Kernel Equality












0












$begingroup$


So for my university studies I was given this problem:



Let B ∈ R^k×m and A ∈ Rm×n
. Further assume that Ker(B) ∩ Ran(A) = {o}. Show
that this implies Ker(A) = Ker(BA).^



To this point I have come so far with that problem:



For showing set equality you have to show that



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA) ,,, land ,,, Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



I have managed to show the easier inclusion myself like this:



Show that:



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA)$



Let $ x in R^n $ be an arb. vector such that $ Ax = 0$



Now look at $BAx$



$BAx = B(Ax) = B (0) = Bcdot 0 = 0$



$ Rightarrow$ $Ker(A)$ is indeed a subset of $Ker(BA)$ Since $x$ was choosen arb.



But now im having a hard time to find a rigorous proof for the other inclusion, I started with this:



Show that:



$Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



Now let $ x in R^n$ be an arb. vector such that $BAx = 0$ Now show that also $Ax = 0$.



$BAx = 0$ $y:= Ax, ,,, y in R^m$



$By = 0$



But this is it i haven't come further and I have no clue how to proceed especially how to use that one condition stated in the problem ($ Ker(B) cap Ran(A) =$ {0}).



I would be very glad if someone could help me with this.






linear-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory proof-writing







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:31
















0












$begingroup$


So for my university studies I was given this problem:



Let B ∈ R^k×m and A ∈ Rm×n
. Further assume that Ker(B) ∩ Ran(A) = {o}. Show
that this implies Ker(A) = Ker(BA).^



To this point I have come so far with that problem:



For showing set equality you have to show that



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA) ,,, land ,,, Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



I have managed to show the easier inclusion myself like this:



Show that:



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA)$



Let $ x in R^n $ be an arb. vector such that $ Ax = 0$



Now look at $BAx$



$BAx = B(Ax) = B (0) = Bcdot 0 = 0$



$ Rightarrow$ $Ker(A)$ is indeed a subset of $Ker(BA)$ Since $x$ was choosen arb.



But now im having a hard time to find a rigorous proof for the other inclusion, I started with this:



Show that:



$Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



Now let $ x in R^n$ be an arb. vector such that $BAx = 0$ Now show that also $Ax = 0$.



$BAx = 0$ $y:= Ax, ,,, y in R^m$



$By = 0$



But this is it i haven't come further and I have no clue how to proceed especially how to use that one condition stated in the problem ($ Ker(B) cap Ran(A) =$ {0}).



I would be very glad if someone could help me with this.






linear-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory proof-writing







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:31














0












0








0





$begingroup$


So for my university studies I was given this problem:



Let B ∈ R^k×m and A ∈ Rm×n
. Further assume that Ker(B) ∩ Ran(A) = {o}. Show
that this implies Ker(A) = Ker(BA).^



To this point I have come so far with that problem:



For showing set equality you have to show that



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA) ,,, land ,,, Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



I have managed to show the easier inclusion myself like this:



Show that:



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA)$



Let $ x in R^n $ be an arb. vector such that $ Ax = 0$



Now look at $BAx$



$BAx = B(Ax) = B (0) = Bcdot 0 = 0$



$ Rightarrow$ $Ker(A)$ is indeed a subset of $Ker(BA)$ Since $x$ was choosen arb.



But now im having a hard time to find a rigorous proof for the other inclusion, I started with this:



Show that:



$Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



Now let $ x in R^n$ be an arb. vector such that $BAx = 0$ Now show that also $Ax = 0$.



$BAx = 0$ $y:= Ax, ,,, y in R^m$



$By = 0$



But this is it i haven't come further and I have no clue how to proceed especially how to use that one condition stated in the problem ($ Ker(B) cap Ran(A) =$ {0}).



I would be very glad if someone could help me with this.






linear-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory proof-writing







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




So for my university studies I was given this problem:



Let B ∈ R^k×m and A ∈ Rm×n
. Further assume that Ker(B) ∩ Ran(A) = {o}. Show
that this implies Ker(A) = Ker(BA).^



To this point I have come so far with that problem:



For showing set equality you have to show that



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA) ,,, land ,,, Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



I have managed to show the easier inclusion myself like this:



Show that:



$Ker(A) subset Ker(BA)$



Let $ x in R^n $ be an arb. vector such that $ Ax = 0$



Now look at $BAx$



$BAx = B(Ax) = B (0) = Bcdot 0 = 0$



$ Rightarrow$ $Ker(A)$ is indeed a subset of $Ker(BA)$ Since $x$ was choosen arb.



But now im having a hard time to find a rigorous proof for the other inclusion, I started with this:



Show that:



$Ker(BA) subset Ker(A)$



Now let $ x in R^n$ be an arb. vector such that $BAx = 0$ Now show that also $Ax = 0$.



$BAx = 0$ $y:= Ax, ,,, y in R^m$



$By = 0$



But this is it i haven't come further and I have no clue how to proceed especially how to use that one condition stated in the problem ($ Ker(B) cap Ran(A) =$ {0}).



I would be very glad if someone could help me with this.






linear-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory proof-writing




linear-algebra proof-verification elementary-set-theory proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 12:56









MathmeeeeenMathmeeeeen

193




193












  • $begingroup$
    Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:31


















  • $begingroup$
    Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila♦
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:31
















$begingroup$
Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 2 '18 at 13:31




$begingroup$
Using ker will produce $ker$ which also has the correct spacing. It is also more appealing to the readers if you put the effort to make the entire question using $rmLaTeX$ and don't use "arb." as a short for "arbitrary".
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Dec 2 '18 at 13:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}BA$ or equivalently $BAmathbf x=mathbf0$ implies that $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ker}B$.



Also we have $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}A$, so $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}Acapmathsf{Ker}B={mathbf0} $.



So actually we have $Amathbf x=mathbf0$ or equivalently $mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:09










  • $begingroup$
    Do you understand and agree with the first line?
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:10












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I do understand it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:15










  • $begingroup$
    What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:16












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:26











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022609%2fkernel-equality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

$mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}BA$ or equivalently $BAmathbf x=mathbf0$ implies that $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ker}B$.



Also we have $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}A$, so $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}Acapmathsf{Ker}B={mathbf0} $.



So actually we have $Amathbf x=mathbf0$ or equivalently $mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:09










  • $begingroup$
    Do you understand and agree with the first line?
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:10












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I do understand it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:15










  • $begingroup$
    What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:16












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:26
















1












$begingroup$

$mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}BA$ or equivalently $BAmathbf x=mathbf0$ implies that $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ker}B$.



Also we have $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}A$, so $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}Acapmathsf{Ker}B={mathbf0} $.



So actually we have $Amathbf x=mathbf0$ or equivalently $mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:09










  • $begingroup$
    Do you understand and agree with the first line?
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:10












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I do understand it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:15










  • $begingroup$
    What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:16












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:26














1












1








1





$begingroup$

$mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}BA$ or equivalently $BAmathbf x=mathbf0$ implies that $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ker}B$.



Also we have $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}A$, so $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}Acapmathsf{Ker}B={mathbf0} $.



So actually we have $Amathbf x=mathbf0$ or equivalently $mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}A$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}BA$ or equivalently $BAmathbf x=mathbf0$ implies that $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ker}B$.



Also we have $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}A$, so $Amathbf xinmathsf{Ran}Acapmathsf{Ker}B={mathbf0} $.



So actually we have $Amathbf x=mathbf0$ or equivalently $mathbf xinmathsf{Ker}A$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 2 '18 at 13:06









drhabdrhab

99.1k544130




99.1k544130












  • $begingroup$
    Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:09










  • $begingroup$
    Do you understand and agree with the first line?
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:10












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I do understand it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:15










  • $begingroup$
    What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:16












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:09










  • $begingroup$
    Do you understand and agree with the first line?
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:10












  • $begingroup$
    Yes I do understand it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:15










  • $begingroup$
    What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:16












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
    $endgroup$
    – Mathmeeeeen
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:26
















$begingroup$
Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:09




$begingroup$
Could you maybe explain this a bit more in detail?
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:09












$begingroup$
Do you understand and agree with the first line?
$endgroup$
– drhab
Dec 2 '18 at 13:10






$begingroup$
Do you understand and agree with the first line?
$endgroup$
– drhab
Dec 2 '18 at 13:10














$begingroup$
Yes I do understand it.
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:15




$begingroup$
Yes I do understand it.
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:15












$begingroup$
What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
$endgroup$
– drhab
Dec 2 '18 at 13:16






$begingroup$
What I actually prove is that for every vector $x$ in $mathsf{Ker}BA$ the vector $Ax$ is an element of $mathsf{Ker}B$ and an element of $mathsf{Ran}A$. Then we can draw the conclusion that $Ax=0$. This comes to the same as $xinmathsf{Ker}A$. Proved is then that every vector that is an element of $mathsf{Ker}BA$ is also an element of $mathsf{Ker}A$, q.e.d..
$endgroup$
– drhab
Dec 2 '18 at 13:16














$begingroup$
Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:26




$begingroup$
Thank you very much that helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– Mathmeeeeen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:26


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022609%2fkernel-equality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more