Finding an exact solution for $u(x)+int_0^{2π}cos(x+t)u(t),mathrm dt=(π+1)cos x$












3












$begingroup$



I need to find an exact solution for$$u(x)+int_0^{2π}cos(x+t)u(t),mathrm dt=(π+1)cos x.$$




So far, I have tried to integrate by parts but it does not seem to be helpful because I got this:
$$u(t)sin(x+t)bigg|_0^{2pi} - int_{0}^{2pi}sin(x+t)u'(t),mathrm{d}t = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x).$$
I think it is a wrong way to solve this equation.



Any suggestion for how to solve it would be appreciated.






trigonometry definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
    $endgroup$
    – baharampuri
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:38


















3












$begingroup$



I need to find an exact solution for$$u(x)+int_0^{2π}cos(x+t)u(t),mathrm dt=(π+1)cos x.$$




So far, I have tried to integrate by parts but it does not seem to be helpful because I got this:
$$u(t)sin(x+t)bigg|_0^{2pi} - int_{0}^{2pi}sin(x+t)u'(t),mathrm{d}t = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x).$$
I think it is a wrong way to solve this equation.



Any suggestion for how to solve it would be appreciated.






trigonometry definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
    $endgroup$
    – baharampuri
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:38
















3












3








3


1



$begingroup$



I need to find an exact solution for$$u(x)+int_0^{2π}cos(x+t)u(t),mathrm dt=(π+1)cos x.$$




So far, I have tried to integrate by parts but it does not seem to be helpful because I got this:
$$u(t)sin(x+t)bigg|_0^{2pi} - int_{0}^{2pi}sin(x+t)u'(t),mathrm{d}t = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x).$$
I think it is a wrong way to solve this equation.



Any suggestion for how to solve it would be appreciated.






trigonometry definite-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





I need to find an exact solution for$$u(x)+int_0^{2π}cos(x+t)u(t),mathrm dt=(π+1)cos x.$$




So far, I have tried to integrate by parts but it does not seem to be helpful because I got this:
$$u(t)sin(x+t)bigg|_0^{2pi} - int_{0}^{2pi}sin(x+t)u'(t),mathrm{d}t = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x).$$
I think it is a wrong way to solve this equation.



Any suggestion for how to solve it would be appreciated.






trigonometry definite-integrals




trigonometry definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 12:48









Saad

19.7k92352




19.7k92352










asked Dec 3 '18 at 12:09









George ZorikovGeorge Zorikov

273




273








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
    $endgroup$
    – baharampuri
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:38
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
    $endgroup$
    – baharampuri
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:18










  • $begingroup$
    After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 12:38










1




1




$begingroup$
What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
$endgroup$
– baharampuri
Dec 3 '18 at 12:18




$begingroup$
What about the sum of angle formula for the $cos$ term?
$endgroup$
– baharampuri
Dec 3 '18 at 12:18












$begingroup$
After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 12:38






$begingroup$
After your advice we got: $$cos xint_{0}^{2pi} cos t, u(t),dt - sin xint_{0}^{2pi} sin(t), u(t), dt = (pi + 1)cos x - u(x)$$ And I still have no idea of how to solve this (following integration by parts didn't help either). I suppose we cannot solve it until we set $u(x)$ and $u(t)$ manually
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 12:38












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

From
$$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$$
We have that
$$u(x)+cos(x)int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t-sin(x)int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t=(pi+1)cos(t)$$
But the integrals are independent of $x$, so they are constant! So the form of $u$ will be
$$u(x)=(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)$$
And you can calculate the value of the constants easily:
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)[(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)] mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=(pi+1)int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x-c_1int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x +c_2 int_{0}^{2pi} sin(x)cos(x) mathrm{d}x$$
You can easily calculate these integrals with the double-angle formulas:
$$c_1=(pi+1)pi-c_1 pi+c_2 0$$
$$c_1(1+pi)=(pi+1)pi$$
$$c_1=pi$$
And you can do the same to get $c_2$:
$$c_2=int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
So we have that $c_1=pi$ and$c_2=0$, which implies that
$$u(x)=cos(x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:44












  • $begingroup$
    @GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – Botond
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50










  • $begingroup$
    now I get it! Thank you again
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:57





















2












$begingroup$

$defR{mathbb{R}}defd{mathrm{d}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$Assume that $u$ is integrable on $[0, 2π]$. For $x in R$ and $Δx ≠ 0$, becausebegin{align*}
frac{1}{Δx} (u(x + Δx) - u(x)) &= -int_0^{2π} frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + t + Δx) - cos(x + t)) u(t) ,d t\
&peq + (π + 1) frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + Δx) - cos x),
end{align*}
making $Δx → 0$ with the dominated convergence theorem yields$$
u'(x) = int_0^{2π} sin(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) sin x.
$$
Analogously,$$
u''(x) = int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) cos x.
$$
Thus $u'' + u = 0$, which implies $u(x) = c_1 cos x + c_2 sin x$ for some constant $c_1$ and $c_2$.



Now, sincebegin{align*}
int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t &= c_1 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) cos t ,d t + c_2 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) sin t ,d t\
&= π(c_1 cos x - c_2 sin x),
end{align*}
then$$
u(x) + int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t = c_1 (π + 1) cos x - c_2 π sin x,
$$
which implies $c_1 = 1$, $c_2 = 0$. Therefore, $u(x) = cos x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023967%2ffinding-an-exact-solution-for-ux-int-02%25cf%2580-cosxtut-mathrm-dt-%25cf%25801-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

From
$$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$$
We have that
$$u(x)+cos(x)int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t-sin(x)int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t=(pi+1)cos(t)$$
But the integrals are independent of $x$, so they are constant! So the form of $u$ will be
$$u(x)=(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)$$
And you can calculate the value of the constants easily:
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)[(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)] mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=(pi+1)int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x-c_1int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x +c_2 int_{0}^{2pi} sin(x)cos(x) mathrm{d}x$$
You can easily calculate these integrals with the double-angle formulas:
$$c_1=(pi+1)pi-c_1 pi+c_2 0$$
$$c_1(1+pi)=(pi+1)pi$$
$$c_1=pi$$
And you can do the same to get $c_2$:
$$c_2=int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
So we have that $c_1=pi$ and$c_2=0$, which implies that
$$u(x)=cos(x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:44












  • $begingroup$
    @GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – Botond
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50










  • $begingroup$
    now I get it! Thank you again
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:57


















3












$begingroup$

From
$$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$$
We have that
$$u(x)+cos(x)int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t-sin(x)int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t=(pi+1)cos(t)$$
But the integrals are independent of $x$, so they are constant! So the form of $u$ will be
$$u(x)=(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)$$
And you can calculate the value of the constants easily:
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)[(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)] mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=(pi+1)int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x-c_1int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x +c_2 int_{0}^{2pi} sin(x)cos(x) mathrm{d}x$$
You can easily calculate these integrals with the double-angle formulas:
$$c_1=(pi+1)pi-c_1 pi+c_2 0$$
$$c_1(1+pi)=(pi+1)pi$$
$$c_1=pi$$
And you can do the same to get $c_2$:
$$c_2=int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
So we have that $c_1=pi$ and$c_2=0$, which implies that
$$u(x)=cos(x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:44












  • $begingroup$
    @GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – Botond
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50










  • $begingroup$
    now I get it! Thank you again
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:57
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

From
$$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$$
We have that
$$u(x)+cos(x)int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t-sin(x)int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t=(pi+1)cos(t)$$
But the integrals are independent of $x$, so they are constant! So the form of $u$ will be
$$u(x)=(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)$$
And you can calculate the value of the constants easily:
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)[(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)] mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=(pi+1)int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x-c_1int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x +c_2 int_{0}^{2pi} sin(x)cos(x) mathrm{d}x$$
You can easily calculate these integrals with the double-angle formulas:
$$c_1=(pi+1)pi-c_1 pi+c_2 0$$
$$c_1(1+pi)=(pi+1)pi$$
$$c_1=pi$$
And you can do the same to get $c_2$:
$$c_2=int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
So we have that $c_1=pi$ and$c_2=0$, which implies that
$$u(x)=cos(x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



From
$$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$$
We have that
$$u(x)+cos(x)int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t-sin(x)int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t)u(t)mathrm{d}t=(pi+1)cos(t)$$
But the integrals are independent of $x$, so they are constant! So the form of $u$ will be
$$u(x)=(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)$$
And you can calculate the value of the constants easily:
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=int_{0}^{2pi} cos(t)[(pi+1)cos(x)-c_1cos(x)+c_2sin(x)] mathrm{d}t$$
$$c_1=(pi+1)int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x-c_1int_{0}^{2pi} cos^2(x) mathrm{d}x +c_2 int_{0}^{2pi} sin(x)cos(x) mathrm{d}x$$
You can easily calculate these integrals with the double-angle formulas:
$$c_1=(pi+1)pi-c_1 pi+c_2 0$$
$$c_1(1+pi)=(pi+1)pi$$
$$c_1=pi$$
And you can do the same to get $c_2$:
$$c_2=int_{0}^{2pi} sin(t) u(t) mathrm{d}t$$
So we have that $c_1=pi$ and$c_2=0$, which implies that
$$u(x)=cos(x)$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 14:04









A.Γ.

22.7k32656




22.7k32656










answered Dec 3 '18 at 13:06









BotondBotond

5,6882732




5,6882732












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:44












  • $begingroup$
    @GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – Botond
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50










  • $begingroup$
    now I get it! Thank you again
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:57




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:44












  • $begingroup$
    @GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
    $endgroup$
    – Botond
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:50










  • $begingroup$
    now I get it! Thank you again
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:57


















$begingroup$
Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:44






$begingroup$
Thank you! But may I ask you one more question? When I try to find $c_1$ I use integration by parts. And I cannot solve it (especially $c_1 = pi$) because I have $u(t)$ undefined. Maybe I should calculate it using another technique?
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:44














$begingroup$
@GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
$endgroup$
– Botond
Dec 3 '18 at 13:50




$begingroup$
@GeorgeZorikov Is it better now?
$endgroup$
– Botond
Dec 3 '18 at 13:50












$begingroup$
now I get it! Thank you again
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:57






$begingroup$
now I get it! Thank you again
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:57













2












$begingroup$

$defR{mathbb{R}}defd{mathrm{d}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$Assume that $u$ is integrable on $[0, 2π]$. For $x in R$ and $Δx ≠ 0$, becausebegin{align*}
frac{1}{Δx} (u(x + Δx) - u(x)) &= -int_0^{2π} frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + t + Δx) - cos(x + t)) u(t) ,d t\
&peq + (π + 1) frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + Δx) - cos x),
end{align*}
making $Δx → 0$ with the dominated convergence theorem yields$$
u'(x) = int_0^{2π} sin(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) sin x.
$$
Analogously,$$
u''(x) = int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) cos x.
$$
Thus $u'' + u = 0$, which implies $u(x) = c_1 cos x + c_2 sin x$ for some constant $c_1$ and $c_2$.



Now, sincebegin{align*}
int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t &= c_1 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) cos t ,d t + c_2 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) sin t ,d t\
&= π(c_1 cos x - c_2 sin x),
end{align*}
then$$
u(x) + int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t = c_1 (π + 1) cos x - c_2 π sin x,
$$
which implies $c_1 = 1$, $c_2 = 0$. Therefore, $u(x) = cos x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:16
















2












$begingroup$

$defR{mathbb{R}}defd{mathrm{d}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$Assume that $u$ is integrable on $[0, 2π]$. For $x in R$ and $Δx ≠ 0$, becausebegin{align*}
frac{1}{Δx} (u(x + Δx) - u(x)) &= -int_0^{2π} frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + t + Δx) - cos(x + t)) u(t) ,d t\
&peq + (π + 1) frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + Δx) - cos x),
end{align*}
making $Δx → 0$ with the dominated convergence theorem yields$$
u'(x) = int_0^{2π} sin(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) sin x.
$$
Analogously,$$
u''(x) = int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) cos x.
$$
Thus $u'' + u = 0$, which implies $u(x) = c_1 cos x + c_2 sin x$ for some constant $c_1$ and $c_2$.



Now, sincebegin{align*}
int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t &= c_1 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) cos t ,d t + c_2 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) sin t ,d t\
&= π(c_1 cos x - c_2 sin x),
end{align*}
then$$
u(x) + int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t = c_1 (π + 1) cos x - c_2 π sin x,
$$
which implies $c_1 = 1$, $c_2 = 0$. Therefore, $u(x) = cos x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:16














2












2








2





$begingroup$

$defR{mathbb{R}}defd{mathrm{d}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$Assume that $u$ is integrable on $[0, 2π]$. For $x in R$ and $Δx ≠ 0$, becausebegin{align*}
frac{1}{Δx} (u(x + Δx) - u(x)) &= -int_0^{2π} frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + t + Δx) - cos(x + t)) u(t) ,d t\
&peq + (π + 1) frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + Δx) - cos x),
end{align*}
making $Δx → 0$ with the dominated convergence theorem yields$$
u'(x) = int_0^{2π} sin(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) sin x.
$$
Analogously,$$
u''(x) = int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) cos x.
$$
Thus $u'' + u = 0$, which implies $u(x) = c_1 cos x + c_2 sin x$ for some constant $c_1$ and $c_2$.



Now, sincebegin{align*}
int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t &= c_1 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) cos t ,d t + c_2 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) sin t ,d t\
&= π(c_1 cos x - c_2 sin x),
end{align*}
then$$
u(x) + int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t = c_1 (π + 1) cos x - c_2 π sin x,
$$
which implies $c_1 = 1$, $c_2 = 0$. Therefore, $u(x) = cos x$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$defR{mathbb{R}}defd{mathrm{d}}defpeq{mathrel{phantom{=}}{}}$Assume that $u$ is integrable on $[0, 2π]$. For $x in R$ and $Δx ≠ 0$, becausebegin{align*}
frac{1}{Δx} (u(x + Δx) - u(x)) &= -int_0^{2π} frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + t + Δx) - cos(x + t)) u(t) ,d t\
&peq + (π + 1) frac{1}{Δx} (cos(x + Δx) - cos x),
end{align*}
making $Δx → 0$ with the dominated convergence theorem yields$$
u'(x) = int_0^{2π} sin(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) sin x.
$$
Analogously,$$
u''(x) = int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t - (π + 1) cos x.
$$
Thus $u'' + u = 0$, which implies $u(x) = c_1 cos x + c_2 sin x$ for some constant $c_1$ and $c_2$.



Now, sincebegin{align*}
int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t &= c_1 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) cos t ,d t + c_2 int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) sin t ,d t\
&= π(c_1 cos x - c_2 sin x),
end{align*}
then$$
u(x) + int_0^{2π} cos(x + t) u(t) ,d t = c_1 (π + 1) cos x - c_2 π sin x,
$$
which implies $c_1 = 1$, $c_2 = 0$. Therefore, $u(x) = cos x$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 3 '18 at 12:44









SaadSaad

19.7k92352




19.7k92352












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – George Zorikov
    Dec 3 '18 at 13:16
















$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:16




$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– George Zorikov
Dec 3 '18 at 13:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023967%2ffinding-an-exact-solution-for-ux-int-02%25cf%2580-cosxtut-mathrm-dt-%25cf%25801-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more