Prove that the space of continuous functions $C(X,Y)$ with the topology of compact convergence is Hausdorff.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $X$ be a topological space and $Y$ be a metric space. Prove that the space of continuous functions $C(X, Y )$ with the topology of compact convergence is Hausdorff.



The compact convergence topology is generated by the collection of sets $B_C(f,ϵ)={g∈Y^X: text{sup }_{x∈C} d(f(x),g(x))<ϵ}$, with compact $C⊂X$.



I know to show a topology is Hausdorff we need to show that for any two distinct elements in the topology we can find neighborhoods of those elements that do not intersect, but I am not sure how to do this for the compact convergence topology. The functions and supremum are throwing me off.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $X$ be a topological space and $Y$ be a metric space. Prove that the space of continuous functions $C(X, Y )$ with the topology of compact convergence is Hausdorff.



    The compact convergence topology is generated by the collection of sets $B_C(f,ϵ)={g∈Y^X: text{sup }_{x∈C} d(f(x),g(x))<ϵ}$, with compact $C⊂X$.



    I know to show a topology is Hausdorff we need to show that for any two distinct elements in the topology we can find neighborhoods of those elements that do not intersect, but I am not sure how to do this for the compact convergence topology. The functions and supremum are throwing me off.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $X$ be a topological space and $Y$ be a metric space. Prove that the space of continuous functions $C(X, Y )$ with the topology of compact convergence is Hausdorff.



      The compact convergence topology is generated by the collection of sets $B_C(f,ϵ)={g∈Y^X: text{sup }_{x∈C} d(f(x),g(x))<ϵ}$, with compact $C⊂X$.



      I know to show a topology is Hausdorff we need to show that for any two distinct elements in the topology we can find neighborhoods of those elements that do not intersect, but I am not sure how to do this for the compact convergence topology. The functions and supremum are throwing me off.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $X$ be a topological space and $Y$ be a metric space. Prove that the space of continuous functions $C(X, Y )$ with the topology of compact convergence is Hausdorff.



      The compact convergence topology is generated by the collection of sets $B_C(f,ϵ)={g∈Y^X: text{sup }_{x∈C} d(f(x),g(x))<ϵ}$, with compact $C⊂X$.



      I know to show a topology is Hausdorff we need to show that for any two distinct elements in the topology we can find neighborhoods of those elements that do not intersect, but I am not sure how to do this for the compact convergence topology. The functions and supremum are throwing me off.







      general-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 15 hours ago









      frostyfeet

      1558




      1558






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Hint: Singleton sets ${x}$ are always compact






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Suppose $f neq g$. We know that there must be some $p in X$ with $f(p) neq g(p)$.
            Define $varepsilon = frac{d(f(p),g(p))}{2} >0$, where $d$ is the metric on $Y$.



            Now define $C={p}$, which is finite, so compact. A supremum of $d(f(x), g(x))$ with $x in C$ is then just the single value $d(f(p), g(p))$.



            Then $f in B_C(f,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(f(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$ and $g in B_C(g,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(g(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$.



            If $h in B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon)$ existed, then both



            $$d(h(p), f(p)) < varepsilon text{, and } d(h(p), g(p)) < varepsilon$$



            and so $$d(f(p), g(p)) le d(f(p), h(p)) + d(h(p), g(p)) < 2varepsilon = d(f(p), g(p)$$



            which is a contradiction. So $B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon) = emptyset$ and $C(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000547%2fprove-that-the-space-of-continuous-functions-cx-y-with-the-topology-of-compa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Hint: Singleton sets ${x}$ are always compact






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Hint: Singleton sets ${x}$ are always compact






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Hint: Singleton sets ${x}$ are always compact






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Hint: Singleton sets ${x}$ are always compact







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 13 hours ago









                  bitesizebo

                  1,38118




                  1,38118






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Suppose $f neq g$. We know that there must be some $p in X$ with $f(p) neq g(p)$.
                      Define $varepsilon = frac{d(f(p),g(p))}{2} >0$, where $d$ is the metric on $Y$.



                      Now define $C={p}$, which is finite, so compact. A supremum of $d(f(x), g(x))$ with $x in C$ is then just the single value $d(f(p), g(p))$.



                      Then $f in B_C(f,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(f(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$ and $g in B_C(g,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(g(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$.



                      If $h in B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon)$ existed, then both



                      $$d(h(p), f(p)) < varepsilon text{, and } d(h(p), g(p)) < varepsilon$$



                      and so $$d(f(p), g(p)) le d(f(p), h(p)) + d(h(p), g(p)) < 2varepsilon = d(f(p), g(p)$$



                      which is a contradiction. So $B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon) = emptyset$ and $C(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Suppose $f neq g$. We know that there must be some $p in X$ with $f(p) neq g(p)$.
                        Define $varepsilon = frac{d(f(p),g(p))}{2} >0$, where $d$ is the metric on $Y$.



                        Now define $C={p}$, which is finite, so compact. A supremum of $d(f(x), g(x))$ with $x in C$ is then just the single value $d(f(p), g(p))$.



                        Then $f in B_C(f,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(f(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$ and $g in B_C(g,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(g(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$.



                        If $h in B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon)$ existed, then both



                        $$d(h(p), f(p)) < varepsilon text{, and } d(h(p), g(p)) < varepsilon$$



                        and so $$d(f(p), g(p)) le d(f(p), h(p)) + d(h(p), g(p)) < 2varepsilon = d(f(p), g(p)$$



                        which is a contradiction. So $B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon) = emptyset$ and $C(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Suppose $f neq g$. We know that there must be some $p in X$ with $f(p) neq g(p)$.
                          Define $varepsilon = frac{d(f(p),g(p))}{2} >0$, where $d$ is the metric on $Y$.



                          Now define $C={p}$, which is finite, so compact. A supremum of $d(f(x), g(x))$ with $x in C$ is then just the single value $d(f(p), g(p))$.



                          Then $f in B_C(f,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(f(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$ and $g in B_C(g,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(g(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$.



                          If $h in B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon)$ existed, then both



                          $$d(h(p), f(p)) < varepsilon text{, and } d(h(p), g(p)) < varepsilon$$



                          and so $$d(f(p), g(p)) le d(f(p), h(p)) + d(h(p), g(p)) < 2varepsilon = d(f(p), g(p)$$



                          which is a contradiction. So $B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon) = emptyset$ and $C(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Suppose $f neq g$. We know that there must be some $p in X$ with $f(p) neq g(p)$.
                          Define $varepsilon = frac{d(f(p),g(p))}{2} >0$, where $d$ is the metric on $Y$.



                          Now define $C={p}$, which is finite, so compact. A supremum of $d(f(x), g(x))$ with $x in C$ is then just the single value $d(f(p), g(p))$.



                          Then $f in B_C(f,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(f(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$ and $g in B_C(g,varepsilon) = {h in Y^X: d(g(p), h(p)) < varepsilon}$.



                          If $h in B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon)$ existed, then both



                          $$d(h(p), f(p)) < varepsilon text{, and } d(h(p), g(p)) < varepsilon$$



                          and so $$d(f(p), g(p)) le d(f(p), h(p)) + d(h(p), g(p)) < 2varepsilon = d(f(p), g(p)$$



                          which is a contradiction. So $B_C(f, varepsilon) cap B(g, varepsilon) = emptyset$ and $C(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 7 hours ago









                          Henno Brandsma

                          100k344107




                          100k344107






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000547%2fprove-that-the-space-of-continuous-functions-cx-y-with-the-topology-of-compa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bundesstraße 106

                              Verónica Boquete

                              Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten