Hensel Lifting with a non-simple root












2












$begingroup$


I was doing a problem and it involves lifting a root x= 55, from mod $2^{10}$ to a solution mod $2^{19}$ but the root is non simple, i.e. $$f'(x) equiv 0 (mod 2)$$



Here,
$f(x) = x^{3} - 9x + 8 equiv 0 $ $(mod 2^{10})$



Where x = 55 is a solution of f(x).



I am wondering how I go about trying to lift to this power modulus.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Feb 14 '18 at 15:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Feb 14 '18 at 22:28








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Bunneh
    Feb 15 '18 at 0:36


















2












$begingroup$


I was doing a problem and it involves lifting a root x= 55, from mod $2^{10}$ to a solution mod $2^{19}$ but the root is non simple, i.e. $$f'(x) equiv 0 (mod 2)$$



Here,
$f(x) = x^{3} - 9x + 8 equiv 0 $ $(mod 2^{10})$



Where x = 55 is a solution of f(x).



I am wondering how I go about trying to lift to this power modulus.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Feb 14 '18 at 15:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Feb 14 '18 at 22:28








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Bunneh
    Feb 15 '18 at 0:36
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


I was doing a problem and it involves lifting a root x= 55, from mod $2^{10}$ to a solution mod $2^{19}$ but the root is non simple, i.e. $$f'(x) equiv 0 (mod 2)$$



Here,
$f(x) = x^{3} - 9x + 8 equiv 0 $ $(mod 2^{10})$



Where x = 55 is a solution of f(x).



I am wondering how I go about trying to lift to this power modulus.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was doing a problem and it involves lifting a root x= 55, from mod $2^{10}$ to a solution mod $2^{19}$ but the root is non simple, i.e. $$f'(x) equiv 0 (mod 2)$$



Here,
$f(x) = x^{3} - 9x + 8 equiv 0 $ $(mod 2^{10})$



Where x = 55 is a solution of f(x).



I am wondering how I go about trying to lift to this power modulus.







number-theory elementary-number-theory hensels-lemma






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 14 '18 at 20:08







Bunneh

















asked Feb 14 '18 at 15:13









BunnehBunneh

557




557












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Feb 14 '18 at 15:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Feb 14 '18 at 22:28








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Bunneh
    Feb 15 '18 at 0:36




















  • $begingroup$
    Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – awllower
    Feb 14 '18 at 15:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
    $endgroup$
    – Lubin
    Feb 14 '18 at 22:28








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Bunneh
    Feb 15 '18 at 0:36


















$begingroup$
Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
$endgroup$
– awllower
Feb 14 '18 at 15:43




$begingroup$
Maybe substitute to find $(55+2^{10}x)^3-9(55+2^{10}x)+8equiv0pmod{2^{19}}$?
$endgroup$
– awllower
Feb 14 '18 at 15:43




1




1




$begingroup$
You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Feb 14 '18 at 22:28






$begingroup$
You could use the fact that $f(x)=(x-1)(x^2+x-8)$. You can do any kind of Hensel on the quadratic factor, and your desired number is the nonunit root. Alternatively, you can write $g(x)=f(x+1)=x(x^2 + 3x - 6)$ and work with the quadratic factor here. In addition, there are several ways of using Strong Hensel, which I guess you’re not aware of.
$endgroup$
– Lubin
Feb 14 '18 at 22:28






1




1




$begingroup$
@awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
$endgroup$
– Bunneh
Feb 15 '18 at 0:36






$begingroup$
@awllower Thank you! I got there, I found that the lift was $x = 55+83 cdot 2^{10}$ if you wanted the answer.
$endgroup$
– Bunneh
Feb 15 '18 at 0:36












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

A general method is: If $x$ is a singular root $mod p^j$, then either it lifts to p roots $mod p^{j+1}$, or it lifts to no root, depending on if $f(x)$ is congruent to $0 mod p^{j+1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
    $endgroup$
    – james0910
    Dec 6 '18 at 9:04











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2650469%2fhensel-lifting-with-a-non-simple-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

A general method is: If $x$ is a singular root $mod p^j$, then either it lifts to p roots $mod p^{j+1}$, or it lifts to no root, depending on if $f(x)$ is congruent to $0 mod p^{j+1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
    $endgroup$
    – james0910
    Dec 6 '18 at 9:04
















0












$begingroup$

A general method is: If $x$ is a singular root $mod p^j$, then either it lifts to p roots $mod p^{j+1}$, or it lifts to no root, depending on if $f(x)$ is congruent to $0 mod p^{j+1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
    $endgroup$
    – james0910
    Dec 6 '18 at 9:04














0












0








0





$begingroup$

A general method is: If $x$ is a singular root $mod p^j$, then either it lifts to p roots $mod p^{j+1}$, or it lifts to no root, depending on if $f(x)$ is congruent to $0 mod p^{j+1}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



A general method is: If $x$ is a singular root $mod p^j$, then either it lifts to p roots $mod p^{j+1}$, or it lifts to no root, depending on if $f(x)$ is congruent to $0 mod p^{j+1}$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 6 '18 at 5:12









Tianlalu

3,08621038




3,08621038










answered Dec 6 '18 at 4:50









james0910james0910

111




111












  • $begingroup$
    A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
    $endgroup$
    – james0910
    Dec 6 '18 at 9:04


















  • $begingroup$
    A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
    $endgroup$
    – james0910
    Dec 6 '18 at 9:04
















$begingroup$
A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
$endgroup$
– james0910
Dec 6 '18 at 9:04




$begingroup$
A remark. f(55) = 81*2^11, f'(55) = 4533*2^1. Since 11 >= 2*1 + 1, the solution 55 can be lifted to mod p^j with arbitrarily large j.
$endgroup$
– james0910
Dec 6 '18 at 9:04


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2650469%2fhensel-lifting-with-a-non-simple-root%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten