Linear dependence after a linear transformation












0












$begingroup$



Find an example for each of the following, or explain why no example can be found:



a) a linear map $phi_3 : M_{2times 2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}_4$ and matrices $ell_1, ldots, ell_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly dependent such that $phi_3(ell_1), ldots, phi_3(ell_4)$ are linearly independent.




I believe an example cannot be found for this statement, but what would a proof for this be?




b) a linear map $phi_4 : M_{2times2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}^4$ and matrices $k_1, ldots, k_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly independent such that $phi_4(k_1), ldots, phi_4(k_4)$ are linearly dependent.




I believe an example for this can be found, my example is
begin{align*}
m_1 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {1} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
m_2 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
m_3 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {1} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
m_4 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {0} & {1} \end{smallmatrix} right)
end{align*}

This set of matrices is clearly linearly independent, and



$$phi_4: left( begin{smallmatrix} {a} & {b}\ {c} & {d} \end{smallmatrix} right) mapsto (a-b,c+d, 2c, 2d)$$



gives $phi_4(m_1) = (0,0,0,0)$.
So as we already have a 0 vector, it does not matter what $phi_4(m_2),phi_4(m_3), phi_4(m_4)$ are, as we have already attained a 0 vector so any integer multiplied by ϕ(m1) satisfies the condition for linear dependence.



Is this example sufficient?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Find an example for each of the following, or explain why no example can be found:



    a) a linear map $phi_3 : M_{2times 2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}_4$ and matrices $ell_1, ldots, ell_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly dependent such that $phi_3(ell_1), ldots, phi_3(ell_4)$ are linearly independent.




    I believe an example cannot be found for this statement, but what would a proof for this be?




    b) a linear map $phi_4 : M_{2times2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}^4$ and matrices $k_1, ldots, k_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly independent such that $phi_4(k_1), ldots, phi_4(k_4)$ are linearly dependent.




    I believe an example for this can be found, my example is
    begin{align*}
    m_1 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {1} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
    m_2 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
    m_3 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {1} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
    m_4 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {0} & {1} \end{smallmatrix} right)
    end{align*}

    This set of matrices is clearly linearly independent, and



    $$phi_4: left( begin{smallmatrix} {a} & {b}\ {c} & {d} \end{smallmatrix} right) mapsto (a-b,c+d, 2c, 2d)$$



    gives $phi_4(m_1) = (0,0,0,0)$.
    So as we already have a 0 vector, it does not matter what $phi_4(m_2),phi_4(m_3), phi_4(m_4)$ are, as we have already attained a 0 vector so any integer multiplied by ϕ(m1) satisfies the condition for linear dependence.



    Is this example sufficient?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Find an example for each of the following, or explain why no example can be found:



      a) a linear map $phi_3 : M_{2times 2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}_4$ and matrices $ell_1, ldots, ell_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly dependent such that $phi_3(ell_1), ldots, phi_3(ell_4)$ are linearly independent.




      I believe an example cannot be found for this statement, but what would a proof for this be?




      b) a linear map $phi_4 : M_{2times2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}^4$ and matrices $k_1, ldots, k_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly independent such that $phi_4(k_1), ldots, phi_4(k_4)$ are linearly dependent.




      I believe an example for this can be found, my example is
      begin{align*}
      m_1 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {1} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_2 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_3 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {1} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_4 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {0} & {1} \end{smallmatrix} right)
      end{align*}

      This set of matrices is clearly linearly independent, and



      $$phi_4: left( begin{smallmatrix} {a} & {b}\ {c} & {d} \end{smallmatrix} right) mapsto (a-b,c+d, 2c, 2d)$$



      gives $phi_4(m_1) = (0,0,0,0)$.
      So as we already have a 0 vector, it does not matter what $phi_4(m_2),phi_4(m_3), phi_4(m_4)$ are, as we have already attained a 0 vector so any integer multiplied by ϕ(m1) satisfies the condition for linear dependence.



      Is this example sufficient?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Find an example for each of the following, or explain why no example can be found:



      a) a linear map $phi_3 : M_{2times 2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}_4$ and matrices $ell_1, ldots, ell_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly dependent such that $phi_3(ell_1), ldots, phi_3(ell_4)$ are linearly independent.




      I believe an example cannot be found for this statement, but what would a proof for this be?




      b) a linear map $phi_4 : M_{2times2}(mathbf{R}) to mathbf{R}^4$ and matrices $k_1, ldots, k_4 in M_{2times2}(mathbf{R})$ that are linearly independent such that $phi_4(k_1), ldots, phi_4(k_4)$ are linearly dependent.




      I believe an example for this can be found, my example is
      begin{align*}
      m_1 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {1} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_2 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {1}\ {0} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_3 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {1} & {0} \end{smallmatrix} right) \
      m_4 &= left( begin{smallmatrix} {0} & {0}\ {0} & {1} \end{smallmatrix} right)
      end{align*}

      This set of matrices is clearly linearly independent, and



      $$phi_4: left( begin{smallmatrix} {a} & {b}\ {c} & {d} \end{smallmatrix} right) mapsto (a-b,c+d, 2c, 2d)$$



      gives $phi_4(m_1) = (0,0,0,0)$.
      So as we already have a 0 vector, it does not matter what $phi_4(m_2),phi_4(m_3), phi_4(m_4)$ are, as we have already attained a 0 vector so any integer multiplied by ϕ(m1) satisfies the condition for linear dependence.



      Is this example sufficient?







      vector-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 3 '18 at 18:34









      Connor Harris

      4,355724




      4,355724










      asked Dec 3 '18 at 18:20









      conot conot

      1




      1






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          $l_1,l_2,l_3, l_4$ are linearly dependent



          there exists some not trivial set of scalars $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$ such that $c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4 = 0$



          $phi(l)$ is a linear map



          $phi(c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4) = c_1phi(l_1) + c_2phi(l_2) + c_3phi(l_3) + c_4phi(l_4) = 0$



          $phi(l_1),phi(l_2),phi(l_3),phi(l_4)$ are linearly dependent.



          2)
          Your example seems fine, but you could probably find something even simpler.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            A: In general, if $T: V to W$ is a linear map and ${v_1, ldots, v_n} subset V$ is a linearly dependent set of vectors—i.e., if there exist $c_1, ldots, c_n$ such that $c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n = 0$—then $c_1 T(v_1) + cdots + c_n T(v_n) = T(c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n) = T(0) = 0$, so ${c_1 T(v_1), ldots, c_n T(v_n)}$ is linearly dependent. So no example can be found.



            B: Any set of vectors including the zero vector is trivially linearly dependent, so your example works fine.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024474%2flinear-dependence-after-a-linear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              $l_1,l_2,l_3, l_4$ are linearly dependent



              there exists some not trivial set of scalars $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$ such that $c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4 = 0$



              $phi(l)$ is a linear map



              $phi(c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4) = c_1phi(l_1) + c_2phi(l_2) + c_3phi(l_3) + c_4phi(l_4) = 0$



              $phi(l_1),phi(l_2),phi(l_3),phi(l_4)$ are linearly dependent.



              2)
              Your example seems fine, but you could probably find something even simpler.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                $l_1,l_2,l_3, l_4$ are linearly dependent



                there exists some not trivial set of scalars $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$ such that $c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4 = 0$



                $phi(l)$ is a linear map



                $phi(c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4) = c_1phi(l_1) + c_2phi(l_2) + c_3phi(l_3) + c_4phi(l_4) = 0$



                $phi(l_1),phi(l_2),phi(l_3),phi(l_4)$ are linearly dependent.



                2)
                Your example seems fine, but you could probably find something even simpler.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $l_1,l_2,l_3, l_4$ are linearly dependent



                  there exists some not trivial set of scalars $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$ such that $c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4 = 0$



                  $phi(l)$ is a linear map



                  $phi(c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4) = c_1phi(l_1) + c_2phi(l_2) + c_3phi(l_3) + c_4phi(l_4) = 0$



                  $phi(l_1),phi(l_2),phi(l_3),phi(l_4)$ are linearly dependent.



                  2)
                  Your example seems fine, but you could probably find something even simpler.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $l_1,l_2,l_3, l_4$ are linearly dependent



                  there exists some not trivial set of scalars $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$ such that $c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4 = 0$



                  $phi(l)$ is a linear map



                  $phi(c_1l_1 + c_2l_2 +c_3l_3 + c_4l_4) = c_1phi(l_1) + c_2phi(l_2) + c_3phi(l_3) + c_4phi(l_4) = 0$



                  $phi(l_1),phi(l_2),phi(l_3),phi(l_4)$ are linearly dependent.



                  2)
                  Your example seems fine, but you could probably find something even simpler.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 3 '18 at 18:34









                  Doug MDoug M

                  44.5k31854




                  44.5k31854























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      A: In general, if $T: V to W$ is a linear map and ${v_1, ldots, v_n} subset V$ is a linearly dependent set of vectors—i.e., if there exist $c_1, ldots, c_n$ such that $c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n = 0$—then $c_1 T(v_1) + cdots + c_n T(v_n) = T(c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n) = T(0) = 0$, so ${c_1 T(v_1), ldots, c_n T(v_n)}$ is linearly dependent. So no example can be found.



                      B: Any set of vectors including the zero vector is trivially linearly dependent, so your example works fine.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        A: In general, if $T: V to W$ is a linear map and ${v_1, ldots, v_n} subset V$ is a linearly dependent set of vectors—i.e., if there exist $c_1, ldots, c_n$ such that $c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n = 0$—then $c_1 T(v_1) + cdots + c_n T(v_n) = T(c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n) = T(0) = 0$, so ${c_1 T(v_1), ldots, c_n T(v_n)}$ is linearly dependent. So no example can be found.



                        B: Any set of vectors including the zero vector is trivially linearly dependent, so your example works fine.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          A: In general, if $T: V to W$ is a linear map and ${v_1, ldots, v_n} subset V$ is a linearly dependent set of vectors—i.e., if there exist $c_1, ldots, c_n$ such that $c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n = 0$—then $c_1 T(v_1) + cdots + c_n T(v_n) = T(c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n) = T(0) = 0$, so ${c_1 T(v_1), ldots, c_n T(v_n)}$ is linearly dependent. So no example can be found.



                          B: Any set of vectors including the zero vector is trivially linearly dependent, so your example works fine.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          A: In general, if $T: V to W$ is a linear map and ${v_1, ldots, v_n} subset V$ is a linearly dependent set of vectors—i.e., if there exist $c_1, ldots, c_n$ such that $c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n = 0$—then $c_1 T(v_1) + cdots + c_n T(v_n) = T(c_1 v_1 + cdots + c_n v_n) = T(0) = 0$, so ${c_1 T(v_1), ldots, c_n T(v_n)}$ is linearly dependent. So no example can be found.



                          B: Any set of vectors including the zero vector is trivially linearly dependent, so your example works fine.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 3 '18 at 18:39









                          Connor HarrisConnor Harris

                          4,355724




                          4,355724






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024474%2flinear-dependence-after-a-linear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bundesstraße 106

                              Verónica Boquete

                              Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten