Impossible to have a triangle where trisectors of an angle trisect the opposite side












0












$begingroup$



Prove that there cannot exist a triangle in which the trisectors of an angle also trisect the opposite side by using proportions.




Attempt
I have started the proof by way of contradiction.



Suppose we have a triangle $Delta BAC$ with trisectors $AD$ and $A$E so that $D$ and $E$ are points lying in side $BC$. I also supposed that $D$ and $E$ trisect $BC$ such that $BD=DE=EC$. I then looked at triangle $BAE$ and observed that $AD$ bisects $angle BAE$ and that point $D$ is the midpoint of $BE$ therefore $BD$ is both a median and an angle bisector.



From this I get stuck and do not know how to apply proportions. I know we proceed similarly when looking at $Delta DAC$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Prove that there cannot exist a triangle in which the trisectors of an angle also trisect the opposite side by using proportions.




    Attempt
    I have started the proof by way of contradiction.



    Suppose we have a triangle $Delta BAC$ with trisectors $AD$ and $A$E so that $D$ and $E$ are points lying in side $BC$. I also supposed that $D$ and $E$ trisect $BC$ such that $BD=DE=EC$. I then looked at triangle $BAE$ and observed that $AD$ bisects $angle BAE$ and that point $D$ is the midpoint of $BE$ therefore $BD$ is both a median and an angle bisector.



    From this I get stuck and do not know how to apply proportions. I know we proceed similarly when looking at $Delta DAC$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Prove that there cannot exist a triangle in which the trisectors of an angle also trisect the opposite side by using proportions.




      Attempt
      I have started the proof by way of contradiction.



      Suppose we have a triangle $Delta BAC$ with trisectors $AD$ and $A$E so that $D$ and $E$ are points lying in side $BC$. I also supposed that $D$ and $E$ trisect $BC$ such that $BD=DE=EC$. I then looked at triangle $BAE$ and observed that $AD$ bisects $angle BAE$ and that point $D$ is the midpoint of $BE$ therefore $BD$ is both a median and an angle bisector.



      From this I get stuck and do not know how to apply proportions. I know we proceed similarly when looking at $Delta DAC$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Prove that there cannot exist a triangle in which the trisectors of an angle also trisect the opposite side by using proportions.




      Attempt
      I have started the proof by way of contradiction.



      Suppose we have a triangle $Delta BAC$ with trisectors $AD$ and $A$E so that $D$ and $E$ are points lying in side $BC$. I also supposed that $D$ and $E$ trisect $BC$ such that $BD=DE=EC$. I then looked at triangle $BAE$ and observed that $AD$ bisects $angle BAE$ and that point $D$ is the midpoint of $BE$ therefore $BD$ is both a median and an angle bisector.



      From this I get stuck and do not know how to apply proportions. I know we proceed similarly when looking at $Delta DAC$.







      geometry triangle






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 19 '18 at 21:36









      jayant98

      653318




      653318










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 19:27









      dhuert4 dhuert4

      63




      63






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is enough to show (through the sine theorem, for instance) that in the following configuration the red segments are longer than the blue ones:
          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            You have a $triangle{ABC}$. Let us say that side $BC$ is trisected by points $D, E$ such as $BD=DE=EC$. Note that $A_{triangle{ACE}}=A_{triangle{AED}}=A_{triangle{ADB}}$ (equal bases, same height). Using area of a triangle formula this leads to $AC=AD$, $AE=AB$. But then $AE$ is a median and height of $triangle{ACD}$ and $AD$ is a median and height of $triangle{AED}$. We have two perpediculars from one point $A$ to side $BC$ that go to two distinct points. This is impossible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046789%2fimpossible-to-have-a-triangle-where-trisectors-of-an-angle-trisect-the-opposite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              It is enough to show (through the sine theorem, for instance) that in the following configuration the red segments are longer than the blue ones:
              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                It is enough to show (through the sine theorem, for instance) that in the following configuration the red segments are longer than the blue ones:
                enter image description here






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  It is enough to show (through the sine theorem, for instance) that in the following configuration the red segments are longer than the blue ones:
                  enter image description here






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It is enough to show (through the sine theorem, for instance) that in the following configuration the red segments are longer than the blue ones:
                  enter image description here







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 19 '18 at 19:45









                  Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

                  291k33284669




                  291k33284669























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      You have a $triangle{ABC}$. Let us say that side $BC$ is trisected by points $D, E$ such as $BD=DE=EC$. Note that $A_{triangle{ACE}}=A_{triangle{AED}}=A_{triangle{ADB}}$ (equal bases, same height). Using area of a triangle formula this leads to $AC=AD$, $AE=AB$. But then $AE$ is a median and height of $triangle{ACD}$ and $AD$ is a median and height of $triangle{AED}$. We have two perpediculars from one point $A$ to side $BC$ that go to two distinct points. This is impossible.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        You have a $triangle{ABC}$. Let us say that side $BC$ is trisected by points $D, E$ such as $BD=DE=EC$. Note that $A_{triangle{ACE}}=A_{triangle{AED}}=A_{triangle{ADB}}$ (equal bases, same height). Using area of a triangle formula this leads to $AC=AD$, $AE=AB$. But then $AE$ is a median and height of $triangle{ACD}$ and $AD$ is a median and height of $triangle{AED}$. We have two perpediculars from one point $A$ to side $BC$ that go to two distinct points. This is impossible.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          You have a $triangle{ABC}$. Let us say that side $BC$ is trisected by points $D, E$ such as $BD=DE=EC$. Note that $A_{triangle{ACE}}=A_{triangle{AED}}=A_{triangle{ADB}}$ (equal bases, same height). Using area of a triangle formula this leads to $AC=AD$, $AE=AB$. But then $AE$ is a median and height of $triangle{ACD}$ and $AD$ is a median and height of $triangle{AED}$. We have two perpediculars from one point $A$ to side $BC$ that go to two distinct points. This is impossible.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          You have a $triangle{ABC}$. Let us say that side $BC$ is trisected by points $D, E$ such as $BD=DE=EC$. Note that $A_{triangle{ACE}}=A_{triangle{AED}}=A_{triangle{ADB}}$ (equal bases, same height). Using area of a triangle formula this leads to $AC=AD$, $AE=AB$. But then $AE$ is a median and height of $triangle{ACD}$ and $AD$ is a median and height of $triangle{AED}$. We have two perpediculars from one point $A$ to side $BC$ that go to two distinct points. This is impossible.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 19 '18 at 19:51









                          VasyaVasya

                          4,1081618




                          4,1081618






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046789%2fimpossible-to-have-a-triangle-where-trisectors-of-an-angle-trisect-the-opposite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bundesstraße 106

                              Verónica Boquete

                              Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten