Bounding a solution for an ODE












0














Given
$$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
I need to bound the solution to that ODE.



I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Given
    $$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
    I need to bound the solution to that ODE.



    I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Given
      $$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
      I need to bound the solution to that ODE.



      I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Given
      $$dot{x}=tcdot sin^2(xt), quad x(0)=0 quad tin[0,1]$$
      I need to bound the solution to that ODE.



      I know that $lvert dot{x} rvert = lvert f(x,y) rvert le 1$, but how can I continue from here and bound $x$ itself? I don't know how to approach that.







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 27 '18 at 15:55









      galah92

      25418




      25418






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
          $$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
          $$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.



          Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:19










          • You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
            – Leo163
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:22










          • Oh, of course..
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:23



















          5














          Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015935%2fbounding-a-solution-for-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
            $$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
            $$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.



            Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:19










            • You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
              – Leo163
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:22










            • Oh, of course..
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
















            3














            Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
            $$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
            $$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.



            Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:19










            • You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
              – Leo163
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:22










            • Oh, of course..
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:23














            3












            3








            3






            Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
            $$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
            $$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.



            Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Your equation tells you that $dot{x}(t)geq 0$ for all $t$, so let's forget about the absolute value. Moreover, since $sin^2leq 1$, we have
            $$dot{x}(t)leq t$$ for all $t$, and integrating we have
            $$int_0^sdot{x}(t)dtleq int_0^stdt Rightarrow x(s)leq {1over 2}s^2,$$ so $1/2$ is a bound, since you are saying $sin [0,1]$.



            Anyway, notice that this procedure can be iterated: since $sin theta<theta$ for positive $theta$, you can conclude that $dot{x}(t)leq {1over 2}t$, which now gives $1/4$ as a bound. Continuing like that, you have what @juliàn was saying: $0$ is actually the only solution.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 27 '18 at 16:25

























            answered Nov 27 '18 at 16:06









            Leo163

            1,600512




            1,600512












            • Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:19










            • You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
              – Leo163
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:22










            • Oh, of course..
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:23


















            • Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:19










            • You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
              – Leo163
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:22










            • Oh, of course..
              – galah92
              Nov 27 '18 at 16:23
















            Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:19




            Thanks. I can't detect the use of the IV though. Why is it needed?
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:19












            You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
            – Leo163
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:22




            You need it to say that $int_0^sdot{x}(t)dt=[x(s)-x(0)]=x(s)$
            – Leo163
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:22












            Oh, of course..
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:23




            Oh, of course..
            – galah92
            Nov 27 '18 at 16:23











            5














            Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              5














              Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                5












                5








                5






                Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Well, the unique solution is $x(t)=0$ for all $t$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 27 '18 at 16:01









                Julián Aguirre

                67.6k24094




                67.6k24094






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015935%2fbounding-a-solution-for-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten