If $f$ is analytic on $mathbb{R}$, is it necessary that $f = sum_{n = 0}^{infty} a_{n} x^{n}$ converges for...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.



First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.



Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • This is correct.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Only an accumuled point is required.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
    – Kemono Chen
    4 hours ago










  • Yes. This is correct.
    – user124942
    4 hours ago










  • @KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
    – Paul Frost
    4 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.



First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.



Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • This is correct.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Only an accumuled point is required.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
    – Kemono Chen
    4 hours ago










  • Yes. This is correct.
    – user124942
    4 hours ago










  • @KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
    – Paul Frost
    4 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.



First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.



Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.



First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.



Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.







real-analysis functions analyticity






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Dillain Smith

396




396




New contributor




Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • This is correct.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Only an accumuled point is required.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
    – Kemono Chen
    4 hours ago










  • Yes. This is correct.
    – user124942
    4 hours ago










  • @KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
    – Paul Frost
    4 hours ago


















  • This is correct.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Only an accumuled point is required.
    – Zanzi
    4 hours ago










  • Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
    – Kemono Chen
    4 hours ago










  • Yes. This is correct.
    – user124942
    4 hours ago










  • @KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
    – Paul Frost
    4 hours ago
















This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago




This is correct.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago












Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago




Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
4 hours ago












Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago




Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
4 hours ago












Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago




Yes. This is correct.
– user124942
4 hours ago












@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago




@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.

If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.

Your explanation of question 2 is correct.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000869%2fif-f-is-analytic-on-mathbbr-is-it-necessary-that-f-sum-n-0-inf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.

    If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.

    Your explanation of question 2 is correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.

      If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.

      Your explanation of question 2 is correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.

        If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.

        Your explanation of question 2 is correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.

        If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.

        Your explanation of question 2 is correct.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        Kemono Chen

        1,491330




        1,491330






















            Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000869%2fif-f-is-analytic-on-mathbbr-is-it-necessary-that-f-sum-n-0-inf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten