Why do I need to copy an array to use a method on it?












23














I can use Array() to have an array with a fixed number of undefined entries. For example



Array(2); // [empty × 2] 


But if I go and use the map method, say, on my new array, the entries are still undefined:



Array(2).map( () => "foo");  // [empty × 2] 


If I copy the array then map does work:



[...Array(2)].map( () => "foo");  // ["foo", "foo"]


Why do I need a copy to use the array?










share|improve this question






















  • what is the result of [...Array(2)]
    – Kain0_0
    Nov 27 at 2:39










  • @Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
    – cham
    Nov 27 at 2:41






  • 2




    Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
    – charlietfl
    Nov 27 at 2:54








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
    – Patrick Roberts
    Dec 3 at 18:42
















23














I can use Array() to have an array with a fixed number of undefined entries. For example



Array(2); // [empty × 2] 


But if I go and use the map method, say, on my new array, the entries are still undefined:



Array(2).map( () => "foo");  // [empty × 2] 


If I copy the array then map does work:



[...Array(2)].map( () => "foo");  // ["foo", "foo"]


Why do I need a copy to use the array?










share|improve this question






















  • what is the result of [...Array(2)]
    – Kain0_0
    Nov 27 at 2:39










  • @Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
    – cham
    Nov 27 at 2:41






  • 2




    Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
    – charlietfl
    Nov 27 at 2:54








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
    – Patrick Roberts
    Dec 3 at 18:42














23












23








23


1





I can use Array() to have an array with a fixed number of undefined entries. For example



Array(2); // [empty × 2] 


But if I go and use the map method, say, on my new array, the entries are still undefined:



Array(2).map( () => "foo");  // [empty × 2] 


If I copy the array then map does work:



[...Array(2)].map( () => "foo");  // ["foo", "foo"]


Why do I need a copy to use the array?










share|improve this question













I can use Array() to have an array with a fixed number of undefined entries. For example



Array(2); // [empty × 2] 


But if I go and use the map method, say, on my new array, the entries are still undefined:



Array(2).map( () => "foo");  // [empty × 2] 


If I copy the array then map does work:



[...Array(2)].map( () => "foo");  // ["foo", "foo"]


Why do I need a copy to use the array?







javascript arrays






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 27 at 2:35









cham

631623




631623












  • what is the result of [...Array(2)]
    – Kain0_0
    Nov 27 at 2:39










  • @Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
    – cham
    Nov 27 at 2:41






  • 2




    Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
    – charlietfl
    Nov 27 at 2:54








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
    – Patrick Roberts
    Dec 3 at 18:42


















  • what is the result of [...Array(2)]
    – Kain0_0
    Nov 27 at 2:39










  • @Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
    – cham
    Nov 27 at 2:41






  • 2




    Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
    – charlietfl
    Nov 27 at 2:54








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
    – Patrick Roberts
    Dec 3 at 18:42
















what is the result of [...Array(2)]
– Kain0_0
Nov 27 at 2:39




what is the result of [...Array(2)]
– Kain0_0
Nov 27 at 2:39












@Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
– cham
Nov 27 at 2:41




@Kain0_0 It is [undefined, undefined]. And Array.isArray(Array(2)) is true.
– cham
Nov 27 at 2:41




2




2




Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
– charlietfl
Nov 27 at 2:54






Can use fill() also. Array(2).fill("foo"); // ["foo", "foo"] Just have to be careful with passing object to fill as all elements will be same reference
– charlietfl
Nov 27 at 2:54






1




1




Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
– Patrick Roberts
Dec 3 at 18:42




Possible duplicate of JavaScript "new Array(n)" and "Array.prototype.map" weirdness
– Patrick Roberts
Dec 3 at 18:42












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















37














When you use Array(arrayLength) to create an array, you will have:




a new JavaScript array with its length property set to that number (Note: this implies an array of arrayLength empty slots, not slots with actual undefined values).




The array does not actually contain any values, not even undefined values - it simply has a length property.



When you spread an item with a length property into an array, eg [...{ length: 4 }], spread syntax accesses each index and sets the value at that index in the new array. For example:






const arr1 = ;
arr1.length = 4;
// arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
console.log('1' in arr1);

const arr2 = [...arr1];
console.log(arr2);
console.log('2' in arr2);





And .map only maps properties/values for which the property actually exists in the array you're mapping over.



Using the array constructor is confusing. I would suggest using Array.from instead, when creating arrays from scratch - you can pass it an object with a length property, as well as a mapping function:






const arr = Array.from(
{ length: 2 },
() => 'foo'
);
console.log(arr);








share|improve this answer





















  • I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
    – cham
    Nov 27 at 2:45












  • It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
    – CertainPerformance
    Nov 27 at 2:46



















8














The reason is that the array element is unassigned. See here the first paragraph of the description. ... callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values, including undefined.



Consider:



var array1 = Array(2);
array1[0] = undefined;

// pass a function to map
const map1 = array1.map(x => x * 2);

console.log(array1);
console.log(map1);


Outputs:



Array [undefined, undefined]
Array [NaN, undefined]


When the array is printed each of its elements are interrogated. The first has been assigned undefined the other is defaulted to undefined.



The mapping operation calls the mapping operation for the first element because it has been defined (through assignment). It does not call the mapping operation for the second argument, and simply passes out undefined.






share|improve this answer





























    0














    As pointed out by @CertainPerformance, your array doesn't have any properties besides its length, you can verify that with this line: new Array(1).hasOwnProperty(0), which returns false.



    Looking at 15.4.4.19 Array.prototype.map you can see, at 7.3, there's a check whether a key exists in the array.



    1..6. [...]

    7. Repeat,
    while k < len





    1. Let
      Pk be ToString(k).





    2. Let
      kPresent be the result of calling the [[HasProperty]]
      internal method of O with argument Pk.




    3. If
      kPresent is true, then



      1. Let
        kValue be the result of calling the [[Get]] internal
        method of O with argument Pk.





      2. Let
        mappedValue be the result of calling the [[Call]] internal
        method of callbackfn with T as the this
        value and argument list containing kValue, k, and
        O.





      3. Call
        the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method of A with
        arguments Pk, Property Descriptor {[[Value]]: mappedValue,
        [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: true,
        [[Configurable]]: true}, and false.







    4. Increase
      k by 1.




    9. Return A.




    share|improve this answer





























      0














      As pointed out already, Array(2) will only create an array of two empty slots which cannot be mapped over.



      As far as some and every are concerned, Array(2) is indeed an empty array:



      Array(2).some(() => 1 > 0); //=> false
      Array(2).every(() => 1 < 0); //=> true


      However this array of empty slots can somehow be "iterated" on:



      .join(','); //=> ''
      Array(2).join(','); //=> ','

      JSON.stringify() //=> ''
      JSON.stringify(Array(2)) //=> '[null,null]'


      So we can take that knowledge to come up with interesting and somewhat ironic ways to use ES5 array functions on such "empty" arrays.



      You've come up with that one yourself:



      [...Array(2)].map(foo);


      A variation of a suggestion from @charlietfl:



      Array(2).fill().map(foo);


      Personally I'd recommend this one:



      Array.from(Array(2)).map(foo);


      A bit old school:



      Array.apply(null, Array(2)).map(foo);


      This one is quite verbose:



      Array(2).join(',').split(',').map(foo);





      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        });
        });
        }, "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53491943%2fwhy-do-i-need-to-copy-an-array-to-use-a-method-on-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        37














        When you use Array(arrayLength) to create an array, you will have:




        a new JavaScript array with its length property set to that number (Note: this implies an array of arrayLength empty slots, not slots with actual undefined values).




        The array does not actually contain any values, not even undefined values - it simply has a length property.



        When you spread an item with a length property into an array, eg [...{ length: 4 }], spread syntax accesses each index and sets the value at that index in the new array. For example:






        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        And .map only maps properties/values for which the property actually exists in the array you're mapping over.



        Using the array constructor is confusing. I would suggest using Array.from instead, when creating arrays from scratch - you can pass it an object with a length property, as well as a mapping function:






        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);








        share|improve this answer





















        • I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
          – cham
          Nov 27 at 2:45












        • It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
          – CertainPerformance
          Nov 27 at 2:46
















        37














        When you use Array(arrayLength) to create an array, you will have:




        a new JavaScript array with its length property set to that number (Note: this implies an array of arrayLength empty slots, not slots with actual undefined values).




        The array does not actually contain any values, not even undefined values - it simply has a length property.



        When you spread an item with a length property into an array, eg [...{ length: 4 }], spread syntax accesses each index and sets the value at that index in the new array. For example:






        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        And .map only maps properties/values for which the property actually exists in the array you're mapping over.



        Using the array constructor is confusing. I would suggest using Array.from instead, when creating arrays from scratch - you can pass it an object with a length property, as well as a mapping function:






        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);








        share|improve this answer





















        • I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
          – cham
          Nov 27 at 2:45












        • It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
          – CertainPerformance
          Nov 27 at 2:46














        37












        37








        37






        When you use Array(arrayLength) to create an array, you will have:




        a new JavaScript array with its length property set to that number (Note: this implies an array of arrayLength empty slots, not slots with actual undefined values).




        The array does not actually contain any values, not even undefined values - it simply has a length property.



        When you spread an item with a length property into an array, eg [...{ length: 4 }], spread syntax accesses each index and sets the value at that index in the new array. For example:






        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        And .map only maps properties/values for which the property actually exists in the array you're mapping over.



        Using the array constructor is confusing. I would suggest using Array.from instead, when creating arrays from scratch - you can pass it an object with a length property, as well as a mapping function:






        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);








        share|improve this answer












        When you use Array(arrayLength) to create an array, you will have:




        a new JavaScript array with its length property set to that number (Note: this implies an array of arrayLength empty slots, not slots with actual undefined values).




        The array does not actually contain any values, not even undefined values - it simply has a length property.



        When you spread an item with a length property into an array, eg [...{ length: 4 }], spread syntax accesses each index and sets the value at that index in the new array. For example:






        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        And .map only maps properties/values for which the property actually exists in the array you're mapping over.



        Using the array constructor is confusing. I would suggest using Array.from instead, when creating arrays from scratch - you can pass it an object with a length property, as well as a mapping function:






        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);








        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        const arr1 = ;
        arr1.length = 4;
        // arr1 does not actually have any index properties:
        console.log('1' in arr1);

        const arr2 = [...arr1];
        console.log(arr2);
        console.log('2' in arr2);





        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);





        const arr = Array.from(
        { length: 2 },
        () => 'foo'
        );
        console.log(arr);






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 27 at 2:42









        CertainPerformance

        75.3k143659




        75.3k143659












        • I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
          – cham
          Nov 27 at 2:45












        • It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
          – CertainPerformance
          Nov 27 at 2:46


















        • I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
          – cham
          Nov 27 at 2:45












        • It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
          – CertainPerformance
          Nov 27 at 2:46
















        I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
        – cham
        Nov 27 at 2:45






        I saw Array() in a course and it reminded me of something useful in Python, But sadly it's maybe it's not so useful. Cheers.
        – cham
        Nov 27 at 2:45














        It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
        – CertainPerformance
        Nov 27 at 2:46




        It used to be a decent option, before Array.from was available, but now I don't think there's any reason to use it, it has too much potential for confusion.
        – CertainPerformance
        Nov 27 at 2:46













        8














        The reason is that the array element is unassigned. See here the first paragraph of the description. ... callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values, including undefined.



        Consider:



        var array1 = Array(2);
        array1[0] = undefined;

        // pass a function to map
        const map1 = array1.map(x => x * 2);

        console.log(array1);
        console.log(map1);


        Outputs:



        Array [undefined, undefined]
        Array [NaN, undefined]


        When the array is printed each of its elements are interrogated. The first has been assigned undefined the other is defaulted to undefined.



        The mapping operation calls the mapping operation for the first element because it has been defined (through assignment). It does not call the mapping operation for the second argument, and simply passes out undefined.






        share|improve this answer


























          8














          The reason is that the array element is unassigned. See here the first paragraph of the description. ... callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values, including undefined.



          Consider:



          var array1 = Array(2);
          array1[0] = undefined;

          // pass a function to map
          const map1 = array1.map(x => x * 2);

          console.log(array1);
          console.log(map1);


          Outputs:



          Array [undefined, undefined]
          Array [NaN, undefined]


          When the array is printed each of its elements are interrogated. The first has been assigned undefined the other is defaulted to undefined.



          The mapping operation calls the mapping operation for the first element because it has been defined (through assignment). It does not call the mapping operation for the second argument, and simply passes out undefined.






          share|improve this answer
























            8












            8








            8






            The reason is that the array element is unassigned. See here the first paragraph of the description. ... callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values, including undefined.



            Consider:



            var array1 = Array(2);
            array1[0] = undefined;

            // pass a function to map
            const map1 = array1.map(x => x * 2);

            console.log(array1);
            console.log(map1);


            Outputs:



            Array [undefined, undefined]
            Array [NaN, undefined]


            When the array is printed each of its elements are interrogated. The first has been assigned undefined the other is defaulted to undefined.



            The mapping operation calls the mapping operation for the first element because it has been defined (through assignment). It does not call the mapping operation for the second argument, and simply passes out undefined.






            share|improve this answer












            The reason is that the array element is unassigned. See here the first paragraph of the description. ... callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values, including undefined.



            Consider:



            var array1 = Array(2);
            array1[0] = undefined;

            // pass a function to map
            const map1 = array1.map(x => x * 2);

            console.log(array1);
            console.log(map1);


            Outputs:



            Array [undefined, undefined]
            Array [NaN, undefined]


            When the array is printed each of its elements are interrogated. The first has been assigned undefined the other is defaulted to undefined.



            The mapping operation calls the mapping operation for the first element because it has been defined (through assignment). It does not call the mapping operation for the second argument, and simply passes out undefined.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 27 at 2:54









            Kain0_0

            2142




            2142























                0














                As pointed out by @CertainPerformance, your array doesn't have any properties besides its length, you can verify that with this line: new Array(1).hasOwnProperty(0), which returns false.



                Looking at 15.4.4.19 Array.prototype.map you can see, at 7.3, there's a check whether a key exists in the array.



                1..6. [...]

                7. Repeat,
                while k < len





                1. Let
                  Pk be ToString(k).





                2. Let
                  kPresent be the result of calling the [[HasProperty]]
                  internal method of O with argument Pk.




                3. If
                  kPresent is true, then



                  1. Let
                    kValue be the result of calling the [[Get]] internal
                    method of O with argument Pk.





                  2. Let
                    mappedValue be the result of calling the [[Call]] internal
                    method of callbackfn with T as the this
                    value and argument list containing kValue, k, and
                    O.





                  3. Call
                    the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method of A with
                    arguments Pk, Property Descriptor {[[Value]]: mappedValue,
                    [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: true,
                    [[Configurable]]: true}, and false.







                4. Increase
                  k by 1.




                9. Return A.




                share|improve this answer


























                  0














                  As pointed out by @CertainPerformance, your array doesn't have any properties besides its length, you can verify that with this line: new Array(1).hasOwnProperty(0), which returns false.



                  Looking at 15.4.4.19 Array.prototype.map you can see, at 7.3, there's a check whether a key exists in the array.



                  1..6. [...]

                  7. Repeat,
                  while k < len





                  1. Let
                    Pk be ToString(k).





                  2. Let
                    kPresent be the result of calling the [[HasProperty]]
                    internal method of O with argument Pk.




                  3. If
                    kPresent is true, then



                    1. Let
                      kValue be the result of calling the [[Get]] internal
                      method of O with argument Pk.





                    2. Let
                      mappedValue be the result of calling the [[Call]] internal
                      method of callbackfn with T as the this
                      value and argument list containing kValue, k, and
                      O.





                    3. Call
                      the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method of A with
                      arguments Pk, Property Descriptor {[[Value]]: mappedValue,
                      [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: true,
                      [[Configurable]]: true}, and false.







                  4. Increase
                    k by 1.




                  9. Return A.




                  share|improve this answer
























                    0












                    0








                    0






                    As pointed out by @CertainPerformance, your array doesn't have any properties besides its length, you can verify that with this line: new Array(1).hasOwnProperty(0), which returns false.



                    Looking at 15.4.4.19 Array.prototype.map you can see, at 7.3, there's a check whether a key exists in the array.



                    1..6. [...]

                    7. Repeat,
                    while k < len





                    1. Let
                      Pk be ToString(k).





                    2. Let
                      kPresent be the result of calling the [[HasProperty]]
                      internal method of O with argument Pk.




                    3. If
                      kPresent is true, then



                      1. Let
                        kValue be the result of calling the [[Get]] internal
                        method of O with argument Pk.





                      2. Let
                        mappedValue be the result of calling the [[Call]] internal
                        method of callbackfn with T as the this
                        value and argument list containing kValue, k, and
                        O.





                      3. Call
                        the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method of A with
                        arguments Pk, Property Descriptor {[[Value]]: mappedValue,
                        [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: true,
                        [[Configurable]]: true}, and false.







                    4. Increase
                      k by 1.




                    9. Return A.




                    share|improve this answer












                    As pointed out by @CertainPerformance, your array doesn't have any properties besides its length, you can verify that with this line: new Array(1).hasOwnProperty(0), which returns false.



                    Looking at 15.4.4.19 Array.prototype.map you can see, at 7.3, there's a check whether a key exists in the array.



                    1..6. [...]

                    7. Repeat,
                    while k < len





                    1. Let
                      Pk be ToString(k).





                    2. Let
                      kPresent be the result of calling the [[HasProperty]]
                      internal method of O with argument Pk.




                    3. If
                      kPresent is true, then



                      1. Let
                        kValue be the result of calling the [[Get]] internal
                        method of O with argument Pk.





                      2. Let
                        mappedValue be the result of calling the [[Call]] internal
                        method of callbackfn with T as the this
                        value and argument list containing kValue, k, and
                        O.





                      3. Call
                        the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method of A with
                        arguments Pk, Property Descriptor {[[Value]]: mappedValue,
                        [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: true,
                        [[Configurable]]: true}, and false.







                    4. Increase
                      k by 1.




                    9. Return A.





                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 27 at 8:59









                    Moritz Roessler

                    6,2571646




                    6,2571646























                        0














                        As pointed out already, Array(2) will only create an array of two empty slots which cannot be mapped over.



                        As far as some and every are concerned, Array(2) is indeed an empty array:



                        Array(2).some(() => 1 > 0); //=> false
                        Array(2).every(() => 1 < 0); //=> true


                        However this array of empty slots can somehow be "iterated" on:



                        .join(','); //=> ''
                        Array(2).join(','); //=> ','

                        JSON.stringify() //=> ''
                        JSON.stringify(Array(2)) //=> '[null,null]'


                        So we can take that knowledge to come up with interesting and somewhat ironic ways to use ES5 array functions on such "empty" arrays.



                        You've come up with that one yourself:



                        [...Array(2)].map(foo);


                        A variation of a suggestion from @charlietfl:



                        Array(2).fill().map(foo);


                        Personally I'd recommend this one:



                        Array.from(Array(2)).map(foo);


                        A bit old school:



                        Array.apply(null, Array(2)).map(foo);


                        This one is quite verbose:



                        Array(2).join(',').split(',').map(foo);





                        share|improve this answer


























                          0














                          As pointed out already, Array(2) will only create an array of two empty slots which cannot be mapped over.



                          As far as some and every are concerned, Array(2) is indeed an empty array:



                          Array(2).some(() => 1 > 0); //=> false
                          Array(2).every(() => 1 < 0); //=> true


                          However this array of empty slots can somehow be "iterated" on:



                          .join(','); //=> ''
                          Array(2).join(','); //=> ','

                          JSON.stringify() //=> ''
                          JSON.stringify(Array(2)) //=> '[null,null]'


                          So we can take that knowledge to come up with interesting and somewhat ironic ways to use ES5 array functions on such "empty" arrays.



                          You've come up with that one yourself:



                          [...Array(2)].map(foo);


                          A variation of a suggestion from @charlietfl:



                          Array(2).fill().map(foo);


                          Personally I'd recommend this one:



                          Array.from(Array(2)).map(foo);


                          A bit old school:



                          Array.apply(null, Array(2)).map(foo);


                          This one is quite verbose:



                          Array(2).join(',').split(',').map(foo);





                          share|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            As pointed out already, Array(2) will only create an array of two empty slots which cannot be mapped over.



                            As far as some and every are concerned, Array(2) is indeed an empty array:



                            Array(2).some(() => 1 > 0); //=> false
                            Array(2).every(() => 1 < 0); //=> true


                            However this array of empty slots can somehow be "iterated" on:



                            .join(','); //=> ''
                            Array(2).join(','); //=> ','

                            JSON.stringify() //=> ''
                            JSON.stringify(Array(2)) //=> '[null,null]'


                            So we can take that knowledge to come up with interesting and somewhat ironic ways to use ES5 array functions on such "empty" arrays.



                            You've come up with that one yourself:



                            [...Array(2)].map(foo);


                            A variation of a suggestion from @charlietfl:



                            Array(2).fill().map(foo);


                            Personally I'd recommend this one:



                            Array.from(Array(2)).map(foo);


                            A bit old school:



                            Array.apply(null, Array(2)).map(foo);


                            This one is quite verbose:



                            Array(2).join(',').split(',').map(foo);





                            share|improve this answer












                            As pointed out already, Array(2) will only create an array of two empty slots which cannot be mapped over.



                            As far as some and every are concerned, Array(2) is indeed an empty array:



                            Array(2).some(() => 1 > 0); //=> false
                            Array(2).every(() => 1 < 0); //=> true


                            However this array of empty slots can somehow be "iterated" on:



                            .join(','); //=> ''
                            Array(2).join(','); //=> ','

                            JSON.stringify() //=> ''
                            JSON.stringify(Array(2)) //=> '[null,null]'


                            So we can take that knowledge to come up with interesting and somewhat ironic ways to use ES5 array functions on such "empty" arrays.



                            You've come up with that one yourself:



                            [...Array(2)].map(foo);


                            A variation of a suggestion from @charlietfl:



                            Array(2).fill().map(foo);


                            Personally I'd recommend this one:



                            Array.from(Array(2)).map(foo);


                            A bit old school:



                            Array.apply(null, Array(2)).map(foo);


                            This one is quite verbose:



                            Array(2).join(',').split(',').map(foo);






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 18 at 0:25









                            customcommander

                            1,195617




                            1,195617






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53491943%2fwhy-do-i-need-to-copy-an-array-to-use-a-method-on-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bundesstraße 106

                                Verónica Boquete

                                Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten