Is it ok to use “aluminium” in an otherwise American English text?












2















I am not an American English native (I'm actually a German native speaker) but, when I write, I use the American style of words predominantly. However, I always use aluminium instead of aluminum, following the nomenclature that is used by all the rest of the world save for the US and Canada. It is also was the only valid IUPAC name between 1990 and 1993, since when aluminum is allowed as an acceptable variant, but IUPAC publications strive to use the official aluminium variant.



Is it ok to break with AE and choose the BE/international version with this one word only (in a non-scientific text)?



Non-scientific means in this context any text that is not a scientific publication, among others fiction or blog posts.





This is not British / American language mishmash as this one just aims at one specific instance of one specific term and not a general "mix and match". This one case also is not looked at in the other question.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

    – Galastel
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

    – eyeballfrog
    5 hours ago











  • Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

    – Alexander
    1 hour ago
















2















I am not an American English native (I'm actually a German native speaker) but, when I write, I use the American style of words predominantly. However, I always use aluminium instead of aluminum, following the nomenclature that is used by all the rest of the world save for the US and Canada. It is also was the only valid IUPAC name between 1990 and 1993, since when aluminum is allowed as an acceptable variant, but IUPAC publications strive to use the official aluminium variant.



Is it ok to break with AE and choose the BE/international version with this one word only (in a non-scientific text)?



Non-scientific means in this context any text that is not a scientific publication, among others fiction or blog posts.





This is not British / American language mishmash as this one just aims at one specific instance of one specific term and not a general "mix and match". This one case also is not looked at in the other question.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

    – Galastel
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

    – eyeballfrog
    5 hours ago











  • Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

    – Alexander
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








I am not an American English native (I'm actually a German native speaker) but, when I write, I use the American style of words predominantly. However, I always use aluminium instead of aluminum, following the nomenclature that is used by all the rest of the world save for the US and Canada. It is also was the only valid IUPAC name between 1990 and 1993, since when aluminum is allowed as an acceptable variant, but IUPAC publications strive to use the official aluminium variant.



Is it ok to break with AE and choose the BE/international version with this one word only (in a non-scientific text)?



Non-scientific means in this context any text that is not a scientific publication, among others fiction or blog posts.





This is not British / American language mishmash as this one just aims at one specific instance of one specific term and not a general "mix and match". This one case also is not looked at in the other question.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am not an American English native (I'm actually a German native speaker) but, when I write, I use the American style of words predominantly. However, I always use aluminium instead of aluminum, following the nomenclature that is used by all the rest of the world save for the US and Canada. It is also was the only valid IUPAC name between 1990 and 1993, since when aluminum is allowed as an acceptable variant, but IUPAC publications strive to use the official aluminium variant.



Is it ok to break with AE and choose the BE/international version with this one word only (in a non-scientific text)?



Non-scientific means in this context any text that is not a scientific publication, among others fiction or blog posts.





This is not British / American language mishmash as this one just aims at one specific instance of one specific term and not a general "mix and match". This one case also is not looked at in the other question.







word-choice language






share|improve this question









New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 33 mins ago







Trish













New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









TrishTrish

1115




1115




New contributor




Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Trish is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

    – Galastel
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

    – eyeballfrog
    5 hours ago











  • Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

    – Alexander
    1 hour ago



















  • Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

    – Galastel
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

    – eyeballfrog
    5 hours ago











  • Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

    – Alexander
    1 hour ago

















Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

– Galastel
7 hours ago





Possible duplicate of British / American language mishmash

– Galastel
7 hours ago




2




2





When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

– eyeballfrog
5 hours ago





When you say "non-scientific", do you mean fiction or nonfiction?

– eyeballfrog
5 hours ago













Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

– Alexander
1 hour ago





Is your text following the other sources where "aluminium" is predominately used?

– Alexander
1 hour ago










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















7














Since you have a real-world justification, why not use that same justification in your fictional setting?



If you want to make it a thing, have a character say "aluminum" and the other characters can eyeroll or correct as per their personalities.



You could also have your infodump characters be from an international organization, and thereby set the standard for communication.



You can also have the individual characters use the word they would be most comfortable with. I doubt readers would be confused any more than if you used "metre" or "colour". (I realize it is actually more than just a variant spelling, but there is little chance the meaning would be mistaken.)



My answer is the same for your narrator/narrative voice. Use what you feel is natural, or use the version that empathizes with the MC.






share|improve this answer































    3














    If it is a scientific article, or scientific text, then by all means use the most precise term. In this case that would be either Aluminium or Aluminum. Pick the one that you prefer and be consistent in your text.



    If it is for fiction or a vulgarization essay, then unless you have other reasons to do so, use the term that your readers will find most fitting. In this case that would be Aluminum.



    PS Note that precision and consistency in scientific writing is not negotiable.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

      – eyeballfrog
      6 hours ago













    • Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

      – NofP
      5 hours ago






    • 2





      @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

      – Trish
      2 hours ago





















    3














    Yes. It's your story, so it's okay. And I can't be the only American who wasn't all that aware of the difference and whose eyes gloss over the two (I can only see them as different now that you've pointed it out to me, though I was dimly aware before, and now I understand why Brits pronounce it so strangely).



    Be aware though:




    1. Your publisher may ask you to change it. Fortunately, it's a super quick change to do globally no matter how long your work.


    2. When an American looks at your text inside any program with a spellchecker, it lights up like a Christmas tree.







    share|improve this answer































      3














      In a non-scientific text (or in a scientific text, for that matter,) you should really keep it consistent. If you're otherwise using British English, then 'Aluminium' will look perfectly normal, just like 'colour' or 'metre.' However, if you're writing in American English, it will look weird, just as 'colour' or 'metre' would in an otherwise-American text.



      Unless you have some reason why the use of this spelling should actually be important to your story, using a spelling that is not consistent with the rest of your text will look jarring and will distract your reader from the story.



      Of course, if you actually want the distinction to be important in your story, then that's another matter. In that case, you can have your characters draw attention to the difference and have them discuss the use of one variety over the other.



      As a side note, mentioning that this spelling is 'only' used in the USA and Canada really doesn't help the argument much, as the same argument could be made for all of American English. (And, even if being used against all of AmE, it's still a poor argument in light of the fact that over two thirds of all native English speakers worldwide speak the American variety, not the British one.)






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




























        2














        It's a minor difference, so I wouldn't get hung up on it. If it's an issue for a publisher, it's easy to fix.
        I do a similar thing with the word "gray", because the street I grew up on had the word "grey" included in it, meaning that I always spell it wrong according to American English. Nobody aside from Microsoft Word's spellchecker has ever given me trouble-- or, I suspect, even noticed.






        share|improve this answer































          1














          (Academic Copyeditor here)



          I see no problems; you have a good justification. If this is your text (your blog, a self-published book), you're done, though you might want to add a footnote etc. to explain why you're using that spelling.



          If someone else will publish the text, you should talk to your editor AND make a note in the text. Talk to the editor because they may or may not have liberty with house style, and if it's a multi-author volume or a journal, they will want to keep things consistent. Make a note because the copyeditor may or may not notice that this is deliberate, and may or may not change it – once you flag it as deliberate, they're likely to leave it alone, respectively you can change it back if you have the editor's backing.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          • Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

            – Galastel
            44 mins ago



















          0














          Aluminum comes from the word alumina and is the name chosen by the Humphry Davy in 1812 and published throughout the world. "Aluminium" only exists because Thomas Young misspelled it. It's not a color vs colour issue.



          The US and Canada were fighting each other in a bloody war at the time, but they both received the correct spelling from across the Atlantic ocean.



          Edit:



          Aluminum is the One True Spelling of the word.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















          • 1





            So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

            – F1Krazy
            53 mins ago






          • 1





            This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

            – Galastel
            49 mins ago











          • @F1Krazy - Correct

            – IKM
            37 mins ago






          • 1





            According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

            – Trish
            19 mins ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "166"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Trish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41465%2fis-it-ok-to-use-aluminium-in-an-otherwise-american-english-text%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes








          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          Since you have a real-world justification, why not use that same justification in your fictional setting?



          If you want to make it a thing, have a character say "aluminum" and the other characters can eyeroll or correct as per their personalities.



          You could also have your infodump characters be from an international organization, and thereby set the standard for communication.



          You can also have the individual characters use the word they would be most comfortable with. I doubt readers would be confused any more than if you used "metre" or "colour". (I realize it is actually more than just a variant spelling, but there is little chance the meaning would be mistaken.)



          My answer is the same for your narrator/narrative voice. Use what you feel is natural, or use the version that empathizes with the MC.






          share|improve this answer




























            7














            Since you have a real-world justification, why not use that same justification in your fictional setting?



            If you want to make it a thing, have a character say "aluminum" and the other characters can eyeroll or correct as per their personalities.



            You could also have your infodump characters be from an international organization, and thereby set the standard for communication.



            You can also have the individual characters use the word they would be most comfortable with. I doubt readers would be confused any more than if you used "metre" or "colour". (I realize it is actually more than just a variant spelling, but there is little chance the meaning would be mistaken.)



            My answer is the same for your narrator/narrative voice. Use what you feel is natural, or use the version that empathizes with the MC.






            share|improve this answer


























              7












              7








              7







              Since you have a real-world justification, why not use that same justification in your fictional setting?



              If you want to make it a thing, have a character say "aluminum" and the other characters can eyeroll or correct as per their personalities.



              You could also have your infodump characters be from an international organization, and thereby set the standard for communication.



              You can also have the individual characters use the word they would be most comfortable with. I doubt readers would be confused any more than if you used "metre" or "colour". (I realize it is actually more than just a variant spelling, but there is little chance the meaning would be mistaken.)



              My answer is the same for your narrator/narrative voice. Use what you feel is natural, or use the version that empathizes with the MC.






              share|improve this answer













              Since you have a real-world justification, why not use that same justification in your fictional setting?



              If you want to make it a thing, have a character say "aluminum" and the other characters can eyeroll or correct as per their personalities.



              You could also have your infodump characters be from an international organization, and thereby set the standard for communication.



              You can also have the individual characters use the word they would be most comfortable with. I doubt readers would be confused any more than if you used "metre" or "colour". (I realize it is actually more than just a variant spelling, but there is little chance the meaning would be mistaken.)



              My answer is the same for your narrator/narrative voice. Use what you feel is natural, or use the version that empathizes with the MC.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 7 hours ago









              wetcircuitwetcircuit

              8,64511545




              8,64511545























                  3














                  If it is a scientific article, or scientific text, then by all means use the most precise term. In this case that would be either Aluminium or Aluminum. Pick the one that you prefer and be consistent in your text.



                  If it is for fiction or a vulgarization essay, then unless you have other reasons to do so, use the term that your readers will find most fitting. In this case that would be Aluminum.



                  PS Note that precision and consistency in scientific writing is not negotiable.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 2





                    "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                    – eyeballfrog
                    6 hours ago













                  • Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                    – NofP
                    5 hours ago






                  • 2





                    @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                    – Trish
                    2 hours ago


















                  3














                  If it is a scientific article, or scientific text, then by all means use the most precise term. In this case that would be either Aluminium or Aluminum. Pick the one that you prefer and be consistent in your text.



                  If it is for fiction or a vulgarization essay, then unless you have other reasons to do so, use the term that your readers will find most fitting. In this case that would be Aluminum.



                  PS Note that precision and consistency in scientific writing is not negotiable.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • 2





                    "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                    – eyeballfrog
                    6 hours ago













                  • Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                    – NofP
                    5 hours ago






                  • 2





                    @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                    – Trish
                    2 hours ago
















                  3












                  3








                  3







                  If it is a scientific article, or scientific text, then by all means use the most precise term. In this case that would be either Aluminium or Aluminum. Pick the one that you prefer and be consistent in your text.



                  If it is for fiction or a vulgarization essay, then unless you have other reasons to do so, use the term that your readers will find most fitting. In this case that would be Aluminum.



                  PS Note that precision and consistency in scientific writing is not negotiable.






                  share|improve this answer















                  If it is a scientific article, or scientific text, then by all means use the most precise term. In this case that would be either Aluminium or Aluminum. Pick the one that you prefer and be consistent in your text.



                  If it is for fiction or a vulgarization essay, then unless you have other reasons to do so, use the term that your readers will find most fitting. In this case that would be Aluminum.



                  PS Note that precision and consistency in scientific writing is not negotiable.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 6 hours ago









                  NofPNofP

                  1,073112




                  1,073112








                  • 2





                    "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                    – eyeballfrog
                    6 hours ago













                  • Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                    – NofP
                    5 hours ago






                  • 2





                    @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                    – Trish
                    2 hours ago
















                  • 2





                    "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                    – eyeballfrog
                    6 hours ago













                  • Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                    – NofP
                    5 hours ago






                  • 2





                    @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                    – Trish
                    2 hours ago










                  2




                  2





                  "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                  – eyeballfrog
                  6 hours ago







                  "Aluminum" is perfectly acceptable in a formal scientific context. It is unambiguous and officially accepted by IUPAC (unlike other alternate spellings like "sulphur" and "cesium"), so it is no less precise than "aluminium". Although strictly speaking what's acceptable is up to the journal editor.

                  – eyeballfrog
                  6 hours ago















                  Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                  – NofP
                  5 hours ago





                  Fair enough. I disagree on the last sentence. It is not up to the editor to define nomenclature standards.

                  – NofP
                  5 hours ago




                  2




                  2





                  @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                  – Trish
                  2 hours ago







                  @NofP The nomenclature Standard is aluminium, any publication by IUPAC reads Aluminium. It is however allowable to use aluminum and not have it rejected by other agencies.

                  – Trish
                  2 hours ago













                  3














                  Yes. It's your story, so it's okay. And I can't be the only American who wasn't all that aware of the difference and whose eyes gloss over the two (I can only see them as different now that you've pointed it out to me, though I was dimly aware before, and now I understand why Brits pronounce it so strangely).



                  Be aware though:




                  1. Your publisher may ask you to change it. Fortunately, it's a super quick change to do globally no matter how long your work.


                  2. When an American looks at your text inside any program with a spellchecker, it lights up like a Christmas tree.







                  share|improve this answer




























                    3














                    Yes. It's your story, so it's okay. And I can't be the only American who wasn't all that aware of the difference and whose eyes gloss over the two (I can only see them as different now that you've pointed it out to me, though I was dimly aware before, and now I understand why Brits pronounce it so strangely).



                    Be aware though:




                    1. Your publisher may ask you to change it. Fortunately, it's a super quick change to do globally no matter how long your work.


                    2. When an American looks at your text inside any program with a spellchecker, it lights up like a Christmas tree.







                    share|improve this answer


























                      3












                      3








                      3







                      Yes. It's your story, so it's okay. And I can't be the only American who wasn't all that aware of the difference and whose eyes gloss over the two (I can only see them as different now that you've pointed it out to me, though I was dimly aware before, and now I understand why Brits pronounce it so strangely).



                      Be aware though:




                      1. Your publisher may ask you to change it. Fortunately, it's a super quick change to do globally no matter how long your work.


                      2. When an American looks at your text inside any program with a spellchecker, it lights up like a Christmas tree.







                      share|improve this answer













                      Yes. It's your story, so it's okay. And I can't be the only American who wasn't all that aware of the difference and whose eyes gloss over the two (I can only see them as different now that you've pointed it out to me, though I was dimly aware before, and now I understand why Brits pronounce it so strangely).



                      Be aware though:




                      1. Your publisher may ask you to change it. Fortunately, it's a super quick change to do globally no matter how long your work.


                      2. When an American looks at your text inside any program with a spellchecker, it lights up like a Christmas tree.








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 4 hours ago









                      CynCyn

                      6,6221740




                      6,6221740























                          3














                          In a non-scientific text (or in a scientific text, for that matter,) you should really keep it consistent. If you're otherwise using British English, then 'Aluminium' will look perfectly normal, just like 'colour' or 'metre.' However, if you're writing in American English, it will look weird, just as 'colour' or 'metre' would in an otherwise-American text.



                          Unless you have some reason why the use of this spelling should actually be important to your story, using a spelling that is not consistent with the rest of your text will look jarring and will distract your reader from the story.



                          Of course, if you actually want the distinction to be important in your story, then that's another matter. In that case, you can have your characters draw attention to the difference and have them discuss the use of one variety over the other.



                          As a side note, mentioning that this spelling is 'only' used in the USA and Canada really doesn't help the argument much, as the same argument could be made for all of American English. (And, even if being used against all of AmE, it's still a poor argument in light of the fact that over two thirds of all native English speakers worldwide speak the American variety, not the British one.)






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                            3














                            In a non-scientific text (or in a scientific text, for that matter,) you should really keep it consistent. If you're otherwise using British English, then 'Aluminium' will look perfectly normal, just like 'colour' or 'metre.' However, if you're writing in American English, it will look weird, just as 'colour' or 'metre' would in an otherwise-American text.



                            Unless you have some reason why the use of this spelling should actually be important to your story, using a spelling that is not consistent with the rest of your text will look jarring and will distract your reader from the story.



                            Of course, if you actually want the distinction to be important in your story, then that's another matter. In that case, you can have your characters draw attention to the difference and have them discuss the use of one variety over the other.



                            As a side note, mentioning that this spelling is 'only' used in the USA and Canada really doesn't help the argument much, as the same argument could be made for all of American English. (And, even if being used against all of AmE, it's still a poor argument in light of the fact that over two thirds of all native English speakers worldwide speak the American variety, not the British one.)






                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                              3












                              3








                              3







                              In a non-scientific text (or in a scientific text, for that matter,) you should really keep it consistent. If you're otherwise using British English, then 'Aluminium' will look perfectly normal, just like 'colour' or 'metre.' However, if you're writing in American English, it will look weird, just as 'colour' or 'metre' would in an otherwise-American text.



                              Unless you have some reason why the use of this spelling should actually be important to your story, using a spelling that is not consistent with the rest of your text will look jarring and will distract your reader from the story.



                              Of course, if you actually want the distinction to be important in your story, then that's another matter. In that case, you can have your characters draw attention to the difference and have them discuss the use of one variety over the other.



                              As a side note, mentioning that this spelling is 'only' used in the USA and Canada really doesn't help the argument much, as the same argument could be made for all of American English. (And, even if being used against all of AmE, it's still a poor argument in light of the fact that over two thirds of all native English speakers worldwide speak the American variety, not the British one.)






                              share|improve this answer








                              New contributor




                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.










                              In a non-scientific text (or in a scientific text, for that matter,) you should really keep it consistent. If you're otherwise using British English, then 'Aluminium' will look perfectly normal, just like 'colour' or 'metre.' However, if you're writing in American English, it will look weird, just as 'colour' or 'metre' would in an otherwise-American text.



                              Unless you have some reason why the use of this spelling should actually be important to your story, using a spelling that is not consistent with the rest of your text will look jarring and will distract your reader from the story.



                              Of course, if you actually want the distinction to be important in your story, then that's another matter. In that case, you can have your characters draw attention to the difference and have them discuss the use of one variety over the other.



                              As a side note, mentioning that this spelling is 'only' used in the USA and Canada really doesn't help the argument much, as the same argument could be made for all of American English. (And, even if being used against all of AmE, it's still a poor argument in light of the fact that over two thirds of all native English speakers worldwide speak the American variety, not the British one.)







                              share|improve this answer








                              New contributor




                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer






                              New contributor




                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                              answered 2 hours ago









                              reirabreirab

                              1313




                              1313




                              New contributor




                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                              New contributor





                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                              reirab is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                  2














                                  It's a minor difference, so I wouldn't get hung up on it. If it's an issue for a publisher, it's easy to fix.
                                  I do a similar thing with the word "gray", because the street I grew up on had the word "grey" included in it, meaning that I always spell it wrong according to American English. Nobody aside from Microsoft Word's spellchecker has ever given me trouble-- or, I suspect, even noticed.






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    2














                                    It's a minor difference, so I wouldn't get hung up on it. If it's an issue for a publisher, it's easy to fix.
                                    I do a similar thing with the word "gray", because the street I grew up on had the word "grey" included in it, meaning that I always spell it wrong according to American English. Nobody aside from Microsoft Word's spellchecker has ever given me trouble-- or, I suspect, even noticed.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      2












                                      2








                                      2







                                      It's a minor difference, so I wouldn't get hung up on it. If it's an issue for a publisher, it's easy to fix.
                                      I do a similar thing with the word "gray", because the street I grew up on had the word "grey" included in it, meaning that I always spell it wrong according to American English. Nobody aside from Microsoft Word's spellchecker has ever given me trouble-- or, I suspect, even noticed.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      It's a minor difference, so I wouldn't get hung up on it. If it's an issue for a publisher, it's easy to fix.
                                      I do a similar thing with the word "gray", because the street I grew up on had the word "grey" included in it, meaning that I always spell it wrong according to American English. Nobody aside from Microsoft Word's spellchecker has ever given me trouble-- or, I suspect, even noticed.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 2 hours ago









                                      L.S. CooperL.S. Cooper

                                      1303




                                      1303























                                          1














                                          (Academic Copyeditor here)



                                          I see no problems; you have a good justification. If this is your text (your blog, a self-published book), you're done, though you might want to add a footnote etc. to explain why you're using that spelling.



                                          If someone else will publish the text, you should talk to your editor AND make a note in the text. Talk to the editor because they may or may not have liberty with house style, and if it's a multi-author volume or a journal, they will want to keep things consistent. Make a note because the copyeditor may or may not notice that this is deliberate, and may or may not change it – once you flag it as deliberate, they're likely to leave it alone, respectively you can change it back if you have the editor's backing.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                          • Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                            – Galastel
                                            44 mins ago
















                                          1














                                          (Academic Copyeditor here)



                                          I see no problems; you have a good justification. If this is your text (your blog, a self-published book), you're done, though you might want to add a footnote etc. to explain why you're using that spelling.



                                          If someone else will publish the text, you should talk to your editor AND make a note in the text. Talk to the editor because they may or may not have liberty with house style, and if it's a multi-author volume or a journal, they will want to keep things consistent. Make a note because the copyeditor may or may not notice that this is deliberate, and may or may not change it – once you flag it as deliberate, they're likely to leave it alone, respectively you can change it back if you have the editor's backing.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                          • Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                            – Galastel
                                            44 mins ago














                                          1












                                          1








                                          1







                                          (Academic Copyeditor here)



                                          I see no problems; you have a good justification. If this is your text (your blog, a self-published book), you're done, though you might want to add a footnote etc. to explain why you're using that spelling.



                                          If someone else will publish the text, you should talk to your editor AND make a note in the text. Talk to the editor because they may or may not have liberty with house style, and if it's a multi-author volume or a journal, they will want to keep things consistent. Make a note because the copyeditor may or may not notice that this is deliberate, and may or may not change it – once you flag it as deliberate, they're likely to leave it alone, respectively you can change it back if you have the editor's backing.






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          (Academic Copyeditor here)



                                          I see no problems; you have a good justification. If this is your text (your blog, a self-published book), you're done, though you might want to add a footnote etc. to explain why you're using that spelling.



                                          If someone else will publish the text, you should talk to your editor AND make a note in the text. Talk to the editor because they may or may not have liberty with house style, and if it's a multi-author volume or a journal, they will want to keep things consistent. Make a note because the copyeditor may or may not notice that this is deliberate, and may or may not change it – once you flag it as deliberate, they're likely to leave it alone, respectively you can change it back if you have the editor's backing.







                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer






                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          answered 2 hours ago









                                          green_knightgreen_knight

                                          1113




                                          1113




                                          New contributor




                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                          New contributor





                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                          green_knight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          • Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                            – Galastel
                                            44 mins ago



















                                          • Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                            – Galastel
                                            44 mins ago

















                                          Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                          – Galastel
                                          44 mins ago





                                          Interestingly, Tolkien had to do something very similar for his spelling 'elven' instead of the then-common 'elfin' (as well as several other similar examples). Being a professor of philology, he knew better how the word should be spelled, and stood his ground. The form stuck.

                                          – Galastel
                                          44 mins ago











                                          0














                                          Aluminum comes from the word alumina and is the name chosen by the Humphry Davy in 1812 and published throughout the world. "Aluminium" only exists because Thomas Young misspelled it. It's not a color vs colour issue.



                                          The US and Canada were fighting each other in a bloody war at the time, but they both received the correct spelling from across the Atlantic ocean.



                                          Edit:



                                          Aluminum is the One True Spelling of the word.






                                          share|improve this answer










                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          • 1





                                            So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                            – F1Krazy
                                            53 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                            – Galastel
                                            49 mins ago











                                          • @F1Krazy - Correct

                                            – IKM
                                            37 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                            – Trish
                                            19 mins ago
















                                          0














                                          Aluminum comes from the word alumina and is the name chosen by the Humphry Davy in 1812 and published throughout the world. "Aluminium" only exists because Thomas Young misspelled it. It's not a color vs colour issue.



                                          The US and Canada were fighting each other in a bloody war at the time, but they both received the correct spelling from across the Atlantic ocean.



                                          Edit:



                                          Aluminum is the One True Spelling of the word.






                                          share|improve this answer










                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          • 1





                                            So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                            – F1Krazy
                                            53 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                            – Galastel
                                            49 mins ago











                                          • @F1Krazy - Correct

                                            – IKM
                                            37 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                            – Trish
                                            19 mins ago














                                          0












                                          0








                                          0







                                          Aluminum comes from the word alumina and is the name chosen by the Humphry Davy in 1812 and published throughout the world. "Aluminium" only exists because Thomas Young misspelled it. It's not a color vs colour issue.



                                          The US and Canada were fighting each other in a bloody war at the time, but they both received the correct spelling from across the Atlantic ocean.



                                          Edit:



                                          Aluminum is the One True Spelling of the word.






                                          share|improve this answer










                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          Aluminum comes from the word alumina and is the name chosen by the Humphry Davy in 1812 and published throughout the world. "Aluminium" only exists because Thomas Young misspelled it. It's not a color vs colour issue.



                                          The US and Canada were fighting each other in a bloody war at the time, but they both received the correct spelling from across the Atlantic ocean.



                                          Edit:



                                          Aluminum is the One True Spelling of the word.







                                          share|improve this answer










                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer








                                          edited 44 mins ago





















                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          answered 1 hour ago









                                          IKMIKM

                                          11




                                          11




                                          New contributor




                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                          New contributor





                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                          IKM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                          • 1





                                            So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                            – F1Krazy
                                            53 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                            – Galastel
                                            49 mins ago











                                          • @F1Krazy - Correct

                                            – IKM
                                            37 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                            – Trish
                                            19 mins ago














                                          • 1





                                            So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                            – F1Krazy
                                            53 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                            – Galastel
                                            49 mins ago











                                          • @F1Krazy - Correct

                                            – IKM
                                            37 mins ago






                                          • 1





                                            According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                            – Trish
                                            19 mins ago








                                          1




                                          1





                                          So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                          – F1Krazy
                                          53 mins ago





                                          So to be clear, your answer to the question is, "no, it's never okay to use 'aluminium'"? Even though that's the spelling promoted by IUPAC?

                                          – F1Krazy
                                          53 mins ago




                                          1




                                          1





                                          This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                          – Galastel
                                          49 mins ago





                                          This could be a very relevant comment, but it doesn't actually answer the question.

                                          – Galastel
                                          49 mins ago













                                          @F1Krazy - Correct

                                          – IKM
                                          37 mins ago





                                          @F1Krazy - Correct

                                          – IKM
                                          37 mins ago




                                          1




                                          1





                                          According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                          – Trish
                                          19 mins ago





                                          According to my info, Thomas Young did 1812 a deliberate decision to propose the better sound of Aluminium. This spelling caught on better in the US and was used by virtually all US Scientists until the mid-1830s (at wich point aluminum became popular via culture and one dictionary) and was still dominant in science till 1895. IUPAC did explicitly forbid to use aluminum between 1990 and 1993.

                                          – Trish
                                          19 mins ago










                                          Trish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          Trish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          Trish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          Trish is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41465%2fis-it-ok-to-use-aluminium-in-an-otherwise-american-english-text%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Bundesstraße 106

                                          Verónica Boquete

                                          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten