Irreducible polynomial over $mathbb{Q}[x]$












0












$begingroup$


Question:



Check if:
$$
f(x) = x^4 + 4x^3 + 6x^2 + 2x + 1
$$
is reducible or irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$




My Answer [Edited]:



Suppose that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $Z_p[x]$ for a prime $p$, therefore it's going to be irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$. Let $p=2$. Therefore:
$$
f_2(x) = f(x) mod{2} = x^4 + 1 = a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) in mathbb{Z}_2[x]
$$
Since $x^4+1$ have roots in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$, there are two cases to check... First let's suppose that $a_2(x),b_2(x)$ have degree equal to two, therefore:
begin{align*}
x^4+1&=(a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_2x^2+b_1x+b_0)=\
&=(a_2b_2)x^4+(a_2b_1+a_1b_2)x^3+(a_2b_0+a_1b_1+a_0b_2)x^2+(a_1b_0+a_0b_1)x^+(a_0b_0)
end{align*}
Since $a_i,b_i in mathbb{Z}_2 rightarrow a_i,b_iin {0,1}$, it follows that:
$$
a_0b_0=1 longrightarrow a_0=b_0=1\
a_1+b_1=0 longrightarrow a_1=b_1=0\
a_2b_2=1 longrightarrow a_2=b_2=1
$$
Hence:
begin{align*}
a_2(x)&=x^2+1\
b_2(x)&=x^2+1\
a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) &= (x^2+1)^2 = x^4 + 2x + 1 overbrace{longrightarrow}^{in mathbb{Z}_2} x^4 + 1
end{align*}



Now let's check WLOG the case for $a_2(x)$ having degree equal to $3$ and $b_2(x)$ having degree equal to $1$:



begin{align*}
x^4+1 &= a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) = (a_3x^3+a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_1x+b_0)\
&= (b_1a_3)x^4 + (b_1a_2+b_0a_3)x^3 + (b_1a_1+b_0a_2)x^2 + (b_1a_0+b_0a_1)x + (b_0a_0)
end{align*}



By the same reasoning as before:
begin{align*}
b_0a_0=1 longrightarrow b_0=a_0=1\
b_1a_3=1 longrightarrow b_1=a_3=1\
a_2+b_0 = 0 longrightarrow a_2=b_0=0\
a_1+a_2 = 0 longrightarrow a_1=a_2=0\
end{align*}



Conclusion, it is reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ and therefore I can't conclude anything.








polynomials ring-theory field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:45


















0












$begingroup$


Question:



Check if:
$$
f(x) = x^4 + 4x^3 + 6x^2 + 2x + 1
$$
is reducible or irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$




My Answer [Edited]:



Suppose that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $Z_p[x]$ for a prime $p$, therefore it's going to be irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$. Let $p=2$. Therefore:
$$
f_2(x) = f(x) mod{2} = x^4 + 1 = a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) in mathbb{Z}_2[x]
$$
Since $x^4+1$ have roots in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$, there are two cases to check... First let's suppose that $a_2(x),b_2(x)$ have degree equal to two, therefore:
begin{align*}
x^4+1&=(a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_2x^2+b_1x+b_0)=\
&=(a_2b_2)x^4+(a_2b_1+a_1b_2)x^3+(a_2b_0+a_1b_1+a_0b_2)x^2+(a_1b_0+a_0b_1)x^+(a_0b_0)
end{align*}
Since $a_i,b_i in mathbb{Z}_2 rightarrow a_i,b_iin {0,1}$, it follows that:
$$
a_0b_0=1 longrightarrow a_0=b_0=1\
a_1+b_1=0 longrightarrow a_1=b_1=0\
a_2b_2=1 longrightarrow a_2=b_2=1
$$
Hence:
begin{align*}
a_2(x)&=x^2+1\
b_2(x)&=x^2+1\
a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) &= (x^2+1)^2 = x^4 + 2x + 1 overbrace{longrightarrow}^{in mathbb{Z}_2} x^4 + 1
end{align*}



Now let's check WLOG the case for $a_2(x)$ having degree equal to $3$ and $b_2(x)$ having degree equal to $1$:



begin{align*}
x^4+1 &= a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) = (a_3x^3+a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_1x+b_0)\
&= (b_1a_3)x^4 + (b_1a_2+b_0a_3)x^3 + (b_1a_1+b_0a_2)x^2 + (b_1a_0+b_0a_1)x + (b_0a_0)
end{align*}



By the same reasoning as before:
begin{align*}
b_0a_0=1 longrightarrow b_0=a_0=1\
b_1a_3=1 longrightarrow b_1=a_3=1\
a_2+b_0 = 0 longrightarrow a_2=b_0=0\
a_1+a_2 = 0 longrightarrow a_1=a_2=0\
end{align*}



Conclusion, it is reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ and therefore I can't conclude anything.








polynomials ring-theory field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:45
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Question:



Check if:
$$
f(x) = x^4 + 4x^3 + 6x^2 + 2x + 1
$$
is reducible or irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$




My Answer [Edited]:



Suppose that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $Z_p[x]$ for a prime $p$, therefore it's going to be irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$. Let $p=2$. Therefore:
$$
f_2(x) = f(x) mod{2} = x^4 + 1 = a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) in mathbb{Z}_2[x]
$$
Since $x^4+1$ have roots in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$, there are two cases to check... First let's suppose that $a_2(x),b_2(x)$ have degree equal to two, therefore:
begin{align*}
x^4+1&=(a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_2x^2+b_1x+b_0)=\
&=(a_2b_2)x^4+(a_2b_1+a_1b_2)x^3+(a_2b_0+a_1b_1+a_0b_2)x^2+(a_1b_0+a_0b_1)x^+(a_0b_0)
end{align*}
Since $a_i,b_i in mathbb{Z}_2 rightarrow a_i,b_iin {0,1}$, it follows that:
$$
a_0b_0=1 longrightarrow a_0=b_0=1\
a_1+b_1=0 longrightarrow a_1=b_1=0\
a_2b_2=1 longrightarrow a_2=b_2=1
$$
Hence:
begin{align*}
a_2(x)&=x^2+1\
b_2(x)&=x^2+1\
a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) &= (x^2+1)^2 = x^4 + 2x + 1 overbrace{longrightarrow}^{in mathbb{Z}_2} x^4 + 1
end{align*}



Now let's check WLOG the case for $a_2(x)$ having degree equal to $3$ and $b_2(x)$ having degree equal to $1$:



begin{align*}
x^4+1 &= a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) = (a_3x^3+a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_1x+b_0)\
&= (b_1a_3)x^4 + (b_1a_2+b_0a_3)x^3 + (b_1a_1+b_0a_2)x^2 + (b_1a_0+b_0a_1)x + (b_0a_0)
end{align*}



By the same reasoning as before:
begin{align*}
b_0a_0=1 longrightarrow b_0=a_0=1\
b_1a_3=1 longrightarrow b_1=a_3=1\
a_2+b_0 = 0 longrightarrow a_2=b_0=0\
a_1+a_2 = 0 longrightarrow a_1=a_2=0\
end{align*}



Conclusion, it is reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ and therefore I can't conclude anything.








polynomials ring-theory field-theory irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Question:



Check if:
$$
f(x) = x^4 + 4x^3 + 6x^2 + 2x + 1
$$
is reducible or irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$




My Answer [Edited]:



Suppose that $f(x)$ is irreducible over $Z_p[x]$ for a prime $p$, therefore it's going to be irreducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$. Let $p=2$. Therefore:
$$
f_2(x) = f(x) mod{2} = x^4 + 1 = a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) in mathbb{Z}_2[x]
$$
Since $x^4+1$ have roots in $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$, there are two cases to check... First let's suppose that $a_2(x),b_2(x)$ have degree equal to two, therefore:
begin{align*}
x^4+1&=(a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_2x^2+b_1x+b_0)=\
&=(a_2b_2)x^4+(a_2b_1+a_1b_2)x^3+(a_2b_0+a_1b_1+a_0b_2)x^2+(a_1b_0+a_0b_1)x^+(a_0b_0)
end{align*}
Since $a_i,b_i in mathbb{Z}_2 rightarrow a_i,b_iin {0,1}$, it follows that:
$$
a_0b_0=1 longrightarrow a_0=b_0=1\
a_1+b_1=0 longrightarrow a_1=b_1=0\
a_2b_2=1 longrightarrow a_2=b_2=1
$$
Hence:
begin{align*}
a_2(x)&=x^2+1\
b_2(x)&=x^2+1\
a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) &= (x^2+1)^2 = x^4 + 2x + 1 overbrace{longrightarrow}^{in mathbb{Z}_2} x^4 + 1
end{align*}



Now let's check WLOG the case for $a_2(x)$ having degree equal to $3$ and $b_2(x)$ having degree equal to $1$:



begin{align*}
x^4+1 &= a_2(x)cdot b_2(x) = (a_3x^3+a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0)cdot(b_1x+b_0)\
&= (b_1a_3)x^4 + (b_1a_2+b_0a_3)x^3 + (b_1a_1+b_0a_2)x^2 + (b_1a_0+b_0a_1)x + (b_0a_0)
end{align*}



By the same reasoning as before:
begin{align*}
b_0a_0=1 longrightarrow b_0=a_0=1\
b_1a_3=1 longrightarrow b_1=a_3=1\
a_2+b_0 = 0 longrightarrow a_2=b_0=0\
a_1+a_2 = 0 longrightarrow a_1=a_2=0\
end{align*}



Conclusion, it is reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$ and therefore I can't conclude anything.








polynomials ring-theory field-theory irreducible-polynomials




polynomials ring-theory field-theory irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 3:57







Bruno Reis

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 3:30









Bruno ReisBruno Reis

982418




982418












  • $begingroup$
    Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:45




















  • $begingroup$
    Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Rolf Hoyer
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:34










  • $begingroup$
    @RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
    $endgroup$
    – Bruno Reis
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:45


















$begingroup$
Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 6 '18 at 3:34




$begingroup$
Seems to me you have shown that $f(x)$ is reducible over $Bbb Z_2[x]$, not whether or not it's reducible over $Bbb Q[x]$.
$endgroup$
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 6 '18 at 3:34












$begingroup$
@RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
$endgroup$
– Bruno Reis
Dec 6 '18 at 3:37




$begingroup$
@RolfHoyer Yeah, I was checking what I've done... I just know that if a monic polynomial is reducible over $mathbb{Q}[x]$, then it is going to be reducible over $mathbb{Z}_2[x]$... But if that polynomial is irreducible, I can't assume the same... How you would approach that question?
$endgroup$
– Bruno Reis
Dec 6 '18 at 3:37












$begingroup$
Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 6 '18 at 3:38




$begingroup$
Why doesn't $x^4+1$ have roots mod $2$?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 6 '18 at 3:38












$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
$endgroup$
– Bruno Reis
Dec 6 '18 at 3:39




$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr in mod 2, $x in {0,1}$ and from that we have $f(0) = 1$ and $f(1)=2=0$... Yeah, you are correct... We have roots...
$endgroup$
– Bruno Reis
Dec 6 '18 at 3:39




1




1




$begingroup$
@AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 6 '18 at 3:45






$begingroup$
@AnikBhowmick Shifting is an invertable operation, so irreduciblity must be preserved. In this case, factoring commutes with shifting.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 6 '18 at 3:45












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The expression for $f(x)$ looks pretty much like a binomial expansion: to be precise,
$$f(x)=(x+1)^4-2x .$$
Hence
$$f(x-1)=x^4-2x+2 ;$$
this is irreducible by Eisenstein, therefore $f(x)$ is also irreducible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Your polynomial is very close to $(x+1)^4$. Making the substitution, $x rightarrow y-1$, we get $ y^4 - 2y + 2$, which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027997%2firreducible-polynomial-over-mathbbqx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      The expression for $f(x)$ looks pretty much like a binomial expansion: to be precise,
      $$f(x)=(x+1)^4-2x .$$
      Hence
      $$f(x-1)=x^4-2x+2 ;$$
      this is irreducible by Eisenstein, therefore $f(x)$ is also irreducible.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        The expression for $f(x)$ looks pretty much like a binomial expansion: to be precise,
        $$f(x)=(x+1)^4-2x .$$
        Hence
        $$f(x-1)=x^4-2x+2 ;$$
        this is irreducible by Eisenstein, therefore $f(x)$ is also irreducible.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The expression for $f(x)$ looks pretty much like a binomial expansion: to be precise,
          $$f(x)=(x+1)^4-2x .$$
          Hence
          $$f(x-1)=x^4-2x+2 ;$$
          this is irreducible by Eisenstein, therefore $f(x)$ is also irreducible.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The expression for $f(x)$ looks pretty much like a binomial expansion: to be precise,
          $$f(x)=(x+1)^4-2x .$$
          Hence
          $$f(x-1)=x^4-2x+2 ;$$
          this is irreducible by Eisenstein, therefore $f(x)$ is also irreducible.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 6 '18 at 3:45









          DavidDavid

          68.1k664126




          68.1k664126























              2












              $begingroup$

              Your polynomial is very close to $(x+1)^4$. Making the substitution, $x rightarrow y-1$, we get $ y^4 - 2y + 2$, which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Your polynomial is very close to $(x+1)^4$. Making the substitution, $x rightarrow y-1$, we get $ y^4 - 2y + 2$, which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Your polynomial is very close to $(x+1)^4$. Making the substitution, $x rightarrow y-1$, we get $ y^4 - 2y + 2$, which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your polynomial is very close to $(x+1)^4$. Making the substitution, $x rightarrow y-1$, we get $ y^4 - 2y + 2$, which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 6 '18 at 3:48









                  Eric TowersEric Towers

                  32.5k22370




                  32.5k22370






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027997%2firreducible-polynomial-over-mathbbqx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Image
                      Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                      Read more

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Image
                      Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                      Read more

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      Image
                      Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                      Read more