Bounding a solution for an ODE
Given
$$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
I need to bound the solution to that ODE.
I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.
differential-equations
add a comment |
Given
$$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
I need to bound the solution to that ODE.
I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.
differential-equations
add a comment |
Given
$$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
I need to bound the solution to that ODE.
I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.
differential-equations
Given
$$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
I need to bound the solution to that ODE.
I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.
differential-equations
differential-equations
asked Nov 27 '18 at 15:55
galah92
25418
25418
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
$$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
$$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.
Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015935%2fbounding-a-solution-for-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
$$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
$$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.
Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
$$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
$$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.
Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
$$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
$$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.
Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.
Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
$$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
$$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.
Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.
edited Nov 27 '18 at 16:25
answered Nov 27 '18 at 16:06
Leo163
1,600512
1,600512
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:19
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
– Leo163
Nov 27 '18 at 16:22
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
Oh, of course..
– galah92
Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
add a comment |
Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.
add a comment |
Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.
add a comment |
Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.
Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 16:01
Julián Aguirre
67.6k24094
67.6k24094
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015935%2fbounding-a-solution-for-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown