Show that two cardioids $r=a(1+costheta)$ and $r=a(1-costheta)$ are at right angles.












3












$begingroup$


Show that two cardioids $r=a(1+costheta)$ and $r=a(1-costheta)$ are at right angles.





$frac{dr}{dtheta}=-asintheta$ for the first curve and $frac{dr}{dtheta}=asintheta$ for the second curve but i dont know how to prove them perpendicular.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Show that two cardioids $r=a(1+costheta)$ and $r=a(1-costheta)$ are at right angles.





    $frac{dr}{dtheta}=-asintheta$ for the first curve and $frac{dr}{dtheta}=asintheta$ for the second curve but i dont know how to prove them perpendicular.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      Show that two cardioids $r=a(1+costheta)$ and $r=a(1-costheta)$ are at right angles.





      $frac{dr}{dtheta}=-asintheta$ for the first curve and $frac{dr}{dtheta}=asintheta$ for the second curve but i dont know how to prove them perpendicular.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Show that two cardioids $r=a(1+costheta)$ and $r=a(1-costheta)$ are at right angles.





      $frac{dr}{dtheta}=-asintheta$ for the first curve and $frac{dr}{dtheta}=asintheta$ for the second curve but i dont know how to prove them perpendicular.







      calculus derivatives analytic-geometry polar-coordinates parametrization






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 11 '18 at 12:50









      Batominovski

      33.1k33293




      33.1k33293










      asked Dec 11 '18 at 12:12









      user984325user984325

      246112




      246112






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Since $(x,y)=(rcostheta,rsintheta)$, the 2 curves can be given parametrically as



          begin{align}
          vec{r}_1 &= big(a(1+costheta)costheta,a(1+costheta)sinthetabig) \
          vec{r}_2 &= big(a(1-costheta)costheta,a(1-costheta)sinthetabig)
          end{align}



          Their tangent vectors are



          begin{align}
          vec{r}_1' &= big(a(-sintheta - sin2theta),a(costheta + cos2theta) big) \
          vec{r}_2' &= big(a(-sintheta + sin2theta),a(costheta - cos2theta) big)
          end{align}



          Then
          $$ vec{r}_1' cdot vec{r}_2' = a^2(sin^2theta - sin^2 2theta) + a^2(cos^2theta - cos^2 2theta) = 0 $$



          i.e. $vec{r}_1'perp vec{r}_2' $





          Alternatively, you can use



          $$ frac{dy}{dx} = frac{frac{dx}{dtheta}}{frac{dy}{dtheta}} = frac{frac{dr}{dtheta}costheta - rsintheta}{frac{dr}{dtheta}sintheta + rcostheta} $$



          to compute the tangent slopes that way






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            3












            $begingroup$

            Solution 1 : take a look at the following figure :



            enter image description here



            Representing the two cardioids we are working on and 2 circles described by $z=frac12(1+e^{i theta})$ and $z=frac12(i+ie^{i theta})$.



            The 2 circles are orthogonal ; the cardioids being the images of these circles by conformal transformation $z to z^2$ (red circle gives magenta cardioid, cyan circle gives blue cardioid), the orthogonality is preserved.



            Solution 2 : Sometimes, one of the best methods for studying a polar curve $r=r(theta)$ is to come back to its equivalent parametric representation under the form



            $$x=r(theta)cos theta, y=r(theta)sin(theta)tag{1}$$



            In particular, (1) permits to obtain easily the polar angle made by a tangent to a curve $r=r(theta)$ with the horizontal axis :



            $$frac{dy}{dx} = frac{dy(theta)}{dtheta}/frac{dx(theta)}{dtheta}= frac{r'(theta)sin theta+r(theta)cos(theta)}{r'(theta)cos theta-r(theta)sin(theta)}=frac{r'(theta)tan theta+r(theta)}{r'(theta)-r(theta)tan(theta)} .tag{1}$$



            Besides, the condition for orthogonality of two curves at a certain intersection point $I$ is that the product of the slopes of their tangents at this point is $-1$, i.e.,



            $$frac{dy_1}{dx} frac{dy_2}{dx}=-1$$



            I think you have now all the ingredients for being able to terminate.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Take a look to my second solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Jean Marie
              Dec 13 '18 at 14:47










            • $begingroup$
              +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
              $endgroup$
              – Nosrati
              Dec 13 '18 at 18:31



















            2












            $begingroup$

            The angle between tangent line and a ray from pole of a polar curve is
            $$tanpsi=dfrac{r}{r'}$$
            then for these curves in every $theta$ on curves
            $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_1}{r'_1}=dfrac{a(1-costheta)}{asintheta}=tandfrac{theta}{2}$$
            $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_2}{r'_2}=dfrac{a(1+costheta)}{-asintheta}=-cotdfrac{theta}{2}$$
            therefore
            $$tanpsi_1tanpsi_2=-1$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
              $endgroup$
              – Jean Marie
              Dec 11 '18 at 17:22










            • $begingroup$
              @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
              $endgroup$
              – Nosrati
              Dec 11 '18 at 19:16












            • $begingroup$
              I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
              $endgroup$
              – Jean Marie
              Dec 13 '18 at 15:31











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035228%2fshow-that-two-cardioids-r-a1-cos-theta-and-r-a1-cos-theta-are-at-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Since $(x,y)=(rcostheta,rsintheta)$, the 2 curves can be given parametrically as



            begin{align}
            vec{r}_1 &= big(a(1+costheta)costheta,a(1+costheta)sinthetabig) \
            vec{r}_2 &= big(a(1-costheta)costheta,a(1-costheta)sinthetabig)
            end{align}



            Their tangent vectors are



            begin{align}
            vec{r}_1' &= big(a(-sintheta - sin2theta),a(costheta + cos2theta) big) \
            vec{r}_2' &= big(a(-sintheta + sin2theta),a(costheta - cos2theta) big)
            end{align}



            Then
            $$ vec{r}_1' cdot vec{r}_2' = a^2(sin^2theta - sin^2 2theta) + a^2(cos^2theta - cos^2 2theta) = 0 $$



            i.e. $vec{r}_1'perp vec{r}_2' $





            Alternatively, you can use



            $$ frac{dy}{dx} = frac{frac{dx}{dtheta}}{frac{dy}{dtheta}} = frac{frac{dr}{dtheta}costheta - rsintheta}{frac{dr}{dtheta}sintheta + rcostheta} $$



            to compute the tangent slopes that way






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Since $(x,y)=(rcostheta,rsintheta)$, the 2 curves can be given parametrically as



              begin{align}
              vec{r}_1 &= big(a(1+costheta)costheta,a(1+costheta)sinthetabig) \
              vec{r}_2 &= big(a(1-costheta)costheta,a(1-costheta)sinthetabig)
              end{align}



              Their tangent vectors are



              begin{align}
              vec{r}_1' &= big(a(-sintheta - sin2theta),a(costheta + cos2theta) big) \
              vec{r}_2' &= big(a(-sintheta + sin2theta),a(costheta - cos2theta) big)
              end{align}



              Then
              $$ vec{r}_1' cdot vec{r}_2' = a^2(sin^2theta - sin^2 2theta) + a^2(cos^2theta - cos^2 2theta) = 0 $$



              i.e. $vec{r}_1'perp vec{r}_2' $





              Alternatively, you can use



              $$ frac{dy}{dx} = frac{frac{dx}{dtheta}}{frac{dy}{dtheta}} = frac{frac{dr}{dtheta}costheta - rsintheta}{frac{dr}{dtheta}sintheta + rcostheta} $$



              to compute the tangent slopes that way






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Since $(x,y)=(rcostheta,rsintheta)$, the 2 curves can be given parametrically as



                begin{align}
                vec{r}_1 &= big(a(1+costheta)costheta,a(1+costheta)sinthetabig) \
                vec{r}_2 &= big(a(1-costheta)costheta,a(1-costheta)sinthetabig)
                end{align}



                Their tangent vectors are



                begin{align}
                vec{r}_1' &= big(a(-sintheta - sin2theta),a(costheta + cos2theta) big) \
                vec{r}_2' &= big(a(-sintheta + sin2theta),a(costheta - cos2theta) big)
                end{align}



                Then
                $$ vec{r}_1' cdot vec{r}_2' = a^2(sin^2theta - sin^2 2theta) + a^2(cos^2theta - cos^2 2theta) = 0 $$



                i.e. $vec{r}_1'perp vec{r}_2' $





                Alternatively, you can use



                $$ frac{dy}{dx} = frac{frac{dx}{dtheta}}{frac{dy}{dtheta}} = frac{frac{dr}{dtheta}costheta - rsintheta}{frac{dr}{dtheta}sintheta + rcostheta} $$



                to compute the tangent slopes that way






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Since $(x,y)=(rcostheta,rsintheta)$, the 2 curves can be given parametrically as



                begin{align}
                vec{r}_1 &= big(a(1+costheta)costheta,a(1+costheta)sinthetabig) \
                vec{r}_2 &= big(a(1-costheta)costheta,a(1-costheta)sinthetabig)
                end{align}



                Their tangent vectors are



                begin{align}
                vec{r}_1' &= big(a(-sintheta - sin2theta),a(costheta + cos2theta) big) \
                vec{r}_2' &= big(a(-sintheta + sin2theta),a(costheta - cos2theta) big)
                end{align}



                Then
                $$ vec{r}_1' cdot vec{r}_2' = a^2(sin^2theta - sin^2 2theta) + a^2(cos^2theta - cos^2 2theta) = 0 $$



                i.e. $vec{r}_1'perp vec{r}_2' $





                Alternatively, you can use



                $$ frac{dy}{dx} = frac{frac{dx}{dtheta}}{frac{dy}{dtheta}} = frac{frac{dr}{dtheta}costheta - rsintheta}{frac{dr}{dtheta}sintheta + rcostheta} $$



                to compute the tangent slopes that way







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 11 '18 at 12:34









                DylanDylan

                12.9k31027




                12.9k31027























                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Solution 1 : take a look at the following figure :



                    enter image description here



                    Representing the two cardioids we are working on and 2 circles described by $z=frac12(1+e^{i theta})$ and $z=frac12(i+ie^{i theta})$.



                    The 2 circles are orthogonal ; the cardioids being the images of these circles by conformal transformation $z to z^2$ (red circle gives magenta cardioid, cyan circle gives blue cardioid), the orthogonality is preserved.



                    Solution 2 : Sometimes, one of the best methods for studying a polar curve $r=r(theta)$ is to come back to its equivalent parametric representation under the form



                    $$x=r(theta)cos theta, y=r(theta)sin(theta)tag{1}$$



                    In particular, (1) permits to obtain easily the polar angle made by a tangent to a curve $r=r(theta)$ with the horizontal axis :



                    $$frac{dy}{dx} = frac{dy(theta)}{dtheta}/frac{dx(theta)}{dtheta}= frac{r'(theta)sin theta+r(theta)cos(theta)}{r'(theta)cos theta-r(theta)sin(theta)}=frac{r'(theta)tan theta+r(theta)}{r'(theta)-r(theta)tan(theta)} .tag{1}$$



                    Besides, the condition for orthogonality of two curves at a certain intersection point $I$ is that the product of the slopes of their tangents at this point is $-1$, i.e.,



                    $$frac{dy_1}{dx} frac{dy_2}{dx}=-1$$



                    I think you have now all the ingredients for being able to terminate.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Take a look to my second solution.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 14:47










                    • $begingroup$
                      +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Solution 1 : take a look at the following figure :



                    enter image description here



                    Representing the two cardioids we are working on and 2 circles described by $z=frac12(1+e^{i theta})$ and $z=frac12(i+ie^{i theta})$.



                    The 2 circles are orthogonal ; the cardioids being the images of these circles by conformal transformation $z to z^2$ (red circle gives magenta cardioid, cyan circle gives blue cardioid), the orthogonality is preserved.



                    Solution 2 : Sometimes, one of the best methods for studying a polar curve $r=r(theta)$ is to come back to its equivalent parametric representation under the form



                    $$x=r(theta)cos theta, y=r(theta)sin(theta)tag{1}$$



                    In particular, (1) permits to obtain easily the polar angle made by a tangent to a curve $r=r(theta)$ with the horizontal axis :



                    $$frac{dy}{dx} = frac{dy(theta)}{dtheta}/frac{dx(theta)}{dtheta}= frac{r'(theta)sin theta+r(theta)cos(theta)}{r'(theta)cos theta-r(theta)sin(theta)}=frac{r'(theta)tan theta+r(theta)}{r'(theta)-r(theta)tan(theta)} .tag{1}$$



                    Besides, the condition for orthogonality of two curves at a certain intersection point $I$ is that the product of the slopes of their tangents at this point is $-1$, i.e.,



                    $$frac{dy_1}{dx} frac{dy_2}{dx}=-1$$



                    I think you have now all the ingredients for being able to terminate.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Take a look to my second solution.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 14:47










                    • $begingroup$
                      +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 13 '18 at 18:31














                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    Solution 1 : take a look at the following figure :



                    enter image description here



                    Representing the two cardioids we are working on and 2 circles described by $z=frac12(1+e^{i theta})$ and $z=frac12(i+ie^{i theta})$.



                    The 2 circles are orthogonal ; the cardioids being the images of these circles by conformal transformation $z to z^2$ (red circle gives magenta cardioid, cyan circle gives blue cardioid), the orthogonality is preserved.



                    Solution 2 : Sometimes, one of the best methods for studying a polar curve $r=r(theta)$ is to come back to its equivalent parametric representation under the form



                    $$x=r(theta)cos theta, y=r(theta)sin(theta)tag{1}$$



                    In particular, (1) permits to obtain easily the polar angle made by a tangent to a curve $r=r(theta)$ with the horizontal axis :



                    $$frac{dy}{dx} = frac{dy(theta)}{dtheta}/frac{dx(theta)}{dtheta}= frac{r'(theta)sin theta+r(theta)cos(theta)}{r'(theta)cos theta-r(theta)sin(theta)}=frac{r'(theta)tan theta+r(theta)}{r'(theta)-r(theta)tan(theta)} .tag{1}$$



                    Besides, the condition for orthogonality of two curves at a certain intersection point $I$ is that the product of the slopes of their tangents at this point is $-1$, i.e.,



                    $$frac{dy_1}{dx} frac{dy_2}{dx}=-1$$



                    I think you have now all the ingredients for being able to terminate.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Solution 1 : take a look at the following figure :



                    enter image description here



                    Representing the two cardioids we are working on and 2 circles described by $z=frac12(1+e^{i theta})$ and $z=frac12(i+ie^{i theta})$.



                    The 2 circles are orthogonal ; the cardioids being the images of these circles by conformal transformation $z to z^2$ (red circle gives magenta cardioid, cyan circle gives blue cardioid), the orthogonality is preserved.



                    Solution 2 : Sometimes, one of the best methods for studying a polar curve $r=r(theta)$ is to come back to its equivalent parametric representation under the form



                    $$x=r(theta)cos theta, y=r(theta)sin(theta)tag{1}$$



                    In particular, (1) permits to obtain easily the polar angle made by a tangent to a curve $r=r(theta)$ with the horizontal axis :



                    $$frac{dy}{dx} = frac{dy(theta)}{dtheta}/frac{dx(theta)}{dtheta}= frac{r'(theta)sin theta+r(theta)cos(theta)}{r'(theta)cos theta-r(theta)sin(theta)}=frac{r'(theta)tan theta+r(theta)}{r'(theta)-r(theta)tan(theta)} .tag{1}$$



                    Besides, the condition for orthogonality of two curves at a certain intersection point $I$ is that the product of the slopes of their tangents at this point is $-1$, i.e.,



                    $$frac{dy_1}{dx} frac{dy_2}{dx}=-1$$



                    I think you have now all the ingredients for being able to terminate.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 13 '18 at 14:46

























                    answered Dec 11 '18 at 12:46









                    Jean MarieJean Marie

                    29.9k42051




                    29.9k42051












                    • $begingroup$
                      Take a look to my second solution.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 14:47










                    • $begingroup$
                      +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 13 '18 at 18:31


















                    • $begingroup$
                      Take a look to my second solution.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 14:47










                    • $begingroup$
                      +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 13 '18 at 18:31
















                    $begingroup$
                    Take a look to my second solution.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 13 '18 at 14:47




                    $begingroup$
                    Take a look to my second solution.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 13 '18 at 14:47












                    $begingroup$
                    +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosrati
                    Dec 13 '18 at 18:31




                    $begingroup$
                    +1. Your description with complex form is great :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosrati
                    Dec 13 '18 at 18:31











                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    The angle between tangent line and a ray from pole of a polar curve is
                    $$tanpsi=dfrac{r}{r'}$$
                    then for these curves in every $theta$ on curves
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_1}{r'_1}=dfrac{a(1-costheta)}{asintheta}=tandfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_2}{r'_2}=dfrac{a(1+costheta)}{-asintheta}=-cotdfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    therefore
                    $$tanpsi_1tanpsi_2=-1$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 11 '18 at 17:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 11 '18 at 19:16












                    • $begingroup$
                      I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 15:31
















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    The angle between tangent line and a ray from pole of a polar curve is
                    $$tanpsi=dfrac{r}{r'}$$
                    then for these curves in every $theta$ on curves
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_1}{r'_1}=dfrac{a(1-costheta)}{asintheta}=tandfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_2}{r'_2}=dfrac{a(1+costheta)}{-asintheta}=-cotdfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    therefore
                    $$tanpsi_1tanpsi_2=-1$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 11 '18 at 17:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 11 '18 at 19:16












                    • $begingroup$
                      I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 15:31














                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    The angle between tangent line and a ray from pole of a polar curve is
                    $$tanpsi=dfrac{r}{r'}$$
                    then for these curves in every $theta$ on curves
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_1}{r'_1}=dfrac{a(1-costheta)}{asintheta}=tandfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_2}{r'_2}=dfrac{a(1+costheta)}{-asintheta}=-cotdfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    therefore
                    $$tanpsi_1tanpsi_2=-1$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    The angle between tangent line and a ray from pole of a polar curve is
                    $$tanpsi=dfrac{r}{r'}$$
                    then for these curves in every $theta$ on curves
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_1}{r'_1}=dfrac{a(1-costheta)}{asintheta}=tandfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    $$tanpsi_1=dfrac{r_2}{r'_2}=dfrac{a(1+costheta)}{-asintheta}=-cotdfrac{theta}{2}$$
                    therefore
                    $$tanpsi_1tanpsi_2=-1$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 11 '18 at 13:11

























                    answered Dec 11 '18 at 12:47









                    NosratiNosrati

                    26.5k62354




                    26.5k62354












                    • $begingroup$
                      You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 11 '18 at 17:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 11 '18 at 19:16












                    • $begingroup$
                      I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 15:31


















                    • $begingroup$
                      You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 11 '18 at 17:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nosrati
                      Dec 11 '18 at 19:16












                    • $begingroup$
                      I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jean Marie
                      Dec 13 '18 at 15:31
















                    $begingroup$
                    You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 11 '18 at 17:22




                    $begingroup$
                    You are right : using formula $tan V = r/r'$ taking the polar axis (instead of the $x$ axis) as the reference axis for angles yield very simple computations. The formulas I gave (with angles referencing to $x$-axis) are more complicated, but have the advantage to be in connection with what the OP has already seen about parametrized curves.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 11 '18 at 17:22












                    $begingroup$
                    @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosrati
                    Dec 11 '18 at 19:16






                    $begingroup$
                    @JeanMarie Thank you. I appreciate your comment which verifies my answer ;)
                    $endgroup$
                    – Nosrati
                    Dec 11 '18 at 19:16














                    $begingroup$
                    I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 13 '18 at 15:31




                    $begingroup$
                    I have had the idea of a very different (and short) solution that I have "prepended" to the other one.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jean Marie
                    Dec 13 '18 at 15:31


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035228%2fshow-that-two-cardioids-r-a1-cos-theta-and-r-a1-cos-theta-are-at-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten