Prove: Euclidean and Cofinite topologies on $mathbb{R}$ are not Homeomorphic












0














Let $mathbb{R}$ denote the real numbers with the standard topology and $mathbb{R}_f$ denote the real numbers with the cofinite topology.




  1. Explicitly show that the identity map between these two spaces is not a homeomorphism.


  2. How do we know there is no homeomorphism between them? (think about a property that must get preserved under a homeomorphism)



Since I am a new with topology. Please give me some advice.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
    – Mike Pierce
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:29












  • If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
    – user228113
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:40












  • For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
    – Rob Arthan
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:44










  • For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Oct 17 '16 at 10:20
















0














Let $mathbb{R}$ denote the real numbers with the standard topology and $mathbb{R}_f$ denote the real numbers with the cofinite topology.




  1. Explicitly show that the identity map between these two spaces is not a homeomorphism.


  2. How do we know there is no homeomorphism between them? (think about a property that must get preserved under a homeomorphism)



Since I am a new with topology. Please give me some advice.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
    – Mike Pierce
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:29












  • If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
    – user228113
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:40












  • For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
    – Rob Arthan
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:44










  • For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Oct 17 '16 at 10:20














0












0








0


1





Let $mathbb{R}$ denote the real numbers with the standard topology and $mathbb{R}_f$ denote the real numbers with the cofinite topology.




  1. Explicitly show that the identity map between these two spaces is not a homeomorphism.


  2. How do we know there is no homeomorphism between them? (think about a property that must get preserved under a homeomorphism)



Since I am a new with topology. Please give me some advice.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question















Let $mathbb{R}$ denote the real numbers with the standard topology and $mathbb{R}_f$ denote the real numbers with the cofinite topology.




  1. Explicitly show that the identity map between these two spaces is not a homeomorphism.


  2. How do we know there is no homeomorphism between them? (think about a property that must get preserved under a homeomorphism)



Since I am a new with topology. Please give me some advice.
Thanks







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 18:19









Cassius12

10611




10611










asked Oct 16 '16 at 23:22









Vui Tinh

658




658












  • Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
    – Mike Pierce
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:29












  • If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
    – user228113
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:40












  • For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
    – Rob Arthan
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:44










  • For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Oct 17 '16 at 10:20


















  • Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
    – Mike Pierce
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:29












  • If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
    – user228113
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:40












  • For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
    – Rob Arthan
    Oct 16 '16 at 23:44










  • For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Oct 17 '16 at 10:20
















Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
– Mike Pierce
Oct 16 '16 at 23:29






Well, what properties does a map need to satisfy to be a homeomorphism?
– Mike Pierce
Oct 16 '16 at 23:29














If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
– user228113
Oct 16 '16 at 23:40






If $tau_1$ and $tau_2$ are two topologies on $X$, the definition yields that the identity map $id_X:(X,tau_1)to (X,tau_2)$ is a homeomorphism if and only if $tau_1=tau_2$.
– user228113
Oct 16 '16 at 23:40














For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
– Rob Arthan
Oct 16 '16 at 23:44




For the second part: how many infinite closed sets are there are in $R$ and in $R_f$?
– Rob Arthan
Oct 16 '16 at 23:44












For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
– Brian M. Scott
Oct 17 '16 at 10:20




For the second part you could show that $Bbb R_f$ is compact, while $Bbb R$ is not.
– Brian M. Scott
Oct 17 '16 at 10:20















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1971825%2fprove-euclidean-and-cofinite-topologies-on-mathbbr-are-not-homeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1971825%2fprove-euclidean-and-cofinite-topologies-on-mathbbr-are-not-homeomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Le Mesnil-Réaume

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always