Elements $I_n+pXinmathbb{Z}^{ntimes n}$ with finite order in $operatorname{SL}(n,mathbb Z)$












1














Given $p$ an odd prime, $Xinmathbb{Z}^{ntimes n}$ a matrix.



If $I_{n}+pXin operatorname{SL}(n,mathbb Z)$ has finite order, prove $X=0$.



My idea:



let $m=p^rh$, $(p,h)=1$, s.t. $(I+pX)^m=I$.



let $(I+pX)^{p^r}=I+pY$, $I=(I+pX)^m=(I+pY)^h=(I+hpY+p^2YZ)$. $Y(hI+pZ)=0$.



If we can prove $Y=0$, then the following would be quite easy.



So how to prove $hI+pZ$ is invertible? Thanks for your time and help!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:12






  • 1




    I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:52










  • Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 14:06










  • @DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
    – Andrews
    Nov 24 at 14:12
















1














Given $p$ an odd prime, $Xinmathbb{Z}^{ntimes n}$ a matrix.



If $I_{n}+pXin operatorname{SL}(n,mathbb Z)$ has finite order, prove $X=0$.



My idea:



let $m=p^rh$, $(p,h)=1$, s.t. $(I+pX)^m=I$.



let $(I+pX)^{p^r}=I+pY$, $I=(I+pX)^m=(I+pY)^h=(I+hpY+p^2YZ)$. $Y(hI+pZ)=0$.



If we can prove $Y=0$, then the following would be quite easy.



So how to prove $hI+pZ$ is invertible? Thanks for your time and help!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:12






  • 1




    I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:52










  • Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 14:06










  • @DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
    – Andrews
    Nov 24 at 14:12














1












1








1


1





Given $p$ an odd prime, $Xinmathbb{Z}^{ntimes n}$ a matrix.



If $I_{n}+pXin operatorname{SL}(n,mathbb Z)$ has finite order, prove $X=0$.



My idea:



let $m=p^rh$, $(p,h)=1$, s.t. $(I+pX)^m=I$.



let $(I+pX)^{p^r}=I+pY$, $I=(I+pX)^m=(I+pY)^h=(I+hpY+p^2YZ)$. $Y(hI+pZ)=0$.



If we can prove $Y=0$, then the following would be quite easy.



So how to prove $hI+pZ$ is invertible? Thanks for your time and help!










share|cite|improve this question















Given $p$ an odd prime, $Xinmathbb{Z}^{ntimes n}$ a matrix.



If $I_{n}+pXin operatorname{SL}(n,mathbb Z)$ has finite order, prove $X=0$.



My idea:



let $m=p^rh$, $(p,h)=1$, s.t. $(I+pX)^m=I$.



let $(I+pX)^{p^r}=I+pY$, $I=(I+pX)^m=(I+pY)^h=(I+hpY+p^2YZ)$. $Y(hI+pZ)=0$.



If we can prove $Y=0$, then the following would be quite easy.



So how to prove $hI+pZ$ is invertible? Thanks for your time and help!







abstract-algebra group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 at 19:26

























asked Nov 24 at 13:06









Andrews

374317




374317








  • 2




    Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:12






  • 1




    I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:52










  • Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 14:06










  • @DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
    – Andrews
    Nov 24 at 14:12














  • 2




    Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:12






  • 1




    I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 13:52










  • Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 24 at 14:06










  • @DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
    – Andrews
    Nov 24 at 14:12








2




2




Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 13:12




Have you already done anything? Did you try some examples, or some cases of $;p;$ ? Anything at all?
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 13:12




1




1




I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 13:52




I really don't understand what you added about the even order. I also don't understand what that product there has anything to do...
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 13:52












Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 14:06




Sorry, that really didn't help at all to my understanding. Perhaps someone else...
– DonAntonio
Nov 24 at 14:06












@DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
– Andrews
Nov 24 at 14:12




@DonAntonio Sorry, my thought was wrong and misleading.
– Andrews
Nov 24 at 14:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














Assume the claim is false. Let $m>1$ be minimal with the property that $Xne0$ with $1+pX$ having order $m$ exists.
If $m=ab$ is composite with $a,b>1$, note that
$$(I+pX)^a=I+sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j}X^j =I+pX'$$
with $X':=sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j-1}X^jinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$. Then from $(I+pX')^b=(I+pX)^m=I$ and the minimality of $m$, we conclude that $X'=0$. But then $(1+pX)^a=I$, also contradicting minimality of $m$.
We conclude that the minimla $m$ cannot be composite. As ist certainly cannot be $=1$ either, we conclude that $m$ is prime.



If $(I+pX)^m=I$ with $Xne 0$, let $rge 1$ be maximal such that we can write $X=p^{r-1}Y$ with $YinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$.
Then
$$tag1 I=(I+pX)^m=(I+p^rY)^m=I+mp^rY+{mchoose 2}p^{2r}Y^2+p^{3r}cdot (ldots)$$
implies that $mp^rY$ must be a multiple of $p^{2r}$. This means that $m$ is a multiple of $p^r$, i.e., $m=p$ and $r=1$.
As $p$ is odd, the number $mchoose 2$ in $(1)$ is a multiple of $p$ so that
$$I=(I+pY)p=I+p^2Y+p^3cdot(ldots) $$
and so $Y$ is a multiple of $p$, contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011533%2felements-i-npx-in-mathbbzn-times-n-with-finite-order-in-operatornames%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    Assume the claim is false. Let $m>1$ be minimal with the property that $Xne0$ with $1+pX$ having order $m$ exists.
    If $m=ab$ is composite with $a,b>1$, note that
    $$(I+pX)^a=I+sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j}X^j =I+pX'$$
    with $X':=sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j-1}X^jinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$. Then from $(I+pX')^b=(I+pX)^m=I$ and the minimality of $m$, we conclude that $X'=0$. But then $(1+pX)^a=I$, also contradicting minimality of $m$.
    We conclude that the minimla $m$ cannot be composite. As ist certainly cannot be $=1$ either, we conclude that $m$ is prime.



    If $(I+pX)^m=I$ with $Xne 0$, let $rge 1$ be maximal such that we can write $X=p^{r-1}Y$ with $YinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$.
    Then
    $$tag1 I=(I+pX)^m=(I+p^rY)^m=I+mp^rY+{mchoose 2}p^{2r}Y^2+p^{3r}cdot (ldots)$$
    implies that $mp^rY$ must be a multiple of $p^{2r}$. This means that $m$ is a multiple of $p^r$, i.e., $m=p$ and $r=1$.
    As $p$ is odd, the number $mchoose 2$ in $(1)$ is a multiple of $p$ so that
    $$I=(I+pY)p=I+p^2Y+p^3cdot(ldots) $$
    and so $Y$ is a multiple of $p$, contradiction.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      7














      Assume the claim is false. Let $m>1$ be minimal with the property that $Xne0$ with $1+pX$ having order $m$ exists.
      If $m=ab$ is composite with $a,b>1$, note that
      $$(I+pX)^a=I+sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j}X^j =I+pX'$$
      with $X':=sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j-1}X^jinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$. Then from $(I+pX')^b=(I+pX)^m=I$ and the minimality of $m$, we conclude that $X'=0$. But then $(1+pX)^a=I$, also contradicting minimality of $m$.
      We conclude that the minimla $m$ cannot be composite. As ist certainly cannot be $=1$ either, we conclude that $m$ is prime.



      If $(I+pX)^m=I$ with $Xne 0$, let $rge 1$ be maximal such that we can write $X=p^{r-1}Y$ with $YinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$.
      Then
      $$tag1 I=(I+pX)^m=(I+p^rY)^m=I+mp^rY+{mchoose 2}p^{2r}Y^2+p^{3r}cdot (ldots)$$
      implies that $mp^rY$ must be a multiple of $p^{2r}$. This means that $m$ is a multiple of $p^r$, i.e., $m=p$ and $r=1$.
      As $p$ is odd, the number $mchoose 2$ in $(1)$ is a multiple of $p$ so that
      $$I=(I+pY)p=I+p^2Y+p^3cdot(ldots) $$
      and so $Y$ is a multiple of $p$, contradiction.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        7












        7








        7






        Assume the claim is false. Let $m>1$ be minimal with the property that $Xne0$ with $1+pX$ having order $m$ exists.
        If $m=ab$ is composite with $a,b>1$, note that
        $$(I+pX)^a=I+sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j}X^j =I+pX'$$
        with $X':=sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j-1}X^jinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$. Then from $(I+pX')^b=(I+pX)^m=I$ and the minimality of $m$, we conclude that $X'=0$. But then $(1+pX)^a=I$, also contradicting minimality of $m$.
        We conclude that the minimla $m$ cannot be composite. As ist certainly cannot be $=1$ either, we conclude that $m$ is prime.



        If $(I+pX)^m=I$ with $Xne 0$, let $rge 1$ be maximal such that we can write $X=p^{r-1}Y$ with $YinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$.
        Then
        $$tag1 I=(I+pX)^m=(I+p^rY)^m=I+mp^rY+{mchoose 2}p^{2r}Y^2+p^{3r}cdot (ldots)$$
        implies that $mp^rY$ must be a multiple of $p^{2r}$. This means that $m$ is a multiple of $p^r$, i.e., $m=p$ and $r=1$.
        As $p$ is odd, the number $mchoose 2$ in $(1)$ is a multiple of $p$ so that
        $$I=(I+pY)p=I+p^2Y+p^3cdot(ldots) $$
        and so $Y$ is a multiple of $p$, contradiction.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Assume the claim is false. Let $m>1$ be minimal with the property that $Xne0$ with $1+pX$ having order $m$ exists.
        If $m=ab$ is composite with $a,b>1$, note that
        $$(I+pX)^a=I+sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j}X^j =I+pX'$$
        with $X':=sum_{j=1}^a{achoose j}p^{j-1}X^jinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$. Then from $(I+pX')^b=(I+pX)^m=I$ and the minimality of $m$, we conclude that $X'=0$. But then $(1+pX)^a=I$, also contradicting minimality of $m$.
        We conclude that the minimla $m$ cannot be composite. As ist certainly cannot be $=1$ either, we conclude that $m$ is prime.



        If $(I+pX)^m=I$ with $Xne 0$, let $rge 1$ be maximal such that we can write $X=p^{r-1}Y$ with $YinBbb Z^{ntimes n}$.
        Then
        $$tag1 I=(I+pX)^m=(I+p^rY)^m=I+mp^rY+{mchoose 2}p^{2r}Y^2+p^{3r}cdot (ldots)$$
        implies that $mp^rY$ must be a multiple of $p^{2r}$. This means that $m$ is a multiple of $p^r$, i.e., $m=p$ and $r=1$.
        As $p$ is odd, the number $mchoose 2$ in $(1)$ is a multiple of $p$ so that
        $$I=(I+pY)p=I+p^2Y+p^3cdot(ldots) $$
        and so $Y$ is a multiple of $p$, contradiction.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 24 at 14:16









        Hagen von Eitzen

        276k21268495




        276k21268495






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011533%2felements-i-npx-in-mathbbzn-times-n-with-finite-order-in-operatornames%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten