Invariant subspace of a representation of a Lie algebra
$begingroup$
This may be silly. Let $mathfrak{g}$ be an Lie algebra, with $V$ a nonzero representation.
Denote the invariant subspace $V^{mathfrak{g}}={vin V|x.v=0,forall xin mathfrak{g}}$.
Question:Is $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ a subrepresentation of $V$? It seems to satisfy all axioms to become a subrepresentation. But I just wonder why the textbook is vague about it (namely, Lorentz's book) and calling it a subspace.
representation-theory lie-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may be silly. Let $mathfrak{g}$ be an Lie algebra, with $V$ a nonzero representation.
Denote the invariant subspace $V^{mathfrak{g}}={vin V|x.v=0,forall xin mathfrak{g}}$.
Question:Is $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ a subrepresentation of $V$? It seems to satisfy all axioms to become a subrepresentation. But I just wonder why the textbook is vague about it (namely, Lorentz's book) and calling it a subspace.
representation-theory lie-algebras
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may be silly. Let $mathfrak{g}$ be an Lie algebra, with $V$ a nonzero representation.
Denote the invariant subspace $V^{mathfrak{g}}={vin V|x.v=0,forall xin mathfrak{g}}$.
Question:Is $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ a subrepresentation of $V$? It seems to satisfy all axioms to become a subrepresentation. But I just wonder why the textbook is vague about it (namely, Lorentz's book) and calling it a subspace.
representation-theory lie-algebras
$endgroup$
This may be silly. Let $mathfrak{g}$ be an Lie algebra, with $V$ a nonzero representation.
Denote the invariant subspace $V^{mathfrak{g}}={vin V|x.v=0,forall xin mathfrak{g}}$.
Question:Is $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ a subrepresentation of $V$? It seems to satisfy all axioms to become a subrepresentation. But I just wonder why the textbook is vague about it (namely, Lorentz's book) and calling it a subspace.
representation-theory lie-algebras
representation-theory lie-algebras
asked Dec 6 '18 at 3:47
Weimin JiangWeimin Jiang
11
11
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028008%2finvariant-subspace-of-a-representation-of-a-lie-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028008%2finvariant-subspace-of-a-representation-of-a-lie-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The textbook says that it is a subspace, which is true. But it is also invariant, yes. Did you check any another book so far?
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 6 '18 at 13:40
$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde Yes, I checked Hall's Book(GTM 222), which also just mentions it as a subspace. I asked my professor about it, he/she was also vague about it, say that $V^{mathfrak{g}}$ already "use up" all the $mathfrak{g}$ actions, which makes me confused. That's why I ask here. Thanks for the response.
$endgroup$
– Weimin Jiang
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
$begingroup$
Anything that satisfies the axioms of X is an X. But we don't write out all the things something is every time we talk about it.
$endgroup$
– Artimis Fowl
Dec 7 '18 at 8:11
$begingroup$
It is a subrepresentation but not interesting in the sense that $ mathfrak{g} $ acts trivially on $ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ and this is what your professor perhaps meant to say - "$ V^{mathfrak{g}} $ uses up all the $ mathfrak{g} $-actions". So it is as good as being a subspace only.
$endgroup$
– hellHound
Dec 10 '18 at 19:50