Prove there is a bijection φ : R(X) → P(X)












1












$begingroup$


For a set $X$, let $R(X)$ be the set of equivalence relations on $X$ and let $P(X)$ be the set of partitions of $X$. Prove there is a bijection $varphi : R(X) to P(X)$.



Stuck on how to proceed with this. I understand that equivalence relations and partitions are in essence the same. But in terms of writing a proof, I am really lost how to proceed. Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
    $endgroup$
    – platty
    Dec 11 '18 at 22:52










  • $begingroup$
    In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    See this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:17
















1












$begingroup$


For a set $X$, let $R(X)$ be the set of equivalence relations on $X$ and let $P(X)$ be the set of partitions of $X$. Prove there is a bijection $varphi : R(X) to P(X)$.



Stuck on how to proceed with this. I understand that equivalence relations and partitions are in essence the same. But in terms of writing a proof, I am really lost how to proceed. Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
    $endgroup$
    – platty
    Dec 11 '18 at 22:52










  • $begingroup$
    In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    See this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:17














1












1








1





$begingroup$


For a set $X$, let $R(X)$ be the set of equivalence relations on $X$ and let $P(X)$ be the set of partitions of $X$. Prove there is a bijection $varphi : R(X) to P(X)$.



Stuck on how to proceed with this. I understand that equivalence relations and partitions are in essence the same. But in terms of writing a proof, I am really lost how to proceed. Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For a set $X$, let $R(X)$ be the set of equivalence relations on $X$ and let $P(X)$ be the set of partitions of $X$. Prove there is a bijection $varphi : R(X) to P(X)$.



Stuck on how to proceed with this. I understand that equivalence relations and partitions are in essence the same. But in terms of writing a proof, I am really lost how to proceed. Any help will be appreciated.







equivalence-relations set-partition






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 11 '18 at 22:51









platty

3,370320




3,370320










asked Dec 11 '18 at 22:47









Nihar GuptaNihar Gupta

61




61








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
    $endgroup$
    – platty
    Dec 11 '18 at 22:52










  • $begingroup$
    In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    See this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:17














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
    $endgroup$
    – platty
    Dec 11 '18 at 22:52










  • $begingroup$
    In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 11 '18 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    See this and this.
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud D.
    Dec 14 '18 at 16:17








2




2




$begingroup$
You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
$endgroup$
– platty
Dec 11 '18 at 22:52




$begingroup$
You say that they are in essence the same -- can you show in what way this holds? That is, if I give you an equivalence relation, can you come up with its corresponding partition and vice versa? This would define such a $varphi$, it then remains to show that it is a bijection.
$endgroup$
– platty
Dec 11 '18 at 22:52












$begingroup$
In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 11 '18 at 23:09




$begingroup$
In addition to platty's advice, it might help to write down exactly what an element of $R(X)$ and an element of $P(X)$ might look like.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 11 '18 at 23:09












$begingroup$
See this and this.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:17




$begingroup$
See this and this.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud D.
Dec 14 '18 at 16:17










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035948%2fprove-there-is-a-bijection-%25cf%2586-rx-%25e2%2586%2592-px%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035948%2fprove-there-is-a-bijection-%25cf%2586-rx-%25e2%2586%2592-px%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Le Mesnil-Réaume

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always