If two minimal surfaces equal to neighborhood then they are equal
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does anyone know if there is any result that says "if two minimal surfaces equal to neighborhood then they are equal"?
My teacher said that you think the result is true, but I do not find this result anywhere.
differential-geometry reference-request surfaces riemann-surfaces minimal-surfaces
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does anyone know if there is any result that says "if two minimal surfaces equal to neighborhood then they are equal"?
My teacher said that you think the result is true, but I do not find this result anywhere.
differential-geometry reference-request surfaces riemann-surfaces minimal-surfaces
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Does anyone know if there is any result that says "if two minimal surfaces equal to neighborhood then they are equal"?
My teacher said that you think the result is true, but I do not find this result anywhere.
differential-geometry reference-request surfaces riemann-surfaces minimal-surfaces
Does anyone know if there is any result that says "if two minimal surfaces equal to neighborhood then they are equal"?
My teacher said that you think the result is true, but I do not find this result anywhere.
differential-geometry reference-request surfaces riemann-surfaces minimal-surfaces
differential-geometry reference-request surfaces riemann-surfaces minimal-surfaces
asked Nov 18 at 11:31
Takashi
1776
1776
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48
add a comment |
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003424%2fif-two-minimal-surfaces-equal-to-neighborhood-then-they-are-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Depending on your setting, minimal surfaces might turn out to be analytic (De Giorgi-Nash theorem), so they satisfy this unique extension property
– Federico
Nov 18 at 11:48