Show that the motion is a circular path
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Question:
The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies
$$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$
where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.
Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.
Attempt:
Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:
$$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$
$$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$
Moreover, I noticed that
$$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$
and solving this gives
$$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$
but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.
differential-equations classical-mechanics
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Question:
The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies
$$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$
where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.
Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.
Attempt:
Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:
$$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$
$$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$
Moreover, I noticed that
$$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$
and solving this gives
$$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$
but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.
differential-equations classical-mechanics
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Question:
The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies
$$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$
where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.
Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.
Attempt:
Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:
$$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$
$$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$
Moreover, I noticed that
$$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$
and solving this gives
$$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$
but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.
differential-equations classical-mechanics
Question:
The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies
$$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$
where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.
Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.
Attempt:
Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:
$$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$
$$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$
Moreover, I noticed that
$$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$
and solving this gives
$$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$
but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.
differential-equations classical-mechanics
differential-equations classical-mechanics
asked Nov 20 at 1:54
glowstonetrees
1,917315
1,917315
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
$$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$
This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
$$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
= 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$
The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
$$
-fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
$$
Comparing coefficients,
$$
vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
$$
is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
$$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.
It might help to write:
begin{align}
dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
&= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
&=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
end{align}
Then just do the grinding to get the final result.
EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.
EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
$$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$
This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
$$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
= 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$
The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
$$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$
This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
$$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
= 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$
The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
$$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$
This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
$$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
= 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$
The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.
Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
$$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
= dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$
This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
$$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
= 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$
The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.
edited Nov 20 at 13:19
glowstonetrees
1,917315
1,917315
answered Nov 20 at 2:44
achille hui
94.3k5129252
94.3k5129252
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
$$
-fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
$$
Comparing coefficients,
$$
vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
$$
is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
$$
-fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
$$
Comparing coefficients,
$$
vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
$$
is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
$$
-fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
$$
Comparing coefficients,
$$
vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
$$
is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.
Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
$$
-fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
$$
Comparing coefficients,
$$
vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
$$
is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.
answered Nov 20 at 10:11
LutzL
54.2k41953
54.2k41953
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
$$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.
It might help to write:
begin{align}
dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
&= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
&=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
end{align}
Then just do the grinding to get the final result.
EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.
EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
$$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.
It might help to write:
begin{align}
dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
&= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
&=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
end{align}
Then just do the grinding to get the final result.
EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.
EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
$$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.
It might help to write:
begin{align}
dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
&= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
&=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
end{align}
Then just do the grinding to get the final result.
EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.
EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.
One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
$$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.
It might help to write:
begin{align}
dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
&= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
&=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
end{align}
Then just do the grinding to get the final result.
EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.
EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.
edited Nov 20 at 2:16
answered Nov 20 at 2:10
AlkaKadri
1,434411
1,434411
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
add a comment |
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
– glowstonetrees
Nov 20 at 2:14
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
@glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
– AlkaKadri
Nov 20 at 2:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005821%2fshow-that-the-motion-is-a-circular-path%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown