what is its definition mathematically of $P(u) $?












0












$begingroup$


In set theory




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P$ is a property (with parameter$p$),
then for any $X$ and $p$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u, p) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P$.




But some of the books are written as follows:




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P(u)$ is a property
then for any $X$ and $P(u)$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P(u)$.






But I do't know that what's this $P (u)$ . what is its definition mathematically of $P(u)$ (and $P(u ,p_1,p_2,...,p_n)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:29


















0












$begingroup$


In set theory




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P$ is a property (with parameter$p$),
then for any $X$ and $p$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u, p) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P$.




But some of the books are written as follows:




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P(u)$ is a property
then for any $X$ and $P(u)$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P(u)$.






But I do't know that what's this $P (u)$ . what is its definition mathematically of $P(u)$ (and $P(u ,p_1,p_2,...,p_n)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:29
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


In set theory




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P$ is a property (with parameter$p$),
then for any $X$ and $p$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u, p) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P$.




But some of the books are written as follows:




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P(u)$ is a property
then for any $X$ and $P(u)$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P(u)$.






But I do't know that what's this $P (u)$ . what is its definition mathematically of $P(u)$ (and $P(u ,p_1,p_2,...,p_n)$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




In set theory




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P$ is a property (with parameter$p$),
then for any $X$ and $p$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u, p) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P$.




But some of the books are written as follows:




Axiom Schema of Separation: If $P(u)$ is a property
then for any $X$ and $P(u)$ there exists a set $Y = lbrace u ∈ X : P(u) rbrace$ that contains all those $u ∈ X$ that have property $P(u)$.






But I do't know that what's this $P (u)$ . what is its definition mathematically of $P(u)$ (and $P(u ,p_1,p_2,...,p_n)$?







set-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 15 '18 at 21:02









Almot1960Almot1960

2,312824




2,312824












  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:29




















  • $begingroup$
    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Dec 16 '18 at 13:01










  • $begingroup$
    Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
    $endgroup$
    – DanielWainfleet
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:29


















$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Dec 16 '18 at 13:01




$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/3028366/…
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Dec 16 '18 at 13:01












$begingroup$
Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 7:29






$begingroup$
Some authors (e.g. K. Kunen) say Comprehension instead of Separation. It depends on how you want to translate the original non-English name.
$endgroup$
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 17 '18 at 7:29












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$P$ is a property: a statement that takes some parameter(s), and is either true or false, depending on those parameters, $P(u)$ is the result of evaluating $P$ with the parameter $u$ (and the same for any other collection of parameters that are valid inputs into $P$).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    $p(u)$ can be anything, really, as long as it can be stated with some kind of logic formula.



    For example, if $X$ is the set of natural numbers, then $p(u)$ could express the property that $u$ is an even number. But you could also have it express that $u$ is an odd number. Or that it is a prime number. Or that $u$ is a prime number that is the sum of three odd numbers. Or ... like I said, pretty much anything you want.



    Note that if you use $u=u$ for the formula $p(u)$, then the subset $Y$ is just the same as $X$ itself, as $u=u$ is true for any $u$. And, if you use the formula $u not = u$, you end up with the empty set.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Almot1960
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












    • $begingroup$
      @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
      $endgroup$
      – Noah Schweber
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:30










    • $begingroup$
      Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
      $endgroup$
      – Almot1960
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:36










    • $begingroup$
      @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
      $endgroup$
      – Bram28
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:38



















    1












    $begingroup$

    The way I read this $P$ could be any property. "is an integer divisible by $7$" for example. Or "eats shoots and leaves".



    All the schema is saying that given any set, there exists a subset of all elements with the property.



    For example. If $P$ = "is divisible by $7$" and $Q$ = "eats shoots and leaves" and $A = $ set of all perfect squares. And $B =$ set of all black and white animals then there is $E = {xin A|P(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that are divisible by $7={49k^2| kin mathbb Z}$.



    There is a $F = {x in A|Q(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that eat shoots and leaves = $emptyset$.



    And there is $G = {xin B|P(x)} = $ set of all black and white animals that are divisible by $7 = emptyset$.



    And there is $H = {x in B|Q(x)}=$ set of all black and white animals that eat shoots and leaves = {pandas, ... and I'm sure something else....}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Almot1960
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:23










    • $begingroup$
      Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      Dec 15 '18 at 22:50



















    1












    $begingroup$

    I give you one exemple :



    $P(f,x_0):forall varepsilon>0,exists eta>0, forall xin mathcal{D}_fqquad |x-x_0|<eta implies |f(x)-f(x_0)|<varepsilon$



    If $f:xto lfloor xrfloor$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is false, indeed $f$ is not continuous on $x_0=1$



    If $f:xto x^2$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is true



    $f,x_0$ are free variables, $varepsilon,eta,x$ are bound variables





    Note that we consider $P(u):ule u^2$



    $P(1)$ is true



    $forall uin mathbb{R}, P(u)$ is wrong, and $u$ is a bound variable and this proposition doesn't depend on $u$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041954%2fwhat-is-its-definition-mathematically-of-pu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      $P$ is a property: a statement that takes some parameter(s), and is either true or false, depending on those parameters, $P(u)$ is the result of evaluating $P$ with the parameter $u$ (and the same for any other collection of parameters that are valid inputs into $P$).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        $P$ is a property: a statement that takes some parameter(s), and is either true or false, depending on those parameters, $P(u)$ is the result of evaluating $P$ with the parameter $u$ (and the same for any other collection of parameters that are valid inputs into $P$).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $P$ is a property: a statement that takes some parameter(s), and is either true or false, depending on those parameters, $P(u)$ is the result of evaluating $P$ with the parameter $u$ (and the same for any other collection of parameters that are valid inputs into $P$).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $P$ is a property: a statement that takes some parameter(s), and is either true or false, depending on those parameters, $P(u)$ is the result of evaluating $P$ with the parameter $u$ (and the same for any other collection of parameters that are valid inputs into $P$).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 15 '18 at 21:10









          user3482749user3482749

          4,296919




          4,296919























              1












              $begingroup$

              $p(u)$ can be anything, really, as long as it can be stated with some kind of logic formula.



              For example, if $X$ is the set of natural numbers, then $p(u)$ could express the property that $u$ is an even number. But you could also have it express that $u$ is an odd number. Or that it is a prime number. Or that $u$ is a prime number that is the sum of three odd numbers. Or ... like I said, pretty much anything you want.



              Note that if you use $u=u$ for the formula $p(u)$, then the subset $Y$ is just the same as $X$ itself, as $u=u$ is true for any $u$. And, if you use the formula $u not = u$, you end up with the empty set.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
                $endgroup$
                – Noah Schweber
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:30










              • $begingroup$
                Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:36










              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
                $endgroup$
                – Bram28
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:38
















              1












              $begingroup$

              $p(u)$ can be anything, really, as long as it can be stated with some kind of logic formula.



              For example, if $X$ is the set of natural numbers, then $p(u)$ could express the property that $u$ is an even number. But you could also have it express that $u$ is an odd number. Or that it is a prime number. Or that $u$ is a prime number that is the sum of three odd numbers. Or ... like I said, pretty much anything you want.



              Note that if you use $u=u$ for the formula $p(u)$, then the subset $Y$ is just the same as $X$ itself, as $u=u$ is true for any $u$. And, if you use the formula $u not = u$, you end up with the empty set.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
                $endgroup$
                – Noah Schweber
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:30










              • $begingroup$
                Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:36










              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
                $endgroup$
                – Bram28
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:38














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              $p(u)$ can be anything, really, as long as it can be stated with some kind of logic formula.



              For example, if $X$ is the set of natural numbers, then $p(u)$ could express the property that $u$ is an even number. But you could also have it express that $u$ is an odd number. Or that it is a prime number. Or that $u$ is a prime number that is the sum of three odd numbers. Or ... like I said, pretty much anything you want.



              Note that if you use $u=u$ for the formula $p(u)$, then the subset $Y$ is just the same as $X$ itself, as $u=u$ is true for any $u$. And, if you use the formula $u not = u$, you end up with the empty set.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              $p(u)$ can be anything, really, as long as it can be stated with some kind of logic formula.



              For example, if $X$ is the set of natural numbers, then $p(u)$ could express the property that $u$ is an even number. But you could also have it express that $u$ is an odd number. Or that it is a prime number. Or that $u$ is a prime number that is the sum of three odd numbers. Or ... like I said, pretty much anything you want.



              Note that if you use $u=u$ for the formula $p(u)$, then the subset $Y$ is just the same as $X$ itself, as $u=u$ is true for any $u$. And, if you use the formula $u not = u$, you end up with the empty set.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 15 '18 at 21:11









              Bram28Bram28

              63.2k44793




              63.2k44793












              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
                $endgroup$
                – Noah Schweber
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:30










              • $begingroup$
                Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:36










              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
                $endgroup$
                – Bram28
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:38


















              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
                $endgroup$
                – Noah Schweber
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:30










              • $begingroup$
                Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:36










              • $begingroup$
                @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
                $endgroup$
                – Bram28
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:38
















              $begingroup$
              I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:23






              $begingroup$
              I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:23














              $begingroup$
              @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:30




              $begingroup$
              @Almot1960 That's just the notation that's used. There's definitely a reasonable complaint here, that the notation makes functions and properties/relations look overly similar, but oh well.
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:30












              $begingroup$
              Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:36




              $begingroup$
              Thus $P(u)$ not related to the function .and only is a notation . it's true ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:36












              $begingroup$
              @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:38




              $begingroup$
              @Almot1960 $p(u)$ is indeed not a function .. it is a property (or predicate).
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:38











              1












              $begingroup$

              The way I read this $P$ could be any property. "is an integer divisible by $7$" for example. Or "eats shoots and leaves".



              All the schema is saying that given any set, there exists a subset of all elements with the property.



              For example. If $P$ = "is divisible by $7$" and $Q$ = "eats shoots and leaves" and $A = $ set of all perfect squares. And $B =$ set of all black and white animals then there is $E = {xin A|P(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that are divisible by $7={49k^2| kin mathbb Z}$.



              There is a $F = {x in A|Q(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that eat shoots and leaves = $emptyset$.



              And there is $G = {xin B|P(x)} = $ set of all black and white animals that are divisible by $7 = emptyset$.



              And there is $H = {x in B|Q(x)}=$ set of all black and white animals that eat shoots and leaves = {pandas, ... and I'm sure something else....}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23










              • $begingroup$
                Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                Dec 15 '18 at 22:50
















              1












              $begingroup$

              The way I read this $P$ could be any property. "is an integer divisible by $7$" for example. Or "eats shoots and leaves".



              All the schema is saying that given any set, there exists a subset of all elements with the property.



              For example. If $P$ = "is divisible by $7$" and $Q$ = "eats shoots and leaves" and $A = $ set of all perfect squares. And $B =$ set of all black and white animals then there is $E = {xin A|P(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that are divisible by $7={49k^2| kin mathbb Z}$.



              There is a $F = {x in A|Q(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that eat shoots and leaves = $emptyset$.



              And there is $G = {xin B|P(x)} = $ set of all black and white animals that are divisible by $7 = emptyset$.



              And there is $H = {x in B|Q(x)}=$ set of all black and white animals that eat shoots and leaves = {pandas, ... and I'm sure something else....}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23










              • $begingroup$
                Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                Dec 15 '18 at 22:50














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              The way I read this $P$ could be any property. "is an integer divisible by $7$" for example. Or "eats shoots and leaves".



              All the schema is saying that given any set, there exists a subset of all elements with the property.



              For example. If $P$ = "is divisible by $7$" and $Q$ = "eats shoots and leaves" and $A = $ set of all perfect squares. And $B =$ set of all black and white animals then there is $E = {xin A|P(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that are divisible by $7={49k^2| kin mathbb Z}$.



              There is a $F = {x in A|Q(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that eat shoots and leaves = $emptyset$.



              And there is $G = {xin B|P(x)} = $ set of all black and white animals that are divisible by $7 = emptyset$.



              And there is $H = {x in B|Q(x)}=$ set of all black and white animals that eat shoots and leaves = {pandas, ... and I'm sure something else....}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The way I read this $P$ could be any property. "is an integer divisible by $7$" for example. Or "eats shoots and leaves".



              All the schema is saying that given any set, there exists a subset of all elements with the property.



              For example. If $P$ = "is divisible by $7$" and $Q$ = "eats shoots and leaves" and $A = $ set of all perfect squares. And $B =$ set of all black and white animals then there is $E = {xin A|P(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that are divisible by $7={49k^2| kin mathbb Z}$.



              There is a $F = {x in A|Q(x)} =$ set of all perfect squares that eat shoots and leaves = $emptyset$.



              And there is $G = {xin B|P(x)} = $ set of all black and white animals that are divisible by $7 = emptyset$.



              And there is $H = {x in B|Q(x)}=$ set of all black and white animals that eat shoots and leaves = {pandas, ... and I'm sure something else....}







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 15 '18 at 21:19









              fleabloodfleablood

              71.9k22687




              71.9k22687












              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23










              • $begingroup$
                Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                Dec 15 '18 at 22:50


















              • $begingroup$
                I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
                $endgroup$
                – Almot1960
                Dec 15 '18 at 21:23










              • $begingroup$
                Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                Dec 15 '18 at 22:50
















              $begingroup$
              I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:23




              $begingroup$
              I know that $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ (function) for the value $x$ of its variable. why symbol of property is to form $P(u)$ ?
              $endgroup$
              – Almot1960
              Dec 15 '18 at 21:23












              $begingroup$
              Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
              $endgroup$
              – fleablood
              Dec 15 '18 at 22:50




              $begingroup$
              Um... why not be in the form $P(u)$? You can think of $P$ as a function that maps $X to {YES, NO}$ where $P(x) = YES$ if $x$ has the property and $P(x) = NO$ uf $x$ does not have the property.
              $endgroup$
              – fleablood
              Dec 15 '18 at 22:50











              1












              $begingroup$

              I give you one exemple :



              $P(f,x_0):forall varepsilon>0,exists eta>0, forall xin mathcal{D}_fqquad |x-x_0|<eta implies |f(x)-f(x_0)|<varepsilon$



              If $f:xto lfloor xrfloor$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is false, indeed $f$ is not continuous on $x_0=1$



              If $f:xto x^2$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is true



              $f,x_0$ are free variables, $varepsilon,eta,x$ are bound variables





              Note that we consider $P(u):ule u^2$



              $P(1)$ is true



              $forall uin mathbb{R}, P(u)$ is wrong, and $u$ is a bound variable and this proposition doesn't depend on $u$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                I give you one exemple :



                $P(f,x_0):forall varepsilon>0,exists eta>0, forall xin mathcal{D}_fqquad |x-x_0|<eta implies |f(x)-f(x_0)|<varepsilon$



                If $f:xto lfloor xrfloor$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is false, indeed $f$ is not continuous on $x_0=1$



                If $f:xto x^2$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is true



                $f,x_0$ are free variables, $varepsilon,eta,x$ are bound variables





                Note that we consider $P(u):ule u^2$



                $P(1)$ is true



                $forall uin mathbb{R}, P(u)$ is wrong, and $u$ is a bound variable and this proposition doesn't depend on $u$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I give you one exemple :



                  $P(f,x_0):forall varepsilon>0,exists eta>0, forall xin mathcal{D}_fqquad |x-x_0|<eta implies |f(x)-f(x_0)|<varepsilon$



                  If $f:xto lfloor xrfloor$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is false, indeed $f$ is not continuous on $x_0=1$



                  If $f:xto x^2$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is true



                  $f,x_0$ are free variables, $varepsilon,eta,x$ are bound variables





                  Note that we consider $P(u):ule u^2$



                  $P(1)$ is true



                  $forall uin mathbb{R}, P(u)$ is wrong, and $u$ is a bound variable and this proposition doesn't depend on $u$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  I give you one exemple :



                  $P(f,x_0):forall varepsilon>0,exists eta>0, forall xin mathcal{D}_fqquad |x-x_0|<eta implies |f(x)-f(x_0)|<varepsilon$



                  If $f:xto lfloor xrfloor$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is false, indeed $f$ is not continuous on $x_0=1$



                  If $f:xto x^2$ and $x_0:=1$ then $P(f,x_0)$ is true



                  $f,x_0$ are free variables, $varepsilon,eta,x$ are bound variables





                  Note that we consider $P(u):ule u^2$



                  $P(1)$ is true



                  $forall uin mathbb{R}, P(u)$ is wrong, and $u$ is a bound variable and this proposition doesn't depend on $u$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 15 '18 at 22:06

























                  answered Dec 15 '18 at 21:43









                  StuStu

                  1,1951414




                  1,1951414






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041954%2fwhat-is-its-definition-mathematically-of-pu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten