How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.
Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money
|
show 5 more comments
I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.
Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money
6
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
2
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
3
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
4
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
3
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.
Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money
I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.
Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money
usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money
edited 6 hours ago
David Richerby
14.9k94790
14.9k94790
asked 6 hours ago
JenniferJennifer
34028
34028
6
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
2
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
3
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
4
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
3
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
6
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
2
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
3
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
4
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
3
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago
6
6
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
2
2
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
3
3
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
4
4
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
3
3
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.
You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.
So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.
You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.
Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.
Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.
So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.
You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.
- Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.
- Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.
* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and usually reflects quite badly on the person's character, as one gets unbanked by bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of inability.
add a comment |
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.
All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.
If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.
add a comment |
First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):
- Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.
- CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.
The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.
But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.
I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.
I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states
Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.
There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.
add a comment |
There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/
It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.
The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.
add a comment |
There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.
So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "273"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137298%2fhow-much-cash-can-i-safely-carry-into-the-usa-and-avoid-civil-forfeiture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.
You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.
So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.
You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.
Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.
Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.
So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.
You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.
- Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.
- Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.
* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and usually reflects quite badly on the person's character, as one gets unbanked by bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of inability.
add a comment |
It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.
You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.
So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.
You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.
Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.
Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.
So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.
You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.
- Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.
- Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.
* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and usually reflects quite badly on the person's character, as one gets unbanked by bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of inability.
add a comment |
It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.
You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.
So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.
You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.
Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.
Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.
So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.
You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.
- Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.
- Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.
* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and usually reflects quite badly on the person's character, as one gets unbanked by bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of inability.
It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.
You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.
So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.
You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.
Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.
Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.
So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.
You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.
- Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.
- Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.
* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and usually reflects quite badly on the person's character, as one gets unbanked by bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of inability.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
HarperHarper
12.8k32363
12.8k32363
add a comment |
add a comment |
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.
All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.
If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.
add a comment |
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.
All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.
If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.
add a comment |
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.
All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.
If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.
I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.
All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.
If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.
answered 5 hours ago
phoogphoog
77.8k12170253
77.8k12170253
add a comment |
add a comment |
First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):
- Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.
- CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.
The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.
But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.
I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.
I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states
Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.
There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.
add a comment |
First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):
- Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.
- CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.
The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.
But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.
I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.
I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states
Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.
There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.
add a comment |
First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):
- Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.
- CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.
The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.
But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.
I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.
I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states
Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.
There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.
First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):
- Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.
- CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.
The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.
But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?
The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.
I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.
I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states
Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.
There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
1,509317
1,509317
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/
It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.
The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.
add a comment |
There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/
It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.
The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.
add a comment |
There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/
It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.
The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.
There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/
It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.
The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.
answered 4 hours ago
HilmarHilmar
23.5k13775
23.5k13775
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.
So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.
add a comment |
There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.
So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.
add a comment |
There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.
So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.
There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.
So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.
answered 2 hours ago
user96519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137298%2fhow-much-cash-can-i-safely-carry-into-the-usa-and-avoid-civil-forfeiture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.
– David Richerby
6 hours ago
2
The tonight show by John Oliver had a main feature about civil forfeiture (which is on YouTube) in which a few cases were mentioned. I don't recall the exact numbers, but they appeared to be relatively low to me (in the order of 100s of dollars). There was some other question on this site that implied that you should never drive a car with California license plates in Texas if you are concerned about civil forfeiture - so refuse such rental cars.
– DCTLib
6 hours ago
3
Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.
– Richard
5 hours ago
4
@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…
– Dan Neely
3 hours ago
3
@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.
– Rob K
3 hours ago