Constraint Qualification in Lagrange












0












$begingroup$




  • $f(x,y)=x^2-y^2$ subject to single constraint $g(x,y)=1-x-y=0$


For this question, I understand that the Constraint Qualification holds, since, rank of $D(g(x,y))=1$ everywhere. Solving Lagrange would suggest that no critical points exist.



For this example, my book states, "Since the constraint qualification holds everywhere, it must be the case that global maxima and global minima fail to exist in problem".



I cannot seem to conceptually grasp the meaning for this statement. In context of this, how are we supposed to find global maxima or minima? Please help me understand the significance of constraint qualification for global maxima or minima.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:53
















0












$begingroup$




  • $f(x,y)=x^2-y^2$ subject to single constraint $g(x,y)=1-x-y=0$


For this question, I understand that the Constraint Qualification holds, since, rank of $D(g(x,y))=1$ everywhere. Solving Lagrange would suggest that no critical points exist.



For this example, my book states, "Since the constraint qualification holds everywhere, it must be the case that global maxima and global minima fail to exist in problem".



I cannot seem to conceptually grasp the meaning for this statement. In context of this, how are we supposed to find global maxima or minima? Please help me understand the significance of constraint qualification for global maxima or minima.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:53














0












0








0





$begingroup$




  • $f(x,y)=x^2-y^2$ subject to single constraint $g(x,y)=1-x-y=0$


For this question, I understand that the Constraint Qualification holds, since, rank of $D(g(x,y))=1$ everywhere. Solving Lagrange would suggest that no critical points exist.



For this example, my book states, "Since the constraint qualification holds everywhere, it must be the case that global maxima and global minima fail to exist in problem".



I cannot seem to conceptually grasp the meaning for this statement. In context of this, how are we supposed to find global maxima or minima? Please help me understand the significance of constraint qualification for global maxima or minima.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$






  • $f(x,y)=x^2-y^2$ subject to single constraint $g(x,y)=1-x-y=0$


For this question, I understand that the Constraint Qualification holds, since, rank of $D(g(x,y))=1$ everywhere. Solving Lagrange would suggest that no critical points exist.



For this example, my book states, "Since the constraint qualification holds everywhere, it must be the case that global maxima and global minima fail to exist in problem".



I cannot seem to conceptually grasp the meaning for this statement. In context of this, how are we supposed to find global maxima or minima? Please help me understand the significance of constraint qualification for global maxima or minima.







optimization self-learning lagrange-multiplier maxima-minima






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 13:21









Shinjini RanaShinjini Rana

8916




8916












  • $begingroup$
    The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:53


















  • $begingroup$
    The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Dec 2 '18 at 14:53
















$begingroup$
The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 2 '18 at 14:53




$begingroup$
The quote of your book is literal or a translation?
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 2 '18 at 14:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

In your example, the set defined by the constraint is unbounded, so is possible that no global extremum exists. Taking $y = 1 - x$, then
$$f(x,y) = x^2 - (1 - x)^2 = 2x - 1$$
and obviously this is the case.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022635%2fconstraint-qualification-in-lagrange%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    In your example, the set defined by the constraint is unbounded, so is possible that no global extremum exists. Taking $y = 1 - x$, then
    $$f(x,y) = x^2 - (1 - x)^2 = 2x - 1$$
    and obviously this is the case.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      In your example, the set defined by the constraint is unbounded, so is possible that no global extremum exists. Taking $y = 1 - x$, then
      $$f(x,y) = x^2 - (1 - x)^2 = 2x - 1$$
      and obviously this is the case.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        In your example, the set defined by the constraint is unbounded, so is possible that no global extremum exists. Taking $y = 1 - x$, then
        $$f(x,y) = x^2 - (1 - x)^2 = 2x - 1$$
        and obviously this is the case.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In your example, the set defined by the constraint is unbounded, so is possible that no global extremum exists. Taking $y = 1 - x$, then
        $$f(x,y) = x^2 - (1 - x)^2 = 2x - 1$$
        and obviously this is the case.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 '18 at 14:50









        Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla

        34.2k42871




        34.2k42871






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022635%2fconstraint-qualification-in-lagrange%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten