Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by:
$begingroup$
Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by
$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$
$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$
for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$
this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$
and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.
Most trouble i have with axiom 4.
A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$
I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$
$=0^7 +3 $
$= 3 neq 0$
where do i go wrong?
linear-algebra vector-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by
$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$
$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$
for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$
this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$
and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.
Most trouble i have with axiom 4.
A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$
I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$
$=0^7 +3 $
$= 3 neq 0$
where do i go wrong?
linear-algebra vector-spaces
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
2
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by
$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$
$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$
for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$
this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$
and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.
Most trouble i have with axiom 4.
A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$
I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$
$=0^7 +3 $
$= 3 neq 0$
where do i go wrong?
linear-algebra vector-spaces
$endgroup$
Show that $(mathbb{R},mathbb{R},odot,oplus)$ is a vector space if $odot$ and $oplus$ are defined by
$alpha odot x = alpha^7 (x-3) + 3$
$x oplus y = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + sqrt[7]{y-3})^7+3$
for all vectors $x,y in mathbb{R} $ and scalars $alpha in mathbb{R}$
this is the question. The way it looks to me x is defined as $sqrt[7]{x-3}$
and just by adding you add the 7th power and the 3. I dont get what the 3 does. I dont need help with the hole question i just want help with one thing, and i hope that i will be able to do the rest then.
Most trouble i have with axiom 4.
A4 - for each $x in V$ there exists an element $-x$ in V such that $x oplus (-x) = 0$
I get this which is wrong because i get to 3 which should be 0.
$x oplus (-x) = (sqrt[7]{x-3} + (-sqrt[7]{x-3}))^7+3$
$=0^7 +3 $
$= 3 neq 0$
where do i go wrong?
linear-algebra vector-spaces
linear-algebra vector-spaces
asked Dec 9 '18 at 14:04
DanielvanheuvenDanielvanheuven
457
457
1
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
2
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
2
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
1
1
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
2
2
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):
- the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and
- the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.
You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:
For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).
On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?
Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.
For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032406%2fshow-that-mathbbr-mathbbr-odot-oplus-is-a-vector-space-if-odot-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):
- the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and
- the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.
You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:
For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).
On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?
Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.
For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):
- the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and
- the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.
You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:
For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).
On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?
Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.
For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):
- the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and
- the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.
You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:
For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).
On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?
Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.
For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).
$endgroup$
The confusion here is that in the statement of axiom (here called A4):
- the symbol $0$ refers to the additive identity of $oplus$, whereas in our particular example we've already used the symbol $0$ for the additive identity of the usual operation +, and
- the symbol $-$ in $-x$ refers again additive structure defined by $oplus$ whereas for this particular example we've already used the symbol $-$ to denote the usual negation operation on $Bbb R$.
You might find it helpful, then, to write the relevant axiom using separate symbols as follows:
For every $x in V$ there is an element $ominus x in V$ such that $x oplus (ominus x) = hat 0$ (where $hat 0$ is the additive identity of $oplus$).
On the other hand, we can use the definition of $hat 0$ and $oplus$ to produce explicit expressions for $hat 0$ additive inverse $ominus x$ in terms of $x$ and the usual operations on $Bbb R$. By definition, we need:
$$x oplus hat 0 = x$$ for all $x in V$ and
$$hat 0 = x oplus (ominus x) = left(sqrt[7]{x - 3} + sqrt[7]{ominus x - 3}right)^7 + 3 .$$
Can you find expressions for $hat 0$ and $ominus x$?
Remark There's a more general story here, by the way. If we have any (say, for concreteness, binary) operation $ast: X times X to X$ and a set bijection $phi : hat X to X$, we can use the bijection to transfer the operation from $X$ to $X'$, by defining the new operation $$hatast : hat X to hat X, qquad a ,hatast, b = phi^{-1}(phi(a) ast phi(b)) .$$ By construction, $hatast$ inherits the properties of $ast$.
For example, if $(X, 0, +)$ satisfies the above axiom, then for all $x in X$ there is an element $-x in X$ such that $x + (-x) = 0$. Then, for any bijection $phi: X to hat X$, we have that $hat 0 := phi(0) = phi(x + (-x)) = phi(x) ,hat +, phi(-x)$, so $(hat X, hat 0, hat+)$ also satisies that axiom, as we can take $hat- y := phi(-phi^{-1}(y))$. As you basically observed in your question (in which our setting is $X = hat X = Bbb R$), we can take $phi(x) := sqrt[7]{x - 3}$. Since this is a bijection and (as computing directly shows) $a oplus b = a ,hat +, b$, we see that $(Bbb R, Bbb R, odot, oplus)$ satisfies the above axiom without actually computing $ominus x$ as a function of $x$ (though it also gives us another way to do so).
edited Dec 10 '18 at 4:05
answered Dec 9 '18 at 19:31
TravisTravis
60.2k767147
60.2k767147
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032406%2fshow-that-mathbbr-mathbbr-odot-oplus-is-a-vector-space-if-odot-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The negative of $x$ may not be $-x$ it might be another real number in this case.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:06
2
$begingroup$
Before that, you need to find the zero element, which again might not be the original zero.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Dec 9 '18 at 14:07