A real polynomial of degree more than or equal to 3 is reducible, but does it necessarily have a real zero?












0












$begingroup$


Takumi Murayama says "Every polynomial in $mathbb R[x]$ of degree at least 3 has a real root, and therefore is not irreducible". I think I understand why it is not irreducible, but what's the real root of $f(x)=(x^2+1)(x^2+2)$?



If he is right, then why?



If it is wrong, then what is probably meant? I think this has something to do with complex roots in pairs.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:06












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 25 '18 at 20:44


















0












$begingroup$


Takumi Murayama says "Every polynomial in $mathbb R[x]$ of degree at least 3 has a real root, and therefore is not irreducible". I think I understand why it is not irreducible, but what's the real root of $f(x)=(x^2+1)(x^2+2)$?



If he is right, then why?



If it is wrong, then what is probably meant? I think this has something to do with complex roots in pairs.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:06












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 25 '18 at 20:44
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Takumi Murayama says "Every polynomial in $mathbb R[x]$ of degree at least 3 has a real root, and therefore is not irreducible". I think I understand why it is not irreducible, but what's the real root of $f(x)=(x^2+1)(x^2+2)$?



If he is right, then why?



If it is wrong, then what is probably meant? I think this has something to do with complex roots in pairs.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Takumi Murayama says "Every polynomial in $mathbb R[x]$ of degree at least 3 has a real root, and therefore is not irreducible". I think I understand why it is not irreducible, but what's the real root of $f(x)=(x^2+1)(x^2+2)$?



If he is right, then why?



If it is wrong, then what is probably meant? I think this has something to do with complex roots in pairs.







abstract-algebra polynomials ideals irreducible-polynomials maximal-and-prime-ideals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 22 '18 at 12:02







user198044















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:06












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 25 '18 at 20:44
















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:06












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 22 '18 at 12:09








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    Dec 25 '18 at 20:44










4




4




$begingroup$
I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 22 '18 at 12:06






$begingroup$
I believe the writer intended to add that the degree was odd. Otherwise, the claim is false for the reason you report. There are polynomials of arbitrarily high even degree with no root, $p_n(x)=(x^2+1)^n$ has degree $2n$ and has no real root, for example.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 22 '18 at 12:06














$begingroup$
Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 22 '18 at 12:08




$begingroup$
Yes, lulu is right; see this post.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 22 '18 at 12:08




1




1




$begingroup$
The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 22 '18 at 12:09




$begingroup$
The link from Murayama you attach is extremely long. On what page does that quote appear?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 22 '18 at 12:09




3




3




$begingroup$
The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






$begingroup$
The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial."
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 22 '18 at 12:09






1




1




$begingroup$
@JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 25 '18 at 20:44






$begingroup$
@JackBauer Well, in my opinion a comment is sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
Dec 25 '18 at 20:44












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

From the comments




The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial." – Michael Hoppe Dec 22 at 12:09







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049375%2fa-real-polynomial-of-degree-more-than-or-equal-to-3-is-reducible-but-does-it-ne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    From the comments




    The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial." – Michael Hoppe Dec 22 at 12:09







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      From the comments




      The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial." – Michael Hoppe Dec 22 at 12:09







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        From the comments




        The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial." – Michael Hoppe Dec 22 at 12:09







        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        From the comments




        The author's claim (on p. 39) is wrong. What he meant is that every polynomial of degree three or more has irreducible factors which are at most quadratic: "So, every maximal ideal is of the form (f) for f a linear polynomial or an irreducible quadratic polynomial." – Michael Hoppe Dec 22 at 12:09








        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 29 '18 at 12:49

























        answered Dec 29 '18 at 12:37







        user198044





































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049375%2fa-real-polynomial-of-degree-more-than-or-equal-to-3-is-reducible-but-does-it-ne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten