The Taylor series of $f(z) := log z$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$












1














So the problem states:




Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with



$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$



Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.




My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
    – Micah
    Feb 26 '13 at 4:57






  • 1




    In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Feb 26 '13 at 5:00
















1














So the problem states:




Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with



$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$



Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.




My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
    – Micah
    Feb 26 '13 at 4:57






  • 1




    In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Feb 26 '13 at 5:00














1












1








1







So the problem states:




Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with



$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$



Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.




My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.










share|cite|improve this question















So the problem states:




Say $f(z) := log z$ is the principal branch of the logarithm (the primitive of $1/z$ on the region $Bbb Csetminus (-infty,0]$). Show that the Taylor series of $f(z)$ about $z_0 = -1 + i$ takes the form
$$log z = sum_{n=0}^{infty} a_n(z-(-1+i))^n $$
with



$$a_0 = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4},,,text{and},,,a_n = (-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-3pi in/4}}{n2^n/2}$$



Determine the radius of convergence of this series. Explain why the series does not represent $f(z)$ in its entire disk of convergence.




My main concern here is how to show $log(-1+i) = log sqrt{2} + ifrac{3pi}{4} $ and determine the radius of convergence.







complex-analysis taylor-expansion






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 at 16:32









Shaun

8,582113580




8,582113580










asked Feb 26 '13 at 4:55









Mett

293




293








  • 1




    Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
    – Micah
    Feb 26 '13 at 4:57






  • 1




    In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Feb 26 '13 at 5:00














  • 1




    Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
    – Micah
    Feb 26 '13 at 4:57






  • 1




    In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
    – Gerry Myerson
    Feb 26 '13 at 5:00








1




1




Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57




Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. Also, many find the use of imperative ("Show", "Determine", etc.) to be rude when asking for help; please consider rewriting your post.
– Micah
Feb 26 '13 at 4:57




1




1




In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00




In short, show us you have put some work into the problem yourself, if you expect other people to put some work into it for you.
– Gerry Myerson
Feb 26 '13 at 5:00










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
$${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
$${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
    – user64494
    Sep 16 '13 at 20:11





















0














The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
$$
e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
$$
Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
$$
e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
$$
Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).



As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
    left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
    right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
    .$$ Next,
    $$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
      – user64494
      Sep 16 '13 at 19:39










    • Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
      – Jyrki Lahtonen
      Sep 20 '15 at 7:45













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314589%2fthe-taylor-series-of-fz-log-z-about-z-0-1-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
    The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
    $${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
    which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
    $${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
    Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
      – user64494
      Sep 16 '13 at 20:11


















    2














    The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
    The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
    $${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
    which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
    $${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
    Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
      – user64494
      Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
















    2












    2








    2






    The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
    The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
    $${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
    which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
    $${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
    Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    The function $g(z):={1over z}$ is analytic in $dot{mathbb C}:={mathbb C}setminus{0}$, but has no primitive defined in all of $dot{mathbb C}$.
    The function $g$ however has primitives in suitable subdomains $Omegasubsetdot{mathbb C}$, the most famous one being the principal value
    $${rm Log}(z):=log|z|+ i>{rm Arg}(z) ,$$
    which is defined on $Omega:={mathbb C}setminus{≤0 {rm real axis}}$. In particular
    $${rm Log}(-1+i)={1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i .$$
    Standing at the point $p:=-1+iindot{mathbb C}$ we see that the function $g$ is analytic in a disk $D$ of radius $sqrt{2}$ around $p$. Therefore $g$ has primitives which are analytic in $D$, whence have a power series development with center $p$ and convergence radius $sqrt{2}$. These primitives are equal up to an additive constant, and one of them has the value ${1over2}log2+{3piover4}>i$ at $p$. Since ${rm Log}$ is a primitive of $g$ in the neighborhood of $p$ having exactly this value at $p$ the corresponding series represents ${rm Log}$ in any domain $Omega'subset DcapOmega$ containing the point $p$. The points of $Omega$ lying below the negative real axis do not belong to such an $Omega'$. Therefore the obtained series does not represent ${rm Log}$ there.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Sep 16 '13 at 20:05









    Christian Blatter

    172k7112325




    172k7112325








    • 1




      The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
      – user64494
      Sep 16 '13 at 20:11
















    • 1




      The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
      – user64494
      Sep 16 '13 at 20:11










    1




    1




    The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
    – user64494
    Sep 16 '13 at 20:11






    The cut may be taken along the positive ray instead of the negative ray too.
    – user64494
    Sep 16 '13 at 20:11













    0














    The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
    $$
    e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
    $$
    Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
    $$
    e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
    $$
    Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).



    As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
      $$
      e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
      $$
      Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
      $$
      e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
      $$
      Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).



      As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
        $$
        e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
        $$
        Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
        $$
        e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
        $$
        Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).



        As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The first part of your question is really asking how to find the real and imaginary parts of the logarithm. So just write it out!
        $$
        e^{x+ i y} = -1 + i
        $$
        Now use Euler's identity to get simultaneous equations for $x$ and $y$:
        $$
        e^x cos y = -1 ~,~ e^x sin y = 1
        $$
        Hopefully you can solve these (the solution for $y$ is only unique because we choose a particular branch of the logarithm).



        As for the second part, what do you know about the radius of convergence of the Taylor series for a holomorphic function?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 26 '13 at 10:45









        Rhys

        3,4671021




        3,4671021























            0














            The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
            left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
            right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
            .$$ Next,
            $$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
              – user64494
              Sep 16 '13 at 19:39










            • Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
              – Jyrki Lahtonen
              Sep 20 '15 at 7:45


















            0














            The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
            left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
            right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
            .$$ Next,
            $$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
              – user64494
              Sep 16 '13 at 19:39










            • Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
              – Jyrki Lahtonen
              Sep 20 '15 at 7:45
















            0












            0








            0






            The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
            left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
            right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
            .$$ Next,
            $$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            The Maple command $$convert(ln(z), FPS, z = -1+I) $$ produces $$ ln left( -1+i right) +sum _{k=0}^{infty } left( -frac {
            left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k}{2,k+2}-frac {i left( 1/2+1/2,i
            right)^k}{2,k+2} right) left( z+1-i right) ^{k+1}
            .$$ Next,
            $$normal(-(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)-I*(1/2+1/2*I)^k/(2*k+2)) $$ outputs $$frac{left( -1/2-1/2, i right) left( 1/2+1/2,i right)^k} {k+1}.
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Sep 16 '13 at 19:35









            user64494

            2,956932




            2,956932












            • PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
              – user64494
              Sep 16 '13 at 19:39










            • Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
              – Jyrki Lahtonen
              Sep 20 '15 at 7:45




















            • PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
              – user64494
              Sep 16 '13 at 19:39










            • Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
              – Jyrki Lahtonen
              Sep 20 '15 at 7:45


















            PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
            – user64494
            Sep 16 '13 at 19:39




            PS. $$ evalc(ln(-1+I))$$ outputs $1/2,ln left( 2 right) +3/4,ipi $.
            – user64494
            Sep 16 '13 at 19:39












            Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
            – Jyrki Lahtonen
            Sep 20 '15 at 7:45






            Do you really need Maple to calculate the $n$th derivative of $log z$?
            – Jyrki Lahtonen
            Sep 20 '15 at 7:45




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314589%2fthe-taylor-series-of-fz-log-z-about-z-0-1-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten