The Taylor series of $f(z) := log z$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$
So the problem states:
Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with
$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$
Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.
My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.
complex-analysis taylor-expansion
add a comment |
So the problem states:
Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with
$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$
Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.
My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.
complex-analysis taylor-expansion
1
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
1
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
add a comment |
So the problem states:
Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with
$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$
Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.
My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.
complex-analysis taylor-expansion
So the problem states:
Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with
$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$
Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.
My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.
complex-analysis taylor-expansion
complex-analysis taylor-expansion
edited Nov 26 at 16:32
Shaun
8,582113580
8,582113580
asked Feb 26 '13 at 4:55
Mett
293
293
1
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
1
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
add a comment |
1
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
1
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
1
1
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
1
1
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
add a comment |
The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).
As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?
add a comment |
The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
.$$ Next,
$$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
$$
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314589%2fthe-taylor-series-of-fz-log-z-about-z-0-1-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
add a comment |
The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
add a comment |
The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.
The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.
answered Sep 16 '13 at 20:05
Christian Blatter
172k7112325
172k7112325
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
add a comment |
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
1
1
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
add a comment |
The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).
As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?
add a comment |
The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).
As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?
add a comment |
The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).
As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?
The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).
As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?
answered Feb 26 '13 at 10:45
Rhys
3,4671021
3,4671021
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
.$$ Next,
$$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
$$
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
add a comment |
The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
.$$ Next,
$$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
$$
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
add a comment |
The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
.$$ Next,
$$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
$$
The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
.$$ Next,
$$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
$$
answered Sep 16 '13 at 19:35
user64494
2,956932
2,956932
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
add a comment |
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
– user64494
Sep 16 '13 at 19:39
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314589%2fthe-taylor-series-of-fz-log-z-about-z-0-1-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57
1
In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00