On cohomology of flasque sheaves of abelian groups












0












$begingroup$


$underline {Background}$: Suppose we have a short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$ as follows,
$0tomathcal {F}to mathcal {I}to mathcal {G}to 0$ with $mathcal F$ a flasque sheaf and $mathcal I$ injective.Then we have the following two exact sequences separately



$1)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to 0$ ,



and the usual cohomology long exact sequence



$2)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to H^1(X,mathcal {F})to H^1(X,mathcal {I})to H^1(X,mathcal {G})to.......to H^i(X,mathcal {F})to H^i(X,mathcal {I})to H^i(X,mathcal {G})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {F})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {I})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {G})to........$



If the maps between $mathcal {F}(X)$,$mathcal {I}(X)$ and $mathcal {G}(X)$ are same(in fact it is enough to have maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ are same)in both the cases then I have shown that $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$.



But I only know that in $2)$,i.e in long exact sequence $mathcal{I}(X)$ is same as zeroth right derived functor of global section functor of $mathcal I$(same goes in case of $mathcal G$.$mathcal F$)



$underline {Question}$:$a)$Are the maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ same in both the cases(i.e in $1)$ and in $2)$)?.If it is so then how to see it explicitly?



$b)$ If the answer to the first question is no then how to see $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$ ?



I tried to look at the process of the establishment of long exact sequence which uses snake lemma ,but it's still not very explicit to me that the maps are same in both the cases.



Any help from anyone is welcome.






algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology homological-algebra sheaf-cohomology







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    $underline {Background}$: Suppose we have a short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$ as follows,
    $0tomathcal {F}to mathcal {I}to mathcal {G}to 0$ with $mathcal F$ a flasque sheaf and $mathcal I$ injective.Then we have the following two exact sequences separately



    $1)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to 0$ ,



    and the usual cohomology long exact sequence



    $2)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to H^1(X,mathcal {F})to H^1(X,mathcal {I})to H^1(X,mathcal {G})to.......to H^i(X,mathcal {F})to H^i(X,mathcal {I})to H^i(X,mathcal {G})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {F})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {I})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {G})to........$



    If the maps between $mathcal {F}(X)$,$mathcal {I}(X)$ and $mathcal {G}(X)$ are same(in fact it is enough to have maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ are same)in both the cases then I have shown that $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$.



    But I only know that in $2)$,i.e in long exact sequence $mathcal{I}(X)$ is same as zeroth right derived functor of global section functor of $mathcal I$(same goes in case of $mathcal G$.$mathcal F$)



    $underline {Question}$:$a)$Are the maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ same in both the cases(i.e in $1)$ and in $2)$)?.If it is so then how to see it explicitly?



    $b)$ If the answer to the first question is no then how to see $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$ ?



    I tried to look at the process of the establishment of long exact sequence which uses snake lemma ,but it's still not very explicit to me that the maps are same in both the cases.



    Any help from anyone is welcome.






    algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology homological-algebra sheaf-cohomology







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      $underline {Background}$: Suppose we have a short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$ as follows,
      $0tomathcal {F}to mathcal {I}to mathcal {G}to 0$ with $mathcal F$ a flasque sheaf and $mathcal I$ injective.Then we have the following two exact sequences separately



      $1)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to 0$ ,



      and the usual cohomology long exact sequence



      $2)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to H^1(X,mathcal {F})to H^1(X,mathcal {I})to H^1(X,mathcal {G})to.......to H^i(X,mathcal {F})to H^i(X,mathcal {I})to H^i(X,mathcal {G})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {F})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {I})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {G})to........$



      If the maps between $mathcal {F}(X)$,$mathcal {I}(X)$ and $mathcal {G}(X)$ are same(in fact it is enough to have maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ are same)in both the cases then I have shown that $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$.



      But I only know that in $2)$,i.e in long exact sequence $mathcal{I}(X)$ is same as zeroth right derived functor of global section functor of $mathcal I$(same goes in case of $mathcal G$.$mathcal F$)



      $underline {Question}$:$a)$Are the maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ same in both the cases(i.e in $1)$ and in $2)$)?.If it is so then how to see it explicitly?



      $b)$ If the answer to the first question is no then how to see $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$ ?



      I tried to look at the process of the establishment of long exact sequence which uses snake lemma ,but it's still not very explicit to me that the maps are same in both the cases.



      Any help from anyone is welcome.






      algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology homological-algebra sheaf-cohomology







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      $underline {Background}$: Suppose we have a short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$ as follows,
      $0tomathcal {F}to mathcal {I}to mathcal {G}to 0$ with $mathcal F$ a flasque sheaf and $mathcal I$ injective.Then we have the following two exact sequences separately



      $1)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to 0$ ,



      and the usual cohomology long exact sequence



      $2)$ $0tomathcal {F}(X)to mathcal {I}(X)to mathcal {G}(X)to H^1(X,mathcal {F})to H^1(X,mathcal {I})to H^1(X,mathcal {G})to.......to H^i(X,mathcal {F})to H^i(X,mathcal {I})to H^i(X,mathcal {G})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {F})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {I})to H^{i+1}(X,mathcal {G})to........$



      If the maps between $mathcal {F}(X)$,$mathcal {I}(X)$ and $mathcal {G}(X)$ are same(in fact it is enough to have maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ are same)in both the cases then I have shown that $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$.



      But I only know that in $2)$,i.e in long exact sequence $mathcal{I}(X)$ is same as zeroth right derived functor of global section functor of $mathcal I$(same goes in case of $mathcal G$.$mathcal F$)



      $underline {Question}$:$a)$Are the maps between $mathcal {I}(X)$,$mathcal {G}(X)$ same in both the cases(i.e in $1)$ and in $2)$)?.If it is so then how to see it explicitly?



      $b)$ If the answer to the first question is no then how to see $H^1(X,mathcal F)=0$ ?



      I tried to look at the process of the establishment of long exact sequence which uses snake lemma ,but it's still not very explicit to me that the maps are same in both the cases.



      Any help from anyone is welcome.






      algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology homological-algebra sheaf-cohomology




      algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology homological-algebra sheaf-cohomology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 13:56







      HARRY

















      asked Dec 3 '18 at 13:50









      HARRYHARRY

      889




      889






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          They are literally the same, since your long exact sequence actually comes from injective resolutions for your sheaves, in particular this long exact sequence coincides everywhere, with the left exact sequence $$0 to mathcal{F}(X) to mathcal{I}(X)to mathcal{G}(X).$$
          And now you can finish your argument, since your short exact sequence makes said left exact sequence into a sequence itself.
          About the precise mechanics about injective resolutions and long exact sequences arising there I recommend the book on homological algebra by Weibel, but there you can see precisely where those maps in the long exact sequence actually come from (injective resolutions).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024078%2fon-cohomology-of-flasque-sheaves-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            They are literally the same, since your long exact sequence actually comes from injective resolutions for your sheaves, in particular this long exact sequence coincides everywhere, with the left exact sequence $$0 to mathcal{F}(X) to mathcal{I}(X)to mathcal{G}(X).$$
            And now you can finish your argument, since your short exact sequence makes said left exact sequence into a sequence itself.
            About the precise mechanics about injective resolutions and long exact sequences arising there I recommend the book on homological algebra by Weibel, but there you can see precisely where those maps in the long exact sequence actually come from (injective resolutions).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              They are literally the same, since your long exact sequence actually comes from injective resolutions for your sheaves, in particular this long exact sequence coincides everywhere, with the left exact sequence $$0 to mathcal{F}(X) to mathcal{I}(X)to mathcal{G}(X).$$
              And now you can finish your argument, since your short exact sequence makes said left exact sequence into a sequence itself.
              About the precise mechanics about injective resolutions and long exact sequences arising there I recommend the book on homological algebra by Weibel, but there you can see precisely where those maps in the long exact sequence actually come from (injective resolutions).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                They are literally the same, since your long exact sequence actually comes from injective resolutions for your sheaves, in particular this long exact sequence coincides everywhere, with the left exact sequence $$0 to mathcal{F}(X) to mathcal{I}(X)to mathcal{G}(X).$$
                And now you can finish your argument, since your short exact sequence makes said left exact sequence into a sequence itself.
                About the precise mechanics about injective resolutions and long exact sequences arising there I recommend the book on homological algebra by Weibel, but there you can see precisely where those maps in the long exact sequence actually come from (injective resolutions).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                They are literally the same, since your long exact sequence actually comes from injective resolutions for your sheaves, in particular this long exact sequence coincides everywhere, with the left exact sequence $$0 to mathcal{F}(X) to mathcal{I}(X)to mathcal{G}(X).$$
                And now you can finish your argument, since your short exact sequence makes said left exact sequence into a sequence itself.
                About the precise mechanics about injective resolutions and long exact sequences arising there I recommend the book on homological algebra by Weibel, but there you can see precisely where those maps in the long exact sequence actually come from (injective resolutions).







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 3 '18 at 14:05









                EnkiduEnkidu

                1,30119




                1,30119






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024078%2fon-cohomology-of-flasque-sheaves-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Image
                    Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                    Read more

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Image
                    Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                    Read more

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Image
                    Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                    Read more