Fibers Under a Covering Map are Discrete Subspaces of the Domain
$begingroup$
In Munkres' topology book, the following claim is made:
If $p : E to B$ is a covering map, then for every $b in B$, $p^{-1}(b)$ is a discrete subspace of $E$.
Here's my attempt at a proof:
Given $b in B$, there's an open set $U ni b$ and disjoint open sets ${V_i}_{i in I}$ in $X$ such that $p^{-1}(U) = bigcup_{i in I} V_i$ and such that $p big|_{V_i} : V_i to U$ is a homeomorphism. Hence, if $x in p^{-1}(b) subseteq p^{-1}(U)$, then $x in V_i$ for some $i in I$. If $y in p^{-1}(b) cap V_i$, then $p(y) = b$ and $y in V_i$. But $p big|_{V_i}$ is, in particular, injective so $p big|_{V_i}(x) = b = p big|_{V_i}(y)$ implies $x=y$. This shows $p^{-1}(b) cap V_i = {x}$, proving that ${x}$ is open in $p^{-1}(b)$.
Does this seem right?
general-topology algebraic-topology covering-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Munkres' topology book, the following claim is made:
If $p : E to B$ is a covering map, then for every $b in B$, $p^{-1}(b)$ is a discrete subspace of $E$.
Here's my attempt at a proof:
Given $b in B$, there's an open set $U ni b$ and disjoint open sets ${V_i}_{i in I}$ in $X$ such that $p^{-1}(U) = bigcup_{i in I} V_i$ and such that $p big|_{V_i} : V_i to U$ is a homeomorphism. Hence, if $x in p^{-1}(b) subseteq p^{-1}(U)$, then $x in V_i$ for some $i in I$. If $y in p^{-1}(b) cap V_i$, then $p(y) = b$ and $y in V_i$. But $p big|_{V_i}$ is, in particular, injective so $p big|_{V_i}(x) = b = p big|_{V_i}(y)$ implies $x=y$. This shows $p^{-1}(b) cap V_i = {x}$, proving that ${x}$ is open in $p^{-1}(b)$.
Does this seem right?
general-topology algebraic-topology covering-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In Munkres' topology book, the following claim is made:
If $p : E to B$ is a covering map, then for every $b in B$, $p^{-1}(b)$ is a discrete subspace of $E$.
Here's my attempt at a proof:
Given $b in B$, there's an open set $U ni b$ and disjoint open sets ${V_i}_{i in I}$ in $X$ such that $p^{-1}(U) = bigcup_{i in I} V_i$ and such that $p big|_{V_i} : V_i to U$ is a homeomorphism. Hence, if $x in p^{-1}(b) subseteq p^{-1}(U)$, then $x in V_i$ for some $i in I$. If $y in p^{-1}(b) cap V_i$, then $p(y) = b$ and $y in V_i$. But $p big|_{V_i}$ is, in particular, injective so $p big|_{V_i}(x) = b = p big|_{V_i}(y)$ implies $x=y$. This shows $p^{-1}(b) cap V_i = {x}$, proving that ${x}$ is open in $p^{-1}(b)$.
Does this seem right?
general-topology algebraic-topology covering-spaces
$endgroup$
In Munkres' topology book, the following claim is made:
If $p : E to B$ is a covering map, then for every $b in B$, $p^{-1}(b)$ is a discrete subspace of $E$.
Here's my attempt at a proof:
Given $b in B$, there's an open set $U ni b$ and disjoint open sets ${V_i}_{i in I}$ in $X$ such that $p^{-1}(U) = bigcup_{i in I} V_i$ and such that $p big|_{V_i} : V_i to U$ is a homeomorphism. Hence, if $x in p^{-1}(b) subseteq p^{-1}(U)$, then $x in V_i$ for some $i in I$. If $y in p^{-1}(b) cap V_i$, then $p(y) = b$ and $y in V_i$. But $p big|_{V_i}$ is, in particular, injective so $p big|_{V_i}(x) = b = p big|_{V_i}(y)$ implies $x=y$. This shows $p^{-1}(b) cap V_i = {x}$, proving that ${x}$ is open in $p^{-1}(b)$.
Does this seem right?
general-topology algebraic-topology covering-spaces
general-topology algebraic-topology covering-spaces
asked Dec 11 '18 at 22:42
user193319user193319
2,4102925
2,4102925
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm just going to put this as an answer since the OP has basically answered his/her own question perfectly.
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate (the set $U$) by projection. Small quibble: I think $X$ should be $E$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035942%2ffibers-under-a-covering-map-are-discrete-subspaces-of-the-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm just going to put this as an answer since the OP has basically answered his/her own question perfectly.
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate (the set $U$) by projection. Small quibble: I think $X$ should be $E$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm just going to put this as an answer since the OP has basically answered his/her own question perfectly.
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate (the set $U$) by projection. Small quibble: I think $X$ should be $E$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm just going to put this as an answer since the OP has basically answered his/her own question perfectly.
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate (the set $U$) by projection. Small quibble: I think $X$ should be $E$.
$endgroup$
I'm just going to put this as an answer since the OP has basically answered his/her own question perfectly.
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate (the set $U$) by projection. Small quibble: I think $X$ should be $E$.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 1:10
zoidbergzoidberg
1,080113
1,080113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035942%2ffibers-under-a-covering-map-are-discrete-subspaces-of-the-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
It seems fine for me, but let the experts talk.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Dec 11 '18 at 22:48
$begingroup$
Yes, the intuition is to imagine the $V_i$ as a stack of pancakes that get mapped down to the plate by projection.
$endgroup$
– zoidberg
Dec 11 '18 at 23:59