existence and uniqueness for $dot x(t)=f(t,x(t))$, with $f$ measurable in $t$.
$begingroup$
Consider the following scalar ODE
$$dot x(t) = f(t,x(t))$$
defined on a compact interval $[0,T]$.
Assume that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous in $x$, but it is measurable in $t$.
What can we say about the existence and uniqueness?
The standard Picard theorem assumes that $f$ is continuous in $t$.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following scalar ODE
$$dot x(t) = f(t,x(t))$$
defined on a compact interval $[0,T]$.
Assume that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous in $x$, but it is measurable in $t$.
What can we say about the existence and uniqueness?
The standard Picard theorem assumes that $f$ is continuous in $t$.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following scalar ODE
$$dot x(t) = f(t,x(t))$$
defined on a compact interval $[0,T]$.
Assume that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous in $x$, but it is measurable in $t$.
What can we say about the existence and uniqueness?
The standard Picard theorem assumes that $f$ is continuous in $t$.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
$endgroup$
Consider the following scalar ODE
$$dot x(t) = f(t,x(t))$$
defined on a compact interval $[0,T]$.
Assume that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous in $x$, but it is measurable in $t$.
What can we say about the existence and uniqueness?
The standard Picard theorem assumes that $f$ is continuous in $t$.
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
real-analysis ordinary-differential-equations
asked Dec 25 '18 at 21:59
M.AM.A
1599
1599
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is almost provided by Carathéodory’s existence theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052459%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-for-dot-xt-ft-xt-with-f-measurable-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The answer is almost provided by Carathéodory’s existence theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is almost provided by Carathéodory’s existence theorem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The answer is almost provided by Carathéodory’s existence theorem.
$endgroup$
The answer is almost provided by Carathéodory’s existence theorem.
answered Dec 25 '18 at 22:21
mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net
26.9k22158
26.9k22158
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052459%2fexistence-and-uniqueness-for-dot-xt-ft-xt-with-f-measurable-in-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown