Are “1” , “3” and “Bech” Addresses (BTC) forward and backward compatible?












2















Wondering if lets say someone has funds in Bech32 and they send to a "1" or "3" address due to less characters to remember ect.










share|improve this question

























  • What is an 'S' address?

    – Pieter Wuille
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:09











  • Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

    – CryptoShoppe
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:13
















2















Wondering if lets say someone has funds in Bech32 and they send to a "1" or "3" address due to less characters to remember ect.










share|improve this question

























  • What is an 'S' address?

    – Pieter Wuille
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:09











  • Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

    – CryptoShoppe
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:13














2












2








2








Wondering if lets say someone has funds in Bech32 and they send to a "1" or "3" address due to less characters to remember ect.










share|improve this question
















Wondering if lets say someone has funds in Bech32 and they send to a "1" or "3" address due to less characters to remember ect.







address segregated-witness bech32-address






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '18 at 12:15







CryptoShoppe

















asked Dec 26 '18 at 12:05









CryptoShoppeCryptoShoppe

133




133













  • What is an 'S' address?

    – Pieter Wuille
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:09











  • Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

    – CryptoShoppe
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:13



















  • What is an 'S' address?

    – Pieter Wuille
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:09











  • Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

    – CryptoShoppe
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:13

















What is an 'S' address?

– Pieter Wuille
Dec 26 '18 at 12:09





What is an 'S' address?

– Pieter Wuille
Dec 26 '18 at 12:09













Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

– CryptoShoppe
Dec 26 '18 at 12:13





Sorry I meant "3" addresses.

– CryptoShoppe
Dec 26 '18 at 12:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














All current addresses are cross compatible.



At a technical level, the chain has no concept of an address, only of locking scripts, which are fragments of a bitcoin script program. You send coins by specifying the locking script, and spend them by providing the unlocking script (also called the script sig), which completes the program by providing the correct inputs to produce a valid output (TRUE, for a valid transaction).



Since there is no concept of an address here, they are all compatible with each other.



Addresses are a secondary encoding performed on standardized scripts to aid human readability, and prevent typographical errors via checksums and error detecting mechanisms.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "308"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83186%2fare-1-3-and-bech-addresses-btc-forward-and-backward-compatible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    All current addresses are cross compatible.



    At a technical level, the chain has no concept of an address, only of locking scripts, which are fragments of a bitcoin script program. You send coins by specifying the locking script, and spend them by providing the unlocking script (also called the script sig), which completes the program by providing the correct inputs to produce a valid output (TRUE, for a valid transaction).



    Since there is no concept of an address here, they are all compatible with each other.



    Addresses are a secondary encoding performed on standardized scripts to aid human readability, and prevent typographical errors via checksums and error detecting mechanisms.






    share|improve this answer




























      6














      All current addresses are cross compatible.



      At a technical level, the chain has no concept of an address, only of locking scripts, which are fragments of a bitcoin script program. You send coins by specifying the locking script, and spend them by providing the unlocking script (also called the script sig), which completes the program by providing the correct inputs to produce a valid output (TRUE, for a valid transaction).



      Since there is no concept of an address here, they are all compatible with each other.



      Addresses are a secondary encoding performed on standardized scripts to aid human readability, and prevent typographical errors via checksums and error detecting mechanisms.






      share|improve this answer


























        6












        6








        6







        All current addresses are cross compatible.



        At a technical level, the chain has no concept of an address, only of locking scripts, which are fragments of a bitcoin script program. You send coins by specifying the locking script, and spend them by providing the unlocking script (also called the script sig), which completes the program by providing the correct inputs to produce a valid output (TRUE, for a valid transaction).



        Since there is no concept of an address here, they are all compatible with each other.



        Addresses are a secondary encoding performed on standardized scripts to aid human readability, and prevent typographical errors via checksums and error detecting mechanisms.






        share|improve this answer













        All current addresses are cross compatible.



        At a technical level, the chain has no concept of an address, only of locking scripts, which are fragments of a bitcoin script program. You send coins by specifying the locking script, and spend them by providing the unlocking script (also called the script sig), which completes the program by providing the correct inputs to produce a valid output (TRUE, for a valid transaction).



        Since there is no concept of an address here, they are all compatible with each other.



        Addresses are a secondary encoding performed on standardized scripts to aid human readability, and prevent typographical errors via checksums and error detecting mechanisms.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 26 '18 at 12:33









        Raghav SoodRaghav Sood

        7,71121127




        7,71121127






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Bitcoin Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83186%2fare-1-3-and-bech-addresses-btc-forward-and-backward-compatible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten