Show $X = {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$












0












$begingroup$


Given $(X,mathcal{A}, mu)$ a measurable space. Let $ p in ]1,infty[$, and $(f_{n})_{n}subseteq L^{p}(X,mu)$ so that $sup_{n}||f_{n}||_{p}<infty$ and $f_{n}to 0$, $n to infty$ $mu-$a.e.



i) Prove $ forall epsilon > 0$ and $n in mathbb N$, $X = {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$



ii) Show $lim_{nto infty}int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|dmu = 0 = lim_{n to infty}int_{X}|g|^{p-1}|f_{n}|dmu$



My ideas:



i) The inclusion ${f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon} subseteq X$ is trivial. I honestly do not know where to begin on $X subseteq {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$.



ii) I believe that i) is then used to split up $g$, and then hopefully get
$lim_{epsilon to 0}lim_{ntoinfty}(int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|leqepsilon}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|geqepsilon^2}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|g|leqepsilon}}dmu)=0$



Any guidance is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given $(X,mathcal{A}, mu)$ a measurable space. Let $ p in ]1,infty[$, and $(f_{n})_{n}subseteq L^{p}(X,mu)$ so that $sup_{n}||f_{n}||_{p}<infty$ and $f_{n}to 0$, $n to infty$ $mu-$a.e.



    i) Prove $ forall epsilon > 0$ and $n in mathbb N$, $X = {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$



    ii) Show $lim_{nto infty}int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|dmu = 0 = lim_{n to infty}int_{X}|g|^{p-1}|f_{n}|dmu$



    My ideas:



    i) The inclusion ${f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon} subseteq X$ is trivial. I honestly do not know where to begin on $X subseteq {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$.



    ii) I believe that i) is then used to split up $g$, and then hopefully get
    $lim_{epsilon to 0}lim_{ntoinfty}(int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|leqepsilon}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|geqepsilon^2}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|g|leqepsilon}}dmu)=0$



    Any guidance is greatly appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given $(X,mathcal{A}, mu)$ a measurable space. Let $ p in ]1,infty[$, and $(f_{n})_{n}subseteq L^{p}(X,mu)$ so that $sup_{n}||f_{n}||_{p}<infty$ and $f_{n}to 0$, $n to infty$ $mu-$a.e.



      i) Prove $ forall epsilon > 0$ and $n in mathbb N$, $X = {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$



      ii) Show $lim_{nto infty}int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|dmu = 0 = lim_{n to infty}int_{X}|g|^{p-1}|f_{n}|dmu$



      My ideas:



      i) The inclusion ${f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon} subseteq X$ is trivial. I honestly do not know where to begin on $X subseteq {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$.



      ii) I believe that i) is then used to split up $g$, and then hopefully get
      $lim_{epsilon to 0}lim_{ntoinfty}(int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|leqepsilon}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|geqepsilon^2}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|g|leqepsilon}}dmu)=0$



      Any guidance is greatly appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given $(X,mathcal{A}, mu)$ a measurable space. Let $ p in ]1,infty[$, and $(f_{n})_{n}subseteq L^{p}(X,mu)$ so that $sup_{n}||f_{n}||_{p}<infty$ and $f_{n}to 0$, $n to infty$ $mu-$a.e.



      i) Prove $ forall epsilon > 0$ and $n in mathbb N$, $X = {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$



      ii) Show $lim_{nto infty}int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|dmu = 0 = lim_{n to infty}int_{X}|g|^{p-1}|f_{n}|dmu$



      My ideas:



      i) The inclusion ${f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon} subseteq X$ is trivial. I honestly do not know where to begin on $X subseteq {f_{n} leq epsilon |g|} cup {|f_{n}|geq epsilon^{2}}cup{|g|leq epsilon}$.



      ii) I believe that i) is then used to split up $g$, and then hopefully get
      $lim_{epsilon to 0}lim_{ntoinfty}(int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|leqepsilon}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|f_{n}|geqepsilon^2}}dmu+int_{X}|f_{n}|^{p-1}|g|chi_{{|g|leqepsilon}}dmu)=0$



      Any guidance is greatly appreciated.







      real-analysis integration measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 22:08









      SABOYSABOY

      684311




      684311






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hypothesis on $g$ is missing. The result is true if $g in L^{p}$. For i) just observe that if $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2}$ and $|g|>epsilon$ then $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2} <epsilon |g|$. Can you finish the proof of i) now?



          I will prove the first part of 2) and the second part is very similar.
          So let us show that $int_A |f_n|^{p-1} |g|dmu $ can be made small (by suitable choice of $epsilon$) if $A$ is one of the sets $A_1={|f_n| leq epsilon |g|}, A_2={|f_n| geq epsilon ^{2}}$ and $A_3={|g|leq epsilon}$.



          For $A=A_1$: use DCT. Since the integrand is dominated by $epsilon |g|^{p}$ which is integrable, the integral tends to $0$.



          For $A=A_2$: apply Holder's inequality (with conjugate exponents $frac p {p-1}$ and $p$) to see that the integral is less than or equal to $|f_n|_p(int_{A_2} |g|^{p}dmu)$. Note that $|f_n|$ is bounded and $mu(A_2) to 0$ as $n to infty$.



          Finally for $A=A_3$ use a similar argument and note that $int |g|^{p} I_{{|g| leq epsilon}} to 0$ as $epsilon to 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 9 '18 at 23:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very smart. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:10











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030421%2fshow-x-f-n-leq-epsilon-g-cup-f-n-geq-epsilon2-cup-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Hypothesis on $g$ is missing. The result is true if $g in L^{p}$. For i) just observe that if $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2}$ and $|g|>epsilon$ then $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2} <epsilon |g|$. Can you finish the proof of i) now?



          I will prove the first part of 2) and the second part is very similar.
          So let us show that $int_A |f_n|^{p-1} |g|dmu $ can be made small (by suitable choice of $epsilon$) if $A$ is one of the sets $A_1={|f_n| leq epsilon |g|}, A_2={|f_n| geq epsilon ^{2}}$ and $A_3={|g|leq epsilon}$.



          For $A=A_1$: use DCT. Since the integrand is dominated by $epsilon |g|^{p}$ which is integrable, the integral tends to $0$.



          For $A=A_2$: apply Holder's inequality (with conjugate exponents $frac p {p-1}$ and $p$) to see that the integral is less than or equal to $|f_n|_p(int_{A_2} |g|^{p}dmu)$. Note that $|f_n|$ is bounded and $mu(A_2) to 0$ as $n to infty$.



          Finally for $A=A_3$ use a similar argument and note that $int |g|^{p} I_{{|g| leq epsilon}} to 0$ as $epsilon to 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 9 '18 at 23:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very smart. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:10
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hypothesis on $g$ is missing. The result is true if $g in L^{p}$. For i) just observe that if $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2}$ and $|g|>epsilon$ then $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2} <epsilon |g|$. Can you finish the proof of i) now?



          I will prove the first part of 2) and the second part is very similar.
          So let us show that $int_A |f_n|^{p-1} |g|dmu $ can be made small (by suitable choice of $epsilon$) if $A$ is one of the sets $A_1={|f_n| leq epsilon |g|}, A_2={|f_n| geq epsilon ^{2}}$ and $A_3={|g|leq epsilon}$.



          For $A=A_1$: use DCT. Since the integrand is dominated by $epsilon |g|^{p}$ which is integrable, the integral tends to $0$.



          For $A=A_2$: apply Holder's inequality (with conjugate exponents $frac p {p-1}$ and $p$) to see that the integral is less than or equal to $|f_n|_p(int_{A_2} |g|^{p}dmu)$. Note that $|f_n|$ is bounded and $mu(A_2) to 0$ as $n to infty$.



          Finally for $A=A_3$ use a similar argument and note that $int |g|^{p} I_{{|g| leq epsilon}} to 0$ as $epsilon to 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 9 '18 at 23:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very smart. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:10














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Hypothesis on $g$ is missing. The result is true if $g in L^{p}$. For i) just observe that if $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2}$ and $|g|>epsilon$ then $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2} <epsilon |g|$. Can you finish the proof of i) now?



          I will prove the first part of 2) and the second part is very similar.
          So let us show that $int_A |f_n|^{p-1} |g|dmu $ can be made small (by suitable choice of $epsilon$) if $A$ is one of the sets $A_1={|f_n| leq epsilon |g|}, A_2={|f_n| geq epsilon ^{2}}$ and $A_3={|g|leq epsilon}$.



          For $A=A_1$: use DCT. Since the integrand is dominated by $epsilon |g|^{p}$ which is integrable, the integral tends to $0$.



          For $A=A_2$: apply Holder's inequality (with conjugate exponents $frac p {p-1}$ and $p$) to see that the integral is less than or equal to $|f_n|_p(int_{A_2} |g|^{p}dmu)$. Note that $|f_n|$ is bounded and $mu(A_2) to 0$ as $n to infty$.



          Finally for $A=A_3$ use a similar argument and note that $int |g|^{p} I_{{|g| leq epsilon}} to 0$ as $epsilon to 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Hypothesis on $g$ is missing. The result is true if $g in L^{p}$. For i) just observe that if $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2}$ and $|g|>epsilon$ then $|f_n| <epsilon ^{2} <epsilon |g|$. Can you finish the proof of i) now?



          I will prove the first part of 2) and the second part is very similar.
          So let us show that $int_A |f_n|^{p-1} |g|dmu $ can be made small (by suitable choice of $epsilon$) if $A$ is one of the sets $A_1={|f_n| leq epsilon |g|}, A_2={|f_n| geq epsilon ^{2}}$ and $A_3={|g|leq epsilon}$.



          For $A=A_1$: use DCT. Since the integrand is dominated by $epsilon |g|^{p}$ which is integrable, the integral tends to $0$.



          For $A=A_2$: apply Holder's inequality (with conjugate exponents $frac p {p-1}$ and $p$) to see that the integral is less than or equal to $|f_n|_p(int_{A_2} |g|^{p}dmu)$. Note that $|f_n|$ is bounded and $mu(A_2) to 0$ as $n to infty$.



          Finally for $A=A_3$ use a similar argument and note that $int |g|^{p} I_{{|g| leq epsilon}} to 0$ as $epsilon to 0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 23:56









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          58.7k42161




          58.7k42161












          • $begingroup$
            I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 9 '18 at 23:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very smart. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:10


















          • $begingroup$
            I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 9 '18 at 19:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
            $endgroup$
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Dec 9 '18 at 23:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very smart. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – SABOY
            Dec 10 '18 at 8:10
















          $begingroup$
          I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
          $endgroup$
          – SABOY
          Dec 9 '18 at 19:07




          $begingroup$
          I do not understand what you are actually proving in i)
          $endgroup$
          – SABOY
          Dec 9 '18 at 19:07




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Dec 9 '18 at 23:17




          $begingroup$
          @SABOY You know that RHS is contained in LHS. To prove the reverse inclusion I am trying to prove that $(RHS)^{c}$ (complement of RHS) is contained in $(LHS)^{c}$ (which is empty, of course). I hope this clears up things a bit.
          $endgroup$
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Dec 9 '18 at 23:17












          $begingroup$
          Very smart. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – SABOY
          Dec 10 '18 at 8:10




          $begingroup$
          Very smart. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – SABOY
          Dec 10 '18 at 8:10


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030421%2fshow-x-f-n-leq-epsilon-g-cup-f-n-geq-epsilon2-cup-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten