Prove $x_n = c_1lambda_1^n + c_1lambda_2^n + dots + c_nlambda_n^n$
We have the recursive relation $x_n = a_{n-1}x_{n-1} + a_{n-2}x_{n-2} + dots + a_1x_1 + a_0x_0$. Prove that if the polynomial $t^n - a_{n-1}t^{n-1} - a_{n-2}t^{n-2} - dots - a_1t - a_0$ has distinct roots $lambda_1, lambda_2, dots, lambda_n$ then $$x_n = c_1lambda_1^n + c_1lambda_2^n + dots + c_nlambda_n^n$$
Here, coefficients $c_1, c_2, dots, c_n$ may be calculated from initial values $x_0, x_1, dots, x_n$.
I'm thinking of finding some matrix $A$ then looking for eigenvalues and eigenvectors so that we can do $A^n$ but I'm stuck.
linear-algebra recurrence-relations
add a comment |
We have the recursive relation $x_n = a_{n-1}x_{n-1} + a_{n-2}x_{n-2} + dots + a_1x_1 + a_0x_0$. Prove that if the polynomial $t^n - a_{n-1}t^{n-1} - a_{n-2}t^{n-2} - dots - a_1t - a_0$ has distinct roots $lambda_1, lambda_2, dots, lambda_n$ then $$x_n = c_1lambda_1^n + c_1lambda_2^n + dots + c_nlambda_n^n$$
Here, coefficients $c_1, c_2, dots, c_n$ may be calculated from initial values $x_0, x_1, dots, x_n$.
I'm thinking of finding some matrix $A$ then looking for eigenvalues and eigenvectors so that we can do $A^n$ but I'm stuck.
linear-algebra recurrence-relations
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03
add a comment |
We have the recursive relation $x_n = a_{n-1}x_{n-1} + a_{n-2}x_{n-2} + dots + a_1x_1 + a_0x_0$. Prove that if the polynomial $t^n - a_{n-1}t^{n-1} - a_{n-2}t^{n-2} - dots - a_1t - a_0$ has distinct roots $lambda_1, lambda_2, dots, lambda_n$ then $$x_n = c_1lambda_1^n + c_1lambda_2^n + dots + c_nlambda_n^n$$
Here, coefficients $c_1, c_2, dots, c_n$ may be calculated from initial values $x_0, x_1, dots, x_n$.
I'm thinking of finding some matrix $A$ then looking for eigenvalues and eigenvectors so that we can do $A^n$ but I'm stuck.
linear-algebra recurrence-relations
We have the recursive relation $x_n = a_{n-1}x_{n-1} + a_{n-2}x_{n-2} + dots + a_1x_1 + a_0x_0$. Prove that if the polynomial $t^n - a_{n-1}t^{n-1} - a_{n-2}t^{n-2} - dots - a_1t - a_0$ has distinct roots $lambda_1, lambda_2, dots, lambda_n$ then $$x_n = c_1lambda_1^n + c_1lambda_2^n + dots + c_nlambda_n^n$$
Here, coefficients $c_1, c_2, dots, c_n$ may be calculated from initial values $x_0, x_1, dots, x_n$.
I'm thinking of finding some matrix $A$ then looking for eigenvalues and eigenvectors so that we can do $A^n$ but I'm stuck.
linear-algebra recurrence-relations
linear-algebra recurrence-relations
edited Nov 25 at 7:59
Jyrki Lahtonen
107k12166365
107k12166365
asked Nov 25 at 7:32
sedrick
43912
43912
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03
add a comment |
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
One of the easiest approach: observe that the sequence space $$S ={(x_n)_{ngeq 0};|;x_{k+n} = a_{n-1}x_{n+k-1} + cdots + a_0 x_k, ;forall kgeq 0}$$ is of dimension $n$ since the whole sequence is determined by $n$-data, $x_0,ldots x_{n-1}$. And show that $lambda_j^n, ngeq 0$ forms a linearly independent subset of $S$, and thus forms a basis.
Matrix approach is also valid. Let $y_k = (x_k, ldots,x_{k-n+1})'$ for $kgeq n-1$. Then for companion matrix $C = (c_{ij})$ s.t. $c_{1j} = a_{n-j}$ and $c_{ij} = 1$ if $i-1 = j$ and $0$ otherwise, for $igeq 2$, it holds that $$y_{k+1} = C y_k.$$ Then the set of eigenvalues of $C$ is exactly ${lambda_j, 1leq j leq n}$ and $C$ is diagonalizable. That is, there is a basis consisting of its eigenvectors. You can see that $y_{n+k-1} = sum_j c_j lambda_j^k v_j$ where $v_j$'s are eigenvectors forming basis corresponding to $lambda_j$ and $y_{n-1}$ is represented as $sum_j c_j v_j$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012541%2fprove-x-n-c-1-lambda-1n-c-1-lambda-2n-dots-c-n-lambda-nn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One of the easiest approach: observe that the sequence space $$S ={(x_n)_{ngeq 0};|;x_{k+n} = a_{n-1}x_{n+k-1} + cdots + a_0 x_k, ;forall kgeq 0}$$ is of dimension $n$ since the whole sequence is determined by $n$-data, $x_0,ldots x_{n-1}$. And show that $lambda_j^n, ngeq 0$ forms a linearly independent subset of $S$, and thus forms a basis.
Matrix approach is also valid. Let $y_k = (x_k, ldots,x_{k-n+1})'$ for $kgeq n-1$. Then for companion matrix $C = (c_{ij})$ s.t. $c_{1j} = a_{n-j}$ and $c_{ij} = 1$ if $i-1 = j$ and $0$ otherwise, for $igeq 2$, it holds that $$y_{k+1} = C y_k.$$ Then the set of eigenvalues of $C$ is exactly ${lambda_j, 1leq j leq n}$ and $C$ is diagonalizable. That is, there is a basis consisting of its eigenvectors. You can see that $y_{n+k-1} = sum_j c_j lambda_j^k v_j$ where $v_j$'s are eigenvectors forming basis corresponding to $lambda_j$ and $y_{n-1}$ is represented as $sum_j c_j v_j$.
add a comment |
One of the easiest approach: observe that the sequence space $$S ={(x_n)_{ngeq 0};|;x_{k+n} = a_{n-1}x_{n+k-1} + cdots + a_0 x_k, ;forall kgeq 0}$$ is of dimension $n$ since the whole sequence is determined by $n$-data, $x_0,ldots x_{n-1}$. And show that $lambda_j^n, ngeq 0$ forms a linearly independent subset of $S$, and thus forms a basis.
Matrix approach is also valid. Let $y_k = (x_k, ldots,x_{k-n+1})'$ for $kgeq n-1$. Then for companion matrix $C = (c_{ij})$ s.t. $c_{1j} = a_{n-j}$ and $c_{ij} = 1$ if $i-1 = j$ and $0$ otherwise, for $igeq 2$, it holds that $$y_{k+1} = C y_k.$$ Then the set of eigenvalues of $C$ is exactly ${lambda_j, 1leq j leq n}$ and $C$ is diagonalizable. That is, there is a basis consisting of its eigenvectors. You can see that $y_{n+k-1} = sum_j c_j lambda_j^k v_j$ where $v_j$'s are eigenvectors forming basis corresponding to $lambda_j$ and $y_{n-1}$ is represented as $sum_j c_j v_j$.
add a comment |
One of the easiest approach: observe that the sequence space $$S ={(x_n)_{ngeq 0};|;x_{k+n} = a_{n-1}x_{n+k-1} + cdots + a_0 x_k, ;forall kgeq 0}$$ is of dimension $n$ since the whole sequence is determined by $n$-data, $x_0,ldots x_{n-1}$. And show that $lambda_j^n, ngeq 0$ forms a linearly independent subset of $S$, and thus forms a basis.
Matrix approach is also valid. Let $y_k = (x_k, ldots,x_{k-n+1})'$ for $kgeq n-1$. Then for companion matrix $C = (c_{ij})$ s.t. $c_{1j} = a_{n-j}$ and $c_{ij} = 1$ if $i-1 = j$ and $0$ otherwise, for $igeq 2$, it holds that $$y_{k+1} = C y_k.$$ Then the set of eigenvalues of $C$ is exactly ${lambda_j, 1leq j leq n}$ and $C$ is diagonalizable. That is, there is a basis consisting of its eigenvectors. You can see that $y_{n+k-1} = sum_j c_j lambda_j^k v_j$ where $v_j$'s are eigenvectors forming basis corresponding to $lambda_j$ and $y_{n-1}$ is represented as $sum_j c_j v_j$.
One of the easiest approach: observe that the sequence space $$S ={(x_n)_{ngeq 0};|;x_{k+n} = a_{n-1}x_{n+k-1} + cdots + a_0 x_k, ;forall kgeq 0}$$ is of dimension $n$ since the whole sequence is determined by $n$-data, $x_0,ldots x_{n-1}$. And show that $lambda_j^n, ngeq 0$ forms a linearly independent subset of $S$, and thus forms a basis.
Matrix approach is also valid. Let $y_k = (x_k, ldots,x_{k-n+1})'$ for $kgeq n-1$. Then for companion matrix $C = (c_{ij})$ s.t. $c_{1j} = a_{n-j}$ and $c_{ij} = 1$ if $i-1 = j$ and $0$ otherwise, for $igeq 2$, it holds that $$y_{k+1} = C y_k.$$ Then the set of eigenvalues of $C$ is exactly ${lambda_j, 1leq j leq n}$ and $C$ is diagonalizable. That is, there is a basis consisting of its eigenvectors. You can see that $y_{n+k-1} = sum_j c_j lambda_j^k v_j$ where $v_j$'s are eigenvectors forming basis corresponding to $lambda_j$ and $y_{n-1}$ is represented as $sum_j c_j v_j$.
edited Nov 25 at 10:25
answered Nov 25 at 8:01
Song
3,985316
3,985316
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012541%2fprove-x-n-c-1-lambda-1n-c-1-lambda-2n-dots-c-n-lambda-nn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is a basic result from the theory of linear homogeneous recurrence relations. As $lambda_i$ is a zero of that polynomial $x_n=lambda_i^n$ is a solution of the recurrence. Because the $lambda_i$s are distinct, those $n$ solutions are linearly independent (Vandermonde). Therefore you can write any initial segment $(x_0,x_1,ldots,x_{n-1})$ as a linear combination. After that we are basically done.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Nov 25 at 8:03