Vrftsjtryk

I am new in Alebraic Topology. Given the torus, we say that the fundamental group of the torus is generated by two loops (or more exactly two equivalent classes of loops). One writes $pi=mathbb{Z}timesmathbb{Z}.$

I don't understand, how the null-homotopic loop, which is the constant loop, is generated by the two generators mentioned above. Can somebody provide an explanation? More even so, I don't see how it functions visually, since the two generators are not null-homotopic.
More precisely, given a null-homotopic loop on the surface on a base point $x$, how this loop will be generated by the two generators mentioned above?

Let $mathbb{T}^2$ denote the torus and choose a basepoint $p in mathbb{T}^2$. Then we know that $pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right) cong mathbb{Z} times mathbb{Z}$.

Now I think the reason for your confusion is an algebraic one.

Recall that $mathbb{Z} times mathbb{Z}$ has two generators, $a= (1, 0)$ and $b =(0, 1)$. Choose an isomorphism $psi : pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right) to mathbb{Z} times mathbb{Z}$, by surjectivity there exists path classes, $[f], [g] in pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$ such that $psi([f]) = a$ and $psi([g]) =b$. Then since $psi$ is an isomorphism we have $[f]$ and $[g]$ to be the two generators of $pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$.

Now your question is how the path class of the constant loop $c_p : I to mathbb{T}^2$ defined by $c_p(x) = p$ for all $x in I$, that being $[c_p] in pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$ is generated by $[f]$ and $[g]$. Well the answer to that is simple: note that $$[c_p] = 1_{pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)}$$
that is $[c_p]$ is the identity element of $pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$. Then recall the following definition that we have for exponents in groups.

Definition: In any group $(G, cdot)$ for any $x in G$ we define $x^0 = 1_G$ where $1_G$ is the identity element of the group $(G, cdot)$.

Hence since $[f], [g] in pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$ and $pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$ is indeed a group, we have $$[f]^0 = [g]^0 = 1_{pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)}.$$

Then we have $$left[c_pright] = [f]^0 * [g]^0$$ and so the constant path at $p$ is indeed generated by the two generators of $pi_1left(mathbb{T}^2, p right)$. And since $[c_p]$ is a nullhomotopic loop, since it is a constant loop by definition, the above shows how a product of two non null-homotopic loops yield a null-homotopic loop.

Note that above even though I've gone into quite a bit of detail, the only real fact I'm using is the following algebraic one. If we have a group $G$ and we have $G = langle A rangle$ for some subset $A subseteq G$ then every element $x in G$ can be written as $x = g_1 dots g_n cdot h_1^{-1} dots h_m^{-1}$ where $g_i, h_i in G$. In particular if we have $G = langle c , d rangle$, that is $G$ is generated by the two elements $c$ and $d$ then we can express $1_G$ as $1_G = c^0 cdot d^0$.

Your confusion seems to be about the meaning of the word "generate". By definition, if $G$ is a group and $Ssubseteq G$, then the subgroup generated by $S$ is the smallest subgroup that contains $S$. Since a subgroup always contains the identity element, any subset of $G$ (even the empty set!) "generates" the identity element.

The subgroup generated by $a$ and $b$ is the set of all elements that can be written as a sequence that consists of nothing but $a$, $b$, and their inverses (e.g $ab$ or $b^{-4}a$). The null sequence is allowed. That is, the empty string (a zero-length sequence) qualifies as "a sequence that consists of nothing but $a$, $b$, and their inverses"; it does not contain anything, so clearly it does not contain anything other than $a$, $b$, and their inverses. In an abelian group with two generators, the group is generated by taking the first generator an integer number of times, and then taking the second generator an integer number of times. And zero is an integer. Given two non null-homotopic loops $a$ and $b$, the constant loop is generated by taking $a$ zero times, then taking $b$ zero times. If you think of a group in terms of group actions, the identity is generated by not doing anything. Doing nothing at all is, at least as far as mathematicians are concerned, an action. Or, in the words of Geddy Lee, if you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.