If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8












$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    6 hours ago




















8












$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    6 hours ago
















8












8








8





$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?







dnd-5e spells wish






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









V2Blast

26.3k591161




26.3k591161










asked 9 hours ago









JWeirJWeir

616




616








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    6 hours ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    6 hours ago










1




1




$begingroup$
Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
6 hours ago






$begingroup$
Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
6 hours ago












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
    $endgroup$
    – JWeir
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Starnes
    8 hours ago



















3












$begingroup$

As Written



The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



As Intended



The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



Final Call



The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



Personally



It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



    As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




    If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




    Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




    Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




    This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



      The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



      If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



      A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




      Bestow Curse



      When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




      Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




      Spirit Guardians



      When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




      Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



      And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




      Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




      The text of Twinned Spell:




      When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



      To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




      This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



      It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




        The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




        This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




        You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




        Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



        Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



        Sansuri's Simulacrum



        I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate.



        ISBN-10: 9780786966004

        ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
          $endgroup$
          – David Coffron
          8 hours ago








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
          $endgroup$
          – SevenSidedDie
          8 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          any further issues that I should fix?
          $endgroup$
          – Aeyt
          7 hours ago












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "122"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144868%2fif-the-wish-spell-is-used-to-duplicate-the-effect-of-simulacrum-are-existing-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        15












        $begingroup$

        Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



        Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



        Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$









        • 5




          $begingroup$
          The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
          $endgroup$
          – JWeir
          9 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          8 hours ago
















        15












        $begingroup$

        Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



        Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



        Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$









        • 5




          $begingroup$
          The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
          $endgroup$
          – JWeir
          9 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          8 hours ago














        15












        15








        15





        $begingroup$

        Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



        Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



        Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



        Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



        Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        SevenSidedDieSevenSidedDie

        210k33671954




        210k33671954








        • 5




          $begingroup$
          The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
          $endgroup$
          – JWeir
          9 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          8 hours ago














        • 5




          $begingroup$
          The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
          $endgroup$
          – JWeir
          9 hours ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          8 hours ago








        5




        5




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        9 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        9 hours ago




        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        8 hours ago




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        8 hours ago













        3












        $begingroup$

        As Written



        The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



        As Intended



        The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




        Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




        But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



        Final Call



        The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



        Personally



        It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          3












          $begingroup$

          As Written



          The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



          As Intended



          The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




          Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




          But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



          Final Call



          The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



          Personally



          It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            As Written



            The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



            As Intended



            The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




            Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




            But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



            Final Call



            The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



            Personally



            It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            As Written



            The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



            As Intended



            The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




            Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




            But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



            Final Call



            The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



            Personally



            It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago









            V2Blast

            26.3k591161




            26.3k591161










            answered 8 hours ago









            J. A. StreichJ. A. Streich

            25.2k175129




            25.2k175129























                1












                $begingroup$

                A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                  As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                  If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                  Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                  Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                  This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                    As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                    If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                    Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                    Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                    This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                    As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                    If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                    Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                    Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                    This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 4 hours ago









                    David CoffronDavid Coffron

                    39.8k3138284




                    39.8k3138284























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



                        The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



                        If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



                        A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




                        Bestow Curse



                        When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




                        Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




                        Spirit Guardians



                        When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




                        Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



                        And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




                        Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                        The text of Twinned Spell:




                        When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



                        To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




                        This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



                        It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



                          The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



                          If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



                          A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




                          Bestow Curse



                          When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




                          Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




                          Spirit Guardians



                          When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




                          Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



                          And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




                          Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                          The text of Twinned Spell:




                          When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



                          To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




                          This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



                          It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



                            The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



                            If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



                            A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




                            Bestow Curse



                            When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




                            Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




                            Spirit Guardians



                            When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




                            Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



                            And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




                            Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                            The text of Twinned Spell:




                            When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



                            To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




                            This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



                            It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



                            The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



                            If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



                            A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




                            Bestow Curse



                            When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




                            Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




                            Spirit Guardians



                            When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




                            Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



                            And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




                            Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                            The text of Twinned Spell:




                            When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



                            To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




                            This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



                            It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 2 hours ago

























                            answered 2 hours ago









                            BenBen

                            1616




                            1616























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                                The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                                This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                                You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                                Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                                Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                                Sansuri's Simulacrum



                                I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate.



                                ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                                ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$









                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – David Coffron
                                  8 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SevenSidedDie
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  any further issues that I should fix?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Aeyt
                                  7 hours ago
















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                                The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                                This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                                You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                                Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                                Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                                Sansuri's Simulacrum



                                I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate.



                                ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                                ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$









                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – David Coffron
                                  8 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SevenSidedDie
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  any further issues that I should fix?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Aeyt
                                  7 hours ago














                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                                The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                                This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                                You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                                Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                                Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                                Sansuri's Simulacrum



                                I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate.



                                ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                                ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$



                                I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                                The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                                This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                                You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                                Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                                Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                                Sansuri's Simulacrum



                                I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate.



                                ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                                ISBN-13: 978-0786966004







                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 6 hours ago





















                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered 8 hours ago









                                AeytAeyt

                                535




                                535




                                New contributor




                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                Aeyt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – David Coffron
                                  8 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SevenSidedDie
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  any further issues that I should fix?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Aeyt
                                  7 hours ago














                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – David Coffron
                                  8 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SevenSidedDie
                                  8 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  any further issues that I should fix?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Aeyt
                                  7 hours ago








                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                $endgroup$
                                – David Coffron
                                8 hours ago






                                $begingroup$
                                Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                                $endgroup$
                                – David Coffron
                                8 hours ago






                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                $endgroup$
                                – SevenSidedDie
                                8 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                                $endgroup$
                                – SevenSidedDie
                                8 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                any further issues that I should fix?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Aeyt
                                7 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                any further issues that I should fix?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Aeyt
                                7 hours ago


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144868%2fif-the-wish-spell-is-used-to-duplicate-the-effect-of-simulacrum-are-existing-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bundesstraße 106

                                Verónica Boquete

                                Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten