calculate max and min number in range












0












$begingroup$


I'm writing a script that's supposed to selectively add hidden to div elements based on which page has been selected.
Each section should have 16 images so the sections go as follows



Section 1: 1 - 16
Section 2: 17 - 33
Section 3: 34 - 40
Section 4: 41 - 57


I'm trying to figure out an equation given the page number can derive the range start and end.
My first assumption was from 2 onwards it would be



Section 2: (((section_num - 1) * 16) + 1) - (section_num * 16) + 1
(16 + 1) - (16 * 2) + 1
17 - 33


But it doesn't always follow this line.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is not linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:39










  • $begingroup$
    think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel M.
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:47
















0












$begingroup$


I'm writing a script that's supposed to selectively add hidden to div elements based on which page has been selected.
Each section should have 16 images so the sections go as follows



Section 1: 1 - 16
Section 2: 17 - 33
Section 3: 34 - 40
Section 4: 41 - 57


I'm trying to figure out an equation given the page number can derive the range start and end.
My first assumption was from 2 onwards it would be



Section 2: (((section_num - 1) * 16) + 1) - (section_num * 16) + 1
(16 + 1) - (16 * 2) + 1
17 - 33


But it doesn't always follow this line.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is not linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:39










  • $begingroup$
    think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel M.
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:47














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm writing a script that's supposed to selectively add hidden to div elements based on which page has been selected.
Each section should have 16 images so the sections go as follows



Section 1: 1 - 16
Section 2: 17 - 33
Section 3: 34 - 40
Section 4: 41 - 57


I'm trying to figure out an equation given the page number can derive the range start and end.
My first assumption was from 2 onwards it would be



Section 2: (((section_num - 1) * 16) + 1) - (section_num * 16) + 1
(16 + 1) - (16 * 2) + 1
17 - 33


But it doesn't always follow this line.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm writing a script that's supposed to selectively add hidden to div elements based on which page has been selected.
Each section should have 16 images so the sections go as follows



Section 1: 1 - 16
Section 2: 17 - 33
Section 3: 34 - 40
Section 4: 41 - 57


I'm trying to figure out an equation given the page number can derive the range start and end.
My first assumption was from 2 onwards it would be



Section 2: (((section_num - 1) * 16) + 1) - (section_num * 16) + 1
(16 + 1) - (16 * 2) + 1
17 - 33


But it doesn't always follow this line.







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 11:46









YiFan

4,8511727




4,8511727










asked Dec 22 '18 at 11:37









Samuel M.Samuel M.

1204




1204












  • $begingroup$
    This is not linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:39










  • $begingroup$
    think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel M.
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:47


















  • $begingroup$
    This is not linear algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:39










  • $begingroup$
    think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
    $endgroup$
    – Samuel M.
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:44










  • $begingroup$
    If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:47
















$begingroup$
This is not linear algebra.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Dec 22 '18 at 11:39




$begingroup$
This is not linear algebra.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Dec 22 '18 at 11:39












$begingroup$
think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
$endgroup$
– Samuel M.
Dec 22 '18 at 11:44




$begingroup$
think it's basic algebra but that's the only near algebra that was on the tag
$endgroup$
– Samuel M.
Dec 22 '18 at 11:44












$begingroup$
If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Dec 22 '18 at 11:47




$begingroup$
If you looked sown, you would see the [algebra-precalculus] tag, which is more appropriate here.
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Dec 22 '18 at 11:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Since you've taken the first "inteverval" to be $1-16$, the ending page (16 in the first case) for any section will be 16*(section number) and NOT 16*(section number). You can also see it like: Let n be current section number, and $x$ be it highest page #. Then, by what you wrote, $x=16n+1$. Also, the lowest page # in $(n+1)th$ section $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x$, which isn't true right?



Instead, if you take what I said, i.e, $x=16n$, then the lowest page in next section will be $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x+1$, which is obviously correct.



Your formula for lower page number was CORRECT anyway!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049342%2fcalculate-max-and-min-number-in-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Since you've taken the first "inteverval" to be $1-16$, the ending page (16 in the first case) for any section will be 16*(section number) and NOT 16*(section number). You can also see it like: Let n be current section number, and $x$ be it highest page #. Then, by what you wrote, $x=16n+1$. Also, the lowest page # in $(n+1)th$ section $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x$, which isn't true right?



    Instead, if you take what I said, i.e, $x=16n$, then the lowest page in next section will be $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x+1$, which is obviously correct.



    Your formula for lower page number was CORRECT anyway!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Since you've taken the first "inteverval" to be $1-16$, the ending page (16 in the first case) for any section will be 16*(section number) and NOT 16*(section number). You can also see it like: Let n be current section number, and $x$ be it highest page #. Then, by what you wrote, $x=16n+1$. Also, the lowest page # in $(n+1)th$ section $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x$, which isn't true right?



      Instead, if you take what I said, i.e, $x=16n$, then the lowest page in next section will be $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x+1$, which is obviously correct.



      Your formula for lower page number was CORRECT anyway!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Since you've taken the first "inteverval" to be $1-16$, the ending page (16 in the first case) for any section will be 16*(section number) and NOT 16*(section number). You can also see it like: Let n be current section number, and $x$ be it highest page #. Then, by what you wrote, $x=16n+1$. Also, the lowest page # in $(n+1)th$ section $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x$, which isn't true right?



        Instead, if you take what I said, i.e, $x=16n$, then the lowest page in next section will be $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x+1$, which is obviously correct.



        Your formula for lower page number was CORRECT anyway!






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since you've taken the first "inteverval" to be $1-16$, the ending page (16 in the first case) for any section will be 16*(section number) and NOT 16*(section number). You can also see it like: Let n be current section number, and $x$ be it highest page #. Then, by what you wrote, $x=16n+1$. Also, the lowest page # in $(n+1)th$ section $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x$, which isn't true right?



        Instead, if you take what I said, i.e, $x=16n$, then the lowest page in next section will be $=((n+1)-1)*16+1=16n+1=x+1$, which is obviously correct.



        Your formula for lower page number was CORRECT anyway!







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 22 '18 at 12:01









        Ankit KumarAnkit Kumar

        1,542221




        1,542221






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049342%2fcalculate-max-and-min-number-in-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten