Finding the first non-zero terms of a power series












1












$begingroup$


I have the function:
$f(x) = frac{30}{(x^2 + 1)(x^2-9)}$



I need to find the first four non-zero terms of the power series centered at zero. I have not had much experience with power series so I am not sure how to start/complete this problem.






power-series







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have the function:
    $f(x) = frac{30}{(x^2 + 1)(x^2-9)}$



    I need to find the first four non-zero terms of the power series centered at zero. I have not had much experience with power series so I am not sure how to start/complete this problem.






    power-series







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have the function:
      $f(x) = frac{30}{(x^2 + 1)(x^2-9)}$



      I need to find the first four non-zero terms of the power series centered at zero. I have not had much experience with power series so I am not sure how to start/complete this problem.






      power-series







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have the function:
      $f(x) = frac{30}{(x^2 + 1)(x^2-9)}$



      I need to find the first four non-zero terms of the power series centered at zero. I have not had much experience with power series so I am not sure how to start/complete this problem.






      power-series




      power-series






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 22:17









      ElijahElijah

      626




      626






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $f(x)=frac{-3}{x^2+1}+frac{3}{x^2-9}$



          $frac{-3}{x^2+1}=-3(1-x^2+x^4-x^6+....)$



          $frac{3}{x^2-9}=frac{-1/3}{1-x^2/9}=(-1/3)(1+x^2/9+x^4/81+x^6/729+.....)$



          Combine to get $f(x)=-4/3+(80/27)x^2-........$



          I'll let you finish.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
            $endgroup$
            – Elijah
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:46










          • $begingroup$
            @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
            $endgroup$
            – herb steinberg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:10










          • $begingroup$
            I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
            $endgroup$
            – Lubin
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:17



















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can start by converting to rational parts.



          $displaystyle f(x)=frac a{x-3}+frac b{x+3}+frac c{x^2+1}$ in order to have a sum of usual power series :



          http://hardycalculus.com/calcindex/IE_powerseriestables.htm



          Then substitute in $displaystyle sum (pm 1)^nu^n=frac 1{1mp u}$ by factoring $3$ and get $u=frac x3$.



          For the other series substitute $u=x^2$ instead.



          Gather all the coefficients with the same power of $x$ to get the final power series $sum a_nx^n$ and determine its radius of convergence.



          Edit: I just saw your problem is just determining first coefficients, not all of them. But even though the methodology presented here allow to find the first coefficients quite quickly, just limit yourself to small powers of $x$.



          An alternative method is to calculate $f(0),f'(0),f''(0), ...$ and so on.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
            $endgroup$
            – eyeballfrog
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:40













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030432%2ffinding-the-first-non-zero-terms-of-a-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          $f(x)=frac{-3}{x^2+1}+frac{3}{x^2-9}$



          $frac{-3}{x^2+1}=-3(1-x^2+x^4-x^6+....)$



          $frac{3}{x^2-9}=frac{-1/3}{1-x^2/9}=(-1/3)(1+x^2/9+x^4/81+x^6/729+.....)$



          Combine to get $f(x)=-4/3+(80/27)x^2-........$



          I'll let you finish.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
            $endgroup$
            – Elijah
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:46










          • $begingroup$
            @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
            $endgroup$
            – herb steinberg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:10










          • $begingroup$
            I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
            $endgroup$
            – Lubin
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:17
















          1












          $begingroup$

          $f(x)=frac{-3}{x^2+1}+frac{3}{x^2-9}$



          $frac{-3}{x^2+1}=-3(1-x^2+x^4-x^6+....)$



          $frac{3}{x^2-9}=frac{-1/3}{1-x^2/9}=(-1/3)(1+x^2/9+x^4/81+x^6/729+.....)$



          Combine to get $f(x)=-4/3+(80/27)x^2-........$



          I'll let you finish.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
            $endgroup$
            – Elijah
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:46










          • $begingroup$
            @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
            $endgroup$
            – herb steinberg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:10










          • $begingroup$
            I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
            $endgroup$
            – Lubin
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:17














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $f(x)=frac{-3}{x^2+1}+frac{3}{x^2-9}$



          $frac{-3}{x^2+1}=-3(1-x^2+x^4-x^6+....)$



          $frac{3}{x^2-9}=frac{-1/3}{1-x^2/9}=(-1/3)(1+x^2/9+x^4/81+x^6/729+.....)$



          Combine to get $f(x)=-4/3+(80/27)x^2-........$



          I'll let you finish.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $f(x)=frac{-3}{x^2+1}+frac{3}{x^2-9}$



          $frac{-3}{x^2+1}=-3(1-x^2+x^4-x^6+....)$



          $frac{3}{x^2-9}=frac{-1/3}{1-x^2/9}=(-1/3)(1+x^2/9+x^4/81+x^6/729+.....)$



          Combine to get $f(x)=-4/3+(80/27)x^2-........$



          I'll let you finish.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 22:42









          herb steinbergherb steinberg

          2,7182310




          2,7182310












          • $begingroup$
            I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
            $endgroup$
            – Elijah
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:46










          • $begingroup$
            @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
            $endgroup$
            – herb steinberg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:10










          • $begingroup$
            I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
            $endgroup$
            – Lubin
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:17


















          • $begingroup$
            I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
            $endgroup$
            – Elijah
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:46










          • $begingroup$
            @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
            $endgroup$
            – herb steinberg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:10










          • $begingroup$
            I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
            $endgroup$
            – Lubin
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:17
















          $begingroup$
          I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
          $endgroup$
          – Elijah
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:46




          $begingroup$
          I am very sorry, this is a completely new topic to me. How would I go about solving this then? would the first term be the -4/3+(80/27)(x)^2 and substituting something in for x? Again this is a new topic for me so I don't know the proper techniques.
          $endgroup$
          – Elijah
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:46












          $begingroup$
          @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
          $endgroup$
          – herb steinberg
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:10




          $begingroup$
          @Elijah What I gave you are the first two terms of what you are looking for. To get the next two just add the coefficients of the $x^4$ and $x^6$ terms from the two given expressions. $-3-1/241$ and $3-1/2187$.
          $endgroup$
          – herb steinberg
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:10












          $begingroup$
          I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
          $endgroup$
          – Lubin
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:17




          $begingroup$
          I like this so much that I discarded my purely formal approach.
          $endgroup$
          – Lubin
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:17











          0












          $begingroup$

          You can start by converting to rational parts.



          $displaystyle f(x)=frac a{x-3}+frac b{x+3}+frac c{x^2+1}$ in order to have a sum of usual power series :



          http://hardycalculus.com/calcindex/IE_powerseriestables.htm



          Then substitute in $displaystyle sum (pm 1)^nu^n=frac 1{1mp u}$ by factoring $3$ and get $u=frac x3$.



          For the other series substitute $u=x^2$ instead.



          Gather all the coefficients with the same power of $x$ to get the final power series $sum a_nx^n$ and determine its radius of convergence.



          Edit: I just saw your problem is just determining first coefficients, not all of them. But even though the methodology presented here allow to find the first coefficients quite quickly, just limit yourself to small powers of $x$.



          An alternative method is to calculate $f(0),f'(0),f''(0), ...$ and so on.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
            $endgroup$
            – eyeballfrog
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:40


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You can start by converting to rational parts.



          $displaystyle f(x)=frac a{x-3}+frac b{x+3}+frac c{x^2+1}$ in order to have a sum of usual power series :



          http://hardycalculus.com/calcindex/IE_powerseriestables.htm



          Then substitute in $displaystyle sum (pm 1)^nu^n=frac 1{1mp u}$ by factoring $3$ and get $u=frac x3$.



          For the other series substitute $u=x^2$ instead.



          Gather all the coefficients with the same power of $x$ to get the final power series $sum a_nx^n$ and determine its radius of convergence.



          Edit: I just saw your problem is just determining first coefficients, not all of them. But even though the methodology presented here allow to find the first coefficients quite quickly, just limit yourself to small powers of $x$.



          An alternative method is to calculate $f(0),f'(0),f''(0), ...$ and so on.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
            $endgroup$
            – eyeballfrog
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:40
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You can start by converting to rational parts.



          $displaystyle f(x)=frac a{x-3}+frac b{x+3}+frac c{x^2+1}$ in order to have a sum of usual power series :



          http://hardycalculus.com/calcindex/IE_powerseriestables.htm



          Then substitute in $displaystyle sum (pm 1)^nu^n=frac 1{1mp u}$ by factoring $3$ and get $u=frac x3$.



          For the other series substitute $u=x^2$ instead.



          Gather all the coefficients with the same power of $x$ to get the final power series $sum a_nx^n$ and determine its radius of convergence.



          Edit: I just saw your problem is just determining first coefficients, not all of them. But even though the methodology presented here allow to find the first coefficients quite quickly, just limit yourself to small powers of $x$.



          An alternative method is to calculate $f(0),f'(0),f''(0), ...$ and so on.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You can start by converting to rational parts.



          $displaystyle f(x)=frac a{x-3}+frac b{x+3}+frac c{x^2+1}$ in order to have a sum of usual power series :



          http://hardycalculus.com/calcindex/IE_powerseriestables.htm



          Then substitute in $displaystyle sum (pm 1)^nu^n=frac 1{1mp u}$ by factoring $3$ and get $u=frac x3$.



          For the other series substitute $u=x^2$ instead.



          Gather all the coefficients with the same power of $x$ to get the final power series $sum a_nx^n$ and determine its radius of convergence.



          Edit: I just saw your problem is just determining first coefficients, not all of them. But even though the methodology presented here allow to find the first coefficients quite quickly, just limit yourself to small powers of $x$.



          An alternative method is to calculate $f(0),f'(0),f''(0), ...$ and so on.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 7 '18 at 22:41

























          answered Dec 7 '18 at 22:33









          zwimzwim

          12k730




          12k730








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
            $endgroup$
            – eyeballfrog
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:40
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
            $endgroup$
            – eyeballfrog
            Dec 7 '18 at 22:40










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
          $endgroup$
          – eyeballfrog
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:40






          $begingroup$
          Separating $1/(x^2-9)$ adds unnecessary steps, as it's already in the form $1/(u+b)$.
          $endgroup$
          – eyeballfrog
          Dec 7 '18 at 22:40




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030432%2ffinding-the-first-non-zero-terms-of-a-power-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Image
          Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
          Read more

          Verónica Boquete

          Image
          Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
          Read more

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          Image
          Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
          Read more