Approximation of $sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ in $x = 0$












4












$begingroup$


I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.



I found the equation for $f(x)$:



$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$



for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$



let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – orlp
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @orlp how to approximate this sum
    $endgroup$
    – KotSmile
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:22










  • $begingroup$
    For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:34












  • $begingroup$
    I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:06












  • $begingroup$
    Related?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Jan 1 at 17:55
















4












$begingroup$


I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.



I found the equation for $f(x)$:



$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$



for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$



let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – orlp
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @orlp how to approximate this sum
    $endgroup$
    – KotSmile
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:22










  • $begingroup$
    For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:34












  • $begingroup$
    I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:06












  • $begingroup$
    Related?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Jan 1 at 17:55














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.



I found the equation for $f(x)$:



$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$



for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$



let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to (asymptotic function) approximate the series $f(x) = sum_{n=0}^infty 2^{-n} tanh(3^n x)$ around $x = 0$.



I found the equation for $f(x)$:



$$f(x) = dfrac{1}{2} f(3x) + tanh(x)$$



for $f(x)=dfrac{1}{2}f(3x) Rightarrow f(x) = A x^{log_32}$



let $A = A(x) Rightarrow A(x) = Theta(ln(x))$ where $Theta(x) $ any function with period $ln3$







sequences-and-series functional-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '18 at 17:30







KotSmile

















asked Dec 26 '18 at 16:07









KotSmileKotSmile

316




316












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – orlp
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @orlp how to approximate this sum
    $endgroup$
    – KotSmile
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:22










  • $begingroup$
    For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:34












  • $begingroup$
    I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:06












  • $begingroup$
    Related?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Jan 1 at 17:55


















  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – orlp
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:19










  • $begingroup$
    @orlp how to approximate this sum
    $endgroup$
    – KotSmile
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:22










  • $begingroup$
    For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:34












  • $begingroup$
    I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
    $endgroup$
    – John Barber
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:06












  • $begingroup$
    Related?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Jan 1 at 17:55
















$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19




$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– orlp
Dec 26 '18 at 16:19












$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22




$begingroup$
@orlp how to approximate this sum
$endgroup$
– KotSmile
Dec 26 '18 at 16:22












$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34






$begingroup$
For whatever it's worth, I've been playing around with this numerically in Mathematica, and it looks like $f(x) approx a x^p$ for small $x>0$, where $aapprox 3.71549$ and $p$ is suspiciously close to $ln(2) / ln(3) approx 0.63093$. (Of course we know that looks can be deceiving.)
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 26 '18 at 17:34














$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06






$begingroup$
I find analytically (with the aid of numerics) that for small $x$, $f(x) approx a, x^{ln 2 / ln 3} - 2 x$, where $a approx 3.71549$. I can't figure out what that value for $a$ is.
$endgroup$
– John Barber
Dec 27 '18 at 15:06














$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55




$begingroup$
Related?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Jan 1 at 17:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
$$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.



Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.



Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
$$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053071%2fapproximation-of-sum-n-0-infty-2-n-tanh3n-x-in-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
    $$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
    Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.



    Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.



    Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
    $$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
    Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
      $$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
      Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.



      Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.



      Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
      $$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
      Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
        $$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
        Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.



        Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.



        Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
        $$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
        Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        An alternative justification for the $log_3 2$ exponent is as follows: suppose we want to approximate $f$ by some $x^a$, where $a>0$ so that $lim_{xto 0} x^{-a}f(x)=c$ with $0<c<infty$. The functional equation shows
        $$c=frac {3^a}2c+begin{cases} 0 & text{if }a<1 \ 1 &text{if } a=1 \ infty & text{if }a>1end{cases}$$
        Which forces $a<1$ and $a=log_3 2$.



        Given this value of $a$, instead of looking at $lim x^{-a}f(x)$ as $xto 0$ we look at $F(x)=3^{-ax}f(3^x)=2^{-x}f(3^x)$ as $xto -infty$. Putting $g(x)=2^{-x}tanh(3^x)$ shows $F(x)=sum_{nge 0}g(x+n)$. Because $g(x)le(frac 32)^x$, $sum_{nle 1} g(x+n)le 2(frac 32)^x$ and thus $bar F(x)=sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}g(x+n)$ tends to $F$ as $xto -infty$. But $bar F$ has period $1$ so all information about it can be gleaned from its behavior on $[0,1]$.



        Since we also have $g(x)le 2^{-x}$, for any $x$ in the unit interval, $g(x+n)le 2^{1-n}$ and $g(x-n)le (frac 32)^{1-n}$ so that
        $$left|bar F(x)-sum_{-N}^N g(x+n)right|le 2^{1-N}+3left(frac 23right)^N $$
        Therefore, the series converges uniformly, and does so at a geometric rate. This means one can obtain a very good approximation for $bar F$ and this in turn approximates $F$ in the limit.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 3 at 2:38









        Guacho PerezGuacho Perez

        3,97911134




        3,97911134






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053071%2fapproximation-of-sum-n-0-infty-2-n-tanh3n-x-in-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten