How can we consider $Bbb Z_3[x]/ langle x^2+x+2rangle$ as splitting field for $x^2+x+2$ over $Bbb Z_3$











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












My book introduce two kind of splitting field. One of them is $Bbb Z_3(i)={a+bi : a, b in Bbb Z_3}$. The other is $Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$. But, I am confused how the latter case could be splitting field. As follows my book, since $F=Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$ is field and by fundamental Theorem of Field, $beta = x+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ is one root of $f(x)=x^2+x+1$ in $F$. So by factor theorem, $f(x)$ splits in $F$. And
because $F$ is two-dimensional vector space over $Bbb Z_3$, we know that $F$ is also a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $Bbb Z_3$



My curious part is here.



First, how can the fact that $F$ is 2-dim vector space induce consequent conclusion.



Second, If the statement is true, by definition of splitting field $F=Bbb Z_3(alpha, beta)$ where $alpha$ is the other root of $f(x)$ in $F$. But rigorously the equality is not true because each side of elements are different. For example, right side contain 2, but 2 is not contained in left side. I guess just identifying $a$ in $Bbb Z_3$ with $a+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ may induce the equality. But even if it is the case, components of two sets are different! So pleas help me with more additional explanation. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    My book introduce two kind of splitting field. One of them is $Bbb Z_3(i)={a+bi : a, b in Bbb Z_3}$. The other is $Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$. But, I am confused how the latter case could be splitting field. As follows my book, since $F=Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$ is field and by fundamental Theorem of Field, $beta = x+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ is one root of $f(x)=x^2+x+1$ in $F$. So by factor theorem, $f(x)$ splits in $F$. And
    because $F$ is two-dimensional vector space over $Bbb Z_3$, we know that $F$ is also a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $Bbb Z_3$



    My curious part is here.



    First, how can the fact that $F$ is 2-dim vector space induce consequent conclusion.



    Second, If the statement is true, by definition of splitting field $F=Bbb Z_3(alpha, beta)$ where $alpha$ is the other root of $f(x)$ in $F$. But rigorously the equality is not true because each side of elements are different. For example, right side contain 2, but 2 is not contained in left side. I guess just identifying $a$ in $Bbb Z_3$ with $a+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ may induce the equality. But even if it is the case, components of two sets are different! So pleas help me with more additional explanation. Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      My book introduce two kind of splitting field. One of them is $Bbb Z_3(i)={a+bi : a, b in Bbb Z_3}$. The other is $Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$. But, I am confused how the latter case could be splitting field. As follows my book, since $F=Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$ is field and by fundamental Theorem of Field, $beta = x+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ is one root of $f(x)=x^2+x+1$ in $F$. So by factor theorem, $f(x)$ splits in $F$. And
      because $F$ is two-dimensional vector space over $Bbb Z_3$, we know that $F$ is also a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $Bbb Z_3$



      My curious part is here.



      First, how can the fact that $F$ is 2-dim vector space induce consequent conclusion.



      Second, If the statement is true, by definition of splitting field $F=Bbb Z_3(alpha, beta)$ where $alpha$ is the other root of $f(x)$ in $F$. But rigorously the equality is not true because each side of elements are different. For example, right side contain 2, but 2 is not contained in left side. I guess just identifying $a$ in $Bbb Z_3$ with $a+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ may induce the equality. But even if it is the case, components of two sets are different! So pleas help me with more additional explanation. Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question















      My book introduce two kind of splitting field. One of them is $Bbb Z_3(i)={a+bi : a, b in Bbb Z_3}$. The other is $Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$. But, I am confused how the latter case could be splitting field. As follows my book, since $F=Bbb Z_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2rangle$ is field and by fundamental Theorem of Field, $beta = x+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ is one root of $f(x)=x^2+x+1$ in $F$. So by factor theorem, $f(x)$ splits in $F$. And
      because $F$ is two-dimensional vector space over $Bbb Z_3$, we know that $F$ is also a splitting field of $f(x)$ over $Bbb Z_3$



      My curious part is here.



      First, how can the fact that $F$ is 2-dim vector space induce consequent conclusion.



      Second, If the statement is true, by definition of splitting field $F=Bbb Z_3(alpha, beta)$ where $alpha$ is the other root of $f(x)$ in $F$. But rigorously the equality is not true because each side of elements are different. For example, right side contain 2, but 2 is not contained in left side. I guess just identifying $a$ in $Bbb Z_3$ with $a+langle x^2+x+1rangle$ may induce the equality. But even if it is the case, components of two sets are different! So pleas help me with more additional explanation. Thanks!







      extension-field






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 7:50









      Teddy38

      2,0512520




      2,0512520










      asked Nov 20 at 7:23









      fivestar

      35519




      35519






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Firstly note that $x^2+x+2$ is an irreducible polynomial over $Bbb{Z}_3$ because it has no linear factors (since it is degree $2$, so enough to check linear factors). So we consider the quotient ring
          $$Bbb{F}_9=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2 rangle={ax+b , | , a,b in Bbb{Z}_3 text{ and } x^2+x+2=0}.$$
          One can use the irreducibility of $f(x)$ (hence the ideal $langle f(x) rangle$ is maximal etc.) to claim that $Bbb{F}_9$ is indeed a field.



          By the definition of this quotient ring, the element $alpha=x+langle f(x) rangle$ is a root of the polynomial $f(x)$. Suppose $beta$ is the other root, then sum of roots=-coefficient of $x$ term gives
          $$alpha + beta =-1=2.$$
          So
          $$beta=2-alpha=2-[x+langle f(x) rangle]=(2+2x)+langle f(x) rangle.$$
          Observe that this is also an element of $Bbb{F}_9$ defined as above. Thus the polynomial $f(x)$ can be factored into linear factors in $Bbb{F}_9$. This means it splits completely in $Bbb{F}_9$.



          Note: In case you want to view $Bbb{F}_9$ as a vector space over $Bbb{Z}_3$ with a basis
          $${mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle,mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle}.$$
          Then consider the vector $beta=2(mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle)+2(mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle)=mathbf{2+2x}+langle f(x) rangle in Bbb{F}_9$ lying in this vector space. Observe that this $beta$ is the other root of $f(x)$. Hence $f(x)$ splits completely.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:15










          • @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
            – Anurag A
            Nov 20 at 8:18












          • aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:31











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006045%2fhow-can-we-consider-bbb-z-3x-langle-x2x2-rangle-as-splitting-field-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Firstly note that $x^2+x+2$ is an irreducible polynomial over $Bbb{Z}_3$ because it has no linear factors (since it is degree $2$, so enough to check linear factors). So we consider the quotient ring
          $$Bbb{F}_9=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2 rangle={ax+b , | , a,b in Bbb{Z}_3 text{ and } x^2+x+2=0}.$$
          One can use the irreducibility of $f(x)$ (hence the ideal $langle f(x) rangle$ is maximal etc.) to claim that $Bbb{F}_9$ is indeed a field.



          By the definition of this quotient ring, the element $alpha=x+langle f(x) rangle$ is a root of the polynomial $f(x)$. Suppose $beta$ is the other root, then sum of roots=-coefficient of $x$ term gives
          $$alpha + beta =-1=2.$$
          So
          $$beta=2-alpha=2-[x+langle f(x) rangle]=(2+2x)+langle f(x) rangle.$$
          Observe that this is also an element of $Bbb{F}_9$ defined as above. Thus the polynomial $f(x)$ can be factored into linear factors in $Bbb{F}_9$. This means it splits completely in $Bbb{F}_9$.



          Note: In case you want to view $Bbb{F}_9$ as a vector space over $Bbb{Z}_3$ with a basis
          $${mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle,mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle}.$$
          Then consider the vector $beta=2(mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle)+2(mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle)=mathbf{2+2x}+langle f(x) rangle in Bbb{F}_9$ lying in this vector space. Observe that this $beta$ is the other root of $f(x)$. Hence $f(x)$ splits completely.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:15










          • @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
            – Anurag A
            Nov 20 at 8:18












          • aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:31















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Firstly note that $x^2+x+2$ is an irreducible polynomial over $Bbb{Z}_3$ because it has no linear factors (since it is degree $2$, so enough to check linear factors). So we consider the quotient ring
          $$Bbb{F}_9=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2 rangle={ax+b , | , a,b in Bbb{Z}_3 text{ and } x^2+x+2=0}.$$
          One can use the irreducibility of $f(x)$ (hence the ideal $langle f(x) rangle$ is maximal etc.) to claim that $Bbb{F}_9$ is indeed a field.



          By the definition of this quotient ring, the element $alpha=x+langle f(x) rangle$ is a root of the polynomial $f(x)$. Suppose $beta$ is the other root, then sum of roots=-coefficient of $x$ term gives
          $$alpha + beta =-1=2.$$
          So
          $$beta=2-alpha=2-[x+langle f(x) rangle]=(2+2x)+langle f(x) rangle.$$
          Observe that this is also an element of $Bbb{F}_9$ defined as above. Thus the polynomial $f(x)$ can be factored into linear factors in $Bbb{F}_9$. This means it splits completely in $Bbb{F}_9$.



          Note: In case you want to view $Bbb{F}_9$ as a vector space over $Bbb{Z}_3$ with a basis
          $${mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle,mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle}.$$
          Then consider the vector $beta=2(mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle)+2(mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle)=mathbf{2+2x}+langle f(x) rangle in Bbb{F}_9$ lying in this vector space. Observe that this $beta$ is the other root of $f(x)$. Hence $f(x)$ splits completely.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:15










          • @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
            – Anurag A
            Nov 20 at 8:18












          • aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:31













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Firstly note that $x^2+x+2$ is an irreducible polynomial over $Bbb{Z}_3$ because it has no linear factors (since it is degree $2$, so enough to check linear factors). So we consider the quotient ring
          $$Bbb{F}_9=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2 rangle={ax+b , | , a,b in Bbb{Z}_3 text{ and } x^2+x+2=0}.$$
          One can use the irreducibility of $f(x)$ (hence the ideal $langle f(x) rangle$ is maximal etc.) to claim that $Bbb{F}_9$ is indeed a field.



          By the definition of this quotient ring, the element $alpha=x+langle f(x) rangle$ is a root of the polynomial $f(x)$. Suppose $beta$ is the other root, then sum of roots=-coefficient of $x$ term gives
          $$alpha + beta =-1=2.$$
          So
          $$beta=2-alpha=2-[x+langle f(x) rangle]=(2+2x)+langle f(x) rangle.$$
          Observe that this is also an element of $Bbb{F}_9$ defined as above. Thus the polynomial $f(x)$ can be factored into linear factors in $Bbb{F}_9$. This means it splits completely in $Bbb{F}_9$.



          Note: In case you want to view $Bbb{F}_9$ as a vector space over $Bbb{Z}_3$ with a basis
          $${mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle,mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle}.$$
          Then consider the vector $beta=2(mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle)+2(mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle)=mathbf{2+2x}+langle f(x) rangle in Bbb{F}_9$ lying in this vector space. Observe that this $beta$ is the other root of $f(x)$. Hence $f(x)$ splits completely.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Firstly note that $x^2+x+2$ is an irreducible polynomial over $Bbb{Z}_3$ because it has no linear factors (since it is degree $2$, so enough to check linear factors). So we consider the quotient ring
          $$Bbb{F}_9=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle f(x) rangle=Bbb{Z}_3[x]/langle x^2+x+2 rangle={ax+b , | , a,b in Bbb{Z}_3 text{ and } x^2+x+2=0}.$$
          One can use the irreducibility of $f(x)$ (hence the ideal $langle f(x) rangle$ is maximal etc.) to claim that $Bbb{F}_9$ is indeed a field.



          By the definition of this quotient ring, the element $alpha=x+langle f(x) rangle$ is a root of the polynomial $f(x)$. Suppose $beta$ is the other root, then sum of roots=-coefficient of $x$ term gives
          $$alpha + beta =-1=2.$$
          So
          $$beta=2-alpha=2-[x+langle f(x) rangle]=(2+2x)+langle f(x) rangle.$$
          Observe that this is also an element of $Bbb{F}_9$ defined as above. Thus the polynomial $f(x)$ can be factored into linear factors in $Bbb{F}_9$. This means it splits completely in $Bbb{F}_9$.



          Note: In case you want to view $Bbb{F}_9$ as a vector space over $Bbb{Z}_3$ with a basis
          $${mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle,mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle}.$$
          Then consider the vector $beta=2(mathbf{1}+langle f(x) rangle)+2(mathbf{x}+langle f(x) rangle)=mathbf{2+2x}+langle f(x) rangle in Bbb{F}_9$ lying in this vector space. Observe that this $beta$ is the other root of $f(x)$. Hence $f(x)$ splits completely.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 20 at 8:13

























          answered Nov 20 at 7:55









          Anurag A

          25k12249




          25k12249












          • Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:15










          • @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
            – Anurag A
            Nov 20 at 8:18












          • aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:31


















          • Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:15










          • @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
            – Anurag A
            Nov 20 at 8:18












          • aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
            – fivestar
            Nov 20 at 8:31
















          Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
          – fivestar
          Nov 20 at 8:15




          Thank you for answer. I almost understand what you said. One thing I want to ask is how we can set $x^2+x+2=0$ in the quotient ring such that all elements of the quotient ring could be considered only polynomial part. is it possible?
          – fivestar
          Nov 20 at 8:15












          @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
          – Anurag A
          Nov 20 at 8:18






          @fivestar I'm not sure if I understand your question completely. But let me try: the idea is when we are taking quotients, then in a sense we are dividing out by that quantity and only focusing on the remainders (think division algorithm). So when we take $mod x^2+x+2$, the remainder of any polynomial modulo this polynomial is of degree at most $1$, so all elements are of the form $ax+b$.
          – Anurag A
          Nov 20 at 8:18














          aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
          – fivestar
          Nov 20 at 8:31




          aha . I unserstand your explaination thank you!!
          – fivestar
          Nov 20 at 8:31


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006045%2fhow-can-we-consider-bbb-z-3x-langle-x2x2-rangle-as-splitting-field-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten