If $f$ is analytic on $mathbb{R}$, is it necessary that $f = sum_{n = 0}^{infty} a_{n} x^{n}$ converges for...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
New contributor
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
New contributor
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
real-analysis functions analyticity
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
Dillain Smith
396
396
New contributor
New contributor
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered 4 hours ago
Kemono Chen
1,491330
1,491330
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000869%2fif-f-is-analytic-on-mathbbr-is-it-necessary-that-f-sum-n-0-inf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago
Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago