If $f$ be non-negative, bounded and Riemann Integrable on $[a, b]$, then $sqrt{f}$ is R- integrable.












1












$begingroup$


The easiest way to solve this is to use the theorem: If $g$ be a continuous function in $[M, m] subset [j, k]$ and $f$ be bounded and Riemann integrable, then $g circ f$ is Riemann integrable too. Using $g(x) = x^{1/2}$ solves the problem, but I want to prove it more directly.



Here is my approach:



From the necessary and sufficient condition of integrability, we have



$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r=U(P,f)-L(P,f) < epsilon $ $ forall ||P||< delta$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



We now create a set ( more precisely, a subset of the index set $I$ ), $Z$, defined as $Z={r in I: sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}f=sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}sqrt{f}=0}$. Since the function is non negative over the entire interval, therefore, in every interval indexed in $Z$ must have $0$ as the infimum.



By the property of non negative real numbers, $m_r leq f leq M_r implies sqrt{m_r} leq sqrt{f} leq sqrt{M_r}$



Now taking $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= sum_{rin IZ}(sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r})delta_r =sum_{rin IZ}frac{({M_r}-{m_r})}{(sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r})}delta_r leq musum_{rin IZ}({M_r}-{m_r})delta_r $



choosing $min {sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r}: r in IZ}= K = 1/mu >0 (neq0$, by our choice of $r$) .



We further have $sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r} = 0 =M_r -m_r forall rin Z.$ Hence $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= W(P,sqrt{f}) $



Now, $forall epsilon >0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r< epsilon/mu $ [$mu$ is a fixed positive real number] $ forall ||P||< delta_mu$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



Thus, we finally have the following:
$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,sqrt{f}) leq mu W(P,f) < epsilon $, $forall ||P||< delta_mu.$



P.S : I am aware of the duplicates. I just want my solution verified.






real-analysis proof-verification alternative-proof riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:41


















1












$begingroup$


The easiest way to solve this is to use the theorem: If $g$ be a continuous function in $[M, m] subset [j, k]$ and $f$ be bounded and Riemann integrable, then $g circ f$ is Riemann integrable too. Using $g(x) = x^{1/2}$ solves the problem, but I want to prove it more directly.



Here is my approach:



From the necessary and sufficient condition of integrability, we have



$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r=U(P,f)-L(P,f) < epsilon $ $ forall ||P||< delta$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



We now create a set ( more precisely, a subset of the index set $I$ ), $Z$, defined as $Z={r in I: sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}f=sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}sqrt{f}=0}$. Since the function is non negative over the entire interval, therefore, in every interval indexed in $Z$ must have $0$ as the infimum.



By the property of non negative real numbers, $m_r leq f leq M_r implies sqrt{m_r} leq sqrt{f} leq sqrt{M_r}$



Now taking $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= sum_{rin IZ}(sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r})delta_r =sum_{rin IZ}frac{({M_r}-{m_r})}{(sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r})}delta_r leq musum_{rin IZ}({M_r}-{m_r})delta_r $



choosing $min {sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r}: r in IZ}= K = 1/mu >0 (neq0$, by our choice of $r$) .



We further have $sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r} = 0 =M_r -m_r forall rin Z.$ Hence $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= W(P,sqrt{f}) $



Now, $forall epsilon >0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r< epsilon/mu $ [$mu$ is a fixed positive real number] $ forall ||P||< delta_mu$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



Thus, we finally have the following:
$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,sqrt{f}) leq mu W(P,f) < epsilon $, $forall ||P||< delta_mu.$



P.S : I am aware of the duplicates. I just want my solution verified.






real-analysis proof-verification alternative-proof riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:41
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


The easiest way to solve this is to use the theorem: If $g$ be a continuous function in $[M, m] subset [j, k]$ and $f$ be bounded and Riemann integrable, then $g circ f$ is Riemann integrable too. Using $g(x) = x^{1/2}$ solves the problem, but I want to prove it more directly.



Here is my approach:



From the necessary and sufficient condition of integrability, we have



$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r=U(P,f)-L(P,f) < epsilon $ $ forall ||P||< delta$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



We now create a set ( more precisely, a subset of the index set $I$ ), $Z$, defined as $Z={r in I: sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}f=sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}sqrt{f}=0}$. Since the function is non negative over the entire interval, therefore, in every interval indexed in $Z$ must have $0$ as the infimum.



By the property of non negative real numbers, $m_r leq f leq M_r implies sqrt{m_r} leq sqrt{f} leq sqrt{M_r}$



Now taking $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= sum_{rin IZ}(sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r})delta_r =sum_{rin IZ}frac{({M_r}-{m_r})}{(sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r})}delta_r leq musum_{rin IZ}({M_r}-{m_r})delta_r $



choosing $min {sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r}: r in IZ}= K = 1/mu >0 (neq0$, by our choice of $r$) .



We further have $sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r} = 0 =M_r -m_r forall rin Z.$ Hence $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= W(P,sqrt{f}) $



Now, $forall epsilon >0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r< epsilon/mu $ [$mu$ is a fixed positive real number] $ forall ||P||< delta_mu$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



Thus, we finally have the following:
$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,sqrt{f}) leq mu W(P,f) < epsilon $, $forall ||P||< delta_mu.$



P.S : I am aware of the duplicates. I just want my solution verified.






real-analysis proof-verification alternative-proof riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The easiest way to solve this is to use the theorem: If $g$ be a continuous function in $[M, m] subset [j, k]$ and $f$ be bounded and Riemann integrable, then $g circ f$ is Riemann integrable too. Using $g(x) = x^{1/2}$ solves the problem, but I want to prove it more directly.



Here is my approach:



From the necessary and sufficient condition of integrability, we have



$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r=U(P,f)-L(P,f) < epsilon $ $ forall ||P||< delta$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



We now create a set ( more precisely, a subset of the index set $I$ ), $Z$, defined as $Z={r in I: sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}f=sup_{[x_{r-1},x_r]}sqrt{f}=0}$. Since the function is non negative over the entire interval, therefore, in every interval indexed in $Z$ must have $0$ as the infimum.



By the property of non negative real numbers, $m_r leq f leq M_r implies sqrt{m_r} leq sqrt{f} leq sqrt{M_r}$



Now taking $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= sum_{rin IZ}(sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r})delta_r =sum_{rin IZ}frac{({M_r}-{m_r})}{(sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r})}delta_r leq musum_{rin IZ}({M_r}-{m_r})delta_r $



choosing $min {sqrt{M_r}+sqrt{m_r}: r in IZ}= K = 1/mu >0 (neq0$, by our choice of $r$) .



We further have $sqrt{M_r}-sqrt{m_r} = 0 =M_r -m_r forall rin Z.$ Hence $W(P^*,sqrt{f})= W(P,sqrt{f}) $



Now, $forall epsilon >0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,f) = sum_{r=1}^{n} (M_r-m_r)delta_r< epsilon/mu $ [$mu$ is a fixed positive real number] $ forall ||P||< delta_mu$, $P$ being any partition of $[a,b]$.



Thus, we finally have the following:
$forall epsilon>0$, $exists$ a $delta_mu >0$ such that, $0 leq W(P,sqrt{f}) leq mu W(P,f) < epsilon $, $forall ||P||< delta_mu.$



P.S : I am aware of the duplicates. I just want my solution verified.






real-analysis proof-verification alternative-proof riemann-integration




real-analysis proof-verification alternative-proof riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 26 '18 at 16:05









Subhasis BiswasSubhasis Biswas

515412




515412












  • $begingroup$
    It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:41




















  • $begingroup$
    It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:41


















$begingroup$
It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 16:41






$begingroup$
It would have been pretty neat and clean if $f$ were $>0$. The problem arises when $0$ is in the range of $f$. This is when for some $i$, $epsilon / (sqrt{M_i}+sqrt{m_i})$ might become $infty$. I just have modified the partition index to remove the trouble. Otherwise, it's just the same thing.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 16:41












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Following your notation, note that we have
$$sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i}$$
since $sqrt{(M_i-m_i) + m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i} + sqrt{m_i}$.



To bound the Riemann sum,
$$sum_i (sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i}) delta_i leq sum_i sqrt {(M_i-m_i)delta_i} sqrt delta_i leq left( sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_iright)^{1/2} left( sum_i delta_iright)^{1/2} $$
because $f$ is Riemann integrable, $sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_i$ can be made arbritrily small, and $sum_i delta_i = b-a$ is bounded, we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Good one. But is mine alright?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:57












  • $begingroup$
    Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:38












  • $begingroup$
    unfortunately, I have to agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:25












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053070%2fif-f-be-non-negative-bounded-and-riemann-integrable-on-a-b-then-sqrt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Following your notation, note that we have
$$sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i}$$
since $sqrt{(M_i-m_i) + m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i} + sqrt{m_i}$.



To bound the Riemann sum,
$$sum_i (sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i}) delta_i leq sum_i sqrt {(M_i-m_i)delta_i} sqrt delta_i leq left( sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_iright)^{1/2} left( sum_i delta_iright)^{1/2} $$
because $f$ is Riemann integrable, $sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_i$ can be made arbritrily small, and $sum_i delta_i = b-a$ is bounded, we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Good one. But is mine alright?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:57












  • $begingroup$
    Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:38












  • $begingroup$
    unfortunately, I have to agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:25
















4












$begingroup$

Following your notation, note that we have
$$sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i}$$
since $sqrt{(M_i-m_i) + m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i} + sqrt{m_i}$.



To bound the Riemann sum,
$$sum_i (sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i}) delta_i leq sum_i sqrt {(M_i-m_i)delta_i} sqrt delta_i leq left( sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_iright)^{1/2} left( sum_i delta_iright)^{1/2} $$
because $f$ is Riemann integrable, $sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_i$ can be made arbritrily small, and $sum_i delta_i = b-a$ is bounded, we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Good one. But is mine alright?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:57












  • $begingroup$
    Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:38












  • $begingroup$
    unfortunately, I have to agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:25














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Following your notation, note that we have
$$sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i}$$
since $sqrt{(M_i-m_i) + m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i} + sqrt{m_i}$.



To bound the Riemann sum,
$$sum_i (sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i}) delta_i leq sum_i sqrt {(M_i-m_i)delta_i} sqrt delta_i leq left( sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_iright)^{1/2} left( sum_i delta_iright)^{1/2} $$
because $f$ is Riemann integrable, $sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_i$ can be made arbritrily small, and $sum_i delta_i = b-a$ is bounded, we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Following your notation, note that we have
$$sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i}$$
since $sqrt{(M_i-m_i) + m_i} leq sqrt {M_i-m_i} + sqrt{m_i}$.



To bound the Riemann sum,
$$sum_i (sqrt{M_i} - sqrt{m_i}) delta_i leq sum_i sqrt {(M_i-m_i)delta_i} sqrt delta_i leq left( sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_iright)^{1/2} left( sum_i delta_iright)^{1/2} $$
because $f$ is Riemann integrable, $sum_i (M_i-m_i)delta_i$ can be made arbritrily small, and $sum_i delta_i = b-a$ is bounded, we are done.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 26 '18 at 17:11









XiaoXiao

4,87811636




4,87811636












  • $begingroup$
    Good one. But is mine alright?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:57












  • $begingroup$
    Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:38












  • $begingroup$
    unfortunately, I have to agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:25


















  • $begingroup$
    Good one. But is mine alright?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:45










  • $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 17:57












  • $begingroup$
    Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Xiao
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:38












  • $begingroup$
    unfortunately, I have to agree.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Dec 26 '18 at 19:25
















$begingroup$
Good one. But is mine alright?
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 17:45




$begingroup$
Good one. But is mine alright?
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 17:45












$begingroup$
@SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Dec 26 '18 at 17:57






$begingroup$
@SubhasisBiswas In your argument, does $mu$ (or the index set $Z$ and $I$) depend on the partition?
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Dec 26 '18 at 17:57














$begingroup$
Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 18:00




$begingroup$
Everything you mentioned changes according to the mode of Partition. But ultimately, we can show that it can be made less than any predetermined positive quantity.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 18:00




1




1




$begingroup$
@SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Dec 26 '18 at 18:38






$begingroup$
@SubhasisBiswas In the second last line, you mentioned [$mu$ is a fixed constant], how did you pick this fixed constant? Also it would be hard to estimate "$mu sum_{iin Isetminus Z} (M_i - m_i) delta i$". Take $f(x) = x$ on $(0,1]$ and $f(0) = 1$, in this case $Z$ is empty. The quantity $mu sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta_i$ is hard to control as the partition size goes to zero, since $mu$ goes to infinity and $sum_{iin I} (M_i - m_i) delta i$ goes to zero.
$endgroup$
– Xiao
Dec 26 '18 at 18:38














$begingroup$
unfortunately, I have to agree.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 19:25




$begingroup$
unfortunately, I have to agree.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Dec 26 '18 at 19:25


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053070%2fif-f-be-non-negative-bounded-and-riemann-integrable-on-a-b-then-sqrt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more