Degree shift operation when constructing chain complexes of the Khovanov Homology












1












$begingroup$


I'm reading this paper by Dror Bar-Natan, On Khovanov’s categorification of the Jones polynomial (here). On chapter 3 (categorification), he wrote: With every vertex $alphain {0,1 }^chi$ of the cube ${0,1 }^chi$, we associate the graded vector space $V_alpha(L)=V^{otimes k}{r}$ where $k$ is the number of cycles in the smoothing of $L$ corresponding to $alpha$ and $r$ is the height $|alpha|=sum_{i}alpha_i$ of $alpha$.



My question is, why do we need the degree shift operation $cdot {r }$ on $V^{otimes k}$? In most of the computation, we kind of ignore this degree shift but only care about $V^{otimes k}$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm reading this paper by Dror Bar-Natan, On Khovanov’s categorification of the Jones polynomial (here). On chapter 3 (categorification), he wrote: With every vertex $alphain {0,1 }^chi$ of the cube ${0,1 }^chi$, we associate the graded vector space $V_alpha(L)=V^{otimes k}{r}$ where $k$ is the number of cycles in the smoothing of $L$ corresponding to $alpha$ and $r$ is the height $|alpha|=sum_{i}alpha_i$ of $alpha$.



    My question is, why do we need the degree shift operation $cdot {r }$ on $V^{otimes k}$? In most of the computation, we kind of ignore this degree shift but only care about $V^{otimes k}$.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm reading this paper by Dror Bar-Natan, On Khovanov’s categorification of the Jones polynomial (here). On chapter 3 (categorification), he wrote: With every vertex $alphain {0,1 }^chi$ of the cube ${0,1 }^chi$, we associate the graded vector space $V_alpha(L)=V^{otimes k}{r}$ where $k$ is the number of cycles in the smoothing of $L$ corresponding to $alpha$ and $r$ is the height $|alpha|=sum_{i}alpha_i$ of $alpha$.



      My question is, why do we need the degree shift operation $cdot {r }$ on $V^{otimes k}$? In most of the computation, we kind of ignore this degree shift but only care about $V^{otimes k}$.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm reading this paper by Dror Bar-Natan, On Khovanov’s categorification of the Jones polynomial (here). On chapter 3 (categorification), he wrote: With every vertex $alphain {0,1 }^chi$ of the cube ${0,1 }^chi$, we associate the graded vector space $V_alpha(L)=V^{otimes k}{r}$ where $k$ is the number of cycles in the smoothing of $L$ corresponding to $alpha$ and $r$ is the height $|alpha|=sum_{i}alpha_i$ of $alpha$.



      My question is, why do we need the degree shift operation $cdot {r }$ on $V^{otimes k}$? In most of the computation, we kind of ignore this degree shift but only care about $V^{otimes k}$.







      algebraic-topology knot-theory knot-invariants






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 2:45









      MinahMinah

      275




      275






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The degree shift operator ensures that the differential preserves polynomial/quantum grading. If we ignore an overall shift depending on the number of positive and negative crossings in the diagram, then the polynomial grading is essentially the number of $v_+$'s minus the number of $v_-$'s plus the height $r$.



          Let's look at the maps used to construct the differential. The multiplication $m:Votimes V to V$ is defined by
          $$m(v_+otimes v_-)=m(v_-otimes v_+) = v_-,~m(v_+otimes v_+)=v_+,~text{and}~m(v_-otimes v_-)=0.$$
          The comulitplication $Delta:Vto Votimes V$ is defined by
          $$Delta(v_+) = v_+otimes v_- + v_-otimes v_+~text{and}~Delta(v_-)=v_- otimes v_-.$$



          In the multiplication map, there is one fewer $v_+$ in each output and the same number of $v_-$'s. But the height of the output is one more than the height of the input. Thus the polynomial grading is preserved. Similarly, in the comultiplication map, there is one more $v_-$ in the output than the input and the same number of $v_+$'s. Again the height of the output is one greater than the height of the input causing the polynomial grading to be preserved.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Minah
            Dec 22 '18 at 3:33












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049075%2fdegree-shift-operation-when-constructing-chain-complexes-of-the-khovanov-homolog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          The degree shift operator ensures that the differential preserves polynomial/quantum grading. If we ignore an overall shift depending on the number of positive and negative crossings in the diagram, then the polynomial grading is essentially the number of $v_+$'s minus the number of $v_-$'s plus the height $r$.



          Let's look at the maps used to construct the differential. The multiplication $m:Votimes V to V$ is defined by
          $$m(v_+otimes v_-)=m(v_-otimes v_+) = v_-,~m(v_+otimes v_+)=v_+,~text{and}~m(v_-otimes v_-)=0.$$
          The comulitplication $Delta:Vto Votimes V$ is defined by
          $$Delta(v_+) = v_+otimes v_- + v_-otimes v_+~text{and}~Delta(v_-)=v_- otimes v_-.$$



          In the multiplication map, there is one fewer $v_+$ in each output and the same number of $v_-$'s. But the height of the output is one more than the height of the input. Thus the polynomial grading is preserved. Similarly, in the comultiplication map, there is one more $v_-$ in the output than the input and the same number of $v_+$'s. Again the height of the output is one greater than the height of the input causing the polynomial grading to be preserved.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Minah
            Dec 22 '18 at 3:33
















          1












          $begingroup$

          The degree shift operator ensures that the differential preserves polynomial/quantum grading. If we ignore an overall shift depending on the number of positive and negative crossings in the diagram, then the polynomial grading is essentially the number of $v_+$'s minus the number of $v_-$'s plus the height $r$.



          Let's look at the maps used to construct the differential. The multiplication $m:Votimes V to V$ is defined by
          $$m(v_+otimes v_-)=m(v_-otimes v_+) = v_-,~m(v_+otimes v_+)=v_+,~text{and}~m(v_-otimes v_-)=0.$$
          The comulitplication $Delta:Vto Votimes V$ is defined by
          $$Delta(v_+) = v_+otimes v_- + v_-otimes v_+~text{and}~Delta(v_-)=v_- otimes v_-.$$



          In the multiplication map, there is one fewer $v_+$ in each output and the same number of $v_-$'s. But the height of the output is one more than the height of the input. Thus the polynomial grading is preserved. Similarly, in the comultiplication map, there is one more $v_-$ in the output than the input and the same number of $v_+$'s. Again the height of the output is one greater than the height of the input causing the polynomial grading to be preserved.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Minah
            Dec 22 '18 at 3:33














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The degree shift operator ensures that the differential preserves polynomial/quantum grading. If we ignore an overall shift depending on the number of positive and negative crossings in the diagram, then the polynomial grading is essentially the number of $v_+$'s minus the number of $v_-$'s plus the height $r$.



          Let's look at the maps used to construct the differential. The multiplication $m:Votimes V to V$ is defined by
          $$m(v_+otimes v_-)=m(v_-otimes v_+) = v_-,~m(v_+otimes v_+)=v_+,~text{and}~m(v_-otimes v_-)=0.$$
          The comulitplication $Delta:Vto Votimes V$ is defined by
          $$Delta(v_+) = v_+otimes v_- + v_-otimes v_+~text{and}~Delta(v_-)=v_- otimes v_-.$$



          In the multiplication map, there is one fewer $v_+$ in each output and the same number of $v_-$'s. But the height of the output is one more than the height of the input. Thus the polynomial grading is preserved. Similarly, in the comultiplication map, there is one more $v_-$ in the output than the input and the same number of $v_+$'s. Again the height of the output is one greater than the height of the input causing the polynomial grading to be preserved.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The degree shift operator ensures that the differential preserves polynomial/quantum grading. If we ignore an overall shift depending on the number of positive and negative crossings in the diagram, then the polynomial grading is essentially the number of $v_+$'s minus the number of $v_-$'s plus the height $r$.



          Let's look at the maps used to construct the differential. The multiplication $m:Votimes V to V$ is defined by
          $$m(v_+otimes v_-)=m(v_-otimes v_+) = v_-,~m(v_+otimes v_+)=v_+,~text{and}~m(v_-otimes v_-)=0.$$
          The comulitplication $Delta:Vto Votimes V$ is defined by
          $$Delta(v_+) = v_+otimes v_- + v_-otimes v_+~text{and}~Delta(v_-)=v_- otimes v_-.$$



          In the multiplication map, there is one fewer $v_+$ in each output and the same number of $v_-$'s. But the height of the output is one more than the height of the input. Thus the polynomial grading is preserved. Similarly, in the comultiplication map, there is one more $v_-$ in the output than the input and the same number of $v_+$'s. Again the height of the output is one greater than the height of the input causing the polynomial grading to be preserved.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 22 '18 at 3:09









          Adam LowranceAdam Lowrance

          2,20711014




          2,20711014












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Minah
            Dec 22 '18 at 3:33


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Minah
            Dec 22 '18 at 3:33
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
          $endgroup$
          – Minah
          Dec 22 '18 at 3:33




          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much. You made it really clear to me.
          $endgroup$
          – Minah
          Dec 22 '18 at 3:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049075%2fdegree-shift-operation-when-constructing-chain-complexes-of-the-khovanov-homolog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten