How to change the limits of integration












4












$begingroup$


I am attempting to solve the integral of the following...



$$int_{0}^{2 pi}int_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdrTheta $$



So I do the following step...



$$=2 piint_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdr$$



but then the next step is to substitute $s = -r^2$ which results in...



$$=2 piint_{- infty}^{0}frac{1}{2}e^{s}ds$$



The limits of integration are reversed now and the $r$ somehow results in $1/2$.



Can someone explain why this works? Why did substituting cause the limits change and result in the integration above?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mattos
    6 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    1 hour ago
















4












$begingroup$


I am attempting to solve the integral of the following...



$$int_{0}^{2 pi}int_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdrTheta $$



So I do the following step...



$$=2 piint_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdr$$



but then the next step is to substitute $s = -r^2$ which results in...



$$=2 piint_{- infty}^{0}frac{1}{2}e^{s}ds$$



The limits of integration are reversed now and the $r$ somehow results in $1/2$.



Can someone explain why this works? Why did substituting cause the limits change and result in the integration above?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mattos
    6 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    1 hour ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I am attempting to solve the integral of the following...



$$int_{0}^{2 pi}int_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdrTheta $$



So I do the following step...



$$=2 piint_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdr$$



but then the next step is to substitute $s = -r^2$ which results in...



$$=2 piint_{- infty}^{0}frac{1}{2}e^{s}ds$$



The limits of integration are reversed now and the $r$ somehow results in $1/2$.



Can someone explain why this works? Why did substituting cause the limits change and result in the integration above?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am attempting to solve the integral of the following...



$$int_{0}^{2 pi}int_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdrTheta $$



So I do the following step...



$$=2 piint_{0}^{infty}e^{-r^2}rdr$$



but then the next step is to substitute $s = -r^2$ which results in...



$$=2 piint_{- infty}^{0}frac{1}{2}e^{s}ds$$



The limits of integration are reversed now and the $r$ somehow results in $1/2$.



Can someone explain why this works? Why did substituting cause the limits change and result in the integration above?







calculus integration limits






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









BolboaBolboa

398516




398516








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mattos
    6 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mattos
    6 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
$$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
$endgroup$
– Mattos
6 hours ago






$begingroup$
$$s = -r^{2} implies ds = -2r dr implies -ds/2 = rdr$$ and as $r to infty$, $s to - infty$ and as $r to 0$, $s to 0$.
$endgroup$
– Mattos
6 hours ago














$begingroup$
This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
This constellation of consequences is why I recommend to my students to set $s = r^2$. This gives fewer minus signs and since the substituent is monotonically increasing, does not reverse the order of the bounds of integration.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

$s=-r^{2}$ gives $ds=-2rdr$ so $dr =-frac 1 {2r} ds$. Also, as $r$ increases from $0$ to $infty$, $s$ decreases from $0$ to $-infty$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    6 hours ago



















0












$begingroup$

Do you really need substitution. We already know the antiderivative of $re^{-r^2}$ and it is $-e^{-r^2}over 2$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181696%2fhow-to-change-the-limits-of-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    $s=-r^{2}$ gives $ds=-2rdr$ so $dr =-frac 1 {2r} ds$. Also, as $r$ increases from $0$ to $infty$, $s$ decreases from $0$ to $-infty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      6 hours ago
















    6












    $begingroup$

    $s=-r^{2}$ gives $ds=-2rdr$ so $dr =-frac 1 {2r} ds$. Also, as $r$ increases from $0$ to $infty$, $s$ decreases from $0$ to $-infty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      6 hours ago














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    $s=-r^{2}$ gives $ds=-2rdr$ so $dr =-frac 1 {2r} ds$. Also, as $r$ increases from $0$ to $infty$, $s$ decreases from $0$ to $-infty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $s=-r^{2}$ gives $ds=-2rdr$ so $dr =-frac 1 {2r} ds$. Also, as $r$ increases from $0$ to $infty$, $s$ decreases from $0$ to $-infty$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 6 hours ago









    Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

    73.6k53170




    73.6k53170








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      6 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
      $endgroup$
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      6 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It should be noted that the minus sign from the substitution is then used to reverse the order of the limits.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    6 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe Right. I didn't mention it explicitly but that is what I meant.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    6 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Do you really need substitution. We already know the antiderivative of $re^{-r^2}$ and it is $-e^{-r^2}over 2$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Do you really need substitution. We already know the antiderivative of $re^{-r^2}$ and it is $-e^{-r^2}over 2$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Do you really need substitution. We already know the antiderivative of $re^{-r^2}$ and it is $-e^{-r^2}over 2$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Do you really need substitution. We already know the antiderivative of $re^{-r^2}$ and it is $-e^{-r^2}over 2$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 6 hours ago









        HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE

        1,836212




        1,836212






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181696%2fhow-to-change-the-limits-of-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten