How should I deal with an employee who is stealing from the cash counter?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
93
down vote
favorite
I own a pharmacy, and I have an employee who has been working for me for the past 5 years. However, he has recently started stealing money from the cash counter.
Maybe he thinks that I will not check camera footage every day, but a few days ago I checked footage for my own need and found out that he was stealing money from cash counter. It was not such a big amount, but it is now bothering me...
I really want to ask, should I fire him or should I talk to him about this? He belongs to a poor family and is a father of four children. I am paying him PKR 20,000 per month, and he is stealing PKR 300-500, not regularly but sometimes.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times. Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away? Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money?
Stealing is a bad habit, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
salary ethics employer-relations pakistan
New contributor
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
93
down vote
favorite
I own a pharmacy, and I have an employee who has been working for me for the past 5 years. However, he has recently started stealing money from the cash counter.
Maybe he thinks that I will not check camera footage every day, but a few days ago I checked footage for my own need and found out that he was stealing money from cash counter. It was not such a big amount, but it is now bothering me...
I really want to ask, should I fire him or should I talk to him about this? He belongs to a poor family and is a father of four children. I am paying him PKR 20,000 per month, and he is stealing PKR 300-500, not regularly but sometimes.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times. Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away? Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money?
Stealing is a bad habit, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
salary ethics employer-relations pakistan
New contributor
2
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
7
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
4
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
15
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
6
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
93
down vote
favorite
up vote
93
down vote
favorite
I own a pharmacy, and I have an employee who has been working for me for the past 5 years. However, he has recently started stealing money from the cash counter.
Maybe he thinks that I will not check camera footage every day, but a few days ago I checked footage for my own need and found out that he was stealing money from cash counter. It was not such a big amount, but it is now bothering me...
I really want to ask, should I fire him or should I talk to him about this? He belongs to a poor family and is a father of four children. I am paying him PKR 20,000 per month, and he is stealing PKR 300-500, not regularly but sometimes.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times. Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away? Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money?
Stealing is a bad habit, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
salary ethics employer-relations pakistan
New contributor
I own a pharmacy, and I have an employee who has been working for me for the past 5 years. However, he has recently started stealing money from the cash counter.
Maybe he thinks that I will not check camera footage every day, but a few days ago I checked footage for my own need and found out that he was stealing money from cash counter. It was not such a big amount, but it is now bothering me...
I really want to ask, should I fire him or should I talk to him about this? He belongs to a poor family and is a father of four children. I am paying him PKR 20,000 per month, and he is stealing PKR 300-500, not regularly but sometimes.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times. Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away? Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money?
Stealing is a bad habit, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
salary ethics employer-relations pakistan
salary ethics employer-relations pakistan
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
jcaron
1447
1447
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Meer Faisal Ali
592124
592124
New contributor
New contributor
2
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
7
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
4
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
15
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
6
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
2
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
7
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
4
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
15
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
6
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago
2
2
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
7
7
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
4
4
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
15
15
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
6
6
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
18 Answers
18
active
oldest
votes
up vote
145
down vote
I'm not insensitive to the fact that extreme levels of financial stress/poverty can make people act out of character.
I don't know much about cost of living in Pakistan but what you're paying him is substantially above the annual average household income in the country, which might indicate that he's either experiencing some additional pressures or (and I hate to say it) he's just skimming.
Obviously you are quite within your rights to just report him to the police and wash your hands of the situation. If however you want to see if this is just a desperate person doing desperate things and give him a chance you could talk with him, calmly explain that you know what he's been doing and offer him a chance to tell his side of the story.
Then you can make a call - if he's struggling to make ends meet on the wage, particularly if it is something that is transient (medical bill or whatever) then you have the option to officially pay/loan him the money and stress that stealing is unacceptable and that you won't tolerate it again but that you are prepared to at least listen to him if he comes to you with issues.
If you think he's skimming or his story doesn't add up or whatever then you can either fire him or fire him and report him.
Regardless I don't think turning a blind eye to it is the right way to go.
Edit: There appears to be some uncertainty around the actual wage figure being paid here - I initially read the salary in the question as being 20,000 PKR (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that does change things a bit - 2,000 PKR a month is quite a bit below the national average - and if the employee is the only one earning for their family then it would be very easy to imagine a scenario where stealing might be the only way they can keep their family from starving! I think I'd still recommend the same approach of talking to them as I describe, but I have to say I'd be leaning much more towards the notion of this being desperation rather than skimming!
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
93
down vote
He is still a very trust worthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
I would doubt that this is true.
The fact that this person has helped you before doesn't justify him stealing money from you in the present. If any, this person is being disrespectful to the trust you had in the past.
If you should fire him is up to you, but you should definitely bring this up to him, and talk about the incident in person, so you can work it out in a way you consider adequate. Anyways, stealing is a serious offense, in some contexts it can mean immediate firing, if not prison or something else, so this is not something to be taken lightly
add a comment |
up vote
60
down vote
should i fire him from job or should i talk to him about this?
I would talk to him about this, and then fire him. I would do it now before he steals more.
I was part owner of a small business in the past. One thing that was absolute was that theft simply cannot be tolerated. We had to fire one of our original employees for stealing. She was also caught on camera. It was tough to do, but it was the right thing.
I once worked for a supermarket chain. One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store. It sent the clear message to all the other employees that stealing was simply not tolerated.
It doesn't matter if this employee is a nice person. It doesn't matter if they helped you out in the past. Right now, this person is a thief. And if you tolerate one thief then you need to expect all your other employees to follow suit. That's no way to run a business.
Talk nicely. Offer to help him in his new job search. But fire him immediately.
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
He can't stay.
If he's stealing from you now, he'll steal from you again even if he promises not to. My family owned a small business for about 50 years and employees that were caught stealing always went back to their old ways even when given a second chance.
You need to fire him, but you definitely don't need to report him to the police.
While I have no direct knowledge of how the legal system works in Pakistan, I suspect that you might ruin his life or cause him much greater harm than he has caused you.
If you have the money and like him, you can just tell him that you don't need him anymore, and give him some severance pay. He'll know why he's being fired. There's nothing to be gained by punishing him.
If you were a big corporation with an HR department, things would be different, but this is your place and you can run it as you wish.
New contributor
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
18
down vote
If you had a better system for keeping your accounts, you would have known money was missing from the till at the end of each day without the security camera.
You probably need that level of basic accounting (i.e. checking that the total of the till receipts matches the amount of money in the cash drawer), whoever you employ. Otherwise, they will soon figure out that they can get away with skimming the till, and once they have found out where the security camera is, they will figure out a way to hide from it (e.g. one employee stands in a position that blocks the camera's view while another one takes the money).
Of course that basic check doesn't catch every thief, because a "sale" might not be put through the till at all - the customer's money goes straight into the thief's pocket not into the till, especially if the customer isn't bothered about having a printed receipt (and I assume that in Pakistan, there will be some customers who won't care about a piece of paper that they might not be able to read anyway).
If you don't want to fire the guy for personal reasons, a "subtle" way to deal with this is to tell all your staff that from now on, there will be a daily check for missing money. If you do find anything has gone missing, put a notice somewhere that all the staff (but not the customers) can see, with a record of when and how much you have lost.
Unless the thief is really stupid, he will get the message that keeping his fingers out of the till in future is probably a good idea!
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
In Argentina, you keep them. You consider the cost of what they're stealing and the cost * risk of what they might steal in the future, and if that is greater than the cost of firing him, hiring a replacement, training a replacement, the risk of the replacement not being as good as this person and the risk of the replacement also stealing, then you keep them.
Of course, if you think any form of theft must absolutely be punished, and this is more important to you than having an otherwise good employee, then you already have your own answer. You have your answer as well if you believe a person stealing a small amount of money from you is worse than allowing a family to starve.
You should be very careful in what responsibilities you assign this person in the future, because if you allow this to keep happening it can scale out of your control. One sure way to control this would be to talk to them and tell them that you know, and that they shouldn't do that. Don't do it as a reprimand, since their own consciousness is already punishing them enough (and if it isn't, then you should re-evaluate whether you keep them or not). Try to find out why they are doing this. Remember, they helped you in the past. Do they need your help now? Can you help them?
As Dmitry Grigoryev mentioned in the comments, you should also take into account how whatever decision you make will affect other employees. In this sense, be VERY careful to not send neither the message that stealing is OK nor that you won't help people who've helped you in the past.
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Is this your own pharmacy or are you managing it for a larger company?
If it's your own pharmacy, it's your decision. I can't say what would be most appropriate, as it is much more about cultural norms than anything else at this point. In the U.S., the person would pretty much have to be fired, as knowingly tolerating this could cause you to lose the licenses and certifications required to handle some controlled-access medications, which I assume would be essential to your business.
If you're the manager and the pharmacy is owned by a larger company, there should be clear guidelines for you to follow. If you aren't certain, call whomever you report to and ask for guidance.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Tell him you know he wouldn't steal from you unless he really needed it. Therefore you're going to raise his salary by the amount he has been stealing.
But if it ever happens again he will be dismissed on the spot because you need to know you can trust your employees so you can't tolerate stealing.
New contributor
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If he needed more money he could have asked for a raise. If his family was starving, as some people here assume, he could have explained this to you and asked for a raise.
If I was caught stealing I 100% expect that I would get fired. My boss wouldn’t be able to trust me. He might get into legal trouble if he kept me employed and I did something worse. So yes, he should be fired.
You might have a discussion with him, and there might be exceptional circumstances, but that is unlikely.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In my opinion case is simple, he is stealing money from you, case closed. Fire him or call police.
From other hand, if you feel like you owe him something, for helping you in past or being good friend or/and employee, talk to him.
Offer him help, maybe loan, maybe rise his salary. But under any circumstances do not let him steal more money.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If you own the pharmacy, and the money in the register is indeed your own money, and you have video evidence of this employee taking that money then you should report him to the local police and terminate their employment.
New contributor
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
I appreciate your predicament which reflects your care towards your employee.
Stealing, though a sin as well as a crime, is a reflection of an immoral way of satisfying some lack.
As you mentioned he is from a poor background and since I don't know his age, family and circumstances, might not be able to make assumptions but running a family on less than 15 dollars a month, would be hard. Here in India a pharmacy helper would get at least 50-100 dollars.
As an Argentinan wrote that in Argentina they would be retained, I would suggest the same and also, if you can manage increase around 300 PAK ruppes /3 dollars (if you can afford it financially) letting him know you are aware of his stealing and encouraging him to be honest of his intentions than resorting to immoral means. Forgiveness and love is the message of all our religions and at these situations, we must show kindness to people, in image, of our messengers.
However if you want to punish him, best fire him but reporting him to the police will make his life miserable, as poor people are treated really bad by police of most countries.
And like you said 'stealing is a bad habit ' and something which can be unlearnt, easely.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
There are different kinds of people but (apart from career criminals) they all justify stealing in their own minds and own ways.
He's rich and I'm poor. I deserve the money more than him.
I helped him when he was in trouble. He owes me something in return.
I'm desperate and I'm only borrowing the money. I fully intend to pay it back when I can.
I'm being threatened by debt collectors and I'll be killed or injured. Even being dishonest is better than that.
I'm not stealing for myself. I'm stealing for the benefit of my family, it's my overarching duty.
My drug habit is too powerful to resist.
Etc.
I think I might approach it by saying, "I sometimes wonder why people steal money. What do you think?"
You may or may not get an answer but either way you've dropped the hint.
From then on count the takings and keep an eye on the cameras. Don't give him a second chance.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I don't think that is good to steal money from You.
Are you sure that he didn't give you this money back? Have you watched all recordings? Maybe your employee had difficult situation and needed money in exact date, but he DID return whole amount to cash counter. It will partly justifie his action.
New contributor
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
Please consider the foll owing!
This could be one of those situations that i like to call the God vs Satan relationship.
Most of the times your better employee, the one you trust more and the one you consider essential start to grow this feeling that your business is running great ONLY for his own merit. This thought become more and more intrusive until something happens for example a difficult financial situation at home. This could be amplified by someone (i.e. wife, older brothers or relatives) that keep telling to him that he deserves more.
He stole and this is a crime no way but you said he has 4 children so maybe you should consider what to do deeply and widely.
My advice is talk with him and try to find out if he feel like your pharmacy is doing good only because of him and he should be compensated more.
After you find it you can discover if it's his own thought or if this thought comes from the outside. If the case is the latter you can make him feel more valued and assure his loyalty by raising the paycheck but scaling every month the money he stole until you recover the stolen amount.
I sincerely hope everything will fix :)
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
If you have detailed accounting, you can just take what he steals out of his paycheck, dock his pay. This sends a much clearer message than stealing will not be tolerated. This sends the message of "You can not mess with me." After that I'd talk to him about it. See what's going on. Perhaps you're wrong. Perhaps he actually needs the money. Perhaps he hasn't gotten a pay increase in a while and he's actually making less due to inflation.
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-3
down vote
Stealing is a Crime !
You seem to have lost sight of this absolutely fundamental fact.
Call the police. Drop into a station and ask them what to do. It is their job to handle such things.
Also note : if he steals money, does he also steal drugs ? Does he take in prescriptions which he knows are false ? This could be the tip of the iceberg - criminals actions like theft rarely stop at one thing. This one person could do tremendous damage to you, your business and your reputation and indeed your family.
Any policeman will tell you that when you uncover one small lie, it's often the start of a trail of lies, sometimes leading to the discovery of bigger (and unrelated) crimes. It's your duty to tell the police.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
Understand that criminals often do project a nice and trusting personality - it's part of the requirement of getting into a trusted position. As your own indecision shows, it also helps keep them from being punished.
Don't fall for that old con.
Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away ?
Police first. Get advice from people who understand crime.
It's what they're there for.
Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money.
No it's not OK.
If this person simply needed more wages, then they should simply have asked for a raise. You don't sound like an unreasonable person, so they presumably have no reason to think you would be unreasonable.
What they are doing is wrong. There are many good people who would do your job and never steal from you under any circumstances. Why should this person get the benefit of your kindness when they have no moral right to it ?
Stealing is a bad habit
Stealing is a crime. That all.
Would you steal ? What would it take to make you steal ?
It is an exploitation of your good nature.
, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
Do not confuse your morality with this persons. My experience is that criminals feel a sense of entitlement and have no real sense of right and wrong. No amount of telling them about right and wrong will give them one.
My view is that this person has cynically manipulated you and your trust. You feel guilty because they want you to feel that way.
I, unfortunately, have dealt with too many crooks who do these things. It's what they do. It's a plan, part of how they get into positions of trust and exploit them for as long as possible with the minimum of consequences.
Do not let this person get away with it.
Mercy is for the court (if it ever reaches court). They can decide, with a more complete knowledge of the individual's circumstances and true history, what sentence if appropriate - a fine, repay victim, perhaps prison. That's what courts are for.
You may not really know the person you think you do. Five years may sound like long enough to know someone, but I've seen ongoing thefts from employers that went back twenty years when people started digging into the facts.
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Normally, the cash is counted before and after the cashier is on duty and the amount rung on the register should be added to the starting amount and be present in the ending amount. This is why people invented the cash register.
New contributor
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
add a comment |
protected by Jane S♦ yesterday
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
18 Answers
18
active
oldest
votes
18 Answers
18
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
145
down vote
I'm not insensitive to the fact that extreme levels of financial stress/poverty can make people act out of character.
I don't know much about cost of living in Pakistan but what you're paying him is substantially above the annual average household income in the country, which might indicate that he's either experiencing some additional pressures or (and I hate to say it) he's just skimming.
Obviously you are quite within your rights to just report him to the police and wash your hands of the situation. If however you want to see if this is just a desperate person doing desperate things and give him a chance you could talk with him, calmly explain that you know what he's been doing and offer him a chance to tell his side of the story.
Then you can make a call - if he's struggling to make ends meet on the wage, particularly if it is something that is transient (medical bill or whatever) then you have the option to officially pay/loan him the money and stress that stealing is unacceptable and that you won't tolerate it again but that you are prepared to at least listen to him if he comes to you with issues.
If you think he's skimming or his story doesn't add up or whatever then you can either fire him or fire him and report him.
Regardless I don't think turning a blind eye to it is the right way to go.
Edit: There appears to be some uncertainty around the actual wage figure being paid here - I initially read the salary in the question as being 20,000 PKR (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that does change things a bit - 2,000 PKR a month is quite a bit below the national average - and if the employee is the only one earning for their family then it would be very easy to imagine a scenario where stealing might be the only way they can keep their family from starving! I think I'd still recommend the same approach of talking to them as I describe, but I have to say I'd be leaning much more towards the notion of this being desperation rather than skimming!
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
145
down vote
I'm not insensitive to the fact that extreme levels of financial stress/poverty can make people act out of character.
I don't know much about cost of living in Pakistan but what you're paying him is substantially above the annual average household income in the country, which might indicate that he's either experiencing some additional pressures or (and I hate to say it) he's just skimming.
Obviously you are quite within your rights to just report him to the police and wash your hands of the situation. If however you want to see if this is just a desperate person doing desperate things and give him a chance you could talk with him, calmly explain that you know what he's been doing and offer him a chance to tell his side of the story.
Then you can make a call - if he's struggling to make ends meet on the wage, particularly if it is something that is transient (medical bill or whatever) then you have the option to officially pay/loan him the money and stress that stealing is unacceptable and that you won't tolerate it again but that you are prepared to at least listen to him if he comes to you with issues.
If you think he's skimming or his story doesn't add up or whatever then you can either fire him or fire him and report him.
Regardless I don't think turning a blind eye to it is the right way to go.
Edit: There appears to be some uncertainty around the actual wage figure being paid here - I initially read the salary in the question as being 20,000 PKR (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that does change things a bit - 2,000 PKR a month is quite a bit below the national average - and if the employee is the only one earning for their family then it would be very easy to imagine a scenario where stealing might be the only way they can keep their family from starving! I think I'd still recommend the same approach of talking to them as I describe, but I have to say I'd be leaning much more towards the notion of this being desperation rather than skimming!
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
145
down vote
up vote
145
down vote
I'm not insensitive to the fact that extreme levels of financial stress/poverty can make people act out of character.
I don't know much about cost of living in Pakistan but what you're paying him is substantially above the annual average household income in the country, which might indicate that he's either experiencing some additional pressures or (and I hate to say it) he's just skimming.
Obviously you are quite within your rights to just report him to the police and wash your hands of the situation. If however you want to see if this is just a desperate person doing desperate things and give him a chance you could talk with him, calmly explain that you know what he's been doing and offer him a chance to tell his side of the story.
Then you can make a call - if he's struggling to make ends meet on the wage, particularly if it is something that is transient (medical bill or whatever) then you have the option to officially pay/loan him the money and stress that stealing is unacceptable and that you won't tolerate it again but that you are prepared to at least listen to him if he comes to you with issues.
If you think he's skimming or his story doesn't add up or whatever then you can either fire him or fire him and report him.
Regardless I don't think turning a blind eye to it is the right way to go.
Edit: There appears to be some uncertainty around the actual wage figure being paid here - I initially read the salary in the question as being 20,000 PKR (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that does change things a bit - 2,000 PKR a month is quite a bit below the national average - and if the employee is the only one earning for their family then it would be very easy to imagine a scenario where stealing might be the only way they can keep their family from starving! I think I'd still recommend the same approach of talking to them as I describe, but I have to say I'd be leaning much more towards the notion of this being desperation rather than skimming!
I'm not insensitive to the fact that extreme levels of financial stress/poverty can make people act out of character.
I don't know much about cost of living in Pakistan but what you're paying him is substantially above the annual average household income in the country, which might indicate that he's either experiencing some additional pressures or (and I hate to say it) he's just skimming.
Obviously you are quite within your rights to just report him to the police and wash your hands of the situation. If however you want to see if this is just a desperate person doing desperate things and give him a chance you could talk with him, calmly explain that you know what he's been doing and offer him a chance to tell his side of the story.
Then you can make a call - if he's struggling to make ends meet on the wage, particularly if it is something that is transient (medical bill or whatever) then you have the option to officially pay/loan him the money and stress that stealing is unacceptable and that you won't tolerate it again but that you are prepared to at least listen to him if he comes to you with issues.
If you think he's skimming or his story doesn't add up or whatever then you can either fire him or fire him and report him.
Regardless I don't think turning a blind eye to it is the right way to go.
Edit: There appears to be some uncertainty around the actual wage figure being paid here - I initially read the salary in the question as being 20,000 PKR (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that does change things a bit - 2,000 PKR a month is quite a bit below the national average - and if the employee is the only one earning for their family then it would be very easy to imagine a scenario where stealing might be the only way they can keep their family from starving! I think I'd still recommend the same approach of talking to them as I describe, but I have to say I'd be leaning much more towards the notion of this being desperation rather than skimming!
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
motosubatsu
38.7k18101162
38.7k18101162
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
21
21
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
I agree that ignoring it is definitely not the way to go, and if the OP really doesn't think the amount being stolen is significant as he said, then there shouldn't be a problem with just officially adding that amount to the employee's salary, but only if he's absolutely certain he can be trusted not to continue stealing more after that.
– Herohtar
2 days ago
4
4
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
We really need clarification from OP about the salary now. You claim that the salary was already much higher than average, and after your answer, someone just randomly bumped the salary to ten times more.
– pipe
2 days ago
2
2
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
@pipe I actually read the salary as being the 20,000 figure in the first place (courtesy of the comma acting to my UK-based brain as a "thousands" separator I assume) - so if that is the correct figure then my answer and calculations still hold. If it's actually the 2,000 figure then that would change things a bit so agree that clarification from the OP would be ideal.
– motosubatsu
2 days ago
2
2
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
@BillK You probably wrote that in the wrong place. Your answer is unrelated to what is written in this answer and you should post it as an answer to the question.
– pipe
yesterday
1
1
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
@NSNoob Which is tbh where I think the PKR 20,000 is more likely - I've added a section to my answer to cover off the other possibility though and to give a bit of context to my "you're paying him substantially above the average" statement!
– motosubatsu
yesterday
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
93
down vote
He is still a very trust worthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
I would doubt that this is true.
The fact that this person has helped you before doesn't justify him stealing money from you in the present. If any, this person is being disrespectful to the trust you had in the past.
If you should fire him is up to you, but you should definitely bring this up to him, and talk about the incident in person, so you can work it out in a way you consider adequate. Anyways, stealing is a serious offense, in some contexts it can mean immediate firing, if not prison or something else, so this is not something to be taken lightly
add a comment |
up vote
93
down vote
He is still a very trust worthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
I would doubt that this is true.
The fact that this person has helped you before doesn't justify him stealing money from you in the present. If any, this person is being disrespectful to the trust you had in the past.
If you should fire him is up to you, but you should definitely bring this up to him, and talk about the incident in person, so you can work it out in a way you consider adequate. Anyways, stealing is a serious offense, in some contexts it can mean immediate firing, if not prison or something else, so this is not something to be taken lightly
add a comment |
up vote
93
down vote
up vote
93
down vote
He is still a very trust worthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
I would doubt that this is true.
The fact that this person has helped you before doesn't justify him stealing money from you in the present. If any, this person is being disrespectful to the trust you had in the past.
If you should fire him is up to you, but you should definitely bring this up to him, and talk about the incident in person, so you can work it out in a way you consider adequate. Anyways, stealing is a serious offense, in some contexts it can mean immediate firing, if not prison or something else, so this is not something to be taken lightly
He is still a very trust worthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
I would doubt that this is true.
The fact that this person has helped you before doesn't justify him stealing money from you in the present. If any, this person is being disrespectful to the trust you had in the past.
If you should fire him is up to you, but you should definitely bring this up to him, and talk about the incident in person, so you can work it out in a way you consider adequate. Anyways, stealing is a serious offense, in some contexts it can mean immediate firing, if not prison or something else, so this is not something to be taken lightly
answered 2 days ago
DarkCygnus
32.3k1362141
32.3k1362141
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
60
down vote
should i fire him from job or should i talk to him about this?
I would talk to him about this, and then fire him. I would do it now before he steals more.
I was part owner of a small business in the past. One thing that was absolute was that theft simply cannot be tolerated. We had to fire one of our original employees for stealing. She was also caught on camera. It was tough to do, but it was the right thing.
I once worked for a supermarket chain. One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store. It sent the clear message to all the other employees that stealing was simply not tolerated.
It doesn't matter if this employee is a nice person. It doesn't matter if they helped you out in the past. Right now, this person is a thief. And if you tolerate one thief then you need to expect all your other employees to follow suit. That's no way to run a business.
Talk nicely. Offer to help him in his new job search. But fire him immediately.
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
60
down vote
should i fire him from job or should i talk to him about this?
I would talk to him about this, and then fire him. I would do it now before he steals more.
I was part owner of a small business in the past. One thing that was absolute was that theft simply cannot be tolerated. We had to fire one of our original employees for stealing. She was also caught on camera. It was tough to do, but it was the right thing.
I once worked for a supermarket chain. One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store. It sent the clear message to all the other employees that stealing was simply not tolerated.
It doesn't matter if this employee is a nice person. It doesn't matter if they helped you out in the past. Right now, this person is a thief. And if you tolerate one thief then you need to expect all your other employees to follow suit. That's no way to run a business.
Talk nicely. Offer to help him in his new job search. But fire him immediately.
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
60
down vote
up vote
60
down vote
should i fire him from job or should i talk to him about this?
I would talk to him about this, and then fire him. I would do it now before he steals more.
I was part owner of a small business in the past. One thing that was absolute was that theft simply cannot be tolerated. We had to fire one of our original employees for stealing. She was also caught on camera. It was tough to do, but it was the right thing.
I once worked for a supermarket chain. One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store. It sent the clear message to all the other employees that stealing was simply not tolerated.
It doesn't matter if this employee is a nice person. It doesn't matter if they helped you out in the past. Right now, this person is a thief. And if you tolerate one thief then you need to expect all your other employees to follow suit. That's no way to run a business.
Talk nicely. Offer to help him in his new job search. But fire him immediately.
should i fire him from job or should i talk to him about this?
I would talk to him about this, and then fire him. I would do it now before he steals more.
I was part owner of a small business in the past. One thing that was absolute was that theft simply cannot be tolerated. We had to fire one of our original employees for stealing. She was also caught on camera. It was tough to do, but it was the right thing.
I once worked for a supermarket chain. One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store. It sent the clear message to all the other employees that stealing was simply not tolerated.
It doesn't matter if this employee is a nice person. It doesn't matter if they helped you out in the past. Right now, this person is a thief. And if you tolerate one thief then you need to expect all your other employees to follow suit. That's no way to run a business.
Talk nicely. Offer to help him in his new job search. But fire him immediately.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Joe Strazzere
236k115693986
236k115693986
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
31
31
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
to quote the show The Ozarks which brings up a near identical situation, 'you fire them because its not the first time they've stolen from you, just the first time you've caught them'
– BKlassen
2 days ago
3
3
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
If he'll steal something small, he'll steal something big.
– Headblender
2 days ago
11
11
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
+1 if you keep an employee that steals, you are a sucker and worse will happen to you. If you talk to him and sympathize with his explanation, then don't have him arrested in the bargain. But there is no responsible way to keep him employed there, period.
– mxyzplk
2 days ago
3
3
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
Re: "One of my young coworkers was fired for stealing a $0.19 pen from the adjoining store": Is there more to that story? I don't even understand why someone would go into a store and steal a 19¢ pen.
– ruakh
yesterday
5
5
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
@JoeStrazzere some people may hold the opinion it's not stealing to take a pen home from work
– Bertelem
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
He can't stay.
If he's stealing from you now, he'll steal from you again even if he promises not to. My family owned a small business for about 50 years and employees that were caught stealing always went back to their old ways even when given a second chance.
You need to fire him, but you definitely don't need to report him to the police.
While I have no direct knowledge of how the legal system works in Pakistan, I suspect that you might ruin his life or cause him much greater harm than he has caused you.
If you have the money and like him, you can just tell him that you don't need him anymore, and give him some severance pay. He'll know why he's being fired. There's nothing to be gained by punishing him.
If you were a big corporation with an HR department, things would be different, but this is your place and you can run it as you wish.
New contributor
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
He can't stay.
If he's stealing from you now, he'll steal from you again even if he promises not to. My family owned a small business for about 50 years and employees that were caught stealing always went back to their old ways even when given a second chance.
You need to fire him, but you definitely don't need to report him to the police.
While I have no direct knowledge of how the legal system works in Pakistan, I suspect that you might ruin his life or cause him much greater harm than he has caused you.
If you have the money and like him, you can just tell him that you don't need him anymore, and give him some severance pay. He'll know why he's being fired. There's nothing to be gained by punishing him.
If you were a big corporation with an HR department, things would be different, but this is your place and you can run it as you wish.
New contributor
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
29
down vote
up vote
29
down vote
He can't stay.
If he's stealing from you now, he'll steal from you again even if he promises not to. My family owned a small business for about 50 years and employees that were caught stealing always went back to their old ways even when given a second chance.
You need to fire him, but you definitely don't need to report him to the police.
While I have no direct knowledge of how the legal system works in Pakistan, I suspect that you might ruin his life or cause him much greater harm than he has caused you.
If you have the money and like him, you can just tell him that you don't need him anymore, and give him some severance pay. He'll know why he's being fired. There's nothing to be gained by punishing him.
If you were a big corporation with an HR department, things would be different, but this is your place and you can run it as you wish.
New contributor
He can't stay.
If he's stealing from you now, he'll steal from you again even if he promises not to. My family owned a small business for about 50 years and employees that were caught stealing always went back to their old ways even when given a second chance.
You need to fire him, but you definitely don't need to report him to the police.
While I have no direct knowledge of how the legal system works in Pakistan, I suspect that you might ruin his life or cause him much greater harm than he has caused you.
If you have the money and like him, you can just tell him that you don't need him anymore, and give him some severance pay. He'll know why he's being fired. There's nothing to be gained by punishing him.
If you were a big corporation with an HR department, things would be different, but this is your place and you can run it as you wish.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Terry Carmen
56517
56517
New contributor
New contributor
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
16
16
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
Plus, if he's stealing money now, he could move to stealing drugs next time. This risks putting both the employee and the pharmacy in legal trouble.
– bta
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
It seems I was mistaken and his salary non which to feed a family with 4 kids, is around $4.50 per day. He may have asked for a raise and been denied, and his family may be starving, so he stole 2c which may have been the remainder he needed to afford a basic meal such as some rice.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
Then I would question why the OP is not paying the employee enough to literally eat.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
2
2
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2000 PKR is ~$15 a month... or $180/year... the average Pakistani salary is $15k/year... So either the OP is off by an order of magnitude or is paying very poorly. averagesalarysurvey.com/pakistan
– WernerCD
yesterday
2
2
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
There was a typo in the OP and then an incorrect edit. The minimum monthly wage in Pakistan is 15,000, so 2,000/month is not possible.
– jcaron
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
18
down vote
If you had a better system for keeping your accounts, you would have known money was missing from the till at the end of each day without the security camera.
You probably need that level of basic accounting (i.e. checking that the total of the till receipts matches the amount of money in the cash drawer), whoever you employ. Otherwise, they will soon figure out that they can get away with skimming the till, and once they have found out where the security camera is, they will figure out a way to hide from it (e.g. one employee stands in a position that blocks the camera's view while another one takes the money).
Of course that basic check doesn't catch every thief, because a "sale" might not be put through the till at all - the customer's money goes straight into the thief's pocket not into the till, especially if the customer isn't bothered about having a printed receipt (and I assume that in Pakistan, there will be some customers who won't care about a piece of paper that they might not be able to read anyway).
If you don't want to fire the guy for personal reasons, a "subtle" way to deal with this is to tell all your staff that from now on, there will be a daily check for missing money. If you do find anything has gone missing, put a notice somewhere that all the staff (but not the customers) can see, with a record of when and how much you have lost.
Unless the thief is really stupid, he will get the message that keeping his fingers out of the till in future is probably a good idea!
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
If you had a better system for keeping your accounts, you would have known money was missing from the till at the end of each day without the security camera.
You probably need that level of basic accounting (i.e. checking that the total of the till receipts matches the amount of money in the cash drawer), whoever you employ. Otherwise, they will soon figure out that they can get away with skimming the till, and once they have found out where the security camera is, they will figure out a way to hide from it (e.g. one employee stands in a position that blocks the camera's view while another one takes the money).
Of course that basic check doesn't catch every thief, because a "sale" might not be put through the till at all - the customer's money goes straight into the thief's pocket not into the till, especially if the customer isn't bothered about having a printed receipt (and I assume that in Pakistan, there will be some customers who won't care about a piece of paper that they might not be able to read anyway).
If you don't want to fire the guy for personal reasons, a "subtle" way to deal with this is to tell all your staff that from now on, there will be a daily check for missing money. If you do find anything has gone missing, put a notice somewhere that all the staff (but not the customers) can see, with a record of when and how much you have lost.
Unless the thief is really stupid, he will get the message that keeping his fingers out of the till in future is probably a good idea!
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
up vote
18
down vote
If you had a better system for keeping your accounts, you would have known money was missing from the till at the end of each day without the security camera.
You probably need that level of basic accounting (i.e. checking that the total of the till receipts matches the amount of money in the cash drawer), whoever you employ. Otherwise, they will soon figure out that they can get away with skimming the till, and once they have found out where the security camera is, they will figure out a way to hide from it (e.g. one employee stands in a position that blocks the camera's view while another one takes the money).
Of course that basic check doesn't catch every thief, because a "sale" might not be put through the till at all - the customer's money goes straight into the thief's pocket not into the till, especially if the customer isn't bothered about having a printed receipt (and I assume that in Pakistan, there will be some customers who won't care about a piece of paper that they might not be able to read anyway).
If you don't want to fire the guy for personal reasons, a "subtle" way to deal with this is to tell all your staff that from now on, there will be a daily check for missing money. If you do find anything has gone missing, put a notice somewhere that all the staff (but not the customers) can see, with a record of when and how much you have lost.
Unless the thief is really stupid, he will get the message that keeping his fingers out of the till in future is probably a good idea!
If you had a better system for keeping your accounts, you would have known money was missing from the till at the end of each day without the security camera.
You probably need that level of basic accounting (i.e. checking that the total of the till receipts matches the amount of money in the cash drawer), whoever you employ. Otherwise, they will soon figure out that they can get away with skimming the till, and once they have found out where the security camera is, they will figure out a way to hide from it (e.g. one employee stands in a position that blocks the camera's view while another one takes the money).
Of course that basic check doesn't catch every thief, because a "sale" might not be put through the till at all - the customer's money goes straight into the thief's pocket not into the till, especially if the customer isn't bothered about having a printed receipt (and I assume that in Pakistan, there will be some customers who won't care about a piece of paper that they might not be able to read anyway).
If you don't want to fire the guy for personal reasons, a "subtle" way to deal with this is to tell all your staff that from now on, there will be a daily check for missing money. If you do find anything has gone missing, put a notice somewhere that all the staff (but not the customers) can see, with a record of when and how much you have lost.
Unless the thief is really stupid, he will get the message that keeping his fingers out of the till in future is probably a good idea!
answered 2 days ago
alephzero
1,8641612
1,8641612
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
In Argentina, you keep them. You consider the cost of what they're stealing and the cost * risk of what they might steal in the future, and if that is greater than the cost of firing him, hiring a replacement, training a replacement, the risk of the replacement not being as good as this person and the risk of the replacement also stealing, then you keep them.
Of course, if you think any form of theft must absolutely be punished, and this is more important to you than having an otherwise good employee, then you already have your own answer. You have your answer as well if you believe a person stealing a small amount of money from you is worse than allowing a family to starve.
You should be very careful in what responsibilities you assign this person in the future, because if you allow this to keep happening it can scale out of your control. One sure way to control this would be to talk to them and tell them that you know, and that they shouldn't do that. Don't do it as a reprimand, since their own consciousness is already punishing them enough (and if it isn't, then you should re-evaluate whether you keep them or not). Try to find out why they are doing this. Remember, they helped you in the past. Do they need your help now? Can you help them?
As Dmitry Grigoryev mentioned in the comments, you should also take into account how whatever decision you make will affect other employees. In this sense, be VERY careful to not send neither the message that stealing is OK nor that you won't help people who've helped you in the past.
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
In Argentina, you keep them. You consider the cost of what they're stealing and the cost * risk of what they might steal in the future, and if that is greater than the cost of firing him, hiring a replacement, training a replacement, the risk of the replacement not being as good as this person and the risk of the replacement also stealing, then you keep them.
Of course, if you think any form of theft must absolutely be punished, and this is more important to you than having an otherwise good employee, then you already have your own answer. You have your answer as well if you believe a person stealing a small amount of money from you is worse than allowing a family to starve.
You should be very careful in what responsibilities you assign this person in the future, because if you allow this to keep happening it can scale out of your control. One sure way to control this would be to talk to them and tell them that you know, and that they shouldn't do that. Don't do it as a reprimand, since their own consciousness is already punishing them enough (and if it isn't, then you should re-evaluate whether you keep them or not). Try to find out why they are doing this. Remember, they helped you in the past. Do they need your help now? Can you help them?
As Dmitry Grigoryev mentioned in the comments, you should also take into account how whatever decision you make will affect other employees. In this sense, be VERY careful to not send neither the message that stealing is OK nor that you won't help people who've helped you in the past.
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
In Argentina, you keep them. You consider the cost of what they're stealing and the cost * risk of what they might steal in the future, and if that is greater than the cost of firing him, hiring a replacement, training a replacement, the risk of the replacement not being as good as this person and the risk of the replacement also stealing, then you keep them.
Of course, if you think any form of theft must absolutely be punished, and this is more important to you than having an otherwise good employee, then you already have your own answer. You have your answer as well if you believe a person stealing a small amount of money from you is worse than allowing a family to starve.
You should be very careful in what responsibilities you assign this person in the future, because if you allow this to keep happening it can scale out of your control. One sure way to control this would be to talk to them and tell them that you know, and that they shouldn't do that. Don't do it as a reprimand, since their own consciousness is already punishing them enough (and if it isn't, then you should re-evaluate whether you keep them or not). Try to find out why they are doing this. Remember, they helped you in the past. Do they need your help now? Can you help them?
As Dmitry Grigoryev mentioned in the comments, you should also take into account how whatever decision you make will affect other employees. In this sense, be VERY careful to not send neither the message that stealing is OK nor that you won't help people who've helped you in the past.
In Argentina, you keep them. You consider the cost of what they're stealing and the cost * risk of what they might steal in the future, and if that is greater than the cost of firing him, hiring a replacement, training a replacement, the risk of the replacement not being as good as this person and the risk of the replacement also stealing, then you keep them.
Of course, if you think any form of theft must absolutely be punished, and this is more important to you than having an otherwise good employee, then you already have your own answer. You have your answer as well if you believe a person stealing a small amount of money from you is worse than allowing a family to starve.
You should be very careful in what responsibilities you assign this person in the future, because if you allow this to keep happening it can scale out of your control. One sure way to control this would be to talk to them and tell them that you know, and that they shouldn't do that. Don't do it as a reprimand, since their own consciousness is already punishing them enough (and if it isn't, then you should re-evaluate whether you keep them or not). Try to find out why they are doing this. Remember, they helped you in the past. Do they need your help now? Can you help them?
As Dmitry Grigoryev mentioned in the comments, you should also take into account how whatever decision you make will affect other employees. In this sense, be VERY careful to not send neither the message that stealing is OK nor that you won't help people who've helped you in the past.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Blueriver
30915
30915
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
19 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Is this your own pharmacy or are you managing it for a larger company?
If it's your own pharmacy, it's your decision. I can't say what would be most appropriate, as it is much more about cultural norms than anything else at this point. In the U.S., the person would pretty much have to be fired, as knowingly tolerating this could cause you to lose the licenses and certifications required to handle some controlled-access medications, which I assume would be essential to your business.
If you're the manager and the pharmacy is owned by a larger company, there should be clear guidelines for you to follow. If you aren't certain, call whomever you report to and ask for guidance.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
Is this your own pharmacy or are you managing it for a larger company?
If it's your own pharmacy, it's your decision. I can't say what would be most appropriate, as it is much more about cultural norms than anything else at this point. In the U.S., the person would pretty much have to be fired, as knowingly tolerating this could cause you to lose the licenses and certifications required to handle some controlled-access medications, which I assume would be essential to your business.
If you're the manager and the pharmacy is owned by a larger company, there should be clear guidelines for you to follow. If you aren't certain, call whomever you report to and ask for guidance.
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
up vote
10
down vote
Is this your own pharmacy or are you managing it for a larger company?
If it's your own pharmacy, it's your decision. I can't say what would be most appropriate, as it is much more about cultural norms than anything else at this point. In the U.S., the person would pretty much have to be fired, as knowingly tolerating this could cause you to lose the licenses and certifications required to handle some controlled-access medications, which I assume would be essential to your business.
If you're the manager and the pharmacy is owned by a larger company, there should be clear guidelines for you to follow. If you aren't certain, call whomever you report to and ask for guidance.
Is this your own pharmacy or are you managing it for a larger company?
If it's your own pharmacy, it's your decision. I can't say what would be most appropriate, as it is much more about cultural norms than anything else at this point. In the U.S., the person would pretty much have to be fired, as knowingly tolerating this could cause you to lose the licenses and certifications required to handle some controlled-access medications, which I assume would be essential to your business.
If you're the manager and the pharmacy is owned by a larger company, there should be clear guidelines for you to follow. If you aren't certain, call whomever you report to and ask for guidance.
answered 2 days ago
Wesley Long
46.5k16102173
46.5k16102173
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Tell him you know he wouldn't steal from you unless he really needed it. Therefore you're going to raise his salary by the amount he has been stealing.
But if it ever happens again he will be dismissed on the spot because you need to know you can trust your employees so you can't tolerate stealing.
New contributor
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Tell him you know he wouldn't steal from you unless he really needed it. Therefore you're going to raise his salary by the amount he has been stealing.
But if it ever happens again he will be dismissed on the spot because you need to know you can trust your employees so you can't tolerate stealing.
New contributor
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Tell him you know he wouldn't steal from you unless he really needed it. Therefore you're going to raise his salary by the amount he has been stealing.
But if it ever happens again he will be dismissed on the spot because you need to know you can trust your employees so you can't tolerate stealing.
New contributor
Tell him you know he wouldn't steal from you unless he really needed it. Therefore you're going to raise his salary by the amount he has been stealing.
But if it ever happens again he will be dismissed on the spot because you need to know you can trust your employees so you can't tolerate stealing.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Robert Frost
1793
1793
New contributor
New contributor
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
add a comment |
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
3
3
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
A raise is supposed to reward the employee for good behaviour. Giving a raise to a thief sends the wrong message to all employees.
– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If he needed more money he could have asked for a raise. If his family was starving, as some people here assume, he could have explained this to you and asked for a raise.
If I was caught stealing I 100% expect that I would get fired. My boss wouldn’t be able to trust me. He might get into legal trouble if he kept me employed and I did something worse. So yes, he should be fired.
You might have a discussion with him, and there might be exceptional circumstances, but that is unlikely.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If he needed more money he could have asked for a raise. If his family was starving, as some people here assume, he could have explained this to you and asked for a raise.
If I was caught stealing I 100% expect that I would get fired. My boss wouldn’t be able to trust me. He might get into legal trouble if he kept me employed and I did something worse. So yes, he should be fired.
You might have a discussion with him, and there might be exceptional circumstances, but that is unlikely.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If he needed more money he could have asked for a raise. If his family was starving, as some people here assume, he could have explained this to you and asked for a raise.
If I was caught stealing I 100% expect that I would get fired. My boss wouldn’t be able to trust me. He might get into legal trouble if he kept me employed and I did something worse. So yes, he should be fired.
You might have a discussion with him, and there might be exceptional circumstances, but that is unlikely.
If he needed more money he could have asked for a raise. If his family was starving, as some people here assume, he could have explained this to you and asked for a raise.
If I was caught stealing I 100% expect that I would get fired. My boss wouldn’t be able to trust me. He might get into legal trouble if he kept me employed and I did something worse. So yes, he should be fired.
You might have a discussion with him, and there might be exceptional circumstances, but that is unlikely.
answered 2 days ago
gnasher729
78.6k34143248
78.6k34143248
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In my opinion case is simple, he is stealing money from you, case closed. Fire him or call police.
From other hand, if you feel like you owe him something, for helping you in past or being good friend or/and employee, talk to him.
Offer him help, maybe loan, maybe rise his salary. But under any circumstances do not let him steal more money.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In my opinion case is simple, he is stealing money from you, case closed. Fire him or call police.
From other hand, if you feel like you owe him something, for helping you in past or being good friend or/and employee, talk to him.
Offer him help, maybe loan, maybe rise his salary. But under any circumstances do not let him steal more money.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In my opinion case is simple, he is stealing money from you, case closed. Fire him or call police.
From other hand, if you feel like you owe him something, for helping you in past or being good friend or/and employee, talk to him.
Offer him help, maybe loan, maybe rise his salary. But under any circumstances do not let him steal more money.
In my opinion case is simple, he is stealing money from you, case closed. Fire him or call police.
From other hand, if you feel like you owe him something, for helping you in past or being good friend or/and employee, talk to him.
Offer him help, maybe loan, maybe rise his salary. But under any circumstances do not let him steal more money.
answered yesterday
user902383
1792
1792
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If you own the pharmacy, and the money in the register is indeed your own money, and you have video evidence of this employee taking that money then you should report him to the local police and terminate their employment.
New contributor
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
If you own the pharmacy, and the money in the register is indeed your own money, and you have video evidence of this employee taking that money then you should report him to the local police and terminate their employment.
New contributor
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
If you own the pharmacy, and the money in the register is indeed your own money, and you have video evidence of this employee taking that money then you should report him to the local police and terminate their employment.
New contributor
If you own the pharmacy, and the money in the register is indeed your own money, and you have video evidence of this employee taking that money then you should report him to the local police and terminate their employment.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
sf02
4395
4395
New contributor
New contributor
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
3
3
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
You are making the assumption that in the OP's country, the police have nothing better to do than chase up petty criminals and bring them to justice. In real life, they might be too busy collecting bribes for alleged infringements of the law, from those rich enough to pay them, to bother with such trivialities. Even in first world countries like some rural parts of the USA, accusing motorists from out of town of fabricated traffic violations is a good way for a traffic cop to "earn a bonus" on top of his basic income.
– alephzero
2 days ago
3
3
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
I am assuming that police will engage in law enforcement regardless of location. Yes, there are corrupt police out there but I don't think their existence should be enough to dissuade the OP from reporting a crime.
– sf02
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
@sf02 All police departments have limited resources. All police departments will have some level of lawbreaking they don't pursue. The same is true of prosecutors. They may very well not be able to handle every case of petty theft that comes around.
– David Thornley
2 days ago
1
1
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
Point is that's for them to decide.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
I appreciate your predicament which reflects your care towards your employee.
Stealing, though a sin as well as a crime, is a reflection of an immoral way of satisfying some lack.
As you mentioned he is from a poor background and since I don't know his age, family and circumstances, might not be able to make assumptions but running a family on less than 15 dollars a month, would be hard. Here in India a pharmacy helper would get at least 50-100 dollars.
As an Argentinan wrote that in Argentina they would be retained, I would suggest the same and also, if you can manage increase around 300 PAK ruppes /3 dollars (if you can afford it financially) letting him know you are aware of his stealing and encouraging him to be honest of his intentions than resorting to immoral means. Forgiveness and love is the message of all our religions and at these situations, we must show kindness to people, in image, of our messengers.
However if you want to punish him, best fire him but reporting him to the police will make his life miserable, as poor people are treated really bad by police of most countries.
And like you said 'stealing is a bad habit ' and something which can be unlearnt, easely.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
I appreciate your predicament which reflects your care towards your employee.
Stealing, though a sin as well as a crime, is a reflection of an immoral way of satisfying some lack.
As you mentioned he is from a poor background and since I don't know his age, family and circumstances, might not be able to make assumptions but running a family on less than 15 dollars a month, would be hard. Here in India a pharmacy helper would get at least 50-100 dollars.
As an Argentinan wrote that in Argentina they would be retained, I would suggest the same and also, if you can manage increase around 300 PAK ruppes /3 dollars (if you can afford it financially) letting him know you are aware of his stealing and encouraging him to be honest of his intentions than resorting to immoral means. Forgiveness and love is the message of all our religions and at these situations, we must show kindness to people, in image, of our messengers.
However if you want to punish him, best fire him but reporting him to the police will make his life miserable, as poor people are treated really bad by police of most countries.
And like you said 'stealing is a bad habit ' and something which can be unlearnt, easely.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
I appreciate your predicament which reflects your care towards your employee.
Stealing, though a sin as well as a crime, is a reflection of an immoral way of satisfying some lack.
As you mentioned he is from a poor background and since I don't know his age, family and circumstances, might not be able to make assumptions but running a family on less than 15 dollars a month, would be hard. Here in India a pharmacy helper would get at least 50-100 dollars.
As an Argentinan wrote that in Argentina they would be retained, I would suggest the same and also, if you can manage increase around 300 PAK ruppes /3 dollars (if you can afford it financially) letting him know you are aware of his stealing and encouraging him to be honest of his intentions than resorting to immoral means. Forgiveness and love is the message of all our religions and at these situations, we must show kindness to people, in image, of our messengers.
However if you want to punish him, best fire him but reporting him to the police will make his life miserable, as poor people are treated really bad by police of most countries.
And like you said 'stealing is a bad habit ' and something which can be unlearnt, easely.
New contributor
I appreciate your predicament which reflects your care towards your employee.
Stealing, though a sin as well as a crime, is a reflection of an immoral way of satisfying some lack.
As you mentioned he is from a poor background and since I don't know his age, family and circumstances, might not be able to make assumptions but running a family on less than 15 dollars a month, would be hard. Here in India a pharmacy helper would get at least 50-100 dollars.
As an Argentinan wrote that in Argentina they would be retained, I would suggest the same and also, if you can manage increase around 300 PAK ruppes /3 dollars (if you can afford it financially) letting him know you are aware of his stealing and encouraging him to be honest of his intentions than resorting to immoral means. Forgiveness and love is the message of all our religions and at these situations, we must show kindness to people, in image, of our messengers.
However if you want to punish him, best fire him but reporting him to the police will make his life miserable, as poor people are treated really bad by police of most countries.
And like you said 'stealing is a bad habit ' and something which can be unlearnt, easely.
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered yesterday
dolma
191
191
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
There are different kinds of people but (apart from career criminals) they all justify stealing in their own minds and own ways.
He's rich and I'm poor. I deserve the money more than him.
I helped him when he was in trouble. He owes me something in return.
I'm desperate and I'm only borrowing the money. I fully intend to pay it back when I can.
I'm being threatened by debt collectors and I'll be killed or injured. Even being dishonest is better than that.
I'm not stealing for myself. I'm stealing for the benefit of my family, it's my overarching duty.
My drug habit is too powerful to resist.
Etc.
I think I might approach it by saying, "I sometimes wonder why people steal money. What do you think?"
You may or may not get an answer but either way you've dropped the hint.
From then on count the takings and keep an eye on the cameras. Don't give him a second chance.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
There are different kinds of people but (apart from career criminals) they all justify stealing in their own minds and own ways.
He's rich and I'm poor. I deserve the money more than him.
I helped him when he was in trouble. He owes me something in return.
I'm desperate and I'm only borrowing the money. I fully intend to pay it back when I can.
I'm being threatened by debt collectors and I'll be killed or injured. Even being dishonest is better than that.
I'm not stealing for myself. I'm stealing for the benefit of my family, it's my overarching duty.
My drug habit is too powerful to resist.
Etc.
I think I might approach it by saying, "I sometimes wonder why people steal money. What do you think?"
You may or may not get an answer but either way you've dropped the hint.
From then on count the takings and keep an eye on the cameras. Don't give him a second chance.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
There are different kinds of people but (apart from career criminals) they all justify stealing in their own minds and own ways.
He's rich and I'm poor. I deserve the money more than him.
I helped him when he was in trouble. He owes me something in return.
I'm desperate and I'm only borrowing the money. I fully intend to pay it back when I can.
I'm being threatened by debt collectors and I'll be killed or injured. Even being dishonest is better than that.
I'm not stealing for myself. I'm stealing for the benefit of my family, it's my overarching duty.
My drug habit is too powerful to resist.
Etc.
I think I might approach it by saying, "I sometimes wonder why people steal money. What do you think?"
You may or may not get an answer but either way you've dropped the hint.
From then on count the takings and keep an eye on the cameras. Don't give him a second chance.
There are different kinds of people but (apart from career criminals) they all justify stealing in their own minds and own ways.
He's rich and I'm poor. I deserve the money more than him.
I helped him when he was in trouble. He owes me something in return.
I'm desperate and I'm only borrowing the money. I fully intend to pay it back when I can.
I'm being threatened by debt collectors and I'll be killed or injured. Even being dishonest is better than that.
I'm not stealing for myself. I'm stealing for the benefit of my family, it's my overarching duty.
My drug habit is too powerful to resist.
Etc.
I think I might approach it by saying, "I sometimes wonder why people steal money. What do you think?"
You may or may not get an answer but either way you've dropped the hint.
From then on count the takings and keep an eye on the cameras. Don't give him a second chance.
answered 16 hours ago
chasly from UK
1626
1626
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I don't think that is good to steal money from You.
Are you sure that he didn't give you this money back? Have you watched all recordings? Maybe your employee had difficult situation and needed money in exact date, but he DID return whole amount to cash counter. It will partly justifie his action.
New contributor
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I don't think that is good to steal money from You.
Are you sure that he didn't give you this money back? Have you watched all recordings? Maybe your employee had difficult situation and needed money in exact date, but he DID return whole amount to cash counter. It will partly justifie his action.
New contributor
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
I don't think that is good to steal money from You.
Are you sure that he didn't give you this money back? Have you watched all recordings? Maybe your employee had difficult situation and needed money in exact date, but he DID return whole amount to cash counter. It will partly justifie his action.
New contributor
I don't think that is good to steal money from You.
Are you sure that he didn't give you this money back? Have you watched all recordings? Maybe your employee had difficult situation and needed money in exact date, but he DID return whole amount to cash counter. It will partly justifie his action.
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Patrycja
292
292
New contributor
New contributor
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
add a comment |
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
2
2
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
And how do you suggest the OP should deal with his employee?
– Anne Daunted
2 days ago
1
1
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
– David K
yesterday
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
This really should have been a comment. I'm going to upvote so you can use the site correctly faster.
– Steve
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
Please consider the foll owing!
This could be one of those situations that i like to call the God vs Satan relationship.
Most of the times your better employee, the one you trust more and the one you consider essential start to grow this feeling that your business is running great ONLY for his own merit. This thought become more and more intrusive until something happens for example a difficult financial situation at home. This could be amplified by someone (i.e. wife, older brothers or relatives) that keep telling to him that he deserves more.
He stole and this is a crime no way but you said he has 4 children so maybe you should consider what to do deeply and widely.
My advice is talk with him and try to find out if he feel like your pharmacy is doing good only because of him and he should be compensated more.
After you find it you can discover if it's his own thought or if this thought comes from the outside. If the case is the latter you can make him feel more valued and assure his loyalty by raising the paycheck but scaling every month the money he stole until you recover the stolen amount.
I sincerely hope everything will fix :)
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
Please consider the foll owing!
This could be one of those situations that i like to call the God vs Satan relationship.
Most of the times your better employee, the one you trust more and the one you consider essential start to grow this feeling that your business is running great ONLY for his own merit. This thought become more and more intrusive until something happens for example a difficult financial situation at home. This could be amplified by someone (i.e. wife, older brothers or relatives) that keep telling to him that he deserves more.
He stole and this is a crime no way but you said he has 4 children so maybe you should consider what to do deeply and widely.
My advice is talk with him and try to find out if he feel like your pharmacy is doing good only because of him and he should be compensated more.
After you find it you can discover if it's his own thought or if this thought comes from the outside. If the case is the latter you can make him feel more valued and assure his loyalty by raising the paycheck but scaling every month the money he stole until you recover the stolen amount.
I sincerely hope everything will fix :)
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
Please consider the foll owing!
This could be one of those situations that i like to call the God vs Satan relationship.
Most of the times your better employee, the one you trust more and the one you consider essential start to grow this feeling that your business is running great ONLY for his own merit. This thought become more and more intrusive until something happens for example a difficult financial situation at home. This could be amplified by someone (i.e. wife, older brothers or relatives) that keep telling to him that he deserves more.
He stole and this is a crime no way but you said he has 4 children so maybe you should consider what to do deeply and widely.
My advice is talk with him and try to find out if he feel like your pharmacy is doing good only because of him and he should be compensated more.
After you find it you can discover if it's his own thought or if this thought comes from the outside. If the case is the latter you can make him feel more valued and assure his loyalty by raising the paycheck but scaling every month the money he stole until you recover the stolen amount.
I sincerely hope everything will fix :)
Please consider the foll owing!
This could be one of those situations that i like to call the God vs Satan relationship.
Most of the times your better employee, the one you trust more and the one you consider essential start to grow this feeling that your business is running great ONLY for his own merit. This thought become more and more intrusive until something happens for example a difficult financial situation at home. This could be amplified by someone (i.e. wife, older brothers or relatives) that keep telling to him that he deserves more.
He stole and this is a crime no way but you said he has 4 children so maybe you should consider what to do deeply and widely.
My advice is talk with him and try to find out if he feel like your pharmacy is doing good only because of him and he should be compensated more.
After you find it you can discover if it's his own thought or if this thought comes from the outside. If the case is the latter you can make him feel more valued and assure his loyalty by raising the paycheck but scaling every month the money he stole until you recover the stolen amount.
I sincerely hope everything will fix :)
answered yesterday
pep 1
994
994
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
If you have detailed accounting, you can just take what he steals out of his paycheck, dock his pay. This sends a much clearer message than stealing will not be tolerated. This sends the message of "You can not mess with me." After that I'd talk to him about it. See what's going on. Perhaps you're wrong. Perhaps he actually needs the money. Perhaps he hasn't gotten a pay increase in a while and he's actually making less due to inflation.
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
If you have detailed accounting, you can just take what he steals out of his paycheck, dock his pay. This sends a much clearer message than stealing will not be tolerated. This sends the message of "You can not mess with me." After that I'd talk to him about it. See what's going on. Perhaps you're wrong. Perhaps he actually needs the money. Perhaps he hasn't gotten a pay increase in a while and he's actually making less due to inflation.
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
If you have detailed accounting, you can just take what he steals out of his paycheck, dock his pay. This sends a much clearer message than stealing will not be tolerated. This sends the message of "You can not mess with me." After that I'd talk to him about it. See what's going on. Perhaps you're wrong. Perhaps he actually needs the money. Perhaps he hasn't gotten a pay increase in a while and he's actually making less due to inflation.
If you have detailed accounting, you can just take what he steals out of his paycheck, dock his pay. This sends a much clearer message than stealing will not be tolerated. This sends the message of "You can not mess with me." After that I'd talk to him about it. See what's going on. Perhaps you're wrong. Perhaps he actually needs the money. Perhaps he hasn't gotten a pay increase in a while and he's actually making less due to inflation.
edited 18 mins ago
David K
21.9k1277112
21.9k1277112
answered 23 hours ago
Steve
1,141314
1,141314
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is illegal?
– Steve
23 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere Docking pay is legal in America, but not for stealing. I couldn't find the laws on docking pay in Pakistan.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere I think you could call this a valid safety concern. Also, you're not even really docking the pay. You're just being flexible with how and when you pay. If anything this gets the employee more involved with how they get paid.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
@JoeStrazzere You're not withholding pay. The employee took it from the register earlier in the month. At the end of the day, the net amount the employee earns is the same. I'd be concerned about not being able to trust someone working in a pharmacy.
– Steve
22 hours ago
1
1
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
Sorry Steve, you are being ridiculous. A judge would laugh at your statements. If you want the money back, take the worker to court. The employer doesn't get to be the judge and jury and impose a judgement of wages here. I think you know that, so I'm not going to play any longer.
– Joe Strazzere
22 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
-3
down vote
Stealing is a Crime !
You seem to have lost sight of this absolutely fundamental fact.
Call the police. Drop into a station and ask them what to do. It is their job to handle such things.
Also note : if he steals money, does he also steal drugs ? Does he take in prescriptions which he knows are false ? This could be the tip of the iceberg - criminals actions like theft rarely stop at one thing. This one person could do tremendous damage to you, your business and your reputation and indeed your family.
Any policeman will tell you that when you uncover one small lie, it's often the start of a trail of lies, sometimes leading to the discovery of bigger (and unrelated) crimes. It's your duty to tell the police.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
Understand that criminals often do project a nice and trusting personality - it's part of the requirement of getting into a trusted position. As your own indecision shows, it also helps keep them from being punished.
Don't fall for that old con.
Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away ?
Police first. Get advice from people who understand crime.
It's what they're there for.
Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money.
No it's not OK.
If this person simply needed more wages, then they should simply have asked for a raise. You don't sound like an unreasonable person, so they presumably have no reason to think you would be unreasonable.
What they are doing is wrong. There are many good people who would do your job and never steal from you under any circumstances. Why should this person get the benefit of your kindness when they have no moral right to it ?
Stealing is a bad habit
Stealing is a crime. That all.
Would you steal ? What would it take to make you steal ?
It is an exploitation of your good nature.
, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
Do not confuse your morality with this persons. My experience is that criminals feel a sense of entitlement and have no real sense of right and wrong. No amount of telling them about right and wrong will give them one.
My view is that this person has cynically manipulated you and your trust. You feel guilty because they want you to feel that way.
I, unfortunately, have dealt with too many crooks who do these things. It's what they do. It's a plan, part of how they get into positions of trust and exploit them for as long as possible with the minimum of consequences.
Do not let this person get away with it.
Mercy is for the court (if it ever reaches court). They can decide, with a more complete knowledge of the individual's circumstances and true history, what sentence if appropriate - a fine, repay victim, perhaps prison. That's what courts are for.
You may not really know the person you think you do. Five years may sound like long enough to know someone, but I've seen ongoing thefts from employers that went back twenty years when people started digging into the facts.
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Stealing is a Crime !
You seem to have lost sight of this absolutely fundamental fact.
Call the police. Drop into a station and ask them what to do. It is their job to handle such things.
Also note : if he steals money, does he also steal drugs ? Does he take in prescriptions which he knows are false ? This could be the tip of the iceberg - criminals actions like theft rarely stop at one thing. This one person could do tremendous damage to you, your business and your reputation and indeed your family.
Any policeman will tell you that when you uncover one small lie, it's often the start of a trail of lies, sometimes leading to the discovery of bigger (and unrelated) crimes. It's your duty to tell the police.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
Understand that criminals often do project a nice and trusting personality - it's part of the requirement of getting into a trusted position. As your own indecision shows, it also helps keep them from being punished.
Don't fall for that old con.
Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away ?
Police first. Get advice from people who understand crime.
It's what they're there for.
Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money.
No it's not OK.
If this person simply needed more wages, then they should simply have asked for a raise. You don't sound like an unreasonable person, so they presumably have no reason to think you would be unreasonable.
What they are doing is wrong. There are many good people who would do your job and never steal from you under any circumstances. Why should this person get the benefit of your kindness when they have no moral right to it ?
Stealing is a bad habit
Stealing is a crime. That all.
Would you steal ? What would it take to make you steal ?
It is an exploitation of your good nature.
, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
Do not confuse your morality with this persons. My experience is that criminals feel a sense of entitlement and have no real sense of right and wrong. No amount of telling them about right and wrong will give them one.
My view is that this person has cynically manipulated you and your trust. You feel guilty because they want you to feel that way.
I, unfortunately, have dealt with too many crooks who do these things. It's what they do. It's a plan, part of how they get into positions of trust and exploit them for as long as possible with the minimum of consequences.
Do not let this person get away with it.
Mercy is for the court (if it ever reaches court). They can decide, with a more complete knowledge of the individual's circumstances and true history, what sentence if appropriate - a fine, repay victim, perhaps prison. That's what courts are for.
You may not really know the person you think you do. Five years may sound like long enough to know someone, but I've seen ongoing thefts from employers that went back twenty years when people started digging into the facts.
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
up vote
-3
down vote
Stealing is a Crime !
You seem to have lost sight of this absolutely fundamental fact.
Call the police. Drop into a station and ask them what to do. It is their job to handle such things.
Also note : if he steals money, does he also steal drugs ? Does he take in prescriptions which he knows are false ? This could be the tip of the iceberg - criminals actions like theft rarely stop at one thing. This one person could do tremendous damage to you, your business and your reputation and indeed your family.
Any policeman will tell you that when you uncover one small lie, it's often the start of a trail of lies, sometimes leading to the discovery of bigger (and unrelated) crimes. It's your duty to tell the police.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
Understand that criminals often do project a nice and trusting personality - it's part of the requirement of getting into a trusted position. As your own indecision shows, it also helps keep them from being punished.
Don't fall for that old con.
Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away ?
Police first. Get advice from people who understand crime.
It's what they're there for.
Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money.
No it's not OK.
If this person simply needed more wages, then they should simply have asked for a raise. You don't sound like an unreasonable person, so they presumably have no reason to think you would be unreasonable.
What they are doing is wrong. There are many good people who would do your job and never steal from you under any circumstances. Why should this person get the benefit of your kindness when they have no moral right to it ?
Stealing is a bad habit
Stealing is a crime. That all.
Would you steal ? What would it take to make you steal ?
It is an exploitation of your good nature.
, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
Do not confuse your morality with this persons. My experience is that criminals feel a sense of entitlement and have no real sense of right and wrong. No amount of telling them about right and wrong will give them one.
My view is that this person has cynically manipulated you and your trust. You feel guilty because they want you to feel that way.
I, unfortunately, have dealt with too many crooks who do these things. It's what they do. It's a plan, part of how they get into positions of trust and exploit them for as long as possible with the minimum of consequences.
Do not let this person get away with it.
Mercy is for the court (if it ever reaches court). They can decide, with a more complete knowledge of the individual's circumstances and true history, what sentence if appropriate - a fine, repay victim, perhaps prison. That's what courts are for.
You may not really know the person you think you do. Five years may sound like long enough to know someone, but I've seen ongoing thefts from employers that went back twenty years when people started digging into the facts.
Stealing is a Crime !
You seem to have lost sight of this absolutely fundamental fact.
Call the police. Drop into a station and ask them what to do. It is their job to handle such things.
Also note : if he steals money, does he also steal drugs ? Does he take in prescriptions which he knows are false ? This could be the tip of the iceberg - criminals actions like theft rarely stop at one thing. This one person could do tremendous damage to you, your business and your reputation and indeed your family.
Any policeman will tell you that when you uncover one small lie, it's often the start of a trail of lies, sometimes leading to the discovery of bigger (and unrelated) crimes. It's your duty to tell the police.
He is still a very trustworthy person for me because he helped me in my difficult times.
Understand that criminals often do project a nice and trusting personality - it's part of the requirement of getting into a trusted position. As your own indecision shows, it also helps keep them from being punished.
Don't fall for that old con.
Should I talk to him about this or report him straight away ?
Police first. Get advice from people who understand crime.
It's what they're there for.
Or let him fulfill his needs by stealing that little amount of money.
No it's not OK.
If this person simply needed more wages, then they should simply have asked for a raise. You don't sound like an unreasonable person, so they presumably have no reason to think you would be unreasonable.
What they are doing is wrong. There are many good people who would do your job and never steal from you under any circumstances. Why should this person get the benefit of your kindness when they have no moral right to it ?
Stealing is a bad habit
Stealing is a crime. That all.
Would you steal ? What would it take to make you steal ?
It is an exploitation of your good nature.
, and I want to share this with him, and make him aware that I know about this incident, but I don't know why I feel guilty about the idea of bringing this up to him.
Do not confuse your morality with this persons. My experience is that criminals feel a sense of entitlement and have no real sense of right and wrong. No amount of telling them about right and wrong will give them one.
My view is that this person has cynically manipulated you and your trust. You feel guilty because they want you to feel that way.
I, unfortunately, have dealt with too many crooks who do these things. It's what they do. It's a plan, part of how they get into positions of trust and exploit them for as long as possible with the minimum of consequences.
Do not let this person get away with it.
Mercy is for the court (if it ever reaches court). They can decide, with a more complete knowledge of the individual's circumstances and true history, what sentence if appropriate - a fine, repay victim, perhaps prison. That's what courts are for.
You may not really know the person you think you do. Five years may sound like long enough to know someone, but I've seen ongoing thefts from employers that went back twenty years when people started digging into the facts.
answered yesterday
StephenG
2,940419
2,940419
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
add a comment |
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
1
1
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
+1 for this person may not be only stealing money, they could be stealing drugs too or messing with prescriptions or committing fraud, and also for don't talk to this person first--it would give them an opportunity to react dangerously or to flee and evade arrest, making an investigation more difficult and increasing the chance they do this at the next pharmacy they work at.
– bob
yesterday
1
1
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
It would be interesting to know why people down voted this. Are there people who think stealing is not a crime ?
– StephenG
5 hours ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
I think sometimes people react negatively to answers that appear alarmist. Not sure why, but I've had it happen before. In my case my answer was a warning to be vigilant against workplace violence with an employee who had reacted inappropriately to a performance review. It was good advice but got downvote after downvote until I deleted it. Part of it might be that people tend to underestimate risks like the possibility that the employee in this question could also be stealing drugs. That's the downside to SE's popular vote system. Sometimes the right answer isn't popular & vice versa.
– bob
22 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Normally, the cash is counted before and after the cashier is on duty and the amount rung on the register should be added to the starting amount and be present in the ending amount. This is why people invented the cash register.
New contributor
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
Normally, the cash is counted before and after the cashier is on duty and the amount rung on the register should be added to the starting amount and be present in the ending amount. This is why people invented the cash register.
New contributor
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
-4
down vote
up vote
-4
down vote
Normally, the cash is counted before and after the cashier is on duty and the amount rung on the register should be added to the starting amount and be present in the ending amount. This is why people invented the cash register.
New contributor
Normally, the cash is counted before and after the cashier is on duty and the amount rung on the register should be added to the starting amount and be present in the ending amount. This is why people invented the cash register.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Stuart Ed
91
91
New contributor
New contributor
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
add a comment |
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
8
8
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
To steal from your shop without getting caught is a simple matter of not ringing a sale up on the register.
– Robert Frost
2 days ago
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
@RobertFrost in which case inventory will be missing.
– dn3s
yesterday
1
1
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
@dn3s Some items will always be missing in an inventory, whatever the shop. Because you might have had defective items that you had to throw away, because some items fell between the counter and the wall, because some customers stole a few items without you noticing, ... Assuming the employee is responsible for all the missing inventory items isn't fair at all.
– dim
yesterday
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
This is more of a comment and doesn't actually answer the question.
– David K
17 mins ago
add a comment |
protected by Jane S♦ yesterday
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
2
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Jane S♦
yesterday
7
Hi, fellow Pakistani here. Can you confirm if you are indeed paying him 2,000 PKR for his job or was it just a typo and you missed a 0 in 20,00 (Which would make more sense in the local context). If it is the former, you should be guilty, no one can live on PKR 2,000. If it's the latter, then you shouldn't, a lot of people make do with that.
– NSNoob
yesterday
4
There were edits that incorrectly changed the original "20,00" which most certainly meant "20,000" to "2,000". The minimum wage in 15,000, so I expect it's 20,000, not 2,000.
– jcaron
yesterday
15
You say that you saw him stealing on the camera. Is there also a record of money going missing in the books? Is it possible you misinterpreted what you saw?
– David K
yesterday
6
Could people please stop seconding guessing what the figure for the employee's wage is ? These edits are not helping anyone. Only the OP knows the correct figure and we should not make up what we "think" is the correct value because we're replacing what the OP told us with nothing more than a belief.
– StephenG
17 hours ago