as that formula.




      Now my doubt is What I observed is right but how? Also I wrote it in terms of $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+...+1$$ to give $$frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$.








      combinatorics geometry discrete-mathematics proof-verification combinations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 4:53







      jayant98

















      asked Dec 10 '18 at 16:58









      jayant98jayant98

      629216




      629216






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You can use inclusion-exclusion principle. Let $A_1A_2...A_n$ be the $n$-gon. $A_1$ can connect with $n-1$ vertices, $A_2$ can connect with $n-2$ vertices (note connection with $A_1$ was already considered) and so on $A_{n-1}$ can connect with only $1$ vertex $A_n$. Hence:
          $$(n-1)+(n-2)+cdots +1=frac{n(n-1)}{2}.$$
          Now to find the number of diagonals, we must exclude the lines between the neighboring vertices, which is $n$:
          $$frac{n(n-1)}{2}-n=frac{n(n-3)}{2},$$
          which is pretty much the same as mlerma54's answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            The number of line segments determined by $n$ points in the plane is $n$ choose 2, i.e., $binom{n}{2} = frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. But in a polygon, $n$ of those segments will be sides, so subtract it to get the number of diagonals: $frac{n(n-1)}{2} - n = frac{n(n-3)}{2}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              The classic formula for the number of diagonals of an $n$ sided polygon is $frac {n(n-3)}2$ as you say. The way to see it is you have $n$ choices for the first end of a diagonal, then $n-3$ choices for the other end because you can't use the original vertex or a neighboring one, but have counted each diagonal twice so divide by $2$.



              You can write your sum $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+(n-5)+ldots+1=2(n-3)+sum_{i=1}^{n-4}i\=2(n-3)+frac 12(n-4)(n-3)\=frac 12(n-3)(4+(n-4))\=frac 12n(n-3)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                1












                $begingroup$

                You can also use the Handshake Lemma from graph theory. Let $G(V,E)$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, where the vertices form a regular $n$-gon and the edges are the diagonals of the $n$-gon. Then, prove that each vertex of $G$ has degree $n-3$. By the Handshake Lemma, $G$ has
                $$|E|=frac{1}{2},sum_{vin V},deg(v)=frac{1}{2},n,(n-3)=frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$ edges.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  });
                  });
                  }, "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function() {
                  var channelOptions = {
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "69"
                  };
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                  createEditor();
                  });
                  }
                  else {
                  createEditor();
                  }
                  });

                  function createEditor() {
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: true,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: 10,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader: {
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  },
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  });


                  }
                  });














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function () {
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034176%2freview-on-my-method-for-number-of-diagonals-in-a-regular-n-gon-is-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                  }
                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  4 Answers
                  4






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  You can use inclusion-exclusion principle. Let $A_1A_2...A_n$ be the $n$-gon. $A_1$ can connect with $n-1$ vertices, $A_2$ can connect with $n-2$ vertices (note connection with $A_1$ was already considered) and so on $A_{n-1}$ can connect with only $1$ vertex $A_n$. Hence:
                  $$(n-1)+(n-2)+cdots +1=frac{n(n-1)}{2}.$$
                  Now to find the number of diagonals, we must exclude the lines between the neighboring vertices, which is $n$:
                  $$frac{n(n-1)}{2}-n=frac{n(n-3)}{2},$$
                  which is pretty much the same as mlerma54's answer.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    You can use inclusion-exclusion principle. Let $A_1A_2...A_n$ be the $n$-gon. $A_1$ can connect with $n-1$ vertices, $A_2$ can connect with $n-2$ vertices (note connection with $A_1$ was already considered) and so on $A_{n-1}$ can connect with only $1$ vertex $A_n$. Hence:
                    $$(n-1)+(n-2)+cdots +1=frac{n(n-1)}{2}.$$
                    Now to find the number of diagonals, we must exclude the lines between the neighboring vertices, which is $n$:
                    $$frac{n(n-1)}{2}-n=frac{n(n-3)}{2},$$
                    which is pretty much the same as mlerma54's answer.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      You can use inclusion-exclusion principle. Let $A_1A_2...A_n$ be the $n$-gon. $A_1$ can connect with $n-1$ vertices, $A_2$ can connect with $n-2$ vertices (note connection with $A_1$ was already considered) and so on $A_{n-1}$ can connect with only $1$ vertex $A_n$. Hence:
                      $$(n-1)+(n-2)+cdots +1=frac{n(n-1)}{2}.$$
                      Now to find the number of diagonals, we must exclude the lines between the neighboring vertices, which is $n$:
                      $$frac{n(n-1)}{2}-n=frac{n(n-3)}{2},$$
                      which is pretty much the same as mlerma54's answer.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      You can use inclusion-exclusion principle. Let $A_1A_2...A_n$ be the $n$-gon. $A_1$ can connect with $n-1$ vertices, $A_2$ can connect with $n-2$ vertices (note connection with $A_1$ was already considered) and so on $A_{n-1}$ can connect with only $1$ vertex $A_n$. Hence:
                      $$(n-1)+(n-2)+cdots +1=frac{n(n-1)}{2}.$$
                      Now to find the number of diagonals, we must exclude the lines between the neighboring vertices, which is $n$:
                      $$frac{n(n-1)}{2}-n=frac{n(n-3)}{2},$$
                      which is pretty much the same as mlerma54's answer.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:40









                      farruhotafarruhota

                      20.4k2739




                      20.4k2739























                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          The number of line segments determined by $n$ points in the plane is $n$ choose 2, i.e., $binom{n}{2} = frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. But in a polygon, $n$ of those segments will be sides, so subtract it to get the number of diagonals: $frac{n(n-1)}{2} - n = frac{n(n-3)}{2}$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            The number of line segments determined by $n$ points in the plane is $n$ choose 2, i.e., $binom{n}{2} = frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. But in a polygon, $n$ of those segments will be sides, so subtract it to get the number of diagonals: $frac{n(n-1)}{2} - n = frac{n(n-3)}{2}$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              The number of line segments determined by $n$ points in the plane is $n$ choose 2, i.e., $binom{n}{2} = frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. But in a polygon, $n$ of those segments will be sides, so subtract it to get the number of diagonals: $frac{n(n-1)}{2} - n = frac{n(n-3)}{2}$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              The number of line segments determined by $n$ points in the plane is $n$ choose 2, i.e., $binom{n}{2} = frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. But in a polygon, $n$ of those segments will be sides, so subtract it to get the number of diagonals: $frac{n(n-1)}{2} - n = frac{n(n-3)}{2}$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:09









                              mlerma54mlerma54

                              1,177148




                              1,177148























                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The classic formula for the number of diagonals of an $n$ sided polygon is $frac {n(n-3)}2$ as you say. The way to see it is you have $n$ choices for the first end of a diagonal, then $n-3$ choices for the other end because you can't use the original vertex or a neighboring one, but have counted each diagonal twice so divide by $2$.



                                  You can write your sum $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+(n-5)+ldots+1=2(n-3)+sum_{i=1}^{n-4}i\=2(n-3)+frac 12(n-4)(n-3)\=frac 12(n-3)(4+(n-4))\=frac 12n(n-3)$$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    The classic formula for the number of diagonals of an $n$ sided polygon is $frac {n(n-3)}2$ as you say. The way to see it is you have $n$ choices for the first end of a diagonal, then $n-3$ choices for the other end because you can't use the original vertex or a neighboring one, but have counted each diagonal twice so divide by $2$.



                                    You can write your sum $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+(n-5)+ldots+1=2(n-3)+sum_{i=1}^{n-4}i\=2(n-3)+frac 12(n-4)(n-3)\=frac 12(n-3)(4+(n-4))\=frac 12n(n-3)$$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      The classic formula for the number of diagonals of an $n$ sided polygon is $frac {n(n-3)}2$ as you say. The way to see it is you have $n$ choices for the first end of a diagonal, then $n-3$ choices for the other end because you can't use the original vertex or a neighboring one, but have counted each diagonal twice so divide by $2$.



                                      You can write your sum $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+(n-5)+ldots+1=2(n-3)+sum_{i=1}^{n-4}i\=2(n-3)+frac 12(n-4)(n-3)\=frac 12(n-3)(4+(n-4))\=frac 12n(n-3)$$






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      The classic formula for the number of diagonals of an $n$ sided polygon is $frac {n(n-3)}2$ as you say. The way to see it is you have $n$ choices for the first end of a diagonal, then $n-3$ choices for the other end because you can't use the original vertex or a neighboring one, but have counted each diagonal twice so divide by $2$.



                                      You can write your sum $$2(n-3)+(n-4)+(n-5)+ldots+1=2(n-3)+sum_{i=1}^{n-4}i\=2(n-3)+frac 12(n-4)(n-3)\=frac 12(n-3)(4+(n-4))\=frac 12n(n-3)$$







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Dec 10 '18 at 17:08









                                      Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

                                      297k23198371




                                      297k23198371























                                          1












                                          $begingroup$

                                          You can also use the Handshake Lemma from graph theory. Let $G(V,E)$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, where the vertices form a regular $n$-gon and the edges are the diagonals of the $n$-gon. Then, prove that each vertex of $G$ has degree $n-3$. By the Handshake Lemma, $G$ has
                                          $$|E|=frac{1}{2},sum_{vin V},deg(v)=frac{1}{2},n,(n-3)=frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$ edges.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$


















                                            1












                                            $begingroup$

                                            You can also use the Handshake Lemma from graph theory. Let $G(V,E)$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, where the vertices form a regular $n$-gon and the edges are the diagonals of the $n$-gon. Then, prove that each vertex of $G$ has degree $n-3$. By the Handshake Lemma, $G$ has
                                            $$|E|=frac{1}{2},sum_{vin V},deg(v)=frac{1}{2},n,(n-3)=frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$ edges.






                                            share|cite|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$
















                                              1












                                              1








                                              1





                                              $begingroup$

                                              You can also use the Handshake Lemma from graph theory. Let $G(V,E)$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, where the vertices form a regular $n$-gon and the edges are the diagonals of the $n$-gon. Then, prove that each vertex of $G$ has degree $n-3$. By the Handshake Lemma, $G$ has
                                              $$|E|=frac{1}{2},sum_{vin V},deg(v)=frac{1}{2},n,(n-3)=frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$ edges.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer











                                              $endgroup$



                                              You can also use the Handshake Lemma from graph theory. Let $G(V,E)$ be a graph on $n$ vertices, where the vertices form a regular $n$-gon and the edges are the diagonals of the $n$-gon. Then, prove that each vertex of $G$ has degree $n-3$. By the Handshake Lemma, $G$ has
                                              $$|E|=frac{1}{2},sum_{vin V},deg(v)=frac{1}{2},n,(n-3)=frac{n(n-3)}{2}$$ edges.







                                              share|cite|improve this answer














                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer








                                              edited Dec 11 '18 at 12:25

























                                              answered Dec 11 '18 at 12:01









                                              BatominovskiBatominovski

                                              33.1k33293




                                              33.1k33293






























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded




















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid



                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function () {
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034176%2freview-on-my-method-for-number-of-diagonals-in-a-regular-n-gon-is-frac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                  }
                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  Le Mesnil-Réaume

                                                  Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                                                  web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always