Approximation of $sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ in $x = 0$
$begingroup$
I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.
I found the equation for $f(x)$:
$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$
for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$
let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$
sequences-and-series functional-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.
I found the equation for $f(x)$:
$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$
for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$
let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$
sequences-and-series functional-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.
I found the equation for $f(x)$:
$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$
for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$
let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$
sequences-and-series functional-equations
$endgroup$
I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.
I found the equation for $f(x)$:
$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$
for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$
let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$
sequences-and-series functional-equations
sequences-and-series functional-equations
edited Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
KotSmile
asked Dec 26 '18 at 16:07
KotSmileKotSmile
316
316
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.
Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.
Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053071%2fapproximation-of-sum-n-0-infty-2-n-tanh3n-x-in-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.
Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.
Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.
Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.
Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.
Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.
Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.
$endgroup$
An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.
Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.
Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.
answered Jan 3 at 2:38
Guacho PerezGuacho Perez
3,97911134
3,97911134
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053071%2fapproximation-of-sum-n-0-infty-2-n-tanh3n-x-in-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19
$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22
$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34
$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06
$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55