How pathological can the boundary of an open, simply connected subset of $mathbb{C}$ be?
$begingroup$
In my complex analysis class we’re currently covering the Riemann Mapping Theorem, and as is well-known there are no conditions imposed on the actual shape of the region $Omega$, except that it must be open, simply connected, and not all of $mathbb{C}$. So I was wondering how pathological such a region can really be, and particularly its boundary $partial Omega$. For example, can the boundary be a non-nullset? No-where differentiable? Can it be that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$ itself? And so on.
This question may also be extended to $mathbb{R}^n$. However, I feel like “simply connected” is no longer the right analogue here, because $mathbb{R}^3$ with a disjoint set of points removed is simply connected, which is not true of $mathbb{R}^2$. I think to generalize, the question would have to be “How pathological can the boundary of an open, connected subset $Omega subset mathbb{R}^n$ be, given that $mathbb{R}^n cup {infty} setminus Omega$ is also connected?”.
complex-analysis analysis examples-counterexamples
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my complex analysis class we’re currently covering the Riemann Mapping Theorem, and as is well-known there are no conditions imposed on the actual shape of the region $Omega$, except that it must be open, simply connected, and not all of $mathbb{C}$. So I was wondering how pathological such a region can really be, and particularly its boundary $partial Omega$. For example, can the boundary be a non-nullset? No-where differentiable? Can it be that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$ itself? And so on.
This question may also be extended to $mathbb{R}^n$. However, I feel like “simply connected” is no longer the right analogue here, because $mathbb{R}^3$ with a disjoint set of points removed is simply connected, which is not true of $mathbb{R}^2$. I think to generalize, the question would have to be “How pathological can the boundary of an open, connected subset $Omega subset mathbb{R}^n$ be, given that $mathbb{R}^n cup {infty} setminus Omega$ is also connected?”.
complex-analysis analysis examples-counterexamples
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my complex analysis class we’re currently covering the Riemann Mapping Theorem, and as is well-known there are no conditions imposed on the actual shape of the region $Omega$, except that it must be open, simply connected, and not all of $mathbb{C}$. So I was wondering how pathological such a region can really be, and particularly its boundary $partial Omega$. For example, can the boundary be a non-nullset? No-where differentiable? Can it be that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$ itself? And so on.
This question may also be extended to $mathbb{R}^n$. However, I feel like “simply connected” is no longer the right analogue here, because $mathbb{R}^3$ with a disjoint set of points removed is simply connected, which is not true of $mathbb{R}^2$. I think to generalize, the question would have to be “How pathological can the boundary of an open, connected subset $Omega subset mathbb{R}^n$ be, given that $mathbb{R}^n cup {infty} setminus Omega$ is also connected?”.
complex-analysis analysis examples-counterexamples
$endgroup$
In my complex analysis class we’re currently covering the Riemann Mapping Theorem, and as is well-known there are no conditions imposed on the actual shape of the region $Omega$, except that it must be open, simply connected, and not all of $mathbb{C}$. So I was wondering how pathological such a region can really be, and particularly its boundary $partial Omega$. For example, can the boundary be a non-nullset? No-where differentiable? Can it be that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$ itself? And so on.
This question may also be extended to $mathbb{R}^n$. However, I feel like “simply connected” is no longer the right analogue here, because $mathbb{R}^3$ with a disjoint set of points removed is simply connected, which is not true of $mathbb{R}^2$. I think to generalize, the question would have to be “How pathological can the boundary of an open, connected subset $Omega subset mathbb{R}^n$ be, given that $mathbb{R}^n cup {infty} setminus Omega$ is also connected?”.
complex-analysis analysis examples-counterexamples
complex-analysis analysis examples-counterexamples
asked Dec 12 '18 at 12:13
AdarainAdarain
1907
1907
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $E subset [0,1]$ be a "fat Cantor set": closed, nowhere dense, with positive Lebesgue measure. Then $((-1,1) times (-1,2)) backslash ([0,1] times E) $ is open in $mathbb R^2$ and simply connected, and its boundary contains
$[0,1] times E$ which has positive two-dimensional Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036609%2fhow-pathological-can-the-boundary-of-an-open-simply-connected-subset-of-mathb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $E subset [0,1]$ be a "fat Cantor set": closed, nowhere dense, with positive Lebesgue measure. Then $((-1,1) times (-1,2)) backslash ([0,1] times E) $ is open in $mathbb R^2$ and simply connected, and its boundary contains
$[0,1] times E$ which has positive two-dimensional Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E subset [0,1]$ be a "fat Cantor set": closed, nowhere dense, with positive Lebesgue measure. Then $((-1,1) times (-1,2)) backslash ([0,1] times E) $ is open in $mathbb R^2$ and simply connected, and its boundary contains
$[0,1] times E$ which has positive two-dimensional Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E subset [0,1]$ be a "fat Cantor set": closed, nowhere dense, with positive Lebesgue measure. Then $((-1,1) times (-1,2)) backslash ([0,1] times E) $ is open in $mathbb R^2$ and simply connected, and its boundary contains
$[0,1] times E$ which has positive two-dimensional Lebesgue measure.
$endgroup$
Let $E subset [0,1]$ be a "fat Cantor set": closed, nowhere dense, with positive Lebesgue measure. Then $((-1,1) times (-1,2)) backslash ([0,1] times E) $ is open in $mathbb R^2$ and simply connected, and its boundary contains
$[0,1] times E$ which has positive two-dimensional Lebesgue measure.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 12:57
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
324k23214468
324k23214468
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Robert Israel's answer also provides an example that the interior of the closure of $Omega$ is not the same as $Omega$. A more elementary example is $((-1,1) times (-1,1)) setminus ([0,1] times { 0 })$. See also math.stackexchange.com/q/3025281.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036609%2fhow-pathological-can-the-boundary-of-an-open-simply-connected-subset-of-mathb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your question whether the boundary can be nowhere differentiable only makes sense if the boundary is a simple closed curve.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Concerning the Riemann mapping theorem see also math.stackexchange.com/q/3020805.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 12 '18 at 14:29