Which is the “correct” way to represent C=AB with mathbf?
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Which is the "correct" way to represent C=AB with mathbf?
mathbf{C=AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}
math-mode
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Which is the "correct" way to represent C=AB with mathbf?
mathbf{C=AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}
math-mode
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
Probablymathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given thatAandBare separate symbols.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never usemathbf, butboldsymbolinstead, and I put,between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differentialds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke thatmathbf{A}mathbf{B}is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Which is the "correct" way to represent C=AB with mathbf?
mathbf{C=AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}
math-mode
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
Which is the "correct" way to represent C=AB with mathbf?
mathbf{C=AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{AB} or mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}
math-mode
math-mode
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
asked 2 hours ago
Artificial Stupidity
4,70011035
4,70011035
Probablymathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given thatAandBare separate symbols.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never usemathbf, butboldsymbolinstead, and I put,between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differentialds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke thatmathbf{A}mathbf{B}is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.
– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Probablymathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given thatAandBare separate symbols.
– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never usemathbf, butboldsymbolinstead, and I put,between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differentialds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke thatmathbf{A}mathbf{B}is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.
– marmot
2 hours ago
Probably
mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given that A and B are separate symbols.– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
Probably
mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given that A and B are separate symbols.– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never use
mathbf, but boldsymbol instead, and I put , between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differential ds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke that mathbf{A}mathbf{B} is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.– marmot
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never use
mathbf, but boldsymbol instead, and I put , between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differential ds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke that mathbf{A}mathbf{B} is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.– marmot
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
I would suggest not to use mathbf explicitly. It would be better to define some meaningful macro name like newcommandmatr[1]{mathbf{#1}} and use it throughout the document. This way the source code becomes more readable and you get the easy way of changing the definition if desired. As for matr{A}matr{B} vs matr{AB}, I'd say that the former would be better unless AB denotes a single matrix (which is very unusual in math).
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
I would suggest not to use mathbf explicitly. It would be better to define some meaningful macro name like newcommandmatr[1]{mathbf{#1}} and use it throughout the document. This way the source code becomes more readable and you get the easy way of changing the definition if desired. As for matr{A}matr{B} vs matr{AB}, I'd say that the former would be better unless AB denotes a single matrix (which is very unusual in math).
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
I would suggest not to use mathbf explicitly. It would be better to define some meaningful macro name like newcommandmatr[1]{mathbf{#1}} and use it throughout the document. This way the source code becomes more readable and you get the easy way of changing the definition if desired. As for matr{A}matr{B} vs matr{AB}, I'd say that the former would be better unless AB denotes a single matrix (which is very unusual in math).
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
I would suggest not to use mathbf explicitly. It would be better to define some meaningful macro name like newcommandmatr[1]{mathbf{#1}} and use it throughout the document. This way the source code becomes more readable and you get the easy way of changing the definition if desired. As for matr{A}matr{B} vs matr{AB}, I'd say that the former would be better unless AB denotes a single matrix (which is very unusual in math).
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
I would suggest not to use mathbf explicitly. It would be better to define some meaningful macro name like newcommandmatr[1]{mathbf{#1}} and use it throughout the document. This way the source code becomes more readable and you get the easy way of changing the definition if desired. As for matr{A}matr{B} vs matr{AB}, I'd say that the former would be better unless AB denotes a single matrix (which is very unusual in math).
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
answered 53 mins ago
Sergei Golovan
3,9351413
3,9351413
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462775%2fwhich-is-the-correct-way-to-represent-c-ab-with-mathbf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Probably
mathbf{C}=mathbf{A}mathbf{B}, given thatAandBare separate symbols.– Henri Menke
2 hours ago
I guess that the correct way is the way you like, I personally never use
mathbf, butboldsymbolinstead, and I put,between the symbols. I am aware that several users disagree, but I do not think they can call my way of doing thins "wrong". In the end you will never be able to really clarify if, say, typesetting differentialds upright (what I do) right or wrong. But I agree with @HenriMenke thatmathbf{A}mathbf{B}is better, at the very least you can search for these symbols more easily in your source code.– marmot
2 hours ago